A method for rewarding collaborative efforts in preclinical assessments
Student success in basic medical science courses is typically determined by their individual performance on examinations of various types. Previous research both within and outside medical education has shown that the use of educational assessment activities can increase learning as demonstrated by...
Gespeichert in:
Veröffentlicht in: | Clinical anatomy (New York, N.Y.) N.Y.), 2023-10, Vol.36 (7), p.986-992 |
---|---|
Hauptverfasser: | , |
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | eng |
Schlagworte: | |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
container_end_page | 992 |
---|---|
container_issue | 7 |
container_start_page | 986 |
container_title | Clinical anatomy (New York, N.Y.) |
container_volume | 36 |
creator | Nolan, Michael F McNamara, John P |
description | Student success in basic medical science courses is typically determined by their individual performance on examinations of various types. Previous research both within and outside medical education has shown that the use of educational assessment activities can increase learning as demonstrated by performance on subsequent examinations, a phenomenon known as the testing effect. Activities primarily designed and used for assessment and evaluation purposes can also be used as teaching opportunities. We developed a method for measuring and evaluating student accomplishment in a preclinical basic science course that incorporates both individual and collaborative efforts, encourages and rewards active participation, does not compromise the reliability of the assessment outcome and is perceived by the students as helpful and valuable. The approach involved a two-part assessment activity composed of an individual examination and a small group examination with each component differentially weighted in determining an overall examination score. We found that the method was successful in encouraging collaborative efforts during the group component and provided valid measures of student grasp of the subject matter. We describe the development and implementation of the method, provide data derived from its use in a preclinical basic science course and discuss factors to be addressed when utilizing this approach to ensure fairness and reliability of the outcome. We include brief summary comments from students regarding their impressions of the value of this method. |
doi_str_mv | 10.1002/ca.24058 |
format | Article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_2817776889</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>2862975653</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c306t-e42a71bbcb6da6b640d36d135b1ed8be91e8a29d37eda137349e47f5f402f9013</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNpdkEtLw0AURgdRbK2Cv0AG3LhJnVfmsSxFqyC40XWYx42mJJk6kyr-e6NWBVd3cQ-Hj4PQKSVzSgi79HbOBCn1HppSYnTBeMn30ZRoowquiZygo5zXhFAqlD5EE64YZUzQKVotcAfDcwy4jgkneLMpNP0T9rFtrYvJDs0rYKjH75Bx0-NNAt82feNti23OkHMH_ZCP0UFt2wwnuztDj9dXD8ub4u5-dbtc3BWeEzkUIJhV1DnvZLDSSUECl4Hy0lEI2oGhoC0zgSsIlnLFhQGh6rIWhNWGUD5DF9_eTYovW8hD1TXZwzi2h7jNFdNUKSW1NiN6_g9dx23qx3UjJZlRpSz5n9CnmHOCutqkprPpvaKk-oxbeVt9xR3Rs51w6zoIv-BPTf4B1ctzxg</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>2862975653</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>A method for rewarding collaborative efforts in preclinical assessments</title><source>Wiley Online Library Journals Frontfile Complete</source><creator>Nolan, Michael F ; McNamara, John P</creator><creatorcontrib>Nolan, Michael F ; McNamara, John P</creatorcontrib><description>Student success in basic medical science courses is typically determined by their individual performance on examinations of various types. Previous research both within and outside medical education has shown that the use of educational assessment activities can increase learning as demonstrated by performance on subsequent examinations, a phenomenon known as the testing effect. Activities primarily designed and used for assessment and evaluation purposes can also be used as teaching opportunities. We developed a method for measuring and evaluating student accomplishment in a preclinical basic science course that incorporates both individual and collaborative efforts, encourages and rewards active participation, does not compromise the reliability of the assessment outcome and is perceived by the students as helpful and valuable. The approach involved a two-part assessment activity composed of an individual examination and a small group examination with each component differentially weighted in determining an overall examination score. We found that the method was successful in encouraging collaborative efforts during the group component and provided valid measures of student grasp of the subject matter. We describe the development and implementation of the method, provide data derived from its use in a preclinical basic science course and discuss factors to be addressed when utilizing this approach to ensure fairness and reliability of the outcome. We include brief summary comments from students regarding their impressions of the value of this method.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0897-3806</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1098-2353</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1002/ca.24058</identifier><identifier>PMID: 37212241</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>United States: Wiley Subscription Services, Inc</publisher><subject>Collaboration ; Measurement methods ; Medical science ; Reliability analysis ; Students</subject><ispartof>Clinical anatomy (New York, N.Y.), 2023-10, Vol.36 (7), p.986-992</ispartof><rights>2023 The Authors. Clinical Anatomy published by Wiley Periodicals LLC on behalf of American Association of Clinical Anatomists and British Association of Clinical Anatomists.</rights><rights>2023. This article is published under http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/ (the “License”). Notwithstanding the ProQuest Terms and Conditions, you may use this content in accordance with the terms of the License.</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c306t-e42a71bbcb6da6b640d36d135b1ed8be91e8a29d37eda137349e47f5f402f9013</cites><orcidid>0000-0002-9177-4276 ; 0000-0002-5178-7750</orcidid></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><link.rule.ids>314,776,780,27901,27902</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37212241$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Nolan, Michael F</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>McNamara, John P</creatorcontrib><title>A method for rewarding collaborative efforts in preclinical assessments</title><title>Clinical anatomy (New York, N.Y.)</title><addtitle>Clin Anat</addtitle><description>Student success in basic medical science courses is typically determined by their individual performance on examinations of various types. Previous research both within and outside medical education has shown that the use of educational assessment activities can increase learning as demonstrated by performance on subsequent examinations, a phenomenon known as the testing effect. Activities primarily designed and used for assessment and evaluation purposes can also be used as teaching opportunities. We developed a method for measuring and evaluating student accomplishment in a preclinical basic science course that incorporates both individual and collaborative efforts, encourages and rewards active participation, does not compromise the reliability of the assessment outcome and is perceived by the students as helpful and valuable. The approach involved a two-part assessment activity composed of an individual examination and a small group examination with each component differentially weighted in determining an overall examination score. We found that the method was successful in encouraging collaborative efforts during the group component and provided valid measures of student grasp of the subject matter. We describe the development and implementation of the method, provide data derived from its use in a preclinical basic science course and discuss factors to be addressed when utilizing this approach to ensure fairness and reliability of the outcome. We include brief summary comments from students regarding their impressions of the value of this method.</description><subject>Collaboration</subject><subject>Measurement methods</subject><subject>Medical science</subject><subject>Reliability analysis</subject><subject>Students</subject><issn>0897-3806</issn><issn>1098-2353</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2023</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><recordid>eNpdkEtLw0AURgdRbK2Cv0AG3LhJnVfmsSxFqyC40XWYx42mJJk6kyr-e6NWBVd3cQ-Hj4PQKSVzSgi79HbOBCn1HppSYnTBeMn30ZRoowquiZygo5zXhFAqlD5EE64YZUzQKVotcAfDcwy4jgkneLMpNP0T9rFtrYvJDs0rYKjH75Bx0-NNAt82feNti23OkHMH_ZCP0UFt2wwnuztDj9dXD8ub4u5-dbtc3BWeEzkUIJhV1DnvZLDSSUECl4Hy0lEI2oGhoC0zgSsIlnLFhQGh6rIWhNWGUD5DF9_eTYovW8hD1TXZwzi2h7jNFdNUKSW1NiN6_g9dx23qx3UjJZlRpSz5n9CnmHOCutqkprPpvaKk-oxbeVt9xR3Rs51w6zoIv-BPTf4B1ctzxg</recordid><startdate>20231001</startdate><enddate>20231001</enddate><creator>Nolan, Michael F</creator><creator>McNamara, John P</creator><general>Wiley Subscription Services, Inc</general><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7QG</scope><scope>7QP</scope><scope>7T5</scope><scope>7TK</scope><scope>7TM</scope><scope>7TS</scope><scope>H94</scope><scope>JQ2</scope><scope>K9.</scope><scope>7X8</scope><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-9177-4276</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-5178-7750</orcidid></search><sort><creationdate>20231001</creationdate><title>A method for rewarding collaborative efforts in preclinical assessments</title><author>Nolan, Michael F ; McNamara, John P</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c306t-e42a71bbcb6da6b640d36d135b1ed8be91e8a29d37eda137349e47f5f402f9013</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2023</creationdate><topic>Collaboration</topic><topic>Measurement methods</topic><topic>Medical science</topic><topic>Reliability analysis</topic><topic>Students</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Nolan, Michael F</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>McNamara, John P</creatorcontrib><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>Animal Behavior Abstracts</collection><collection>Calcium & Calcified Tissue Abstracts</collection><collection>Immunology Abstracts</collection><collection>Neurosciences Abstracts</collection><collection>Nucleic Acids Abstracts</collection><collection>Physical Education Index</collection><collection>AIDS and Cancer Research Abstracts</collection><collection>ProQuest Computer Science Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Health & Medical Complete (Alumni)</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><jtitle>Clinical anatomy (New York, N.Y.)</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Nolan, Michael F</au><au>McNamara, John P</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>A method for rewarding collaborative efforts in preclinical assessments</atitle><jtitle>Clinical anatomy (New York, N.Y.)</jtitle><addtitle>Clin Anat</addtitle><date>2023-10-01</date><risdate>2023</risdate><volume>36</volume><issue>7</issue><spage>986</spage><epage>992</epage><pages>986-992</pages><issn>0897-3806</issn><eissn>1098-2353</eissn><abstract>Student success in basic medical science courses is typically determined by their individual performance on examinations of various types. Previous research both within and outside medical education has shown that the use of educational assessment activities can increase learning as demonstrated by performance on subsequent examinations, a phenomenon known as the testing effect. Activities primarily designed and used for assessment and evaluation purposes can also be used as teaching opportunities. We developed a method for measuring and evaluating student accomplishment in a preclinical basic science course that incorporates both individual and collaborative efforts, encourages and rewards active participation, does not compromise the reliability of the assessment outcome and is perceived by the students as helpful and valuable. The approach involved a two-part assessment activity composed of an individual examination and a small group examination with each component differentially weighted in determining an overall examination score. We found that the method was successful in encouraging collaborative efforts during the group component and provided valid measures of student grasp of the subject matter. We describe the development and implementation of the method, provide data derived from its use in a preclinical basic science course and discuss factors to be addressed when utilizing this approach to ensure fairness and reliability of the outcome. We include brief summary comments from students regarding their impressions of the value of this method.</abstract><cop>United States</cop><pub>Wiley Subscription Services, Inc</pub><pmid>37212241</pmid><doi>10.1002/ca.24058</doi><tpages>7</tpages><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-9177-4276</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-5178-7750</orcidid><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | ISSN: 0897-3806 |
ispartof | Clinical anatomy (New York, N.Y.), 2023-10, Vol.36 (7), p.986-992 |
issn | 0897-3806 1098-2353 |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_2817776889 |
source | Wiley Online Library Journals Frontfile Complete |
subjects | Collaboration Measurement methods Medical science Reliability analysis Students |
title | A method for rewarding collaborative efforts in preclinical assessments |
url | https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-02-02T01%3A36%3A30IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=A%20method%20for%20rewarding%20collaborative%20efforts%20in%20preclinical%20assessments&rft.jtitle=Clinical%20anatomy%20(New%20York,%20N.Y.)&rft.au=Nolan,%20Michael%20F&rft.date=2023-10-01&rft.volume=36&rft.issue=7&rft.spage=986&rft.epage=992&rft.pages=986-992&rft.issn=0897-3806&rft.eissn=1098-2353&rft_id=info:doi/10.1002/ca.24058&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E2862975653%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=2862975653&rft_id=info:pmid/37212241&rfr_iscdi=true |