A cross‐sectional survey examining clinician characteristics, practices, and attitudes associated with adoption of the 2019 American Society for Colposcopy and Cervical Pathology risk‐based management consensus guidelines

Background The 2019 American Society for Colposcopy and Cervical Pathology (ASCCP) risk‐based management consensus guidelines are the most recent national guidelines for the management of abnormal cervical cancer screening tests. These guidelines benefit patients by concentrating testing and treatme...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Cancer 2023-09, Vol.129 (17), p.2671-2684
Hauptverfasser: Vadaparampil, Susan T., Fuzzell, Lindsay N., Brownstein, Naomi C., Fontenot, Holly B., Lake, Paige, Michel, Alexandra, McIntyre, McKenzie, Whitmer, Ashley, Perkins, Rebecca B.
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page 2684
container_issue 17
container_start_page 2671
container_title Cancer
container_volume 129
creator Vadaparampil, Susan T.
Fuzzell, Lindsay N.
Brownstein, Naomi C.
Fontenot, Holly B.
Lake, Paige
Michel, Alexandra
McIntyre, McKenzie
Whitmer, Ashley
Perkins, Rebecca B.
description Background The 2019 American Society for Colposcopy and Cervical Pathology (ASCCP) risk‐based management consensus guidelines are the most recent national guidelines for the management of abnormal cervical cancer screening tests. These guidelines benefit patients by concentrating testing and treatment in those at highest cervical cancer risk. Adoption of guidelines often occurs slowly, with few studies examining the factors associated with guideline‐adherent management of abnormal results. Methods To elucidate the factors associated with the use of the 2019 ASCCP guidelines among clinicians who perform cervical cancer screening, physicians and advanced practice professionals who perform cervical cancer screening were cross‐sectionally surveyed. Clinicians responded to screening vignettes with differing recommendations for management between the 2019 and prior management guidelines. Screening vignette 1 involved reduction of invasive testing on a low‐risk patient; screening vignette 2 involved increased surveillance testing on a high‐risk patient. Binomial logistic regression models determined the factors associated with the use of the 2019 guidelines. Results A total of 1251 clinicians participated from across the United States. For screening vignettes 1 and 2, guideline‐adherent responses were given by 28% and 36% of participants, respectively. Management recommendations differed by specialty and were incorrect in different situations: there was inappropriate invasive testing by obstetrics and gynecology physicians (vignette 1) and inappropriate discontinuation of screening by family and internal medicine physicians (vignette 2). Regardless of their chosen response, over half erroneously believed they were guideline adherent. Conclusions Many clinicians who believe they are following appropriate guidelines may not realize their management strategy is inconsistent with the 2019 guidelines. Education initiatives tailored to clinician specialty could address the understanding of current guidelines, encourage the use of updated guidelines, maximize patient benefits, and minimize harms. Plain Language Summary The 2019 American Society for Colposcopy and Cervical Pathology risk‐based management consensus guidelines are the most recent national guidelines for abnormal cervical cancer screening test management. We surveyed over 1200 obstetrics and gynecology (OB/GYN), family medicine, and internal medicine physicians and advanced practice providers about their sc
doi_str_mv 10.1002/cncr.34838
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_2818749047</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>2847558578</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c3578-d6ec0534b0ba3caf4aee4b4bf9874bb67968671f544407fb6aac5bf0e55f383e3</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp9kcuO1DAQRSMEYpqBDR-ALLFBiAxObCfpZSviJY0A8ZDYRRWn0u0hsTMuZ4bs-AR-Eb4Ed_fAggWrcknHx1e-SfIw42cZ5_lzbbU_E7IS1a1klfF1mfJM5reTFee8SpUUX06Se0QXcS1zJe4mJ6LM86xQYpX83DDtHdGv7z8IdTDOwsBo9le4MPwGo7HGbpke4tQGLNM78KADekPBaHrGpv1qNMYj2I5BCCbMHRIDIhevBOzYtQk7Bp2b9n7mehZ2yHKerdlmjCYdvR8ji2FhvfOsdsPkSLtpOShr9FeRGdh7CDs3uO3C4utfY-IWKNpHsLDFEW1g2llCSzOx7Ww6jKmR7id3ehgIH9zM0-Tzyxef6tfp-btXb-rNeaqFKqu0K1BzJWTLWxAaegmIspVtv65K2bZFuS6qosx6JaXkZd8WAFq1PUelelEJFKfJk6N38u5yRgrNaEjjMIBFN1OTV1k0rbksI_r4H_TCzT7-_J6SpVJVTBSpp0fqUJDHvpm8GcEvTcabffHNvvjmUHyEH90o53bE7i_6p-kIZEfg2gy4_EfV1G_rD0fpb-cSwNE</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>2847558578</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>A cross‐sectional survey examining clinician characteristics, practices, and attitudes associated with adoption of the 2019 American Society for Colposcopy and Cervical Pathology risk‐based management consensus guidelines</title><source>Wiley Journals</source><source>Wiley Free Content</source><source>EZB-FREE-00999 freely available EZB journals</source><source>Alma/SFX Local Collection</source><creator>Vadaparampil, Susan T. ; Fuzzell, Lindsay N. ; Brownstein, Naomi C. ; Fontenot, Holly B. ; Lake, Paige ; Michel, Alexandra ; McIntyre, McKenzie ; Whitmer, Ashley ; Perkins, Rebecca B.</creator><creatorcontrib>Vadaparampil, Susan T. ; Fuzzell, Lindsay N. ; Brownstein, Naomi C. ; Fontenot, Holly B. ; Lake, Paige ; Michel, Alexandra ; McIntyre, McKenzie ; Whitmer, Ashley ; Perkins, Rebecca B.</creatorcontrib><description>Background The 2019 American Society for Colposcopy and Cervical Pathology (ASCCP) risk‐based management consensus guidelines are the most recent national guidelines for the management of abnormal cervical cancer screening tests. These guidelines benefit patients by concentrating testing and treatment in those at highest cervical cancer risk. Adoption of guidelines often occurs slowly, with few studies examining the factors associated with guideline‐adherent management of abnormal results. Methods To elucidate the factors associated with the use of the 2019 ASCCP guidelines among clinicians who perform cervical cancer screening, physicians and advanced practice professionals who perform cervical cancer screening were cross‐sectionally surveyed. Clinicians responded to screening vignettes with differing recommendations for management between the 2019 and prior management guidelines. Screening vignette 1 involved reduction of invasive testing on a low‐risk patient; screening vignette 2 involved increased surveillance testing on a high‐risk patient. Binomial logistic regression models determined the factors associated with the use of the 2019 guidelines. Results A total of 1251 clinicians participated from across the United States. For screening vignettes 1 and 2, guideline‐adherent responses were given by 28% and 36% of participants, respectively. Management recommendations differed by specialty and were incorrect in different situations: there was inappropriate invasive testing by obstetrics and gynecology physicians (vignette 1) and inappropriate discontinuation of screening by family and internal medicine physicians (vignette 2). Regardless of their chosen response, over half erroneously believed they were guideline adherent. Conclusions Many clinicians who believe they are following appropriate guidelines may not realize their management strategy is inconsistent with the 2019 guidelines. Education initiatives tailored to clinician specialty could address the understanding of current guidelines, encourage the use of updated guidelines, maximize patient benefits, and minimize harms. Plain Language Summary The 2019 American Society for Colposcopy and Cervical Pathology risk‐based management consensus guidelines are the most recent national guidelines for abnormal cervical cancer screening test management. We surveyed over 1200 obstetrics and gynecology (OB/GYN), family medicine, and internal medicine physicians and advanced practice providers about their screening and abnormal results follow‐up practices in relation to guidelines. Few clinicians are following the 2019 guidelines. Management recommendations differed by clinician specialty and were incorrect in different situations: there was inappropriate invasive testing by OB/GYN physicians and inappropriate screening discontinuation by family and internal medicine physicians. Education tailored by clinician specialty could address the understanding of current guidelines, encourage the use of updated guidelines, maximize patient benefits, and minimize harms. Many clinicians who believe that they are following appropriate cervical cancer screening and management guidelines may not realize their management strategy is inconsistent with the 2019 American Society for Colposcopy and Cervical Pathology guidelines.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0008-543X</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1097-0142</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1002/cncr.34838</identifier><identifier>PMID: 37221653</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>United States: Wiley Subscription Services, Inc</publisher><subject>abnormal results management ; Cancer ; cancer prevention ; Cancer screening ; Cervical cancer ; cervical cancer screening ; Clinical practice guidelines ; Colposcopy ; Cross-sectional studies ; Disease management ; Education ; Guidelines ; Gynecology ; Health risks ; human papillomavirus ; Internal medicine ; Invasiveness ; Medical screening ; Medicine ; Obstetrics ; Oncology ; Pathology ; Physicians ; Regression analysis ; Regression models ; Risk</subject><ispartof>Cancer, 2023-09, Vol.129 (17), p.2671-2684</ispartof><rights>2023 American Cancer Society.</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c3578-d6ec0534b0ba3caf4aee4b4bf9874bb67968671f544407fb6aac5bf0e55f383e3</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c3578-d6ec0534b0ba3caf4aee4b4bf9874bb67968671f544407fb6aac5bf0e55f383e3</cites><orcidid>0000-0002-8549-6476</orcidid></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/pdf/10.1002%2Fcncr.34838$$EPDF$$P50$$Gwiley$$H</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/full/10.1002%2Fcncr.34838$$EHTML$$P50$$Gwiley$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,780,784,1417,1433,27924,27925,45574,45575,46409,46833</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37221653$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Vadaparampil, Susan T.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Fuzzell, Lindsay N.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Brownstein, Naomi C.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Fontenot, Holly B.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Lake, Paige</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Michel, Alexandra</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>McIntyre, McKenzie</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Whitmer, Ashley</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Perkins, Rebecca B.</creatorcontrib><title>A cross‐sectional survey examining clinician characteristics, practices, and attitudes associated with adoption of the 2019 American Society for Colposcopy and Cervical Pathology risk‐based management consensus guidelines</title><title>Cancer</title><addtitle>Cancer</addtitle><description>Background The 2019 American Society for Colposcopy and Cervical Pathology (ASCCP) risk‐based management consensus guidelines are the most recent national guidelines for the management of abnormal cervical cancer screening tests. These guidelines benefit patients by concentrating testing and treatment in those at highest cervical cancer risk. Adoption of guidelines often occurs slowly, with few studies examining the factors associated with guideline‐adherent management of abnormal results. Methods To elucidate the factors associated with the use of the 2019 ASCCP guidelines among clinicians who perform cervical cancer screening, physicians and advanced practice professionals who perform cervical cancer screening were cross‐sectionally surveyed. Clinicians responded to screening vignettes with differing recommendations for management between the 2019 and prior management guidelines. Screening vignette 1 involved reduction of invasive testing on a low‐risk patient; screening vignette 2 involved increased surveillance testing on a high‐risk patient. Binomial logistic regression models determined the factors associated with the use of the 2019 guidelines. Results A total of 1251 clinicians participated from across the United States. For screening vignettes 1 and 2, guideline‐adherent responses were given by 28% and 36% of participants, respectively. Management recommendations differed by specialty and were incorrect in different situations: there was inappropriate invasive testing by obstetrics and gynecology physicians (vignette 1) and inappropriate discontinuation of screening by family and internal medicine physicians (vignette 2). Regardless of their chosen response, over half erroneously believed they were guideline adherent. Conclusions Many clinicians who believe they are following appropriate guidelines may not realize their management strategy is inconsistent with the 2019 guidelines. Education initiatives tailored to clinician specialty could address the understanding of current guidelines, encourage the use of updated guidelines, maximize patient benefits, and minimize harms. Plain Language Summary The 2019 American Society for Colposcopy and Cervical Pathology risk‐based management consensus guidelines are the most recent national guidelines for abnormal cervical cancer screening test management. We surveyed over 1200 obstetrics and gynecology (OB/GYN), family medicine, and internal medicine physicians and advanced practice providers about their screening and abnormal results follow‐up practices in relation to guidelines. Few clinicians are following the 2019 guidelines. Management recommendations differed by clinician specialty and were incorrect in different situations: there was inappropriate invasive testing by OB/GYN physicians and inappropriate screening discontinuation by family and internal medicine physicians. Education tailored by clinician specialty could address the understanding of current guidelines, encourage the use of updated guidelines, maximize patient benefits, and minimize harms. Many clinicians who believe that they are following appropriate cervical cancer screening and management guidelines may not realize their management strategy is inconsistent with the 2019 American Society for Colposcopy and Cervical Pathology guidelines.</description><subject>abnormal results management</subject><subject>Cancer</subject><subject>cancer prevention</subject><subject>Cancer screening</subject><subject>Cervical cancer</subject><subject>cervical cancer screening</subject><subject>Clinical practice guidelines</subject><subject>Colposcopy</subject><subject>Cross-sectional studies</subject><subject>Disease management</subject><subject>Education</subject><subject>Guidelines</subject><subject>Gynecology</subject><subject>Health risks</subject><subject>human papillomavirus</subject><subject>Internal medicine</subject><subject>Invasiveness</subject><subject>Medical screening</subject><subject>Medicine</subject><subject>Obstetrics</subject><subject>Oncology</subject><subject>Pathology</subject><subject>Physicians</subject><subject>Regression analysis</subject><subject>Regression models</subject><subject>Risk</subject><issn>0008-543X</issn><issn>1097-0142</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2023</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><recordid>eNp9kcuO1DAQRSMEYpqBDR-ALLFBiAxObCfpZSviJY0A8ZDYRRWn0u0hsTMuZ4bs-AR-Eb4Ed_fAggWrcknHx1e-SfIw42cZ5_lzbbU_E7IS1a1klfF1mfJM5reTFee8SpUUX06Se0QXcS1zJe4mJ6LM86xQYpX83DDtHdGv7z8IdTDOwsBo9le4MPwGo7HGbpke4tQGLNM78KADekPBaHrGpv1qNMYj2I5BCCbMHRIDIhevBOzYtQk7Bp2b9n7mehZ2yHKerdlmjCYdvR8ji2FhvfOsdsPkSLtpOShr9FeRGdh7CDs3uO3C4utfY-IWKNpHsLDFEW1g2llCSzOx7Ww6jKmR7id3ehgIH9zM0-Tzyxef6tfp-btXb-rNeaqFKqu0K1BzJWTLWxAaegmIspVtv65K2bZFuS6qosx6JaXkZd8WAFq1PUelelEJFKfJk6N38u5yRgrNaEjjMIBFN1OTV1k0rbksI_r4H_TCzT7-_J6SpVJVTBSpp0fqUJDHvpm8GcEvTcabffHNvvjmUHyEH90o53bE7i_6p-kIZEfg2gy4_EfV1G_rD0fpb-cSwNE</recordid><startdate>20230901</startdate><enddate>20230901</enddate><creator>Vadaparampil, Susan T.</creator><creator>Fuzzell, Lindsay N.</creator><creator>Brownstein, Naomi C.</creator><creator>Fontenot, Holly B.</creator><creator>Lake, Paige</creator><creator>Michel, Alexandra</creator><creator>McIntyre, McKenzie</creator><creator>Whitmer, Ashley</creator><creator>Perkins, Rebecca B.</creator><general>Wiley Subscription Services, Inc</general><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7TO</scope><scope>7U7</scope><scope>C1K</scope><scope>H94</scope><scope>K9.</scope><scope>NAPCQ</scope><scope>7X8</scope><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-8549-6476</orcidid></search><sort><creationdate>20230901</creationdate><title>A cross‐sectional survey examining clinician characteristics, practices, and attitudes associated with adoption of the 2019 American Society for Colposcopy and Cervical Pathology risk‐based management consensus guidelines</title><author>Vadaparampil, Susan T. ; Fuzzell, Lindsay N. ; Brownstein, Naomi C. ; Fontenot, Holly B. ; Lake, Paige ; Michel, Alexandra ; McIntyre, McKenzie ; Whitmer, Ashley ; Perkins, Rebecca B.</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c3578-d6ec0534b0ba3caf4aee4b4bf9874bb67968671f544407fb6aac5bf0e55f383e3</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2023</creationdate><topic>abnormal results management</topic><topic>Cancer</topic><topic>cancer prevention</topic><topic>Cancer screening</topic><topic>Cervical cancer</topic><topic>cervical cancer screening</topic><topic>Clinical practice guidelines</topic><topic>Colposcopy</topic><topic>Cross-sectional studies</topic><topic>Disease management</topic><topic>Education</topic><topic>Guidelines</topic><topic>Gynecology</topic><topic>Health risks</topic><topic>human papillomavirus</topic><topic>Internal medicine</topic><topic>Invasiveness</topic><topic>Medical screening</topic><topic>Medicine</topic><topic>Obstetrics</topic><topic>Oncology</topic><topic>Pathology</topic><topic>Physicians</topic><topic>Regression analysis</topic><topic>Regression models</topic><topic>Risk</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Vadaparampil, Susan T.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Fuzzell, Lindsay N.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Brownstein, Naomi C.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Fontenot, Holly B.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Lake, Paige</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Michel, Alexandra</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>McIntyre, McKenzie</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Whitmer, Ashley</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Perkins, Rebecca B.</creatorcontrib><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>Oncogenes and Growth Factors Abstracts</collection><collection>Toxicology Abstracts</collection><collection>Environmental Sciences and Pollution Management</collection><collection>AIDS and Cancer Research Abstracts</collection><collection>ProQuest Health &amp; Medical Complete (Alumni)</collection><collection>Nursing &amp; Allied Health Premium</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><jtitle>Cancer</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Vadaparampil, Susan T.</au><au>Fuzzell, Lindsay N.</au><au>Brownstein, Naomi C.</au><au>Fontenot, Holly B.</au><au>Lake, Paige</au><au>Michel, Alexandra</au><au>McIntyre, McKenzie</au><au>Whitmer, Ashley</au><au>Perkins, Rebecca B.</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>A cross‐sectional survey examining clinician characteristics, practices, and attitudes associated with adoption of the 2019 American Society for Colposcopy and Cervical Pathology risk‐based management consensus guidelines</atitle><jtitle>Cancer</jtitle><addtitle>Cancer</addtitle><date>2023-09-01</date><risdate>2023</risdate><volume>129</volume><issue>17</issue><spage>2671</spage><epage>2684</epage><pages>2671-2684</pages><issn>0008-543X</issn><eissn>1097-0142</eissn><abstract>Background The 2019 American Society for Colposcopy and Cervical Pathology (ASCCP) risk‐based management consensus guidelines are the most recent national guidelines for the management of abnormal cervical cancer screening tests. These guidelines benefit patients by concentrating testing and treatment in those at highest cervical cancer risk. Adoption of guidelines often occurs slowly, with few studies examining the factors associated with guideline‐adherent management of abnormal results. Methods To elucidate the factors associated with the use of the 2019 ASCCP guidelines among clinicians who perform cervical cancer screening, physicians and advanced practice professionals who perform cervical cancer screening were cross‐sectionally surveyed. Clinicians responded to screening vignettes with differing recommendations for management between the 2019 and prior management guidelines. Screening vignette 1 involved reduction of invasive testing on a low‐risk patient; screening vignette 2 involved increased surveillance testing on a high‐risk patient. Binomial logistic regression models determined the factors associated with the use of the 2019 guidelines. Results A total of 1251 clinicians participated from across the United States. For screening vignettes 1 and 2, guideline‐adherent responses were given by 28% and 36% of participants, respectively. Management recommendations differed by specialty and were incorrect in different situations: there was inappropriate invasive testing by obstetrics and gynecology physicians (vignette 1) and inappropriate discontinuation of screening by family and internal medicine physicians (vignette 2). Regardless of their chosen response, over half erroneously believed they were guideline adherent. Conclusions Many clinicians who believe they are following appropriate guidelines may not realize their management strategy is inconsistent with the 2019 guidelines. Education initiatives tailored to clinician specialty could address the understanding of current guidelines, encourage the use of updated guidelines, maximize patient benefits, and minimize harms. Plain Language Summary The 2019 American Society for Colposcopy and Cervical Pathology risk‐based management consensus guidelines are the most recent national guidelines for abnormal cervical cancer screening test management. We surveyed over 1200 obstetrics and gynecology (OB/GYN), family medicine, and internal medicine physicians and advanced practice providers about their screening and abnormal results follow‐up practices in relation to guidelines. Few clinicians are following the 2019 guidelines. Management recommendations differed by clinician specialty and were incorrect in different situations: there was inappropriate invasive testing by OB/GYN physicians and inappropriate screening discontinuation by family and internal medicine physicians. Education tailored by clinician specialty could address the understanding of current guidelines, encourage the use of updated guidelines, maximize patient benefits, and minimize harms. Many clinicians who believe that they are following appropriate cervical cancer screening and management guidelines may not realize their management strategy is inconsistent with the 2019 American Society for Colposcopy and Cervical Pathology guidelines.</abstract><cop>United States</cop><pub>Wiley Subscription Services, Inc</pub><pmid>37221653</pmid><doi>10.1002/cncr.34838</doi><tpages>14</tpages><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-8549-6476</orcidid></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 0008-543X
ispartof Cancer, 2023-09, Vol.129 (17), p.2671-2684
issn 0008-543X
1097-0142
language eng
recordid cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_2818749047
source Wiley Journals; Wiley Free Content; EZB-FREE-00999 freely available EZB journals; Alma/SFX Local Collection
subjects abnormal results management
Cancer
cancer prevention
Cancer screening
Cervical cancer
cervical cancer screening
Clinical practice guidelines
Colposcopy
Cross-sectional studies
Disease management
Education
Guidelines
Gynecology
Health risks
human papillomavirus
Internal medicine
Invasiveness
Medical screening
Medicine
Obstetrics
Oncology
Pathology
Physicians
Regression analysis
Regression models
Risk
title A cross‐sectional survey examining clinician characteristics, practices, and attitudes associated with adoption of the 2019 American Society for Colposcopy and Cervical Pathology risk‐based management consensus guidelines
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-04T15%3A57%3A27IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=A%20cross%E2%80%90sectional%20survey%20examining%20clinician%20characteristics,%20practices,%20and%20attitudes%20associated%20with%20adoption%20of%20the%202019%20American%20Society%20for%20Colposcopy%20and%20Cervical%20Pathology%20risk%E2%80%90based%20management%20consensus%20guidelines&rft.jtitle=Cancer&rft.au=Vadaparampil,%20Susan%20T.&rft.date=2023-09-01&rft.volume=129&rft.issue=17&rft.spage=2671&rft.epage=2684&rft.pages=2671-2684&rft.issn=0008-543X&rft.eissn=1097-0142&rft_id=info:doi/10.1002/cncr.34838&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E2847558578%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=2847558578&rft_id=info:pmid/37221653&rfr_iscdi=true