How many cosmological parameters

Constraints on cosmological parameters depend on the set of parameters chosen to define the model that is compared with observational data. I use the Akaike and Bayesian information criteria to carry out cosmological model selection, in order to determine the parameter set providing the preferred fi...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Monthly notices of the Royal Astronomical Society 2004-07, Vol.351 (3), p.L49-L53
1. Verfasser: Liddle, Andrew R.
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page L53
container_issue 3
container_start_page L49
container_title Monthly notices of the Royal Astronomical Society
container_volume 351
creator Liddle, Andrew R.
description Constraints on cosmological parameters depend on the set of parameters chosen to define the model that is compared with observational data. I use the Akaike and Bayesian information criteria to carry out cosmological model selection, in order to determine the parameter set providing the preferred fit to the data. Applying the information criteria to the current cosmological data sets indicates, for example, that spatially flat models are statistically preferred to closed models, and that possible running of the spectral index has lower significance than inferred from its confidence limits. I also discuss some problems of statistical assessment arising from there being a large number of ‘candidate’ cosmological parameters that can be investigated for possible cosmological implications, and argue that 95 per cent confidence is too low a threshold to identify robustly the need for new parameters in model fitting. The best present description of cosmological data uses a scale-invariant (n= 1) spectrum of Gaussian adiabatic perturbations in a spatially flat Universe, with the cosmological model requiring only five fundamental parameters to specify it fully.
doi_str_mv 10.1111/j.1365-2966.2004.08033.x
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_28208442</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>28208442</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c4603-2688d9991c86b28ce6eb9153ca430fa8f18086fe39574ce6399b9a4c8c9e86673</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNqNkMtOwzAQRS0EEqXwD9nALsGvOPaCBWqBIrUg8VLFZuQaB6UkTbFTtf17HFKVLd7Y0pwz1r0IRQQnJJzLeUKYSGOqhEgoxjzBEjOWbA5Qbz84RD2MWRrLjJBjdOL9HAeSUdFD0aheR5VebCNT-6ou68_C6DJaaqcr21jnT9FRrktvz3Z3H73e3rwMRvH48e5-cD2ODReYxVRI-aGUIkaKGZXGCjtTJGVGc4ZzLXMisRS5ZSrNeJgypWZKcyONslKIjPXRRbd36ervlfUNVIU3tiz1wtYrD1RSLDmnAZQdaFztvbM5LF1RabcFgqGtBObQJoc2ObSVwG8lsAnq-e4P7UPK3OmFKfyfnypKFeeBu-q4dVHa7b_3w-ThqX0FP-78wjd2s_e1-4KQNEthNH2H6VC8kfHwGSbsB9dfgaI</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>28208442</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>How many cosmological parameters</title><source>Oxford Journals Open Access Collection</source><source>Wiley Online Library Journals Frontfile Complete</source><creator>Liddle, Andrew R.</creator><creatorcontrib>Liddle, Andrew R.</creatorcontrib><description>Constraints on cosmological parameters depend on the set of parameters chosen to define the model that is compared with observational data. I use the Akaike and Bayesian information criteria to carry out cosmological model selection, in order to determine the parameter set providing the preferred fit to the data. Applying the information criteria to the current cosmological data sets indicates, for example, that spatially flat models are statistically preferred to closed models, and that possible running of the spectral index has lower significance than inferred from its confidence limits. I also discuss some problems of statistical assessment arising from there being a large number of ‘candidate’ cosmological parameters that can be investigated for possible cosmological implications, and argue that 95 per cent confidence is too low a threshold to identify robustly the need for new parameters in model fitting. The best present description of cosmological data uses a scale-invariant (n= 1) spectrum of Gaussian adiabatic perturbations in a spatially flat Universe, with the cosmological model requiring only five fundamental parameters to specify it fully.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0035-8711</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1365-2966</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1111/j.1365-2966.2004.08033.x</identifier><identifier>CODEN: MNRAA4</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Oxford, UK: Blackwell Publishing Ltd</publisher><subject>cosmology: theory</subject><ispartof>Monthly notices of the Royal Astronomical Society, 2004-07, Vol.351 (3), p.L49-L53</ispartof><rights>2004 INIST-CNRS</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c4603-2688d9991c86b28ce6eb9153ca430fa8f18086fe39574ce6399b9a4c8c9e86673</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c4603-2688d9991c86b28ce6eb9153ca430fa8f18086fe39574ce6399b9a4c8c9e86673</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/pdf/10.1111%2Fj.1365-2966.2004.08033.x$$EPDF$$P50$$Gwiley$$H</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/full/10.1111%2Fj.1365-2966.2004.08033.x$$EHTML$$P50$$Gwiley$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,776,780,1411,27901,27902,45550,45551</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttp://pascal-francis.inist.fr/vibad/index.php?action=getRecordDetail&amp;idt=15922944$$DView record in Pascal Francis$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Liddle, Andrew R.</creatorcontrib><title>How many cosmological parameters</title><title>Monthly notices of the Royal Astronomical Society</title><addtitle>Mon. Not. R. Astron. Soc</addtitle><description>Constraints on cosmological parameters depend on the set of parameters chosen to define the model that is compared with observational data. I use the Akaike and Bayesian information criteria to carry out cosmological model selection, in order to determine the parameter set providing the preferred fit to the data. Applying the information criteria to the current cosmological data sets indicates, for example, that spatially flat models are statistically preferred to closed models, and that possible running of the spectral index has lower significance than inferred from its confidence limits. I also discuss some problems of statistical assessment arising from there being a large number of ‘candidate’ cosmological parameters that can be investigated for possible cosmological implications, and argue that 95 per cent confidence is too low a threshold to identify robustly the need for new parameters in model fitting. The best present description of cosmological data uses a scale-invariant (n= 1) spectrum of Gaussian adiabatic perturbations in a spatially flat Universe, with the cosmological model requiring only five fundamental parameters to specify it fully.</description><subject>cosmology: theory</subject><issn>0035-8711</issn><issn>1365-2966</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2004</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><recordid>eNqNkMtOwzAQRS0EEqXwD9nALsGvOPaCBWqBIrUg8VLFZuQaB6UkTbFTtf17HFKVLd7Y0pwz1r0IRQQnJJzLeUKYSGOqhEgoxjzBEjOWbA5Qbz84RD2MWRrLjJBjdOL9HAeSUdFD0aheR5VebCNT-6ou68_C6DJaaqcr21jnT9FRrktvz3Z3H73e3rwMRvH48e5-cD2ODReYxVRI-aGUIkaKGZXGCjtTJGVGc4ZzLXMisRS5ZSrNeJgypWZKcyONslKIjPXRRbd36ervlfUNVIU3tiz1wtYrD1RSLDmnAZQdaFztvbM5LF1RabcFgqGtBObQJoc2ObSVwG8lsAnq-e4P7UPK3OmFKfyfnypKFeeBu-q4dVHa7b_3w-ThqX0FP-78wjd2s_e1-4KQNEthNH2H6VC8kfHwGSbsB9dfgaI</recordid><startdate>200407</startdate><enddate>200407</enddate><creator>Liddle, Andrew R.</creator><general>Blackwell Publishing Ltd</general><general>Blackwell Science Ltd</general><general>Blackwell Science</general><scope>BSCLL</scope><scope>IQODW</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7U5</scope><scope>8FD</scope><scope>H8D</scope><scope>L7M</scope></search><sort><creationdate>200407</creationdate><title>How many cosmological parameters</title><author>Liddle, Andrew R.</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c4603-2688d9991c86b28ce6eb9153ca430fa8f18086fe39574ce6399b9a4c8c9e86673</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2004</creationdate><topic>cosmology: theory</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Liddle, Andrew R.</creatorcontrib><collection>Istex</collection><collection>Pascal-Francis</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>Solid State and Superconductivity Abstracts</collection><collection>Technology Research Database</collection><collection>Aerospace Database</collection><collection>Advanced Technologies Database with Aerospace</collection><jtitle>Monthly notices of the Royal Astronomical Society</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Liddle, Andrew R.</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>How many cosmological parameters</atitle><jtitle>Monthly notices of the Royal Astronomical Society</jtitle><addtitle>Mon. Not. R. Astron. Soc</addtitle><date>2004-07</date><risdate>2004</risdate><volume>351</volume><issue>3</issue><spage>L49</spage><epage>L53</epage><pages>L49-L53</pages><issn>0035-8711</issn><eissn>1365-2966</eissn><coden>MNRAA4</coden><abstract>Constraints on cosmological parameters depend on the set of parameters chosen to define the model that is compared with observational data. I use the Akaike and Bayesian information criteria to carry out cosmological model selection, in order to determine the parameter set providing the preferred fit to the data. Applying the information criteria to the current cosmological data sets indicates, for example, that spatially flat models are statistically preferred to closed models, and that possible running of the spectral index has lower significance than inferred from its confidence limits. I also discuss some problems of statistical assessment arising from there being a large number of ‘candidate’ cosmological parameters that can be investigated for possible cosmological implications, and argue that 95 per cent confidence is too low a threshold to identify robustly the need for new parameters in model fitting. The best present description of cosmological data uses a scale-invariant (n= 1) spectrum of Gaussian adiabatic perturbations in a spatially flat Universe, with the cosmological model requiring only five fundamental parameters to specify it fully.</abstract><cop>Oxford, UK</cop><pub>Blackwell Publishing Ltd</pub><doi>10.1111/j.1365-2966.2004.08033.x</doi><tpages>5</tpages><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 0035-8711
ispartof Monthly notices of the Royal Astronomical Society, 2004-07, Vol.351 (3), p.L49-L53
issn 0035-8711
1365-2966
language eng
recordid cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_28208442
source Oxford Journals Open Access Collection; Wiley Online Library Journals Frontfile Complete
subjects cosmology: theory
title How many cosmological parameters
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-02-16T05%3A18%3A30IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=How%20many%20cosmological%20parameters&rft.jtitle=Monthly%20notices%20of%20the%20Royal%20Astronomical%20Society&rft.au=Liddle,%20Andrew%20R.&rft.date=2004-07&rft.volume=351&rft.issue=3&rft.spage=L49&rft.epage=L53&rft.pages=L49-L53&rft.issn=0035-8711&rft.eissn=1365-2966&rft.coden=MNRAA4&rft_id=info:doi/10.1111/j.1365-2966.2004.08033.x&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E28208442%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=28208442&rft_id=info:pmid/&rfr_iscdi=true