Time on task and task load in visual inspection: A four-month field study with X-ray baggage screeners
Previous studies suggest that performance in visual inspection and typical vigilance tasks depend on time on task and task load. European regulation mandates that security officers (screeners) take a break or change tasks after 20 min of X-ray baggage screening. However, longer screening durations c...
Gespeichert in:
Veröffentlicht in: | Applied ergonomics 2023-09, Vol.111, p.103995-103995, Article 103995 |
---|---|
Hauptverfasser: | , , , |
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | eng |
Schlagworte: | |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
container_end_page | 103995 |
---|---|
container_issue | |
container_start_page | 103995 |
container_title | Applied ergonomics |
container_volume | 111 |
creator | Buser, D. Schwaninger, A. Sauer, J. Sterchi, Y. |
description | Previous studies suggest that performance in visual inspection and typical vigilance tasks depend on time on task and task load. European regulation mandates that security officers (screeners) take a break or change tasks after 20 min of X-ray baggage screening. However, longer screening durations could reduce staffing challenges. We investigated the effects of time on task and task load on visual inspection performance in a four-month field study with screeners. At an international airport, 22 screeners inspected X-ray images of cabin baggage for up to 60 min, while a control group (N = 19) screened for 20 min. Hit rate remained stable for low and average task loads. However, when the task load was high, the screeners compensated by speeding up X-ray image inspection at the expense of the hit rate over time on task. Our results support the dynamic-allocation resource theory. Moreover, extending the permitted screening duration to 30 or 40 min should be considered.
•Detection (hit rate) remained stable over time for low and average task loads.•High task load is compensated by increasing efficiency at the expense of detection.•Screeners differed in their performance and in preferences for screening durations.•Longer, more flexible screening durations were associated with higher engagement.•Extending screening duration to 30 or 40 min should be considered. |
doi_str_mv | 10.1016/j.apergo.2023.103995 |
format | Article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_2816765045</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><els_id>S0003687023000339</els_id><sourcerecordid>2816765045</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c408t-b7363e614d81bb225ab1170ff3d58d8c39f27c1e75f5b9c1b6b1179850d2940a3</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp9kE1P3DAQhi3UChbKP0CVj71k8UccOz1UQogvCYkLlXqzHHu8eJvEWzsB7b_Hq9Aee5qZd96Z0TwIXVCypoQ2l9u12UHaxDUjjBeJt604QiuqJKtayppPaEUI4VWjJDlBpzlvS6lqKo7RCZeMSMH4CvnnMACOI55M_o3N6Jakj8bhMOLXkGfTlyzvwE4hjt_xFfZxTtUQx-kF-wC9w3ma3R6_hSL8qpLZ485sNmYDONsEMELKX9Bnb_oM5x_xDP28vXm-vq8en-4erq8eK1sTNVWd5A2HhtZO0a5jTJiOUkm8504opyxvPZOWghRedK2lXXPot0oQx9qaGH6Gvi17dyn-mSFPegjZQt-bEeKcNVO0kY0gtSjWerHaFHNO4PUuhcGkvaZEHwjrrV4I6wNhvRAuY18_LszdAO7f0F-kxfBjMUD58zVA0tkGGC24kApD7WL4_4V3aeqN0w</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>2816765045</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Time on task and task load in visual inspection: A four-month field study with X-ray baggage screeners</title><source>Access via ScienceDirect (Elsevier)</source><creator>Buser, D. ; Schwaninger, A. ; Sauer, J. ; Sterchi, Y.</creator><creatorcontrib>Buser, D. ; Schwaninger, A. ; Sauer, J. ; Sterchi, Y.</creatorcontrib><description>Previous studies suggest that performance in visual inspection and typical vigilance tasks depend on time on task and task load. European regulation mandates that security officers (screeners) take a break or change tasks after 20 min of X-ray baggage screening. However, longer screening durations could reduce staffing challenges. We investigated the effects of time on task and task load on visual inspection performance in a four-month field study with screeners. At an international airport, 22 screeners inspected X-ray images of cabin baggage for up to 60 min, while a control group (N = 19) screened for 20 min. Hit rate remained stable for low and average task loads. However, when the task load was high, the screeners compensated by speeding up X-ray image inspection at the expense of the hit rate over time on task. Our results support the dynamic-allocation resource theory. Moreover, extending the permitted screening duration to 30 or 40 min should be considered.
•Detection (hit rate) remained stable over time for low and average task loads.•High task load is compensated by increasing efficiency at the expense of detection.•Screeners differed in their performance and in preferences for screening durations.•Longer, more flexible screening durations were associated with higher engagement.•Extending screening duration to 30 or 40 min should be considered.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0003-6870</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1872-9126</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1016/j.apergo.2023.103995</identifier><identifier>PMID: 37207523</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>England: Elsevier Ltd</publisher><subject>Time on task ; Visual search ; X-ray image inspection</subject><ispartof>Applied ergonomics, 2023-09, Vol.111, p.103995-103995, Article 103995</ispartof><rights>2023 The Authors</rights><rights>Copyright © 2023 The Authors. Published by Elsevier Ltd.. All rights reserved.</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c408t-b7363e614d81bb225ab1170ff3d58d8c39f27c1e75f5b9c1b6b1179850d2940a3</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c408t-b7363e614d81bb225ab1170ff3d58d8c39f27c1e75f5b9c1b6b1179850d2940a3</cites><orcidid>0000-0002-7656-182X</orcidid></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.apergo.2023.103995$$EHTML$$P50$$Gelsevier$$Hfree_for_read</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,780,784,3550,27924,27925,45995</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37207523$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Buser, D.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Schwaninger, A.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Sauer, J.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Sterchi, Y.</creatorcontrib><title>Time on task and task load in visual inspection: A four-month field study with X-ray baggage screeners</title><title>Applied ergonomics</title><addtitle>Appl Ergon</addtitle><description>Previous studies suggest that performance in visual inspection and typical vigilance tasks depend on time on task and task load. European regulation mandates that security officers (screeners) take a break or change tasks after 20 min of X-ray baggage screening. However, longer screening durations could reduce staffing challenges. We investigated the effects of time on task and task load on visual inspection performance in a four-month field study with screeners. At an international airport, 22 screeners inspected X-ray images of cabin baggage for up to 60 min, while a control group (N = 19) screened for 20 min. Hit rate remained stable for low and average task loads. However, when the task load was high, the screeners compensated by speeding up X-ray image inspection at the expense of the hit rate over time on task. Our results support the dynamic-allocation resource theory. Moreover, extending the permitted screening duration to 30 or 40 min should be considered.
•Detection (hit rate) remained stable over time for low and average task loads.•High task load is compensated by increasing efficiency at the expense of detection.•Screeners differed in their performance and in preferences for screening durations.•Longer, more flexible screening durations were associated with higher engagement.•Extending screening duration to 30 or 40 min should be considered.</description><subject>Time on task</subject><subject>Visual search</subject><subject>X-ray image inspection</subject><issn>0003-6870</issn><issn>1872-9126</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2023</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><recordid>eNp9kE1P3DAQhi3UChbKP0CVj71k8UccOz1UQogvCYkLlXqzHHu8eJvEWzsB7b_Hq9Aee5qZd96Z0TwIXVCypoQ2l9u12UHaxDUjjBeJt604QiuqJKtayppPaEUI4VWjJDlBpzlvS6lqKo7RCZeMSMH4CvnnMACOI55M_o3N6Jakj8bhMOLXkGfTlyzvwE4hjt_xFfZxTtUQx-kF-wC9w3ma3R6_hSL8qpLZ485sNmYDONsEMELKX9Bnb_oM5x_xDP28vXm-vq8en-4erq8eK1sTNVWd5A2HhtZO0a5jTJiOUkm8504opyxvPZOWghRedK2lXXPot0oQx9qaGH6Gvi17dyn-mSFPegjZQt-bEeKcNVO0kY0gtSjWerHaFHNO4PUuhcGkvaZEHwjrrV4I6wNhvRAuY18_LszdAO7f0F-kxfBjMUD58zVA0tkGGC24kApD7WL4_4V3aeqN0w</recordid><startdate>202309</startdate><enddate>202309</enddate><creator>Buser, D.</creator><creator>Schwaninger, A.</creator><creator>Sauer, J.</creator><creator>Sterchi, Y.</creator><general>Elsevier Ltd</general><scope>6I.</scope><scope>AAFTH</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7X8</scope><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-7656-182X</orcidid></search><sort><creationdate>202309</creationdate><title>Time on task and task load in visual inspection: A four-month field study with X-ray baggage screeners</title><author>Buser, D. ; Schwaninger, A. ; Sauer, J. ; Sterchi, Y.</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c408t-b7363e614d81bb225ab1170ff3d58d8c39f27c1e75f5b9c1b6b1179850d2940a3</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2023</creationdate><topic>Time on task</topic><topic>Visual search</topic><topic>X-ray image inspection</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Buser, D.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Schwaninger, A.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Sauer, J.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Sterchi, Y.</creatorcontrib><collection>ScienceDirect Open Access Titles</collection><collection>Elsevier:ScienceDirect:Open Access</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><jtitle>Applied ergonomics</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Buser, D.</au><au>Schwaninger, A.</au><au>Sauer, J.</au><au>Sterchi, Y.</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Time on task and task load in visual inspection: A four-month field study with X-ray baggage screeners</atitle><jtitle>Applied ergonomics</jtitle><addtitle>Appl Ergon</addtitle><date>2023-09</date><risdate>2023</risdate><volume>111</volume><spage>103995</spage><epage>103995</epage><pages>103995-103995</pages><artnum>103995</artnum><issn>0003-6870</issn><eissn>1872-9126</eissn><abstract>Previous studies suggest that performance in visual inspection and typical vigilance tasks depend on time on task and task load. European regulation mandates that security officers (screeners) take a break or change tasks after 20 min of X-ray baggage screening. However, longer screening durations could reduce staffing challenges. We investigated the effects of time on task and task load on visual inspection performance in a four-month field study with screeners. At an international airport, 22 screeners inspected X-ray images of cabin baggage for up to 60 min, while a control group (N = 19) screened for 20 min. Hit rate remained stable for low and average task loads. However, when the task load was high, the screeners compensated by speeding up X-ray image inspection at the expense of the hit rate over time on task. Our results support the dynamic-allocation resource theory. Moreover, extending the permitted screening duration to 30 or 40 min should be considered.
•Detection (hit rate) remained stable over time for low and average task loads.•High task load is compensated by increasing efficiency at the expense of detection.•Screeners differed in their performance and in preferences for screening durations.•Longer, more flexible screening durations were associated with higher engagement.•Extending screening duration to 30 or 40 min should be considered.</abstract><cop>England</cop><pub>Elsevier Ltd</pub><pmid>37207523</pmid><doi>10.1016/j.apergo.2023.103995</doi><tpages>1</tpages><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-7656-182X</orcidid><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | ISSN: 0003-6870 |
ispartof | Applied ergonomics, 2023-09, Vol.111, p.103995-103995, Article 103995 |
issn | 0003-6870 1872-9126 |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_2816765045 |
source | Access via ScienceDirect (Elsevier) |
subjects | Time on task Visual search X-ray image inspection |
title | Time on task and task load in visual inspection: A four-month field study with X-ray baggage screeners |
url | https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2024-12-26T18%3A52%3A44IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Time%20on%20task%20and%20task%20load%20in%20visual%20inspection:%20A%20four-month%20field%20study%20with%20X-ray%20baggage%20screeners&rft.jtitle=Applied%20ergonomics&rft.au=Buser,%20D.&rft.date=2023-09&rft.volume=111&rft.spage=103995&rft.epage=103995&rft.pages=103995-103995&rft.artnum=103995&rft.issn=0003-6870&rft.eissn=1872-9126&rft_id=info:doi/10.1016/j.apergo.2023.103995&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E2816765045%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=2816765045&rft_id=info:pmid/37207523&rft_els_id=S0003687023000339&rfr_iscdi=true |