Psychosocial hazards play a key role in differentiating MSD risk levels of workers in high-risk occupations

Workplace management practices targeting risk of musculoskeletal disorders (MSDs) fail to reflect evidence that risk is affected by psychosocial as well as physical hazards. To promote improved practices in occupations where MSD risk is highest, better information is needed on how psychosocial hazar...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Applied ergonomics 2023-10, Vol.112, p.104053-104053, Article 104053
Hauptverfasser: Oakman, Jodi, Macdonald, Wendy A., McCredie, Kate
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page 104053
container_issue
container_start_page 104053
container_title Applied ergonomics
container_volume 112
creator Oakman, Jodi
Macdonald, Wendy A.
McCredie, Kate
description Workplace management practices targeting risk of musculoskeletal disorders (MSDs) fail to reflect evidence that risk is affected by psychosocial as well as physical hazards. To promote improved practices in occupations where MSD risk is highest, better information is needed on how psychosocial hazards, combined with physical hazards, affect risk of workers in these occupations. Survey ratings of physical and psychosocial hazards by 2329 Australian workers in occupations with high MSD risk were subjected to Principal Components Analysis. Latent Profile Analysis of hazard factor scores identified different combinations of hazards to which latent subgroups of workers were typically exposed. Survey ratings of frequency and severity of musculoskeletal discomfort or pain (MSP) generated a pre-validated MSP score and its relationship with subgroup membership was analysed. Demographic variables associated with group membership were investigated using regression modelling and descriptive statistics. Analyses identified three physical and seven psychosocial hazard factors and three participant subgroups with differing hazard profiles. Profile group differences were greater for psychosocial than physical hazards, and MSP scores out of 60 ranged from 6.7 for the low hazard profile (29% of participants) to 17.5 for the high hazard profile (21%). Differences between occupations in hazard profiles were not large. Both physical and psychosocial hazards affect MSD risk of workers in high-risk occupations. In workplaces such as this large Australian sample where risk management has focused on physical hazards, actions targeting psychosocial hazards may now be the most effective way to reduce risk further. •Latent profile analysis was applied to hazard data from workers at risk of MSDs.•3 subgroups of workers were identified based on similarity of their hazard profiles.•The 3 groups differed substantially in musculoskeletal pain levels – i.e. MSD risk.•Psychosocial hazards affected group membership more than biomechanical hazards.•Controlling psychosocial hazards should have high priority in these workplaces.
doi_str_mv 10.1016/j.apergo.2023.104053
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_2822709440</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><els_id>S0003687023000911</els_id><sourcerecordid>2822709440</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c408t-3a5666693c89ccebeb8e309f673d32a091bd642a8bc4c9797153ca1391247cbc3</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp9kE1PGzEQhq2qCMLHP6iQj71s6q_sxwWpCm2pFAQScLa8s7OJk816a-8GhV9fhwWO-GJ5_LwzmoeQb5xNOePpj_XUdOiXbiqYkLGk2Ex-IROeZyIpuEi_kgljTCZpnrETchrCOj5zxWfH5ERmImMRnJDNfdjDygUH1jR0ZV6MrwLtGrOnhm5wT71rkNqWVrau0WPbW9PbdklvH66pt2FDG9xhE6ir6bPzG_ThQK_scpW8fjuAoYsR14ZzclSbJuDF231Gnn7_epzfJIu7P3_nPxcJKJb3iTSzNJ5CQl4AYIlljpIVdZrJSgrDCl5WqRImL0FBkRUZn0kwXMalVQYlyDPyfezbefdvwNDrrQ2ATWNadEPQIhdx_UIpFlE1ouBdCB5r3Xm7NX6vOdMHzXqtR836oFmPmmPs8m3CUG6x-gi9e43A1QhENbiz6HUAiy1gZT1CrytnP5_wHx6jkLU</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>2822709440</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Psychosocial hazards play a key role in differentiating MSD risk levels of workers in high-risk occupations</title><source>MEDLINE</source><source>Elsevier ScienceDirect Journals</source><creator>Oakman, Jodi ; Macdonald, Wendy A. ; McCredie, Kate</creator><creatorcontrib>Oakman, Jodi ; Macdonald, Wendy A. ; McCredie, Kate</creatorcontrib><description>Workplace management practices targeting risk of musculoskeletal disorders (MSDs) fail to reflect evidence that risk is affected by psychosocial as well as physical hazards. To promote improved practices in occupations where MSD risk is highest, better information is needed on how psychosocial hazards, combined with physical hazards, affect risk of workers in these occupations. Survey ratings of physical and psychosocial hazards by 2329 Australian workers in occupations with high MSD risk were subjected to Principal Components Analysis. Latent Profile Analysis of hazard factor scores identified different combinations of hazards to which latent subgroups of workers were typically exposed. Survey ratings of frequency and severity of musculoskeletal discomfort or pain (MSP) generated a pre-validated MSP score and its relationship with subgroup membership was analysed. Demographic variables associated with group membership were investigated using regression modelling and descriptive statistics. Analyses identified three physical and seven psychosocial hazard factors and three participant subgroups with differing hazard profiles. Profile group differences were greater for psychosocial than physical hazards, and MSP scores out of 60 ranged from 6.7 for the low hazard profile (29% of participants) to 17.5 for the high hazard profile (21%). Differences between occupations in hazard profiles were not large. Both physical and psychosocial hazards affect MSD risk of workers in high-risk occupations. In workplaces such as this large Australian sample where risk management has focused on physical hazards, actions targeting psychosocial hazards may now be the most effective way to reduce risk further. •Latent profile analysis was applied to hazard data from workers at risk of MSDs.•3 subgroups of workers were identified based on similarity of their hazard profiles.•The 3 groups differed substantially in musculoskeletal pain levels – i.e. MSD risk.•Psychosocial hazards affected group membership more than biomechanical hazards.•Controlling psychosocial hazards should have high priority in these workplaces.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0003-6870</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1872-9126</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1016/j.apergo.2023.104053</identifier><identifier>PMID: 37270872</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>England: Elsevier Ltd</publisher><subject>APHIRM toolkit ; Australia ; Humans ; Latent profile analysis ; Musculoskeletal Diseases - etiology ; Musculoskeletal disorders ; Occupational Diseases - etiology ; Occupations ; Pain ; Risk Factors ; Workplace - psychology ; Workplace risk management</subject><ispartof>Applied ergonomics, 2023-10, Vol.112, p.104053-104053, Article 104053</ispartof><rights>2023 The Authors</rights><rights>Copyright © 2023 The Authors. Published by Elsevier Ltd.. All rights reserved.</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c408t-3a5666693c89ccebeb8e309f673d32a091bd642a8bc4c9797153ca1391247cbc3</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c408t-3a5666693c89ccebeb8e309f673d32a091bd642a8bc4c9797153ca1391247cbc3</cites><orcidid>0000-0002-7514-0855 ; 0000-0002-0484-8442</orcidid></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.apergo.2023.104053$$EHTML$$P50$$Gelsevier$$Hfree_for_read</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,776,780,3536,27903,27904,45974</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37270872$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Oakman, Jodi</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Macdonald, Wendy A.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>McCredie, Kate</creatorcontrib><title>Psychosocial hazards play a key role in differentiating MSD risk levels of workers in high-risk occupations</title><title>Applied ergonomics</title><addtitle>Appl Ergon</addtitle><description>Workplace management practices targeting risk of musculoskeletal disorders (MSDs) fail to reflect evidence that risk is affected by psychosocial as well as physical hazards. To promote improved practices in occupations where MSD risk is highest, better information is needed on how psychosocial hazards, combined with physical hazards, affect risk of workers in these occupations. Survey ratings of physical and psychosocial hazards by 2329 Australian workers in occupations with high MSD risk were subjected to Principal Components Analysis. Latent Profile Analysis of hazard factor scores identified different combinations of hazards to which latent subgroups of workers were typically exposed. Survey ratings of frequency and severity of musculoskeletal discomfort or pain (MSP) generated a pre-validated MSP score and its relationship with subgroup membership was analysed. Demographic variables associated with group membership were investigated using regression modelling and descriptive statistics. Analyses identified three physical and seven psychosocial hazard factors and three participant subgroups with differing hazard profiles. Profile group differences were greater for psychosocial than physical hazards, and MSP scores out of 60 ranged from 6.7 for the low hazard profile (29% of participants) to 17.5 for the high hazard profile (21%). Differences between occupations in hazard profiles were not large. Both physical and psychosocial hazards affect MSD risk of workers in high-risk occupations. In workplaces such as this large Australian sample where risk management has focused on physical hazards, actions targeting psychosocial hazards may now be the most effective way to reduce risk further. •Latent profile analysis was applied to hazard data from workers at risk of MSDs.•3 subgroups of workers were identified based on similarity of their hazard profiles.•The 3 groups differed substantially in musculoskeletal pain levels – i.e. MSD risk.•Psychosocial hazards affected group membership more than biomechanical hazards.•Controlling psychosocial hazards should have high priority in these workplaces.</description><subject>APHIRM toolkit</subject><subject>Australia</subject><subject>Humans</subject><subject>Latent profile analysis</subject><subject>Musculoskeletal Diseases - etiology</subject><subject>Musculoskeletal disorders</subject><subject>Occupational Diseases - etiology</subject><subject>Occupations</subject><subject>Pain</subject><subject>Risk Factors</subject><subject>Workplace - psychology</subject><subject>Workplace risk management</subject><issn>0003-6870</issn><issn>1872-9126</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2023</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>EIF</sourceid><recordid>eNp9kE1PGzEQhq2qCMLHP6iQj71s6q_sxwWpCm2pFAQScLa8s7OJk816a-8GhV9fhwWO-GJ5_LwzmoeQb5xNOePpj_XUdOiXbiqYkLGk2Ex-IROeZyIpuEi_kgljTCZpnrETchrCOj5zxWfH5ERmImMRnJDNfdjDygUH1jR0ZV6MrwLtGrOnhm5wT71rkNqWVrau0WPbW9PbdklvH66pt2FDG9xhE6ir6bPzG_ThQK_scpW8fjuAoYsR14ZzclSbJuDF231Gnn7_epzfJIu7P3_nPxcJKJb3iTSzNJ5CQl4AYIlljpIVdZrJSgrDCl5WqRImL0FBkRUZn0kwXMalVQYlyDPyfezbefdvwNDrrQ2ATWNadEPQIhdx_UIpFlE1ouBdCB5r3Xm7NX6vOdMHzXqtR836oFmPmmPs8m3CUG6x-gi9e43A1QhENbiz6HUAiy1gZT1CrytnP5_wHx6jkLU</recordid><startdate>202310</startdate><enddate>202310</enddate><creator>Oakman, Jodi</creator><creator>Macdonald, Wendy A.</creator><creator>McCredie, Kate</creator><general>Elsevier Ltd</general><scope>6I.</scope><scope>AAFTH</scope><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7X8</scope><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-7514-0855</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-0484-8442</orcidid></search><sort><creationdate>202310</creationdate><title>Psychosocial hazards play a key role in differentiating MSD risk levels of workers in high-risk occupations</title><author>Oakman, Jodi ; Macdonald, Wendy A. ; McCredie, Kate</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c408t-3a5666693c89ccebeb8e309f673d32a091bd642a8bc4c9797153ca1391247cbc3</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2023</creationdate><topic>APHIRM toolkit</topic><topic>Australia</topic><topic>Humans</topic><topic>Latent profile analysis</topic><topic>Musculoskeletal Diseases - etiology</topic><topic>Musculoskeletal disorders</topic><topic>Occupational Diseases - etiology</topic><topic>Occupations</topic><topic>Pain</topic><topic>Risk Factors</topic><topic>Workplace - psychology</topic><topic>Workplace risk management</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Oakman, Jodi</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Macdonald, Wendy A.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>McCredie, Kate</creatorcontrib><collection>ScienceDirect Open Access Titles</collection><collection>Elsevier:ScienceDirect:Open Access</collection><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><jtitle>Applied ergonomics</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Oakman, Jodi</au><au>Macdonald, Wendy A.</au><au>McCredie, Kate</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Psychosocial hazards play a key role in differentiating MSD risk levels of workers in high-risk occupations</atitle><jtitle>Applied ergonomics</jtitle><addtitle>Appl Ergon</addtitle><date>2023-10</date><risdate>2023</risdate><volume>112</volume><spage>104053</spage><epage>104053</epage><pages>104053-104053</pages><artnum>104053</artnum><issn>0003-6870</issn><eissn>1872-9126</eissn><abstract>Workplace management practices targeting risk of musculoskeletal disorders (MSDs) fail to reflect evidence that risk is affected by psychosocial as well as physical hazards. To promote improved practices in occupations where MSD risk is highest, better information is needed on how psychosocial hazards, combined with physical hazards, affect risk of workers in these occupations. Survey ratings of physical and psychosocial hazards by 2329 Australian workers in occupations with high MSD risk were subjected to Principal Components Analysis. Latent Profile Analysis of hazard factor scores identified different combinations of hazards to which latent subgroups of workers were typically exposed. Survey ratings of frequency and severity of musculoskeletal discomfort or pain (MSP) generated a pre-validated MSP score and its relationship with subgroup membership was analysed. Demographic variables associated with group membership were investigated using regression modelling and descriptive statistics. Analyses identified three physical and seven psychosocial hazard factors and three participant subgroups with differing hazard profiles. Profile group differences were greater for psychosocial than physical hazards, and MSP scores out of 60 ranged from 6.7 for the low hazard profile (29% of participants) to 17.5 for the high hazard profile (21%). Differences between occupations in hazard profiles were not large. Both physical and psychosocial hazards affect MSD risk of workers in high-risk occupations. In workplaces such as this large Australian sample where risk management has focused on physical hazards, actions targeting psychosocial hazards may now be the most effective way to reduce risk further. •Latent profile analysis was applied to hazard data from workers at risk of MSDs.•3 subgroups of workers were identified based on similarity of their hazard profiles.•The 3 groups differed substantially in musculoskeletal pain levels – i.e. MSD risk.•Psychosocial hazards affected group membership more than biomechanical hazards.•Controlling psychosocial hazards should have high priority in these workplaces.</abstract><cop>England</cop><pub>Elsevier Ltd</pub><pmid>37270872</pmid><doi>10.1016/j.apergo.2023.104053</doi><tpages>1</tpages><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-7514-0855</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-0484-8442</orcidid><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 0003-6870
ispartof Applied ergonomics, 2023-10, Vol.112, p.104053-104053, Article 104053
issn 0003-6870
1872-9126
language eng
recordid cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_2822709440
source MEDLINE; Elsevier ScienceDirect Journals
subjects APHIRM toolkit
Australia
Humans
Latent profile analysis
Musculoskeletal Diseases - etiology
Musculoskeletal disorders
Occupational Diseases - etiology
Occupations
Pain
Risk Factors
Workplace - psychology
Workplace risk management
title Psychosocial hazards play a key role in differentiating MSD risk levels of workers in high-risk occupations
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-21T23%3A58%3A00IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Psychosocial%20hazards%20play%20a%20key%20role%20in%20differentiating%20MSD%20risk%20levels%20of%20workers%20in%20high-risk%20occupations&rft.jtitle=Applied%20ergonomics&rft.au=Oakman,%20Jodi&rft.date=2023-10&rft.volume=112&rft.spage=104053&rft.epage=104053&rft.pages=104053-104053&rft.artnum=104053&rft.issn=0003-6870&rft.eissn=1872-9126&rft_id=info:doi/10.1016/j.apergo.2023.104053&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E2822709440%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=2822709440&rft_id=info:pmid/37270872&rft_els_id=S0003687023000911&rfr_iscdi=true