Time on task and task load in visual inspection: A four-month field study with X-ray baggage screeners

Previous studies suggest that performance in visual inspection and typical vigilance tasks depend on time on task and task load. European regulation mandates that security officers (screeners) take a break or change tasks after 20 min of X-ray baggage screening. However, longer screening durations c...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Applied ergonomics 2023-09, Vol.111, p.103995-103995, Article 103995
Hauptverfasser: Buser, D., Schwaninger, A., Sauer, J., Sterchi, Y.
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page 103995
container_issue
container_start_page 103995
container_title Applied ergonomics
container_volume 111
creator Buser, D.
Schwaninger, A.
Sauer, J.
Sterchi, Y.
description Previous studies suggest that performance in visual inspection and typical vigilance tasks depend on time on task and task load. European regulation mandates that security officers (screeners) take a break or change tasks after 20 min of X-ray baggage screening. However, longer screening durations could reduce staffing challenges. We investigated the effects of time on task and task load on visual inspection performance in a four-month field study with screeners. At an international airport, 22 screeners inspected X-ray images of cabin baggage for up to 60 min, while a control group (N = 19) screened for 20 min. Hit rate remained stable for low and average task loads. However, when the task load was high, the screeners compensated by speeding up X-ray image inspection at the expense of the hit rate over time on task. Our results support the dynamic-allocation resource theory. Moreover, extending the permitted screening duration to 30 or 40 min should be considered. •Detection (hit rate) remained stable over time for low and average task loads.•High task load is compensated by increasing efficiency at the expense of detection.•Screeners differed in their performance and in preferences for screening durations.•Longer, more flexible screening durations were associated with higher engagement.•Extending screening duration to 30 or 40 min should be considered.
doi_str_mv 10.1016/j.apergo.2023.103995
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_2816765045</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><els_id>S0003687023000339</els_id><sourcerecordid>2816765045</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c408t-b7363e614d81bb225ab1170ff3d58d8c39f27c1e75f5b9c1b6b1179850d2940a3</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp9kE1P3DAQhi3UChbKP0CVj71k8UccOz1UQogvCYkLlXqzHHu8eJvEWzsB7b_Hq9Aee5qZd96Z0TwIXVCypoQ2l9u12UHaxDUjjBeJt604QiuqJKtayppPaEUI4VWjJDlBpzlvS6lqKo7RCZeMSMH4CvnnMACOI55M_o3N6Jakj8bhMOLXkGfTlyzvwE4hjt_xFfZxTtUQx-kF-wC9w3ma3R6_hSL8qpLZ485sNmYDONsEMELKX9Bnb_oM5x_xDP28vXm-vq8en-4erq8eK1sTNVWd5A2HhtZO0a5jTJiOUkm8504opyxvPZOWghRedK2lXXPot0oQx9qaGH6Gvi17dyn-mSFPegjZQt-bEeKcNVO0kY0gtSjWerHaFHNO4PUuhcGkvaZEHwjrrV4I6wNhvRAuY18_LszdAO7f0F-kxfBjMUD58zVA0tkGGC24kApD7WL4_4V3aeqN0w</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>2816765045</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Time on task and task load in visual inspection: A four-month field study with X-ray baggage screeners</title><source>Access via ScienceDirect (Elsevier)</source><creator>Buser, D. ; Schwaninger, A. ; Sauer, J. ; Sterchi, Y.</creator><creatorcontrib>Buser, D. ; Schwaninger, A. ; Sauer, J. ; Sterchi, Y.</creatorcontrib><description>Previous studies suggest that performance in visual inspection and typical vigilance tasks depend on time on task and task load. European regulation mandates that security officers (screeners) take a break or change tasks after 20 min of X-ray baggage screening. However, longer screening durations could reduce staffing challenges. We investigated the effects of time on task and task load on visual inspection performance in a four-month field study with screeners. At an international airport, 22 screeners inspected X-ray images of cabin baggage for up to 60 min, while a control group (N = 19) screened for 20 min. Hit rate remained stable for low and average task loads. However, when the task load was high, the screeners compensated by speeding up X-ray image inspection at the expense of the hit rate over time on task. Our results support the dynamic-allocation resource theory. Moreover, extending the permitted screening duration to 30 or 40 min should be considered. •Detection (hit rate) remained stable over time for low and average task loads.•High task load is compensated by increasing efficiency at the expense of detection.•Screeners differed in their performance and in preferences for screening durations.•Longer, more flexible screening durations were associated with higher engagement.•Extending screening duration to 30 or 40 min should be considered.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0003-6870</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1872-9126</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1016/j.apergo.2023.103995</identifier><identifier>PMID: 37207523</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>England: Elsevier Ltd</publisher><subject>Time on task ; Visual search ; X-ray image inspection</subject><ispartof>Applied ergonomics, 2023-09, Vol.111, p.103995-103995, Article 103995</ispartof><rights>2023 The Authors</rights><rights>Copyright © 2023 The Authors. Published by Elsevier Ltd.. All rights reserved.</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c408t-b7363e614d81bb225ab1170ff3d58d8c39f27c1e75f5b9c1b6b1179850d2940a3</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c408t-b7363e614d81bb225ab1170ff3d58d8c39f27c1e75f5b9c1b6b1179850d2940a3</cites><orcidid>0000-0002-7656-182X</orcidid></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.apergo.2023.103995$$EHTML$$P50$$Gelsevier$$Hfree_for_read</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,780,784,3550,27924,27925,45995</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37207523$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Buser, D.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Schwaninger, A.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Sauer, J.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Sterchi, Y.</creatorcontrib><title>Time on task and task load in visual inspection: A four-month field study with X-ray baggage screeners</title><title>Applied ergonomics</title><addtitle>Appl Ergon</addtitle><description>Previous studies suggest that performance in visual inspection and typical vigilance tasks depend on time on task and task load. European regulation mandates that security officers (screeners) take a break or change tasks after 20 min of X-ray baggage screening. However, longer screening durations could reduce staffing challenges. We investigated the effects of time on task and task load on visual inspection performance in a four-month field study with screeners. At an international airport, 22 screeners inspected X-ray images of cabin baggage for up to 60 min, while a control group (N = 19) screened for 20 min. Hit rate remained stable for low and average task loads. However, when the task load was high, the screeners compensated by speeding up X-ray image inspection at the expense of the hit rate over time on task. Our results support the dynamic-allocation resource theory. Moreover, extending the permitted screening duration to 30 or 40 min should be considered. •Detection (hit rate) remained stable over time for low and average task loads.•High task load is compensated by increasing efficiency at the expense of detection.•Screeners differed in their performance and in preferences for screening durations.•Longer, more flexible screening durations were associated with higher engagement.•Extending screening duration to 30 or 40 min should be considered.</description><subject>Time on task</subject><subject>Visual search</subject><subject>X-ray image inspection</subject><issn>0003-6870</issn><issn>1872-9126</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2023</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><recordid>eNp9kE1P3DAQhi3UChbKP0CVj71k8UccOz1UQogvCYkLlXqzHHu8eJvEWzsB7b_Hq9Aee5qZd96Z0TwIXVCypoQ2l9u12UHaxDUjjBeJt604QiuqJKtayppPaEUI4VWjJDlBpzlvS6lqKo7RCZeMSMH4CvnnMACOI55M_o3N6Jakj8bhMOLXkGfTlyzvwE4hjt_xFfZxTtUQx-kF-wC9w3ma3R6_hSL8qpLZ485sNmYDONsEMELKX9Bnb_oM5x_xDP28vXm-vq8en-4erq8eK1sTNVWd5A2HhtZO0a5jTJiOUkm8504opyxvPZOWghRedK2lXXPot0oQx9qaGH6Gvi17dyn-mSFPegjZQt-bEeKcNVO0kY0gtSjWerHaFHNO4PUuhcGkvaZEHwjrrV4I6wNhvRAuY18_LszdAO7f0F-kxfBjMUD58zVA0tkGGC24kApD7WL4_4V3aeqN0w</recordid><startdate>202309</startdate><enddate>202309</enddate><creator>Buser, D.</creator><creator>Schwaninger, A.</creator><creator>Sauer, J.</creator><creator>Sterchi, Y.</creator><general>Elsevier Ltd</general><scope>6I.</scope><scope>AAFTH</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7X8</scope><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-7656-182X</orcidid></search><sort><creationdate>202309</creationdate><title>Time on task and task load in visual inspection: A four-month field study with X-ray baggage screeners</title><author>Buser, D. ; Schwaninger, A. ; Sauer, J. ; Sterchi, Y.</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c408t-b7363e614d81bb225ab1170ff3d58d8c39f27c1e75f5b9c1b6b1179850d2940a3</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2023</creationdate><topic>Time on task</topic><topic>Visual search</topic><topic>X-ray image inspection</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Buser, D.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Schwaninger, A.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Sauer, J.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Sterchi, Y.</creatorcontrib><collection>ScienceDirect Open Access Titles</collection><collection>Elsevier:ScienceDirect:Open Access</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><jtitle>Applied ergonomics</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Buser, D.</au><au>Schwaninger, A.</au><au>Sauer, J.</au><au>Sterchi, Y.</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Time on task and task load in visual inspection: A four-month field study with X-ray baggage screeners</atitle><jtitle>Applied ergonomics</jtitle><addtitle>Appl Ergon</addtitle><date>2023-09</date><risdate>2023</risdate><volume>111</volume><spage>103995</spage><epage>103995</epage><pages>103995-103995</pages><artnum>103995</artnum><issn>0003-6870</issn><eissn>1872-9126</eissn><abstract>Previous studies suggest that performance in visual inspection and typical vigilance tasks depend on time on task and task load. European regulation mandates that security officers (screeners) take a break or change tasks after 20 min of X-ray baggage screening. However, longer screening durations could reduce staffing challenges. We investigated the effects of time on task and task load on visual inspection performance in a four-month field study with screeners. At an international airport, 22 screeners inspected X-ray images of cabin baggage for up to 60 min, while a control group (N = 19) screened for 20 min. Hit rate remained stable for low and average task loads. However, when the task load was high, the screeners compensated by speeding up X-ray image inspection at the expense of the hit rate over time on task. Our results support the dynamic-allocation resource theory. Moreover, extending the permitted screening duration to 30 or 40 min should be considered. •Detection (hit rate) remained stable over time for low and average task loads.•High task load is compensated by increasing efficiency at the expense of detection.•Screeners differed in their performance and in preferences for screening durations.•Longer, more flexible screening durations were associated with higher engagement.•Extending screening duration to 30 or 40 min should be considered.</abstract><cop>England</cop><pub>Elsevier Ltd</pub><pmid>37207523</pmid><doi>10.1016/j.apergo.2023.103995</doi><tpages>1</tpages><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-7656-182X</orcidid><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 0003-6870
ispartof Applied ergonomics, 2023-09, Vol.111, p.103995-103995, Article 103995
issn 0003-6870
1872-9126
language eng
recordid cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_2816765045
source Access via ScienceDirect (Elsevier)
subjects Time on task
Visual search
X-ray image inspection
title Time on task and task load in visual inspection: A four-month field study with X-ray baggage screeners
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2024-12-26T18%3A52%3A44IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Time%20on%20task%20and%20task%20load%20in%20visual%20inspection:%20A%20four-month%20field%20study%20with%20X-ray%20baggage%20screeners&rft.jtitle=Applied%20ergonomics&rft.au=Buser,%20D.&rft.date=2023-09&rft.volume=111&rft.spage=103995&rft.epage=103995&rft.pages=103995-103995&rft.artnum=103995&rft.issn=0003-6870&rft.eissn=1872-9126&rft_id=info:doi/10.1016/j.apergo.2023.103995&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E2816765045%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=2816765045&rft_id=info:pmid/37207523&rft_els_id=S0003687023000339&rfr_iscdi=true