The use of basic fibroblast growth factor to improve vocal function: A systematic review and meta‐analysis
Objectives This systematic review and meta‐analysis examines if intralaryngeal injection of basic fibroblast growth factor 2 (FGF2) can improve voice outcomes in those with vocal disability. Design A Systematic review of original human studies reporting voice outcomes following intra‐laryngeal injec...
Gespeichert in:
Veröffentlicht in: | Clinical otolaryngology 2023-09, Vol.48 (5), p.725-733 |
---|---|
Hauptverfasser: | , , |
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | eng |
Schlagworte: | |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
container_end_page | 733 |
---|---|
container_issue | 5 |
container_start_page | 725 |
container_title | Clinical otolaryngology |
container_volume | 48 |
creator | Hamilton, Nick J. I. Saccente‐Kennedy, Brian Ambler, Gareth |
description | Objectives
This systematic review and meta‐analysis examines if intralaryngeal injection of basic fibroblast growth factor 2 (FGF2) can improve voice outcomes in those with vocal disability.
Design
A Systematic review of original human studies reporting voice outcomes following intra‐laryngeal injection of basic fibroblast growth factor 2 in those with vocal dysfunction. Databases searched were Medline (1946–July 2022), Embase (1947–July 2022), Cochrane database and Google Scholar.
Setting
Secondary or tertiary care centres that undertook the management of voice pathology Hospital.
Participants
Inclusion criteria were original human studies reporting voice outcome measurements following intralaryngeal injection of FGF2 to treat vocal fold atrophy, vocal fold scarring, vocal fold sulcus or vocal fold palsy. Articles not written in English, studies that did not include human subjects and studies where voice outcome measures were not recorded before and after FGF2 injection were excluded from the review.
Main Outcome Measures
The primary outcome measure was maximum phonation time. Secondary outcome measures included acoustic analysis, glottic closure, mucosal wave formation, voice handicap index and GRBAS scale.
Results
Fourteen articles were included out of a search of 1023 and one article was included from scanning reference lists. All studies had a single arm design without control groups. Conditions treated were vocal fold atrophy (n = 186), vocal cord paralysis (n = 74), vocal fold fibrosis (n = 74) and vocal fold sulcus (n = 56). A meta‐analysis of six articles reporting on the use of FGF2 in patients with vocal fold atrophy showed a significant increase of mean maximum phonation time of 5.2 s (95% CI: 3.4–7.0) at 3–6 months following injection. A significant improvement in maximum phonation time, voice handicap index and glottic closure was found following injection in most studies assessed. No major adverse events were reported following injection.
Conclusions
To date, intralaryngeal injection of basic FGF2 appears to be safe and it may be able to improve voice outcomes in those with vocal dysfunction, especially vocal fold atrophy. Randomised controlled trials are needed to further evaluate efficacy and support the wider use of this therapy. |
doi_str_mv | 10.1111/coa.14073 |
format | Article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_2820337341</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>2820337341</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c3483-28f27e7d86f5531f6b8671d6c46af467fde3aad1825a99506260632110f8af643</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp1kbtOHDEUhi1EBISkyAtElmiSYsG3sT3pVisukZC2WerRGY8djGbGxPbsajseIc_Ik-BlCUWknOac4tOnX-dH6Asl57TMhQlwTgVR_ACdUCXqmRBaHr7fSh-jjyk9ECI4UfQIHXPFhFSVPEH96t7iKVkcHG4heYOdb2Noe0gZ_4phk--xA5NDxDlgPzzGsLZ4HQz02E2jyT6MP_Acp23KdoBcBNGuvd1gGDs82AzPT39ghH6bfPqEPjjok_38tk_R3dXlanEzu11e_1zMb2eGC81nTDumrOq0dFXFqZOtlop20ggJruR2neUAHdWsgrquiGSSSM4oJU6Dk4Kfom97b0n7e7IpN4NPxvY9jDZMqWGaEc4VF7SgZ_-gD2GKJe-OErWqa6FZob7vKRNDStG65jH6AeK2oaTZVdCUCprXCgr79c04tYPt3sm_Py_AxR7Y-N5u_29qFsv5XvkCFS2QOw</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>2849799482</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>The use of basic fibroblast growth factor to improve vocal function: A systematic review and meta‐analysis</title><source>Wiley Online Library All Journals</source><creator>Hamilton, Nick J. I. ; Saccente‐Kennedy, Brian ; Ambler, Gareth</creator><creatorcontrib>Hamilton, Nick J. I. ; Saccente‐Kennedy, Brian ; Ambler, Gareth</creatorcontrib><description>Objectives
This systematic review and meta‐analysis examines if intralaryngeal injection of basic fibroblast growth factor 2 (FGF2) can improve voice outcomes in those with vocal disability.
Design
A Systematic review of original human studies reporting voice outcomes following intra‐laryngeal injection of basic fibroblast growth factor 2 in those with vocal dysfunction. Databases searched were Medline (1946–July 2022), Embase (1947–July 2022), Cochrane database and Google Scholar.
Setting
Secondary or tertiary care centres that undertook the management of voice pathology Hospital.
Participants
Inclusion criteria were original human studies reporting voice outcome measurements following intralaryngeal injection of FGF2 to treat vocal fold atrophy, vocal fold scarring, vocal fold sulcus or vocal fold palsy. Articles not written in English, studies that did not include human subjects and studies where voice outcome measures were not recorded before and after FGF2 injection were excluded from the review.
Main Outcome Measures
The primary outcome measure was maximum phonation time. Secondary outcome measures included acoustic analysis, glottic closure, mucosal wave formation, voice handicap index and GRBAS scale.
Results
Fourteen articles were included out of a search of 1023 and one article was included from scanning reference lists. All studies had a single arm design without control groups. Conditions treated were vocal fold atrophy (n = 186), vocal cord paralysis (n = 74), vocal fold fibrosis (n = 74) and vocal fold sulcus (n = 56). A meta‐analysis of six articles reporting on the use of FGF2 in patients with vocal fold atrophy showed a significant increase of mean maximum phonation time of 5.2 s (95% CI: 3.4–7.0) at 3–6 months following injection. A significant improvement in maximum phonation time, voice handicap index and glottic closure was found following injection in most studies assessed. No major adverse events were reported following injection.
Conclusions
To date, intralaryngeal injection of basic FGF2 appears to be safe and it may be able to improve voice outcomes in those with vocal dysfunction, especially vocal fold atrophy. Randomised controlled trials are needed to further evaluate efficacy and support the wider use of this therapy.</description><identifier>ISSN: 1749-4478</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1749-4486</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1111/coa.14073</identifier><identifier>PMID: 37246756</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>England: Wiley Subscription Services, Inc</publisher><subject>Atrophy ; Clinical trials ; FGF2 ; fibroblast growth factor ; Fibroblast growth factor 2 ; Fibroblasts ; Fibrosis ; Growth factors ; Injection ; Meta-analysis ; Paralysis ; Phonation ; Systematic review ; Time measurement ; vocal cord ; Vocal organs ; Voice</subject><ispartof>Clinical otolaryngology, 2023-09, Vol.48 (5), p.725-733</ispartof><rights>2023 The Authors. published by John Wiley & Sons Ltd.</rights><rights>2023 The Authors. Clinical Otolaryngology published by John Wiley & Sons Ltd.</rights><rights>2023. This article is published under http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ (the “License”). Notwithstanding the ProQuest Terms and Conditions, you may use this content in accordance with the terms of the License.</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c3483-28f27e7d86f5531f6b8671d6c46af467fde3aad1825a99506260632110f8af643</cites><orcidid>0000-0002-5322-7327 ; 0000-0002-2419-3922 ; 0000-0001-6251-9316</orcidid></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/pdf/10.1111%2Fcoa.14073$$EPDF$$P50$$Gwiley$$Hfree_for_read</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/full/10.1111%2Fcoa.14073$$EHTML$$P50$$Gwiley$$Hfree_for_read</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,780,784,1417,27923,27924,45573,45574</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37246756$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Hamilton, Nick J. I.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Saccente‐Kennedy, Brian</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Ambler, Gareth</creatorcontrib><title>The use of basic fibroblast growth factor to improve vocal function: A systematic review and meta‐analysis</title><title>Clinical otolaryngology</title><addtitle>Clin Otolaryngol</addtitle><description>Objectives
This systematic review and meta‐analysis examines if intralaryngeal injection of basic fibroblast growth factor 2 (FGF2) can improve voice outcomes in those with vocal disability.
Design
A Systematic review of original human studies reporting voice outcomes following intra‐laryngeal injection of basic fibroblast growth factor 2 in those with vocal dysfunction. Databases searched were Medline (1946–July 2022), Embase (1947–July 2022), Cochrane database and Google Scholar.
Setting
Secondary or tertiary care centres that undertook the management of voice pathology Hospital.
Participants
Inclusion criteria were original human studies reporting voice outcome measurements following intralaryngeal injection of FGF2 to treat vocal fold atrophy, vocal fold scarring, vocal fold sulcus or vocal fold palsy. Articles not written in English, studies that did not include human subjects and studies where voice outcome measures were not recorded before and after FGF2 injection were excluded from the review.
Main Outcome Measures
The primary outcome measure was maximum phonation time. Secondary outcome measures included acoustic analysis, glottic closure, mucosal wave formation, voice handicap index and GRBAS scale.
Results
Fourteen articles were included out of a search of 1023 and one article was included from scanning reference lists. All studies had a single arm design without control groups. Conditions treated were vocal fold atrophy (n = 186), vocal cord paralysis (n = 74), vocal fold fibrosis (n = 74) and vocal fold sulcus (n = 56). A meta‐analysis of six articles reporting on the use of FGF2 in patients with vocal fold atrophy showed a significant increase of mean maximum phonation time of 5.2 s (95% CI: 3.4–7.0) at 3–6 months following injection. A significant improvement in maximum phonation time, voice handicap index and glottic closure was found following injection in most studies assessed. No major adverse events were reported following injection.
Conclusions
To date, intralaryngeal injection of basic FGF2 appears to be safe and it may be able to improve voice outcomes in those with vocal dysfunction, especially vocal fold atrophy. Randomised controlled trials are needed to further evaluate efficacy and support the wider use of this therapy.</description><subject>Atrophy</subject><subject>Clinical trials</subject><subject>FGF2</subject><subject>fibroblast growth factor</subject><subject>Fibroblast growth factor 2</subject><subject>Fibroblasts</subject><subject>Fibrosis</subject><subject>Growth factors</subject><subject>Injection</subject><subject>Meta-analysis</subject><subject>Paralysis</subject><subject>Phonation</subject><subject>Systematic review</subject><subject>Time measurement</subject><subject>vocal cord</subject><subject>Vocal organs</subject><subject>Voice</subject><issn>1749-4478</issn><issn>1749-4486</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2023</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>24P</sourceid><sourceid>WIN</sourceid><recordid>eNp1kbtOHDEUhi1EBISkyAtElmiSYsG3sT3pVisukZC2WerRGY8djGbGxPbsajseIc_Ik-BlCUWknOac4tOnX-dH6Asl57TMhQlwTgVR_ACdUCXqmRBaHr7fSh-jjyk9ECI4UfQIHXPFhFSVPEH96t7iKVkcHG4heYOdb2Noe0gZ_4phk--xA5NDxDlgPzzGsLZ4HQz02E2jyT6MP_Acp23KdoBcBNGuvd1gGDs82AzPT39ghH6bfPqEPjjok_38tk_R3dXlanEzu11e_1zMb2eGC81nTDumrOq0dFXFqZOtlop20ggJruR2neUAHdWsgrquiGSSSM4oJU6Dk4Kfom97b0n7e7IpN4NPxvY9jDZMqWGaEc4VF7SgZ_-gD2GKJe-OErWqa6FZob7vKRNDStG65jH6AeK2oaTZVdCUCprXCgr79c04tYPt3sm_Py_AxR7Y-N5u_29qFsv5XvkCFS2QOw</recordid><startdate>202309</startdate><enddate>202309</enddate><creator>Hamilton, Nick J. I.</creator><creator>Saccente‐Kennedy, Brian</creator><creator>Ambler, Gareth</creator><general>Wiley Subscription Services, Inc</general><scope>24P</scope><scope>WIN</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>8FD</scope><scope>FR3</scope><scope>K9.</scope><scope>M7Z</scope><scope>P64</scope><scope>7X8</scope><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-5322-7327</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-2419-3922</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0001-6251-9316</orcidid></search><sort><creationdate>202309</creationdate><title>The use of basic fibroblast growth factor to improve vocal function: A systematic review and meta‐analysis</title><author>Hamilton, Nick J. I. ; Saccente‐Kennedy, Brian ; Ambler, Gareth</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c3483-28f27e7d86f5531f6b8671d6c46af467fde3aad1825a99506260632110f8af643</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2023</creationdate><topic>Atrophy</topic><topic>Clinical trials</topic><topic>FGF2</topic><topic>fibroblast growth factor</topic><topic>Fibroblast growth factor 2</topic><topic>Fibroblasts</topic><topic>Fibrosis</topic><topic>Growth factors</topic><topic>Injection</topic><topic>Meta-analysis</topic><topic>Paralysis</topic><topic>Phonation</topic><topic>Systematic review</topic><topic>Time measurement</topic><topic>vocal cord</topic><topic>Vocal organs</topic><topic>Voice</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Hamilton, Nick J. I.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Saccente‐Kennedy, Brian</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Ambler, Gareth</creatorcontrib><collection>Wiley-Blackwell Open Access Titles</collection><collection>Wiley Free Content</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>Technology Research Database</collection><collection>Engineering Research Database</collection><collection>ProQuest Health & Medical Complete (Alumni)</collection><collection>Biochemistry Abstracts 1</collection><collection>Biotechnology and BioEngineering Abstracts</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><jtitle>Clinical otolaryngology</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Hamilton, Nick J. I.</au><au>Saccente‐Kennedy, Brian</au><au>Ambler, Gareth</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>The use of basic fibroblast growth factor to improve vocal function: A systematic review and meta‐analysis</atitle><jtitle>Clinical otolaryngology</jtitle><addtitle>Clin Otolaryngol</addtitle><date>2023-09</date><risdate>2023</risdate><volume>48</volume><issue>5</issue><spage>725</spage><epage>733</epage><pages>725-733</pages><issn>1749-4478</issn><eissn>1749-4486</eissn><abstract>Objectives
This systematic review and meta‐analysis examines if intralaryngeal injection of basic fibroblast growth factor 2 (FGF2) can improve voice outcomes in those with vocal disability.
Design
A Systematic review of original human studies reporting voice outcomes following intra‐laryngeal injection of basic fibroblast growth factor 2 in those with vocal dysfunction. Databases searched were Medline (1946–July 2022), Embase (1947–July 2022), Cochrane database and Google Scholar.
Setting
Secondary or tertiary care centres that undertook the management of voice pathology Hospital.
Participants
Inclusion criteria were original human studies reporting voice outcome measurements following intralaryngeal injection of FGF2 to treat vocal fold atrophy, vocal fold scarring, vocal fold sulcus or vocal fold palsy. Articles not written in English, studies that did not include human subjects and studies where voice outcome measures were not recorded before and after FGF2 injection were excluded from the review.
Main Outcome Measures
The primary outcome measure was maximum phonation time. Secondary outcome measures included acoustic analysis, glottic closure, mucosal wave formation, voice handicap index and GRBAS scale.
Results
Fourteen articles were included out of a search of 1023 and one article was included from scanning reference lists. All studies had a single arm design without control groups. Conditions treated were vocal fold atrophy (n = 186), vocal cord paralysis (n = 74), vocal fold fibrosis (n = 74) and vocal fold sulcus (n = 56). A meta‐analysis of six articles reporting on the use of FGF2 in patients with vocal fold atrophy showed a significant increase of mean maximum phonation time of 5.2 s (95% CI: 3.4–7.0) at 3–6 months following injection. A significant improvement in maximum phonation time, voice handicap index and glottic closure was found following injection in most studies assessed. No major adverse events were reported following injection.
Conclusions
To date, intralaryngeal injection of basic FGF2 appears to be safe and it may be able to improve voice outcomes in those with vocal dysfunction, especially vocal fold atrophy. Randomised controlled trials are needed to further evaluate efficacy and support the wider use of this therapy.</abstract><cop>England</cop><pub>Wiley Subscription Services, Inc</pub><pmid>37246756</pmid><doi>10.1111/coa.14073</doi><tpages>9</tpages><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-5322-7327</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-2419-3922</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0001-6251-9316</orcidid><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | ISSN: 1749-4478 |
ispartof | Clinical otolaryngology, 2023-09, Vol.48 (5), p.725-733 |
issn | 1749-4478 1749-4486 |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_2820337341 |
source | Wiley Online Library All Journals |
subjects | Atrophy Clinical trials FGF2 fibroblast growth factor Fibroblast growth factor 2 Fibroblasts Fibrosis Growth factors Injection Meta-analysis Paralysis Phonation Systematic review Time measurement vocal cord Vocal organs Voice |
title | The use of basic fibroblast growth factor to improve vocal function: A systematic review and meta‐analysis |
url | https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-08T16%3A44%3A10IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=The%20use%20of%20basic%20fibroblast%20growth%20factor%20to%20improve%20vocal%20function:%20A%20systematic%20review%20and%20meta%E2%80%90analysis&rft.jtitle=Clinical%20otolaryngology&rft.au=Hamilton,%20Nick%20J.%20I.&rft.date=2023-09&rft.volume=48&rft.issue=5&rft.spage=725&rft.epage=733&rft.pages=725-733&rft.issn=1749-4478&rft.eissn=1749-4486&rft_id=info:doi/10.1111/coa.14073&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E2820337341%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=2849799482&rft_id=info:pmid/37246756&rfr_iscdi=true |