The use of basic fibroblast growth factor to improve vocal function: A systematic review and meta‐analysis

Objectives This systematic review and meta‐analysis examines if intralaryngeal injection of basic fibroblast growth factor 2 (FGF2) can improve voice outcomes in those with vocal disability. Design A Systematic review of original human studies reporting voice outcomes following intra‐laryngeal injec...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Clinical otolaryngology 2023-09, Vol.48 (5), p.725-733
Hauptverfasser: Hamilton, Nick J. I., Saccente‐Kennedy, Brian, Ambler, Gareth
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page 733
container_issue 5
container_start_page 725
container_title Clinical otolaryngology
container_volume 48
creator Hamilton, Nick J. I.
Saccente‐Kennedy, Brian
Ambler, Gareth
description Objectives This systematic review and meta‐analysis examines if intralaryngeal injection of basic fibroblast growth factor 2 (FGF2) can improve voice outcomes in those with vocal disability. Design A Systematic review of original human studies reporting voice outcomes following intra‐laryngeal injection of basic fibroblast growth factor 2 in those with vocal dysfunction. Databases searched were Medline (1946–July 2022), Embase (1947–July 2022), Cochrane database and Google Scholar. Setting Secondary or tertiary care centres that undertook the management of voice pathology Hospital. Participants Inclusion criteria were original human studies reporting voice outcome measurements following intralaryngeal injection of FGF2 to treat vocal fold atrophy, vocal fold scarring, vocal fold sulcus or vocal fold palsy. Articles not written in English, studies that did not include human subjects and studies where voice outcome measures were not recorded before and after FGF2 injection were excluded from the review. Main Outcome Measures The primary outcome measure was maximum phonation time. Secondary outcome measures included acoustic analysis, glottic closure, mucosal wave formation, voice handicap index and GRBAS scale. Results Fourteen articles were included out of a search of 1023 and one article was included from scanning reference lists. All studies had a single arm design without control groups. Conditions treated were vocal fold atrophy (n = 186), vocal cord paralysis (n = 74), vocal fold fibrosis (n = 74) and vocal fold sulcus (n = 56). A meta‐analysis of six articles reporting on the use of FGF2 in patients with vocal fold atrophy showed a significant increase of mean maximum phonation time of 5.2 s (95% CI: 3.4–7.0) at 3–6 months following injection. A significant improvement in maximum phonation time, voice handicap index and glottic closure was found following injection in most studies assessed. No major adverse events were reported following injection. Conclusions To date, intralaryngeal injection of basic FGF2 appears to be safe and it may be able to improve voice outcomes in those with vocal dysfunction, especially vocal fold atrophy. Randomised controlled trials are needed to further evaluate efficacy and support the wider use of this therapy.
doi_str_mv 10.1111/coa.14073
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_2820337341</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>2820337341</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c3483-28f27e7d86f5531f6b8671d6c46af467fde3aad1825a99506260632110f8af643</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp1kbtOHDEUhi1EBISkyAtElmiSYsG3sT3pVisukZC2WerRGY8djGbGxPbsajseIc_Ik-BlCUWknOac4tOnX-dH6Asl57TMhQlwTgVR_ACdUCXqmRBaHr7fSh-jjyk9ECI4UfQIHXPFhFSVPEH96t7iKVkcHG4heYOdb2Noe0gZ_4phk--xA5NDxDlgPzzGsLZ4HQz02E2jyT6MP_Acp23KdoBcBNGuvd1gGDs82AzPT39ghH6bfPqEPjjok_38tk_R3dXlanEzu11e_1zMb2eGC81nTDumrOq0dFXFqZOtlop20ggJruR2neUAHdWsgrquiGSSSM4oJU6Dk4Kfom97b0n7e7IpN4NPxvY9jDZMqWGaEc4VF7SgZ_-gD2GKJe-OErWqa6FZob7vKRNDStG65jH6AeK2oaTZVdCUCprXCgr79c04tYPt3sm_Py_AxR7Y-N5u_29qFsv5XvkCFS2QOw</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>2849799482</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>The use of basic fibroblast growth factor to improve vocal function: A systematic review and meta‐analysis</title><source>Wiley Online Library All Journals</source><creator>Hamilton, Nick J. I. ; Saccente‐Kennedy, Brian ; Ambler, Gareth</creator><creatorcontrib>Hamilton, Nick J. I. ; Saccente‐Kennedy, Brian ; Ambler, Gareth</creatorcontrib><description>Objectives This systematic review and meta‐analysis examines if intralaryngeal injection of basic fibroblast growth factor 2 (FGF2) can improve voice outcomes in those with vocal disability. Design A Systematic review of original human studies reporting voice outcomes following intra‐laryngeal injection of basic fibroblast growth factor 2 in those with vocal dysfunction. Databases searched were Medline (1946–July 2022), Embase (1947–July 2022), Cochrane database and Google Scholar. Setting Secondary or tertiary care centres that undertook the management of voice pathology Hospital. Participants Inclusion criteria were original human studies reporting voice outcome measurements following intralaryngeal injection of FGF2 to treat vocal fold atrophy, vocal fold scarring, vocal fold sulcus or vocal fold palsy. Articles not written in English, studies that did not include human subjects and studies where voice outcome measures were not recorded before and after FGF2 injection were excluded from the review. Main Outcome Measures The primary outcome measure was maximum phonation time. Secondary outcome measures included acoustic analysis, glottic closure, mucosal wave formation, voice handicap index and GRBAS scale. Results Fourteen articles were included out of a search of 1023 and one article was included from scanning reference lists. All studies had a single arm design without control groups. Conditions treated were vocal fold atrophy (n = 186), vocal cord paralysis (n = 74), vocal fold fibrosis (n = 74) and vocal fold sulcus (n = 56). A meta‐analysis of six articles reporting on the use of FGF2 in patients with vocal fold atrophy showed a significant increase of mean maximum phonation time of 5.2 s (95% CI: 3.4–7.0) at 3–6 months following injection. A significant improvement in maximum phonation time, voice handicap index and glottic closure was found following injection in most studies assessed. No major adverse events were reported following injection. Conclusions To date, intralaryngeal injection of basic FGF2 appears to be safe and it may be able to improve voice outcomes in those with vocal dysfunction, especially vocal fold atrophy. Randomised controlled trials are needed to further evaluate efficacy and support the wider use of this therapy.</description><identifier>ISSN: 1749-4478</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1749-4486</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1111/coa.14073</identifier><identifier>PMID: 37246756</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>England: Wiley Subscription Services, Inc</publisher><subject>Atrophy ; Clinical trials ; FGF2 ; fibroblast growth factor ; Fibroblast growth factor 2 ; Fibroblasts ; Fibrosis ; Growth factors ; Injection ; Meta-analysis ; Paralysis ; Phonation ; Systematic review ; Time measurement ; vocal cord ; Vocal organs ; Voice</subject><ispartof>Clinical otolaryngology, 2023-09, Vol.48 (5), p.725-733</ispartof><rights>2023 The Authors. published by John Wiley &amp; Sons Ltd.</rights><rights>2023 The Authors. Clinical Otolaryngology published by John Wiley &amp; Sons Ltd.</rights><rights>2023. This article is published under http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ (the “License”). Notwithstanding the ProQuest Terms and Conditions, you may use this content in accordance with the terms of the License.</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c3483-28f27e7d86f5531f6b8671d6c46af467fde3aad1825a99506260632110f8af643</cites><orcidid>0000-0002-5322-7327 ; 0000-0002-2419-3922 ; 0000-0001-6251-9316</orcidid></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/pdf/10.1111%2Fcoa.14073$$EPDF$$P50$$Gwiley$$Hfree_for_read</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/full/10.1111%2Fcoa.14073$$EHTML$$P50$$Gwiley$$Hfree_for_read</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,780,784,1417,27923,27924,45573,45574</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37246756$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Hamilton, Nick J. I.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Saccente‐Kennedy, Brian</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Ambler, Gareth</creatorcontrib><title>The use of basic fibroblast growth factor to improve vocal function: A systematic review and meta‐analysis</title><title>Clinical otolaryngology</title><addtitle>Clin Otolaryngol</addtitle><description>Objectives This systematic review and meta‐analysis examines if intralaryngeal injection of basic fibroblast growth factor 2 (FGF2) can improve voice outcomes in those with vocal disability. Design A Systematic review of original human studies reporting voice outcomes following intra‐laryngeal injection of basic fibroblast growth factor 2 in those with vocal dysfunction. Databases searched were Medline (1946–July 2022), Embase (1947–July 2022), Cochrane database and Google Scholar. Setting Secondary or tertiary care centres that undertook the management of voice pathology Hospital. Participants Inclusion criteria were original human studies reporting voice outcome measurements following intralaryngeal injection of FGF2 to treat vocal fold atrophy, vocal fold scarring, vocal fold sulcus or vocal fold palsy. Articles not written in English, studies that did not include human subjects and studies where voice outcome measures were not recorded before and after FGF2 injection were excluded from the review. Main Outcome Measures The primary outcome measure was maximum phonation time. Secondary outcome measures included acoustic analysis, glottic closure, mucosal wave formation, voice handicap index and GRBAS scale. Results Fourteen articles were included out of a search of 1023 and one article was included from scanning reference lists. All studies had a single arm design without control groups. Conditions treated were vocal fold atrophy (n = 186), vocal cord paralysis (n = 74), vocal fold fibrosis (n = 74) and vocal fold sulcus (n = 56). A meta‐analysis of six articles reporting on the use of FGF2 in patients with vocal fold atrophy showed a significant increase of mean maximum phonation time of 5.2 s (95% CI: 3.4–7.0) at 3–6 months following injection. A significant improvement in maximum phonation time, voice handicap index and glottic closure was found following injection in most studies assessed. No major adverse events were reported following injection. Conclusions To date, intralaryngeal injection of basic FGF2 appears to be safe and it may be able to improve voice outcomes in those with vocal dysfunction, especially vocal fold atrophy. Randomised controlled trials are needed to further evaluate efficacy and support the wider use of this therapy.</description><subject>Atrophy</subject><subject>Clinical trials</subject><subject>FGF2</subject><subject>fibroblast growth factor</subject><subject>Fibroblast growth factor 2</subject><subject>Fibroblasts</subject><subject>Fibrosis</subject><subject>Growth factors</subject><subject>Injection</subject><subject>Meta-analysis</subject><subject>Paralysis</subject><subject>Phonation</subject><subject>Systematic review</subject><subject>Time measurement</subject><subject>vocal cord</subject><subject>Vocal organs</subject><subject>Voice</subject><issn>1749-4478</issn><issn>1749-4486</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2023</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>24P</sourceid><sourceid>WIN</sourceid><recordid>eNp1kbtOHDEUhi1EBISkyAtElmiSYsG3sT3pVisukZC2WerRGY8djGbGxPbsajseIc_Ik-BlCUWknOac4tOnX-dH6Asl57TMhQlwTgVR_ACdUCXqmRBaHr7fSh-jjyk9ECI4UfQIHXPFhFSVPEH96t7iKVkcHG4heYOdb2Noe0gZ_4phk--xA5NDxDlgPzzGsLZ4HQz02E2jyT6MP_Acp23KdoBcBNGuvd1gGDs82AzPT39ghH6bfPqEPjjok_38tk_R3dXlanEzu11e_1zMb2eGC81nTDumrOq0dFXFqZOtlop20ggJruR2neUAHdWsgrquiGSSSM4oJU6Dk4Kfom97b0n7e7IpN4NPxvY9jDZMqWGaEc4VF7SgZ_-gD2GKJe-OErWqa6FZob7vKRNDStG65jH6AeK2oaTZVdCUCprXCgr79c04tYPt3sm_Py_AxR7Y-N5u_29qFsv5XvkCFS2QOw</recordid><startdate>202309</startdate><enddate>202309</enddate><creator>Hamilton, Nick J. I.</creator><creator>Saccente‐Kennedy, Brian</creator><creator>Ambler, Gareth</creator><general>Wiley Subscription Services, Inc</general><scope>24P</scope><scope>WIN</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>8FD</scope><scope>FR3</scope><scope>K9.</scope><scope>M7Z</scope><scope>P64</scope><scope>7X8</scope><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-5322-7327</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-2419-3922</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0001-6251-9316</orcidid></search><sort><creationdate>202309</creationdate><title>The use of basic fibroblast growth factor to improve vocal function: A systematic review and meta‐analysis</title><author>Hamilton, Nick J. I. ; Saccente‐Kennedy, Brian ; Ambler, Gareth</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c3483-28f27e7d86f5531f6b8671d6c46af467fde3aad1825a99506260632110f8af643</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2023</creationdate><topic>Atrophy</topic><topic>Clinical trials</topic><topic>FGF2</topic><topic>fibroblast growth factor</topic><topic>Fibroblast growth factor 2</topic><topic>Fibroblasts</topic><topic>Fibrosis</topic><topic>Growth factors</topic><topic>Injection</topic><topic>Meta-analysis</topic><topic>Paralysis</topic><topic>Phonation</topic><topic>Systematic review</topic><topic>Time measurement</topic><topic>vocal cord</topic><topic>Vocal organs</topic><topic>Voice</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Hamilton, Nick J. I.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Saccente‐Kennedy, Brian</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Ambler, Gareth</creatorcontrib><collection>Wiley-Blackwell Open Access Titles</collection><collection>Wiley Free Content</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>Technology Research Database</collection><collection>Engineering Research Database</collection><collection>ProQuest Health &amp; Medical Complete (Alumni)</collection><collection>Biochemistry Abstracts 1</collection><collection>Biotechnology and BioEngineering Abstracts</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><jtitle>Clinical otolaryngology</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Hamilton, Nick J. I.</au><au>Saccente‐Kennedy, Brian</au><au>Ambler, Gareth</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>The use of basic fibroblast growth factor to improve vocal function: A systematic review and meta‐analysis</atitle><jtitle>Clinical otolaryngology</jtitle><addtitle>Clin Otolaryngol</addtitle><date>2023-09</date><risdate>2023</risdate><volume>48</volume><issue>5</issue><spage>725</spage><epage>733</epage><pages>725-733</pages><issn>1749-4478</issn><eissn>1749-4486</eissn><abstract>Objectives This systematic review and meta‐analysis examines if intralaryngeal injection of basic fibroblast growth factor 2 (FGF2) can improve voice outcomes in those with vocal disability. Design A Systematic review of original human studies reporting voice outcomes following intra‐laryngeal injection of basic fibroblast growth factor 2 in those with vocal dysfunction. Databases searched were Medline (1946–July 2022), Embase (1947–July 2022), Cochrane database and Google Scholar. Setting Secondary or tertiary care centres that undertook the management of voice pathology Hospital. Participants Inclusion criteria were original human studies reporting voice outcome measurements following intralaryngeal injection of FGF2 to treat vocal fold atrophy, vocal fold scarring, vocal fold sulcus or vocal fold palsy. Articles not written in English, studies that did not include human subjects and studies where voice outcome measures were not recorded before and after FGF2 injection were excluded from the review. Main Outcome Measures The primary outcome measure was maximum phonation time. Secondary outcome measures included acoustic analysis, glottic closure, mucosal wave formation, voice handicap index and GRBAS scale. Results Fourteen articles were included out of a search of 1023 and one article was included from scanning reference lists. All studies had a single arm design without control groups. Conditions treated were vocal fold atrophy (n = 186), vocal cord paralysis (n = 74), vocal fold fibrosis (n = 74) and vocal fold sulcus (n = 56). A meta‐analysis of six articles reporting on the use of FGF2 in patients with vocal fold atrophy showed a significant increase of mean maximum phonation time of 5.2 s (95% CI: 3.4–7.0) at 3–6 months following injection. A significant improvement in maximum phonation time, voice handicap index and glottic closure was found following injection in most studies assessed. No major adverse events were reported following injection. Conclusions To date, intralaryngeal injection of basic FGF2 appears to be safe and it may be able to improve voice outcomes in those with vocal dysfunction, especially vocal fold atrophy. Randomised controlled trials are needed to further evaluate efficacy and support the wider use of this therapy.</abstract><cop>England</cop><pub>Wiley Subscription Services, Inc</pub><pmid>37246756</pmid><doi>10.1111/coa.14073</doi><tpages>9</tpages><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-5322-7327</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-2419-3922</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0001-6251-9316</orcidid><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 1749-4478
ispartof Clinical otolaryngology, 2023-09, Vol.48 (5), p.725-733
issn 1749-4478
1749-4486
language eng
recordid cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_2820337341
source Wiley Online Library All Journals
subjects Atrophy
Clinical trials
FGF2
fibroblast growth factor
Fibroblast growth factor 2
Fibroblasts
Fibrosis
Growth factors
Injection
Meta-analysis
Paralysis
Phonation
Systematic review
Time measurement
vocal cord
Vocal organs
Voice
title The use of basic fibroblast growth factor to improve vocal function: A systematic review and meta‐analysis
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-08T16%3A44%3A10IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=The%20use%20of%20basic%20fibroblast%20growth%20factor%20to%20improve%20vocal%20function:%20A%20systematic%20review%20and%20meta%E2%80%90analysis&rft.jtitle=Clinical%20otolaryngology&rft.au=Hamilton,%20Nick%20J.%20I.&rft.date=2023-09&rft.volume=48&rft.issue=5&rft.spage=725&rft.epage=733&rft.pages=725-733&rft.issn=1749-4478&rft.eissn=1749-4486&rft_id=info:doi/10.1111/coa.14073&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E2820337341%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=2849799482&rft_id=info:pmid/37246756&rfr_iscdi=true