Risk assessment of ionizing radiation and radiological thresholds to compound an environmental baseline for the unconventional gas industry
The exploration of unconventional hydrocarbons may be very effective in promoting economic development and confronting energy crisis around the world. However, the environmental risks associated with this practice might be an impediment if not adequately dimensioned. In this context, naturally occur...
Gespeichert in:
| Veröffentlicht in: | Environmental monitoring and assessment 2023-06, Vol.195 (6), p.707-707, Article 707 |
|---|---|
| Hauptverfasser: | , , , , |
| Format: | Artikel |
| Sprache: | eng |
| Schlagworte: | |
| Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
| Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
| container_end_page | 707 |
|---|---|
| container_issue | 6 |
| container_start_page | 707 |
| container_title | Environmental monitoring and assessment |
| container_volume | 195 |
| creator | Lima, G. F. C. Vasconcelos, D. C. De Carvalho Filho, C. A. Moreira, R. M. Almeida, P. H. C. |
| description | The exploration of unconventional hydrocarbons may be very effective in promoting economic development and confronting energy crisis around the world. However, the environmental risks associated with this practice might be an impediment if not adequately dimensioned. In this context, naturally occurring radioactive materials and ionizing radiation are sensitive aspects in the unconventional gas industry that may compromise the environmental sustainability of gas production and they should be properly monitored. This paper provides a radioecological assessment of the São Francisco Basin (Brazil) as part of an environmental baseline evaluation regarding the Brazilian potential for exploring its unconventional gas reserves. Eleven and thirteen samples of surface waters and groundwater were analyzed for gross alpha and beta using a gas flow proportional counter. A radiological background range was proposed using the ± 2 Median Absolute Deviation method. Using geoprocessing tools, the annual equivalent doses and lifetime cancer risk indexes were spatialized. Gross alpha and beta background thresholds in surface water ranged from 0.04–0.40 Bq L
−1
to 0.17–0.46 Bq L
−
, respectively. Groundwater radiological background varies from 0.006–0.81 Bq L
−1
to 0.06–0.72 Bq L
−1
for gross alpha and beta, respectively. All environmental indexes are relatively higher in the south of the basin, probably a direct response to the local volcanic formations. Traçadal fault and local gas seepages might also influence the gross alpha and beta distribution. All samples have radiological indexes below the environmental thresholds, and should remain at acceptable levels with the development of the unconventional gas industry in Brazil. |
| doi_str_mv | 10.1007/s10661-023-11211-y |
| format | Article |
| fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_2817776272</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>2817229137</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c326t-5f0f3f68ab6ad258babad5a629571e0d1677421ecff9a9eb83012047debfde8a3</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp9kU9rFTEUxYNY7Gv1C7iQgBs3Y_PnTTJZSqltoSCIrkNmcvOaOpM8c2cKz6_glzbtVAUXrsLl_M7JvRxCXnP2njOmz5AzpXjDhGw4F5w3h2dkw1stG2Fa85xsGFe6UVKZY3KCeMcYM3prXpBjqQUXRpgN-fk54jfqEAFxgjTTHGjMKf6IaUeL89HNdaQu-ccpj3kXBzfS-bYA3ubRI50zHfK0z0tlXKKQ7mPJ6SGscr1DGGMCGnKpJqBLGnK6r2KNrfrOIY3JLziXw0tyFNyI8OrpPSVfP158Ob9qbj5dXp9_uGkGKdTctIEFGVTneuW8aLve9c63TtWjNQfm69F6KzgMIRhnoO8k44JttYc-eOicPCXv1tx9yd8XwNlOEQcYR5cgL2hFx7XWSmhR0bf_oHd5KXXxlRLCcKkrJVZqKBmxQLD7EidXDpYz-1CVXauytSr7WJU9VNObp-iln8D_sfzupgJyBbBKaQfl79__if0FxRCjfw</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>2817229137</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Risk assessment of ionizing radiation and radiological thresholds to compound an environmental baseline for the unconventional gas industry</title><source>MEDLINE</source><source>SpringerLink_现刊</source><creator>Lima, G. F. C. ; Vasconcelos, D. C. ; De Carvalho Filho, C. A. ; Moreira, R. M. ; Almeida, P. H. C.</creator><creatorcontrib>Lima, G. F. C. ; Vasconcelos, D. C. ; De Carvalho Filho, C. A. ; Moreira, R. M. ; Almeida, P. H. C.</creatorcontrib><description>The exploration of unconventional hydrocarbons may be very effective in promoting economic development and confronting energy crisis around the world. However, the environmental risks associated with this practice might be an impediment if not adequately dimensioned. In this context, naturally occurring radioactive materials and ionizing radiation are sensitive aspects in the unconventional gas industry that may compromise the environmental sustainability of gas production and they should be properly monitored. This paper provides a radioecological assessment of the São Francisco Basin (Brazil) as part of an environmental baseline evaluation regarding the Brazilian potential for exploring its unconventional gas reserves. Eleven and thirteen samples of surface waters and groundwater were analyzed for gross alpha and beta using a gas flow proportional counter. A radiological background range was proposed using the ± 2 Median Absolute Deviation method. Using geoprocessing tools, the annual equivalent doses and lifetime cancer risk indexes were spatialized. Gross alpha and beta background thresholds in surface water ranged from 0.04–0.40 Bq L
−1
to 0.17–0.46 Bq L
−
, respectively. Groundwater radiological background varies from 0.006–0.81 Bq L
−1
to 0.06–0.72 Bq L
−1
for gross alpha and beta, respectively. All environmental indexes are relatively higher in the south of the basin, probably a direct response to the local volcanic formations. Traçadal fault and local gas seepages might also influence the gross alpha and beta distribution. All samples have radiological indexes below the environmental thresholds, and should remain at acceptable levels with the development of the unconventional gas industry in Brazil.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0167-6369</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1573-2959</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1007/s10661-023-11211-y</identifier><identifier>PMID: 37212929</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Cham: Springer International Publishing</publisher><subject>Atmospheric Protection/Air Quality Control/Air Pollution ; Earth and Environmental Science ; Ecology ; Economic development ; Ecotoxicology ; Environment ; Environmental Management ; Environmental Monitoring ; Environmental risk ; Environmental science ; Gas flow ; Gas industry ; Gas production ; Gas seepage ; Gas seepages ; Groundwater ; Health risks ; Hydrocarbons ; Ionizing radiation ; Monitoring/Environmental Analysis ; Natural Gas ; Oil and Gas Fields ; Oil and gas industries ; Oil and gas industry ; Oil and gas production ; Probability distribution functions ; Proportional counters ; Radiation ; Radiation, Ionizing ; Radioactive materials ; Risk Assessment ; Surface water ; Sustainability ; Thresholds</subject><ispartof>Environmental monitoring and assessment, 2023-06, Vol.195 (6), p.707-707, Article 707</ispartof><rights>The Author(s), under exclusive licence to Springer Nature Switzerland AG 2023. Springer Nature or its licensor (e.g. a society or other partner) holds exclusive rights to this article under a publishing agreement with the author(s) or other rightsholder(s); author self-archiving of the accepted manuscript version of this article is solely governed by the terms of such publishing agreement and applicable law.</rights><rights>2023. The Author(s), under exclusive licence to Springer Nature Switzerland AG.</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c326t-5f0f3f68ab6ad258babad5a629571e0d1677421ecff9a9eb83012047debfde8a3</cites><orcidid>0000-0003-3793-4395 ; 0000-0003-4880-2080</orcidid></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://link.springer.com/content/pdf/10.1007/s10661-023-11211-y$$EPDF$$P50$$Gspringer$$H</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://link.springer.com/10.1007/s10661-023-11211-y$$EHTML$$P50$$Gspringer$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,780,784,27924,27925,41488,42557,51319</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37212929$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Lima, G. F. C.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Vasconcelos, D. C.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>De Carvalho Filho, C. A.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Moreira, R. M.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Almeida, P. H. C.</creatorcontrib><title>Risk assessment of ionizing radiation and radiological thresholds to compound an environmental baseline for the unconventional gas industry</title><title>Environmental monitoring and assessment</title><addtitle>Environ Monit Assess</addtitle><addtitle>Environ Monit Assess</addtitle><description>The exploration of unconventional hydrocarbons may be very effective in promoting economic development and confronting energy crisis around the world. However, the environmental risks associated with this practice might be an impediment if not adequately dimensioned. In this context, naturally occurring radioactive materials and ionizing radiation are sensitive aspects in the unconventional gas industry that may compromise the environmental sustainability of gas production and they should be properly monitored. This paper provides a radioecological assessment of the São Francisco Basin (Brazil) as part of an environmental baseline evaluation regarding the Brazilian potential for exploring its unconventional gas reserves. Eleven and thirteen samples of surface waters and groundwater were analyzed for gross alpha and beta using a gas flow proportional counter. A radiological background range was proposed using the ± 2 Median Absolute Deviation method. Using geoprocessing tools, the annual equivalent doses and lifetime cancer risk indexes were spatialized. Gross alpha and beta background thresholds in surface water ranged from 0.04–0.40 Bq L
−1
to 0.17–0.46 Bq L
−
, respectively. Groundwater radiological background varies from 0.006–0.81 Bq L
−1
to 0.06–0.72 Bq L
−1
for gross alpha and beta, respectively. All environmental indexes are relatively higher in the south of the basin, probably a direct response to the local volcanic formations. Traçadal fault and local gas seepages might also influence the gross alpha and beta distribution. All samples have radiological indexes below the environmental thresholds, and should remain at acceptable levels with the development of the unconventional gas industry in Brazil.</description><subject>Atmospheric Protection/Air Quality Control/Air Pollution</subject><subject>Earth and Environmental Science</subject><subject>Ecology</subject><subject>Economic development</subject><subject>Ecotoxicology</subject><subject>Environment</subject><subject>Environmental Management</subject><subject>Environmental Monitoring</subject><subject>Environmental risk</subject><subject>Environmental science</subject><subject>Gas flow</subject><subject>Gas industry</subject><subject>Gas production</subject><subject>Gas seepage</subject><subject>Gas seepages</subject><subject>Groundwater</subject><subject>Health risks</subject><subject>Hydrocarbons</subject><subject>Ionizing radiation</subject><subject>Monitoring/Environmental Analysis</subject><subject>Natural Gas</subject><subject>Oil and Gas Fields</subject><subject>Oil and gas industries</subject><subject>Oil and gas industry</subject><subject>Oil and gas production</subject><subject>Probability distribution functions</subject><subject>Proportional counters</subject><subject>Radiation</subject><subject>Radiation, Ionizing</subject><subject>Radioactive materials</subject><subject>Risk Assessment</subject><subject>Surface water</subject><subject>Sustainability</subject><subject>Thresholds</subject><issn>0167-6369</issn><issn>1573-2959</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2023</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>EIF</sourceid><sourceid>ABUWG</sourceid><sourceid>AFKRA</sourceid><sourceid>AZQEC</sourceid><sourceid>BENPR</sourceid><sourceid>CCPQU</sourceid><sourceid>DWQXO</sourceid><sourceid>GNUQQ</sourceid><recordid>eNp9kU9rFTEUxYNY7Gv1C7iQgBs3Y_PnTTJZSqltoSCIrkNmcvOaOpM8c2cKz6_glzbtVAUXrsLl_M7JvRxCXnP2njOmz5AzpXjDhGw4F5w3h2dkw1stG2Fa85xsGFe6UVKZY3KCeMcYM3prXpBjqQUXRpgN-fk54jfqEAFxgjTTHGjMKf6IaUeL89HNdaQu-ccpj3kXBzfS-bYA3ubRI50zHfK0z0tlXKKQ7mPJ6SGscr1DGGMCGnKpJqBLGnK6r2KNrfrOIY3JLziXw0tyFNyI8OrpPSVfP158Ob9qbj5dXp9_uGkGKdTctIEFGVTneuW8aLve9c63TtWjNQfm69F6KzgMIRhnoO8k44JttYc-eOicPCXv1tx9yd8XwNlOEQcYR5cgL2hFx7XWSmhR0bf_oHd5KXXxlRLCcKkrJVZqKBmxQLD7EidXDpYz-1CVXauytSr7WJU9VNObp-iln8D_sfzupgJyBbBKaQfl79__if0FxRCjfw</recordid><startdate>20230601</startdate><enddate>20230601</enddate><creator>Lima, G. F. C.</creator><creator>Vasconcelos, D. C.</creator><creator>De Carvalho Filho, C. A.</creator><creator>Moreira, R. M.</creator><creator>Almeida, P. H. C.</creator><general>Springer International Publishing</general><general>Springer Nature B.V</general><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>3V.</scope><scope>7QH</scope><scope>7QL</scope><scope>7SN</scope><scope>7ST</scope><scope>7T7</scope><scope>7TG</scope><scope>7TN</scope><scope>7U7</scope><scope>7UA</scope><scope>7WY</scope><scope>7WZ</scope><scope>7X7</scope><scope>7XB</scope><scope>87Z</scope><scope>88E</scope><scope>88I</scope><scope>8AO</scope><scope>8C1</scope><scope>8FD</scope><scope>8FI</scope><scope>8FJ</scope><scope>8FK</scope><scope>8FL</scope><scope>ABUWG</scope><scope>AEUYN</scope><scope>AFKRA</scope><scope>ATCPS</scope><scope>AZQEC</scope><scope>BENPR</scope><scope>BEZIV</scope><scope>BHPHI</scope><scope>C1K</scope><scope>CCPQU</scope><scope>DWQXO</scope><scope>F1W</scope><scope>FR3</scope><scope>FRNLG</scope><scope>FYUFA</scope><scope>F~G</scope><scope>GHDGH</scope><scope>GNUQQ</scope><scope>H97</scope><scope>HCIFZ</scope><scope>K60</scope><scope>K6~</scope><scope>K9.</scope><scope>KL.</scope><scope>L.-</scope><scope>L.G</scope><scope>M0C</scope><scope>M0S</scope><scope>M1P</scope><scope>M2P</scope><scope>M7N</scope><scope>P64</scope><scope>PATMY</scope><scope>PQBIZ</scope><scope>PQBZA</scope><scope>PQEST</scope><scope>PQQKQ</scope><scope>PQUKI</scope><scope>PYCSY</scope><scope>Q9U</scope><scope>SOI</scope><scope>7X8</scope><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0003-3793-4395</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0003-4880-2080</orcidid></search><sort><creationdate>20230601</creationdate><title>Risk assessment of ionizing radiation and radiological thresholds to compound an environmental baseline for the unconventional gas industry</title><author>Lima, G. F. C. ; Vasconcelos, D. C. ; De Carvalho Filho, C. A. ; Moreira, R. M. ; Almeida, P. H. C.</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c326t-5f0f3f68ab6ad258babad5a629571e0d1677421ecff9a9eb83012047debfde8a3</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2023</creationdate><topic>Atmospheric Protection/Air Quality Control/Air Pollution</topic><topic>Earth and Environmental Science</topic><topic>Ecology</topic><topic>Economic development</topic><topic>Ecotoxicology</topic><topic>Environment</topic><topic>Environmental Management</topic><topic>Environmental Monitoring</topic><topic>Environmental risk</topic><topic>Environmental science</topic><topic>Gas flow</topic><topic>Gas industry</topic><topic>Gas production</topic><topic>Gas seepage</topic><topic>Gas seepages</topic><topic>Groundwater</topic><topic>Health risks</topic><topic>Hydrocarbons</topic><topic>Ionizing radiation</topic><topic>Monitoring/Environmental Analysis</topic><topic>Natural Gas</topic><topic>Oil and Gas Fields</topic><topic>Oil and gas industries</topic><topic>Oil and gas industry</topic><topic>Oil and gas production</topic><topic>Probability distribution functions</topic><topic>Proportional counters</topic><topic>Radiation</topic><topic>Radiation, Ionizing</topic><topic>Radioactive materials</topic><topic>Risk Assessment</topic><topic>Surface water</topic><topic>Sustainability</topic><topic>Thresholds</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Lima, G. F. C.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Vasconcelos, D. C.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>De Carvalho Filho, C. A.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Moreira, R. M.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Almeida, P. H. C.</creatorcontrib><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Corporate)</collection><collection>Aqualine</collection><collection>Bacteriology Abstracts (Microbiology B)</collection><collection>Ecology Abstracts</collection><collection>Environment Abstracts</collection><collection>Industrial and Applied Microbiology Abstracts (Microbiology A)</collection><collection>Meteorological & Geoastrophysical Abstracts</collection><collection>Oceanic Abstracts</collection><collection>Toxicology Abstracts</collection><collection>Water Resources Abstracts</collection><collection>ABI/INFORM Collection</collection><collection>ABI/INFORM Global (PDF only)</collection><collection>ProQuest_Health & Medical Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>ABI/INFORM Collection</collection><collection>Medical Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Science Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Pharma Collection</collection><collection>Public Health Database (Proquest)</collection><collection>Technology Research Database</collection><collection>Hospital Premium Collection</collection><collection>Hospital Premium Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni) (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>ABI/INFORM Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Sustainability</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>Agricultural & Environmental Science Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Essentials</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>ProQuest Business Premium Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Natural Science Collection</collection><collection>Environmental Sciences and Pollution Management</collection><collection>ProQuest One Community College</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>ASFA: Aquatic Sciences and Fisheries Abstracts</collection><collection>Engineering Research Database</collection><collection>Business Premium Collection (Alumni)</collection><collection>Health Research Premium Collection</collection><collection>ABI/INFORM Global (Corporate)</collection><collection>Health Research Premium Collection (Alumni)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Student</collection><collection>Aquatic Science & Fisheries Abstracts (ASFA) 3: Aquatic Pollution & Environmental Quality</collection><collection>SciTech Premium Collection (Proquest) (PQ_SDU_P3)</collection><collection>ProQuest Business Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Business Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Health & Medical Complete (Alumni)</collection><collection>Meteorological & Geoastrophysical Abstracts - Academic</collection><collection>ABI/INFORM Professional Advanced</collection><collection>Aquatic Science & Fisheries Abstracts (ASFA) Professional</collection><collection>ABI/INFORM Global (ProQuest)</collection><collection>Health & Medical Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>PML(ProQuest Medical Library)</collection><collection>Science Journals (ProQuest Database)</collection><collection>Algology Mycology and Protozoology Abstracts (Microbiology C)</collection><collection>Biotechnology and BioEngineering Abstracts</collection><collection>Environmental Science Database</collection><collection>ProQuest One Business</collection><collection>ProQuest One Business (Alumni)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic Eastern Edition (DO NOT USE)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic UKI Edition</collection><collection>Environmental Science Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Basic</collection><collection>Environment Abstracts</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><jtitle>Environmental monitoring and assessment</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Lima, G. F. C.</au><au>Vasconcelos, D. C.</au><au>De Carvalho Filho, C. A.</au><au>Moreira, R. M.</au><au>Almeida, P. H. C.</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Risk assessment of ionizing radiation and radiological thresholds to compound an environmental baseline for the unconventional gas industry</atitle><jtitle>Environmental monitoring and assessment</jtitle><stitle>Environ Monit Assess</stitle><addtitle>Environ Monit Assess</addtitle><date>2023-06-01</date><risdate>2023</risdate><volume>195</volume><issue>6</issue><spage>707</spage><epage>707</epage><pages>707-707</pages><artnum>707</artnum><issn>0167-6369</issn><eissn>1573-2959</eissn><abstract>The exploration of unconventional hydrocarbons may be very effective in promoting economic development and confronting energy crisis around the world. However, the environmental risks associated with this practice might be an impediment if not adequately dimensioned. In this context, naturally occurring radioactive materials and ionizing radiation are sensitive aspects in the unconventional gas industry that may compromise the environmental sustainability of gas production and they should be properly monitored. This paper provides a radioecological assessment of the São Francisco Basin (Brazil) as part of an environmental baseline evaluation regarding the Brazilian potential for exploring its unconventional gas reserves. Eleven and thirteen samples of surface waters and groundwater were analyzed for gross alpha and beta using a gas flow proportional counter. A radiological background range was proposed using the ± 2 Median Absolute Deviation method. Using geoprocessing tools, the annual equivalent doses and lifetime cancer risk indexes were spatialized. Gross alpha and beta background thresholds in surface water ranged from 0.04–0.40 Bq L
−1
to 0.17–0.46 Bq L
−
, respectively. Groundwater radiological background varies from 0.006–0.81 Bq L
−1
to 0.06–0.72 Bq L
−1
for gross alpha and beta, respectively. All environmental indexes are relatively higher in the south of the basin, probably a direct response to the local volcanic formations. Traçadal fault and local gas seepages might also influence the gross alpha and beta distribution. All samples have radiological indexes below the environmental thresholds, and should remain at acceptable levels with the development of the unconventional gas industry in Brazil.</abstract><cop>Cham</cop><pub>Springer International Publishing</pub><pmid>37212929</pmid><doi>10.1007/s10661-023-11211-y</doi><tpages>1</tpages><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0003-3793-4395</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0003-4880-2080</orcidid></addata></record> |
| fulltext | fulltext |
| identifier | ISSN: 0167-6369 |
| ispartof | Environmental monitoring and assessment, 2023-06, Vol.195 (6), p.707-707, Article 707 |
| issn | 0167-6369 1573-2959 |
| language | eng |
| recordid | cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_2817776272 |
| source | MEDLINE; SpringerLink_现刊 |
| subjects | Atmospheric Protection/Air Quality Control/Air Pollution Earth and Environmental Science Ecology Economic development Ecotoxicology Environment Environmental Management Environmental Monitoring Environmental risk Environmental science Gas flow Gas industry Gas production Gas seepage Gas seepages Groundwater Health risks Hydrocarbons Ionizing radiation Monitoring/Environmental Analysis Natural Gas Oil and Gas Fields Oil and gas industries Oil and gas industry Oil and gas production Probability distribution functions Proportional counters Radiation Radiation, Ionizing Radioactive materials Risk Assessment Surface water Sustainability Thresholds |
| title | Risk assessment of ionizing radiation and radiological thresholds to compound an environmental baseline for the unconventional gas industry |
| url | https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-07T14%3A08%3A01IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Risk%20assessment%20of%20ionizing%20radiation%20and%20radiological%20thresholds%20to%20compound%20an%20environmental%20baseline%20for%20the%20unconventional%20gas%20industry&rft.jtitle=Environmental%20monitoring%20and%20assessment&rft.au=Lima,%20G.%20F.%20C.&rft.date=2023-06-01&rft.volume=195&rft.issue=6&rft.spage=707&rft.epage=707&rft.pages=707-707&rft.artnum=707&rft.issn=0167-6369&rft.eissn=1573-2959&rft_id=info:doi/10.1007/s10661-023-11211-y&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E2817229137%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=2817229137&rft_id=info:pmid/37212929&rfr_iscdi=true |