Intraoperative computed tomography for orbital reconstruction: a systematic review
Orbital reconstruction is a common procedure with inherent challenges and important consequences. Intraoperative use of computed tomography (CT) is an emerging application that facilitates accurate intraoperative evaluation to improve clinical outcomes. The aim of this review was to investigate the...
Gespeichert in:
Veröffentlicht in: | International journal of oral and maxillofacial surgery 2024-02, Vol.53 (2), p.127-132 |
---|---|
Hauptverfasser: | , , , |
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | eng |
Schlagworte: | |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
container_end_page | 132 |
---|---|
container_issue | 2 |
container_start_page | 127 |
container_title | International journal of oral and maxillofacial surgery |
container_volume | 53 |
creator | Goh, Elizabeth Z. Bullis, Sam Beech, Nicholas Johnson, Nigel R. |
description | Orbital reconstruction is a common procedure with inherent challenges and important consequences. Intraoperative use of computed tomography (CT) is an emerging application that facilitates accurate intraoperative evaluation to improve clinical outcomes. The aim of this review was to investigate the intraoperative and postoperative outcomes of intraoperative CT use in orbital reconstruction. The PubMed and Scopus databases were systematically searched. Inclusion criteria were clinical studies investigating intraoperative CT use in orbital reconstruction. Exclusion criteria were duplicates, non-English publications, non-full-text publications, and studies with insufficient data. Of the 1022 articles identified, seven eligible articles representing 256 cases were included. The mean age was 39 years. Most cases were male (69.9% male, 30.1% female). Regarding intraoperative outcomes, the mean revision rate was 34.1%, with plate repositioning being the most common type (51.1%). The intraoperative time was variably reported. With regards to postoperative outcomes, there were no revisions, and only one case had a complication (transient exophthalmos). The mean volumetric difference between the repaired and contralateral orbits was reported in two studies. The findings of this review present an updated evidence-based summary of the intraoperative and postoperative outcomes of intraoperative CT use in orbital reconstruction. Robust longitudinal comparisons of clinical outcomes between intraoperative and non-intraoperative CT cases are required. |
doi_str_mv | 10.1016/j.ijom.2023.05.002 |
format | Article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_2816762374</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><els_id>S0901502723001066</els_id><sourcerecordid>2816762374</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c356t-6a634a360cf95a1ac7ae2356e6bb14d3b3a3ae5cd62c474978475c5116e1f0953</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp9kM1q3DAUhUVoSKZJXqCL4mU3dq4kSxqHbsqQtIGBQEjWQpavE5mx5Uhyyrx9NUzaZVf3wvmB8xHyhUJFgcrroXKDHysGjFcgKgB2QlaUN02ZX_hEVtAALQUwdU4-xzgAQMPX6oycc8VgzVSzIo_3UwrGzxhMcu9YWD_OS8KuSH70L8HMr_ui96HwoXXJ7IqA1k8xhcUm56ebwhRxHxOOOW2z-O7w9yU57c0u4tXHvSDPd7dPm1_l9uHn_ebHtrRcyFRKI3ltuATbN8JQY5VBlhWUbUvrjrfccIPCdpLZWtWNWtdKWEGpRNpDI_gF-XbsnYN_WzAmPbpocbczE_olaramUknGVZ2t7Gi1wccYsNdzcKMJe01BH1jqQR9Y6gNLDUJngDn09aN_aUfs_kX-wsuG70cD5pV5edDROpwsdi5jSrrz7n_9fwB83Iah</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>2816762374</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Intraoperative computed tomography for orbital reconstruction: a systematic review</title><source>MEDLINE</source><source>Elsevier ScienceDirect Journals Complete</source><creator>Goh, Elizabeth Z. ; Bullis, Sam ; Beech, Nicholas ; Johnson, Nigel R.</creator><creatorcontrib>Goh, Elizabeth Z. ; Bullis, Sam ; Beech, Nicholas ; Johnson, Nigel R.</creatorcontrib><description>Orbital reconstruction is a common procedure with inherent challenges and important consequences. Intraoperative use of computed tomography (CT) is an emerging application that facilitates accurate intraoperative evaluation to improve clinical outcomes. The aim of this review was to investigate the intraoperative and postoperative outcomes of intraoperative CT use in orbital reconstruction. The PubMed and Scopus databases were systematically searched. Inclusion criteria were clinical studies investigating intraoperative CT use in orbital reconstruction. Exclusion criteria were duplicates, non-English publications, non-full-text publications, and studies with insufficient data. Of the 1022 articles identified, seven eligible articles representing 256 cases were included. The mean age was 39 years. Most cases were male (69.9% male, 30.1% female). Regarding intraoperative outcomes, the mean revision rate was 34.1%, with plate repositioning being the most common type (51.1%). The intraoperative time was variably reported. With regards to postoperative outcomes, there were no revisions, and only one case had a complication (transient exophthalmos). The mean volumetric difference between the repaired and contralateral orbits was reported in two studies. The findings of this review present an updated evidence-based summary of the intraoperative and postoperative outcomes of intraoperative CT use in orbital reconstruction. Robust longitudinal comparisons of clinical outcomes between intraoperative and non-intraoperative CT cases are required.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0901-5027</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1399-0020</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1016/j.ijom.2023.05.002</identifier><identifier>PMID: 37208279</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Denmark: Elsevier Inc</publisher><subject>Adult ; cone-beam computed tomography ; Exophthalmos ; Female ; Humans ; Male ; operative time ; Orbit - diagnostic imaging ; Orbit - surgery ; orbital fractures ; Orbital Fractures - surgery ; postoperative complications ; Postoperative Period ; reoperation ; Retrospective Studies ; Tomography, X-Ray Computed - methods</subject><ispartof>International journal of oral and maxillofacial surgery, 2024-02, Vol.53 (2), p.127-132</ispartof><rights>2023</rights><rights>Copyright © 2023 International Association of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgeons. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c356t-6a634a360cf95a1ac7ae2356e6bb14d3b3a3ae5cd62c474978475c5116e1f0953</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c356t-6a634a360cf95a1ac7ae2356e6bb14d3b3a3ae5cd62c474978475c5116e1f0953</cites><orcidid>0009-0008-1953-7752 ; 0000-0003-3843-0252</orcidid></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.ijom.2023.05.002$$EHTML$$P50$$Gelsevier$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,780,784,3550,27924,27925,45995</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37208279$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Goh, Elizabeth Z.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Bullis, Sam</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Beech, Nicholas</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Johnson, Nigel R.</creatorcontrib><title>Intraoperative computed tomography for orbital reconstruction: a systematic review</title><title>International journal of oral and maxillofacial surgery</title><addtitle>Int J Oral Maxillofac Surg</addtitle><description>Orbital reconstruction is a common procedure with inherent challenges and important consequences. Intraoperative use of computed tomography (CT) is an emerging application that facilitates accurate intraoperative evaluation to improve clinical outcomes. The aim of this review was to investigate the intraoperative and postoperative outcomes of intraoperative CT use in orbital reconstruction. The PubMed and Scopus databases were systematically searched. Inclusion criteria were clinical studies investigating intraoperative CT use in orbital reconstruction. Exclusion criteria were duplicates, non-English publications, non-full-text publications, and studies with insufficient data. Of the 1022 articles identified, seven eligible articles representing 256 cases were included. The mean age was 39 years. Most cases were male (69.9% male, 30.1% female). Regarding intraoperative outcomes, the mean revision rate was 34.1%, with plate repositioning being the most common type (51.1%). The intraoperative time was variably reported. With regards to postoperative outcomes, there were no revisions, and only one case had a complication (transient exophthalmos). The mean volumetric difference between the repaired and contralateral orbits was reported in two studies. The findings of this review present an updated evidence-based summary of the intraoperative and postoperative outcomes of intraoperative CT use in orbital reconstruction. Robust longitudinal comparisons of clinical outcomes between intraoperative and non-intraoperative CT cases are required.</description><subject>Adult</subject><subject>cone-beam computed tomography</subject><subject>Exophthalmos</subject><subject>Female</subject><subject>Humans</subject><subject>Male</subject><subject>operative time</subject><subject>Orbit - diagnostic imaging</subject><subject>Orbit - surgery</subject><subject>orbital fractures</subject><subject>Orbital Fractures - surgery</subject><subject>postoperative complications</subject><subject>Postoperative Period</subject><subject>reoperation</subject><subject>Retrospective Studies</subject><subject>Tomography, X-Ray Computed - methods</subject><issn>0901-5027</issn><issn>1399-0020</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2024</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>EIF</sourceid><recordid>eNp9kM1q3DAUhUVoSKZJXqCL4mU3dq4kSxqHbsqQtIGBQEjWQpavE5mx5Uhyyrx9NUzaZVf3wvmB8xHyhUJFgcrroXKDHysGjFcgKgB2QlaUN02ZX_hEVtAALQUwdU4-xzgAQMPX6oycc8VgzVSzIo_3UwrGzxhMcu9YWD_OS8KuSH70L8HMr_ui96HwoXXJ7IqA1k8xhcUm56ebwhRxHxOOOW2z-O7w9yU57c0u4tXHvSDPd7dPm1_l9uHn_ebHtrRcyFRKI3ltuATbN8JQY5VBlhWUbUvrjrfccIPCdpLZWtWNWtdKWEGpRNpDI_gF-XbsnYN_WzAmPbpocbczE_olaramUknGVZ2t7Gi1wccYsNdzcKMJe01BH1jqQR9Y6gNLDUJngDn09aN_aUfs_kX-wsuG70cD5pV5edDROpwsdi5jSrrz7n_9fwB83Iah</recordid><startdate>20240201</startdate><enddate>20240201</enddate><creator>Goh, Elizabeth Z.</creator><creator>Bullis, Sam</creator><creator>Beech, Nicholas</creator><creator>Johnson, Nigel R.</creator><general>Elsevier Inc</general><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7X8</scope><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0009-0008-1953-7752</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0003-3843-0252</orcidid></search><sort><creationdate>20240201</creationdate><title>Intraoperative computed tomography for orbital reconstruction: a systematic review</title><author>Goh, Elizabeth Z. ; Bullis, Sam ; Beech, Nicholas ; Johnson, Nigel R.</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c356t-6a634a360cf95a1ac7ae2356e6bb14d3b3a3ae5cd62c474978475c5116e1f0953</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2024</creationdate><topic>Adult</topic><topic>cone-beam computed tomography</topic><topic>Exophthalmos</topic><topic>Female</topic><topic>Humans</topic><topic>Male</topic><topic>operative time</topic><topic>Orbit - diagnostic imaging</topic><topic>Orbit - surgery</topic><topic>orbital fractures</topic><topic>Orbital Fractures - surgery</topic><topic>postoperative complications</topic><topic>Postoperative Period</topic><topic>reoperation</topic><topic>Retrospective Studies</topic><topic>Tomography, X-Ray Computed - methods</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Goh, Elizabeth Z.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Bullis, Sam</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Beech, Nicholas</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Johnson, Nigel R.</creatorcontrib><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><jtitle>International journal of oral and maxillofacial surgery</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Goh, Elizabeth Z.</au><au>Bullis, Sam</au><au>Beech, Nicholas</au><au>Johnson, Nigel R.</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Intraoperative computed tomography for orbital reconstruction: a systematic review</atitle><jtitle>International journal of oral and maxillofacial surgery</jtitle><addtitle>Int J Oral Maxillofac Surg</addtitle><date>2024-02-01</date><risdate>2024</risdate><volume>53</volume><issue>2</issue><spage>127</spage><epage>132</epage><pages>127-132</pages><issn>0901-5027</issn><eissn>1399-0020</eissn><abstract>Orbital reconstruction is a common procedure with inherent challenges and important consequences. Intraoperative use of computed tomography (CT) is an emerging application that facilitates accurate intraoperative evaluation to improve clinical outcomes. The aim of this review was to investigate the intraoperative and postoperative outcomes of intraoperative CT use in orbital reconstruction. The PubMed and Scopus databases were systematically searched. Inclusion criteria were clinical studies investigating intraoperative CT use in orbital reconstruction. Exclusion criteria were duplicates, non-English publications, non-full-text publications, and studies with insufficient data. Of the 1022 articles identified, seven eligible articles representing 256 cases were included. The mean age was 39 years. Most cases were male (69.9% male, 30.1% female). Regarding intraoperative outcomes, the mean revision rate was 34.1%, with plate repositioning being the most common type (51.1%). The intraoperative time was variably reported. With regards to postoperative outcomes, there were no revisions, and only one case had a complication (transient exophthalmos). The mean volumetric difference between the repaired and contralateral orbits was reported in two studies. The findings of this review present an updated evidence-based summary of the intraoperative and postoperative outcomes of intraoperative CT use in orbital reconstruction. Robust longitudinal comparisons of clinical outcomes between intraoperative and non-intraoperative CT cases are required.</abstract><cop>Denmark</cop><pub>Elsevier Inc</pub><pmid>37208279</pmid><doi>10.1016/j.ijom.2023.05.002</doi><tpages>6</tpages><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0009-0008-1953-7752</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0003-3843-0252</orcidid></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | ISSN: 0901-5027 |
ispartof | International journal of oral and maxillofacial surgery, 2024-02, Vol.53 (2), p.127-132 |
issn | 0901-5027 1399-0020 |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_2816762374 |
source | MEDLINE; Elsevier ScienceDirect Journals Complete |
subjects | Adult cone-beam computed tomography Exophthalmos Female Humans Male operative time Orbit - diagnostic imaging Orbit - surgery orbital fractures Orbital Fractures - surgery postoperative complications Postoperative Period reoperation Retrospective Studies Tomography, X-Ray Computed - methods |
title | Intraoperative computed tomography for orbital reconstruction: a systematic review |
url | https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2024-12-26T02%3A08%3A13IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Intraoperative%20computed%20tomography%20for%20orbital%20reconstruction:%20a%20systematic%20review&rft.jtitle=International%20journal%20of%20oral%20and%20maxillofacial%20surgery&rft.au=Goh,%20Elizabeth%20Z.&rft.date=2024-02-01&rft.volume=53&rft.issue=2&rft.spage=127&rft.epage=132&rft.pages=127-132&rft.issn=0901-5027&rft.eissn=1399-0020&rft_id=info:doi/10.1016/j.ijom.2023.05.002&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E2816762374%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=2816762374&rft_id=info:pmid/37208279&rft_els_id=S0901502723001066&rfr_iscdi=true |