Intraoperative computed tomography for orbital reconstruction: a systematic review

Orbital reconstruction is a common procedure with inherent challenges and important consequences. Intraoperative use of computed tomography (CT) is an emerging application that facilitates accurate intraoperative evaluation to improve clinical outcomes. The aim of this review was to investigate the...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:International journal of oral and maxillofacial surgery 2024-02, Vol.53 (2), p.127-132
Hauptverfasser: Goh, Elizabeth Z., Bullis, Sam, Beech, Nicholas, Johnson, Nigel R.
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page 132
container_issue 2
container_start_page 127
container_title International journal of oral and maxillofacial surgery
container_volume 53
creator Goh, Elizabeth Z.
Bullis, Sam
Beech, Nicholas
Johnson, Nigel R.
description Orbital reconstruction is a common procedure with inherent challenges and important consequences. Intraoperative use of computed tomography (CT) is an emerging application that facilitates accurate intraoperative evaluation to improve clinical outcomes. The aim of this review was to investigate the intraoperative and postoperative outcomes of intraoperative CT use in orbital reconstruction. The PubMed and Scopus databases were systematically searched. Inclusion criteria were clinical studies investigating intraoperative CT use in orbital reconstruction. Exclusion criteria were duplicates, non-English publications, non-full-text publications, and studies with insufficient data. Of the 1022 articles identified, seven eligible articles representing 256 cases were included. The mean age was 39 years. Most cases were male (69.9% male, 30.1% female). Regarding intraoperative outcomes, the mean revision rate was 34.1%, with plate repositioning being the most common type (51.1%). The intraoperative time was variably reported. With regards to postoperative outcomes, there were no revisions, and only one case had a complication (transient exophthalmos). The mean volumetric difference between the repaired and contralateral orbits was reported in two studies. The findings of this review present an updated evidence-based summary of the intraoperative and postoperative outcomes of intraoperative CT use in orbital reconstruction. Robust longitudinal comparisons of clinical outcomes between intraoperative and non-intraoperative CT cases are required.
doi_str_mv 10.1016/j.ijom.2023.05.002
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_2816762374</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><els_id>S0901502723001066</els_id><sourcerecordid>2816762374</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c356t-6a634a360cf95a1ac7ae2356e6bb14d3b3a3ae5cd62c474978475c5116e1f0953</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp9kM1q3DAUhUVoSKZJXqCL4mU3dq4kSxqHbsqQtIGBQEjWQpavE5mx5Uhyyrx9NUzaZVf3wvmB8xHyhUJFgcrroXKDHysGjFcgKgB2QlaUN02ZX_hEVtAALQUwdU4-xzgAQMPX6oycc8VgzVSzIo_3UwrGzxhMcu9YWD_OS8KuSH70L8HMr_ui96HwoXXJ7IqA1k8xhcUm56ebwhRxHxOOOW2z-O7w9yU57c0u4tXHvSDPd7dPm1_l9uHn_ebHtrRcyFRKI3ltuATbN8JQY5VBlhWUbUvrjrfccIPCdpLZWtWNWtdKWEGpRNpDI_gF-XbsnYN_WzAmPbpocbczE_olaramUknGVZ2t7Gi1wccYsNdzcKMJe01BH1jqQR9Y6gNLDUJngDn09aN_aUfs_kX-wsuG70cD5pV5edDROpwsdi5jSrrz7n_9fwB83Iah</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>2816762374</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Intraoperative computed tomography for orbital reconstruction: a systematic review</title><source>MEDLINE</source><source>Elsevier ScienceDirect Journals Complete</source><creator>Goh, Elizabeth Z. ; Bullis, Sam ; Beech, Nicholas ; Johnson, Nigel R.</creator><creatorcontrib>Goh, Elizabeth Z. ; Bullis, Sam ; Beech, Nicholas ; Johnson, Nigel R.</creatorcontrib><description>Orbital reconstruction is a common procedure with inherent challenges and important consequences. Intraoperative use of computed tomography (CT) is an emerging application that facilitates accurate intraoperative evaluation to improve clinical outcomes. The aim of this review was to investigate the intraoperative and postoperative outcomes of intraoperative CT use in orbital reconstruction. The PubMed and Scopus databases were systematically searched. Inclusion criteria were clinical studies investigating intraoperative CT use in orbital reconstruction. Exclusion criteria were duplicates, non-English publications, non-full-text publications, and studies with insufficient data. Of the 1022 articles identified, seven eligible articles representing 256 cases were included. The mean age was 39 years. Most cases were male (69.9% male, 30.1% female). Regarding intraoperative outcomes, the mean revision rate was 34.1%, with plate repositioning being the most common type (51.1%). The intraoperative time was variably reported. With regards to postoperative outcomes, there were no revisions, and only one case had a complication (transient exophthalmos). The mean volumetric difference between the repaired and contralateral orbits was reported in two studies. The findings of this review present an updated evidence-based summary of the intraoperative and postoperative outcomes of intraoperative CT use in orbital reconstruction. Robust longitudinal comparisons of clinical outcomes between intraoperative and non-intraoperative CT cases are required.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0901-5027</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1399-0020</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1016/j.ijom.2023.05.002</identifier><identifier>PMID: 37208279</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Denmark: Elsevier Inc</publisher><subject>Adult ; cone-beam computed tomography ; Exophthalmos ; Female ; Humans ; Male ; operative time ; Orbit - diagnostic imaging ; Orbit - surgery ; orbital fractures ; Orbital Fractures - surgery ; postoperative complications ; Postoperative Period ; reoperation ; Retrospective Studies ; Tomography, X-Ray Computed - methods</subject><ispartof>International journal of oral and maxillofacial surgery, 2024-02, Vol.53 (2), p.127-132</ispartof><rights>2023</rights><rights>Copyright © 2023 International Association of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgeons. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c356t-6a634a360cf95a1ac7ae2356e6bb14d3b3a3ae5cd62c474978475c5116e1f0953</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c356t-6a634a360cf95a1ac7ae2356e6bb14d3b3a3ae5cd62c474978475c5116e1f0953</cites><orcidid>0009-0008-1953-7752 ; 0000-0003-3843-0252</orcidid></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.ijom.2023.05.002$$EHTML$$P50$$Gelsevier$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,780,784,3550,27924,27925,45995</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37208279$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Goh, Elizabeth Z.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Bullis, Sam</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Beech, Nicholas</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Johnson, Nigel R.</creatorcontrib><title>Intraoperative computed tomography for orbital reconstruction: a systematic review</title><title>International journal of oral and maxillofacial surgery</title><addtitle>Int J Oral Maxillofac Surg</addtitle><description>Orbital reconstruction is a common procedure with inherent challenges and important consequences. Intraoperative use of computed tomography (CT) is an emerging application that facilitates accurate intraoperative evaluation to improve clinical outcomes. The aim of this review was to investigate the intraoperative and postoperative outcomes of intraoperative CT use in orbital reconstruction. The PubMed and Scopus databases were systematically searched. Inclusion criteria were clinical studies investigating intraoperative CT use in orbital reconstruction. Exclusion criteria were duplicates, non-English publications, non-full-text publications, and studies with insufficient data. Of the 1022 articles identified, seven eligible articles representing 256 cases were included. The mean age was 39 years. Most cases were male (69.9% male, 30.1% female). Regarding intraoperative outcomes, the mean revision rate was 34.1%, with plate repositioning being the most common type (51.1%). The intraoperative time was variably reported. With regards to postoperative outcomes, there were no revisions, and only one case had a complication (transient exophthalmos). The mean volumetric difference between the repaired and contralateral orbits was reported in two studies. The findings of this review present an updated evidence-based summary of the intraoperative and postoperative outcomes of intraoperative CT use in orbital reconstruction. Robust longitudinal comparisons of clinical outcomes between intraoperative and non-intraoperative CT cases are required.</description><subject>Adult</subject><subject>cone-beam computed tomography</subject><subject>Exophthalmos</subject><subject>Female</subject><subject>Humans</subject><subject>Male</subject><subject>operative time</subject><subject>Orbit - diagnostic imaging</subject><subject>Orbit - surgery</subject><subject>orbital fractures</subject><subject>Orbital Fractures - surgery</subject><subject>postoperative complications</subject><subject>Postoperative Period</subject><subject>reoperation</subject><subject>Retrospective Studies</subject><subject>Tomography, X-Ray Computed - methods</subject><issn>0901-5027</issn><issn>1399-0020</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2024</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>EIF</sourceid><recordid>eNp9kM1q3DAUhUVoSKZJXqCL4mU3dq4kSxqHbsqQtIGBQEjWQpavE5mx5Uhyyrx9NUzaZVf3wvmB8xHyhUJFgcrroXKDHysGjFcgKgB2QlaUN02ZX_hEVtAALQUwdU4-xzgAQMPX6oycc8VgzVSzIo_3UwrGzxhMcu9YWD_OS8KuSH70L8HMr_ui96HwoXXJ7IqA1k8xhcUm56ebwhRxHxOOOW2z-O7w9yU57c0u4tXHvSDPd7dPm1_l9uHn_ebHtrRcyFRKI3ltuATbN8JQY5VBlhWUbUvrjrfccIPCdpLZWtWNWtdKWEGpRNpDI_gF-XbsnYN_WzAmPbpocbczE_olaramUknGVZ2t7Gi1wccYsNdzcKMJe01BH1jqQR9Y6gNLDUJngDn09aN_aUfs_kX-wsuG70cD5pV5edDROpwsdi5jSrrz7n_9fwB83Iah</recordid><startdate>20240201</startdate><enddate>20240201</enddate><creator>Goh, Elizabeth Z.</creator><creator>Bullis, Sam</creator><creator>Beech, Nicholas</creator><creator>Johnson, Nigel R.</creator><general>Elsevier Inc</general><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7X8</scope><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0009-0008-1953-7752</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0003-3843-0252</orcidid></search><sort><creationdate>20240201</creationdate><title>Intraoperative computed tomography for orbital reconstruction: a systematic review</title><author>Goh, Elizabeth Z. ; Bullis, Sam ; Beech, Nicholas ; Johnson, Nigel R.</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c356t-6a634a360cf95a1ac7ae2356e6bb14d3b3a3ae5cd62c474978475c5116e1f0953</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2024</creationdate><topic>Adult</topic><topic>cone-beam computed tomography</topic><topic>Exophthalmos</topic><topic>Female</topic><topic>Humans</topic><topic>Male</topic><topic>operative time</topic><topic>Orbit - diagnostic imaging</topic><topic>Orbit - surgery</topic><topic>orbital fractures</topic><topic>Orbital Fractures - surgery</topic><topic>postoperative complications</topic><topic>Postoperative Period</topic><topic>reoperation</topic><topic>Retrospective Studies</topic><topic>Tomography, X-Ray Computed - methods</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Goh, Elizabeth Z.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Bullis, Sam</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Beech, Nicholas</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Johnson, Nigel R.</creatorcontrib><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><jtitle>International journal of oral and maxillofacial surgery</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Goh, Elizabeth Z.</au><au>Bullis, Sam</au><au>Beech, Nicholas</au><au>Johnson, Nigel R.</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Intraoperative computed tomography for orbital reconstruction: a systematic review</atitle><jtitle>International journal of oral and maxillofacial surgery</jtitle><addtitle>Int J Oral Maxillofac Surg</addtitle><date>2024-02-01</date><risdate>2024</risdate><volume>53</volume><issue>2</issue><spage>127</spage><epage>132</epage><pages>127-132</pages><issn>0901-5027</issn><eissn>1399-0020</eissn><abstract>Orbital reconstruction is a common procedure with inherent challenges and important consequences. Intraoperative use of computed tomography (CT) is an emerging application that facilitates accurate intraoperative evaluation to improve clinical outcomes. The aim of this review was to investigate the intraoperative and postoperative outcomes of intraoperative CT use in orbital reconstruction. The PubMed and Scopus databases were systematically searched. Inclusion criteria were clinical studies investigating intraoperative CT use in orbital reconstruction. Exclusion criteria were duplicates, non-English publications, non-full-text publications, and studies with insufficient data. Of the 1022 articles identified, seven eligible articles representing 256 cases were included. The mean age was 39 years. Most cases were male (69.9% male, 30.1% female). Regarding intraoperative outcomes, the mean revision rate was 34.1%, with plate repositioning being the most common type (51.1%). The intraoperative time was variably reported. With regards to postoperative outcomes, there were no revisions, and only one case had a complication (transient exophthalmos). The mean volumetric difference between the repaired and contralateral orbits was reported in two studies. The findings of this review present an updated evidence-based summary of the intraoperative and postoperative outcomes of intraoperative CT use in orbital reconstruction. Robust longitudinal comparisons of clinical outcomes between intraoperative and non-intraoperative CT cases are required.</abstract><cop>Denmark</cop><pub>Elsevier Inc</pub><pmid>37208279</pmid><doi>10.1016/j.ijom.2023.05.002</doi><tpages>6</tpages><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0009-0008-1953-7752</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0003-3843-0252</orcidid></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 0901-5027
ispartof International journal of oral and maxillofacial surgery, 2024-02, Vol.53 (2), p.127-132
issn 0901-5027
1399-0020
language eng
recordid cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_2816762374
source MEDLINE; Elsevier ScienceDirect Journals Complete
subjects Adult
cone-beam computed tomography
Exophthalmos
Female
Humans
Male
operative time
Orbit - diagnostic imaging
Orbit - surgery
orbital fractures
Orbital Fractures - surgery
postoperative complications
Postoperative Period
reoperation
Retrospective Studies
Tomography, X-Ray Computed - methods
title Intraoperative computed tomography for orbital reconstruction: a systematic review
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2024-12-26T02%3A08%3A13IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Intraoperative%20computed%20tomography%20for%20orbital%20reconstruction:%20a%20systematic%20review&rft.jtitle=International%20journal%20of%20oral%20and%20maxillofacial%20surgery&rft.au=Goh,%20Elizabeth%20Z.&rft.date=2024-02-01&rft.volume=53&rft.issue=2&rft.spage=127&rft.epage=132&rft.pages=127-132&rft.issn=0901-5027&rft.eissn=1399-0020&rft_id=info:doi/10.1016/j.ijom.2023.05.002&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E2816762374%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=2816762374&rft_id=info:pmid/37208279&rft_els_id=S0901502723001066&rfr_iscdi=true