Defining the safety of early ileostomy closure after ileal pouch anal anastomosis

Purpose The safety of early ileostomy reversal after ileal pouch anal anastomosis (IPAA) has not been established. Our hypothesis was that ileostomy reversal before 8 weeks is associated with negative outcomes. Methods This was a retrospective cohort study from a prospectively maintained institution...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Techniques in coloproctology 2023-12, Vol.27 (12), p.1257-1263
Hauptverfasser: Clancy, C., Connelly, T. M., Jia, X., Lipman, J., Lightner, A. L., Hull, T., Steele, S. R., Holubar, S. D.
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page 1263
container_issue 12
container_start_page 1257
container_title Techniques in coloproctology
container_volume 27
creator Clancy, C.
Connelly, T. M.
Jia, X.
Lipman, J.
Lightner, A. L.
Hull, T.
Steele, S. R.
Holubar, S. D.
description Purpose The safety of early ileostomy reversal after ileal pouch anal anastomosis (IPAA) has not been established. Our hypothesis was that ileostomy reversal before 8 weeks is associated with negative outcomes. Methods This was a retrospective cohort study from a prospectively maintained institutional database. Patients who underwent primary IPAA with ileostomy reversal between 2000 and 2021 from a Pouch Registry were stratified on the basis of timing of reversal. Those reversed before 8 weeks (early) and those reversed from 8 weeks to 116 days (routine) were compared. The primary outcome was overall complications according to timing and reason for closure. Results Ileostomy reversal was performed early in 92 patients and routinely in 1908. Median time to closure was 49 days in the early group and 93 days in the routine group. Reasons for early reversal were stoma-related morbidity in 43.3% ( n  = 39) and scheduled closure in 56.7% ( n  = 51). The complication rate in the early group was 17.4% versus 11% in the routine group ( p  = 0.085). When early patients were stratified according to reason for reversal, those reversed early for stoma-related morbidity had an increased complication rate compared to the routine group (25.6% vs. 11%, p  = 0.006). Patients undergoing scheduled reversal in the early group did not have increased complications (11.8% vs. 11%, p  = 0.9). There was a higher likelihood of pouch anastomotic leak when reversal was performed early for stoma complications compared to routinely (OR 5.13, 95% CI 1.01–16.57, p  = 0.049). Conclusions Early closure is safe but could be delayed in stoma morbidity as patients may experience increased complications.
doi_str_mv 10.1007/s10151-023-02811-4
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_2816758923</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>2816758923</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c375t-7c2d6653430f2f4b821ae2d6f522601a4ecf23db1c32bf16dc19da658200153d3</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp9kE9PwyAYh4nRuDn9Ah4MiRcvVV4opT2a-TdZYkw08UYoha1LVya0h3172To18eABeAPP-wMehM6BXAMh4iYAAQ4JoSyOHCBJD9AYgOYJSfnH4a5mScaYGKGTEJaEgBAcjtGICUoKKooxer0ztm7rdo67hcFBWdNtsLPYKN9scN0YFzq32mDduNB7g5XtjN_uqwavXa8XWLWxjNOWc6EOp-jIqiaYs_06Qe8P92_Tp2T28vg8vZ0lmgneJULTKss4Sxmx1KZlTkGZuGU5pRkBlRptKatK0IyWFrJKQ1GpjOc0foOzik3Q1ZC79u6zN6GTqzpo0zSqNa4PMhrJBM8LyiJ6-Qddut7Hd2-pPM9YDCwiRQdKexeCN1aufb1SfiOByK1wOQiXUbjcCZdpbLrYR_flylQ_Ld-GI8AGIMSjdm78793_xH4B2UmKkA</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>2888631539</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Defining the safety of early ileostomy closure after ileal pouch anal anastomosis</title><source>SpringerLink Journals - AutoHoldings</source><creator>Clancy, C. ; Connelly, T. M. ; Jia, X. ; Lipman, J. ; Lightner, A. L. ; Hull, T. ; Steele, S. R. ; Holubar, S. D.</creator><creatorcontrib>Clancy, C. ; Connelly, T. M. ; Jia, X. ; Lipman, J. ; Lightner, A. L. ; Hull, T. ; Steele, S. R. ; Holubar, S. D.</creatorcontrib><description>Purpose The safety of early ileostomy reversal after ileal pouch anal anastomosis (IPAA) has not been established. Our hypothesis was that ileostomy reversal before 8 weeks is associated with negative outcomes. Methods This was a retrospective cohort study from a prospectively maintained institutional database. Patients who underwent primary IPAA with ileostomy reversal between 2000 and 2021 from a Pouch Registry were stratified on the basis of timing of reversal. Those reversed before 8 weeks (early) and those reversed from 8 weeks to 116 days (routine) were compared. The primary outcome was overall complications according to timing and reason for closure. Results Ileostomy reversal was performed early in 92 patients and routinely in 1908. Median time to closure was 49 days in the early group and 93 days in the routine group. Reasons for early reversal were stoma-related morbidity in 43.3% ( n  = 39) and scheduled closure in 56.7% ( n  = 51). The complication rate in the early group was 17.4% versus 11% in the routine group ( p  = 0.085). When early patients were stratified according to reason for reversal, those reversed early for stoma-related morbidity had an increased complication rate compared to the routine group (25.6% vs. 11%, p  = 0.006). Patients undergoing scheduled reversal in the early group did not have increased complications (11.8% vs. 11%, p  = 0.9). There was a higher likelihood of pouch anastomotic leak when reversal was performed early for stoma complications compared to routinely (OR 5.13, 95% CI 1.01–16.57, p  = 0.049). Conclusions Early closure is safe but could be delayed in stoma morbidity as patients may experience increased complications.</description><identifier>ISSN: 1123-6337</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1128-045X</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1007/s10151-023-02811-4</identifier><identifier>PMID: 37209279</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Cham: Springer International Publishing</publisher><subject>Abdominal Surgery ; Colorectal Surgery ; Gastroenterology ; Medicine ; Medicine &amp; Public Health ; Morbidity ; Original Article ; Ostomy ; Proctology ; Surgery ; Surgical anastomosis</subject><ispartof>Techniques in coloproctology, 2023-12, Vol.27 (12), p.1257-1263</ispartof><rights>Springer Nature Switzerland AG 2023. Springer Nature or its licensor (e.g. a society or other partner) holds exclusive rights to this article under a publishing agreement with the author(s) or other rightsholder(s); author self-archiving of the accepted manuscript version of this article is solely governed by the terms of such publishing agreement and applicable law.</rights><rights>2023. Springer Nature Switzerland AG.</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c375t-7c2d6653430f2f4b821ae2d6f522601a4ecf23db1c32bf16dc19da658200153d3</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c375t-7c2d6653430f2f4b821ae2d6f522601a4ecf23db1c32bf16dc19da658200153d3</cites><orcidid>0000-0001-6038-2563</orcidid></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://link.springer.com/content/pdf/10.1007/s10151-023-02811-4$$EPDF$$P50$$Gspringer$$H</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://link.springer.com/10.1007/s10151-023-02811-4$$EHTML$$P50$$Gspringer$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,776,780,27901,27902,41464,42533,51294</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37209279$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Clancy, C.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Connelly, T. M.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Jia, X.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Lipman, J.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Lightner, A. L.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Hull, T.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Steele, S. R.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Holubar, S. D.</creatorcontrib><title>Defining the safety of early ileostomy closure after ileal pouch anal anastomosis</title><title>Techniques in coloproctology</title><addtitle>Tech Coloproctol</addtitle><addtitle>Tech Coloproctol</addtitle><description>Purpose The safety of early ileostomy reversal after ileal pouch anal anastomosis (IPAA) has not been established. Our hypothesis was that ileostomy reversal before 8 weeks is associated with negative outcomes. Methods This was a retrospective cohort study from a prospectively maintained institutional database. Patients who underwent primary IPAA with ileostomy reversal between 2000 and 2021 from a Pouch Registry were stratified on the basis of timing of reversal. Those reversed before 8 weeks (early) and those reversed from 8 weeks to 116 days (routine) were compared. The primary outcome was overall complications according to timing and reason for closure. Results Ileostomy reversal was performed early in 92 patients and routinely in 1908. Median time to closure was 49 days in the early group and 93 days in the routine group. Reasons for early reversal were stoma-related morbidity in 43.3% ( n  = 39) and scheduled closure in 56.7% ( n  = 51). The complication rate in the early group was 17.4% versus 11% in the routine group ( p  = 0.085). When early patients were stratified according to reason for reversal, those reversed early for stoma-related morbidity had an increased complication rate compared to the routine group (25.6% vs. 11%, p  = 0.006). Patients undergoing scheduled reversal in the early group did not have increased complications (11.8% vs. 11%, p  = 0.9). There was a higher likelihood of pouch anastomotic leak when reversal was performed early for stoma complications compared to routinely (OR 5.13, 95% CI 1.01–16.57, p  = 0.049). Conclusions Early closure is safe but could be delayed in stoma morbidity as patients may experience increased complications.</description><subject>Abdominal Surgery</subject><subject>Colorectal Surgery</subject><subject>Gastroenterology</subject><subject>Medicine</subject><subject>Medicine &amp; Public Health</subject><subject>Morbidity</subject><subject>Original Article</subject><subject>Ostomy</subject><subject>Proctology</subject><subject>Surgery</subject><subject>Surgical anastomosis</subject><issn>1123-6337</issn><issn>1128-045X</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2023</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><recordid>eNp9kE9PwyAYh4nRuDn9Ah4MiRcvVV4opT2a-TdZYkw08UYoha1LVya0h3172To18eABeAPP-wMehM6BXAMh4iYAAQ4JoSyOHCBJD9AYgOYJSfnH4a5mScaYGKGTEJaEgBAcjtGICUoKKooxer0ztm7rdo67hcFBWdNtsLPYKN9scN0YFzq32mDduNB7g5XtjN_uqwavXa8XWLWxjNOWc6EOp-jIqiaYs_06Qe8P92_Tp2T28vg8vZ0lmgneJULTKss4Sxmx1KZlTkGZuGU5pRkBlRptKatK0IyWFrJKQ1GpjOc0foOzik3Q1ZC79u6zN6GTqzpo0zSqNa4PMhrJBM8LyiJ6-Qddut7Hd2-pPM9YDCwiRQdKexeCN1aufb1SfiOByK1wOQiXUbjcCZdpbLrYR_flylQ_Ld-GI8AGIMSjdm78793_xH4B2UmKkA</recordid><startdate>20231201</startdate><enddate>20231201</enddate><creator>Clancy, C.</creator><creator>Connelly, T. M.</creator><creator>Jia, X.</creator><creator>Lipman, J.</creator><creator>Lightner, A. L.</creator><creator>Hull, T.</creator><creator>Steele, S. R.</creator><creator>Holubar, S. D.</creator><general>Springer International Publishing</general><general>Springer Nature B.V</general><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>K9.</scope><scope>7X8</scope><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0001-6038-2563</orcidid></search><sort><creationdate>20231201</creationdate><title>Defining the safety of early ileostomy closure after ileal pouch anal anastomosis</title><author>Clancy, C. ; Connelly, T. M. ; Jia, X. ; Lipman, J. ; Lightner, A. L. ; Hull, T. ; Steele, S. R. ; Holubar, S. D.</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c375t-7c2d6653430f2f4b821ae2d6f522601a4ecf23db1c32bf16dc19da658200153d3</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2023</creationdate><topic>Abdominal Surgery</topic><topic>Colorectal Surgery</topic><topic>Gastroenterology</topic><topic>Medicine</topic><topic>Medicine &amp; Public Health</topic><topic>Morbidity</topic><topic>Original Article</topic><topic>Ostomy</topic><topic>Proctology</topic><topic>Surgery</topic><topic>Surgical anastomosis</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Clancy, C.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Connelly, T. M.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Jia, X.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Lipman, J.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Lightner, A. L.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Hull, T.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Steele, S. R.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Holubar, S. D.</creatorcontrib><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>ProQuest Health &amp; Medical Complete (Alumni)</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><jtitle>Techniques in coloproctology</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Clancy, C.</au><au>Connelly, T. M.</au><au>Jia, X.</au><au>Lipman, J.</au><au>Lightner, A. L.</au><au>Hull, T.</au><au>Steele, S. R.</au><au>Holubar, S. D.</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Defining the safety of early ileostomy closure after ileal pouch anal anastomosis</atitle><jtitle>Techniques in coloproctology</jtitle><stitle>Tech Coloproctol</stitle><addtitle>Tech Coloproctol</addtitle><date>2023-12-01</date><risdate>2023</risdate><volume>27</volume><issue>12</issue><spage>1257</spage><epage>1263</epage><pages>1257-1263</pages><issn>1123-6337</issn><eissn>1128-045X</eissn><abstract>Purpose The safety of early ileostomy reversal after ileal pouch anal anastomosis (IPAA) has not been established. Our hypothesis was that ileostomy reversal before 8 weeks is associated with negative outcomes. Methods This was a retrospective cohort study from a prospectively maintained institutional database. Patients who underwent primary IPAA with ileostomy reversal between 2000 and 2021 from a Pouch Registry were stratified on the basis of timing of reversal. Those reversed before 8 weeks (early) and those reversed from 8 weeks to 116 days (routine) were compared. The primary outcome was overall complications according to timing and reason for closure. Results Ileostomy reversal was performed early in 92 patients and routinely in 1908. Median time to closure was 49 days in the early group and 93 days in the routine group. Reasons for early reversal were stoma-related morbidity in 43.3% ( n  = 39) and scheduled closure in 56.7% ( n  = 51). The complication rate in the early group was 17.4% versus 11% in the routine group ( p  = 0.085). When early patients were stratified according to reason for reversal, those reversed early for stoma-related morbidity had an increased complication rate compared to the routine group (25.6% vs. 11%, p  = 0.006). Patients undergoing scheduled reversal in the early group did not have increased complications (11.8% vs. 11%, p  = 0.9). There was a higher likelihood of pouch anastomotic leak when reversal was performed early for stoma complications compared to routinely (OR 5.13, 95% CI 1.01–16.57, p  = 0.049). Conclusions Early closure is safe but could be delayed in stoma morbidity as patients may experience increased complications.</abstract><cop>Cham</cop><pub>Springer International Publishing</pub><pmid>37209279</pmid><doi>10.1007/s10151-023-02811-4</doi><tpages>7</tpages><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0001-6038-2563</orcidid></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 1123-6337
ispartof Techniques in coloproctology, 2023-12, Vol.27 (12), p.1257-1263
issn 1123-6337
1128-045X
language eng
recordid cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_2816758923
source SpringerLink Journals - AutoHoldings
subjects Abdominal Surgery
Colorectal Surgery
Gastroenterology
Medicine
Medicine & Public Health
Morbidity
Original Article
Ostomy
Proctology
Surgery
Surgical anastomosis
title Defining the safety of early ileostomy closure after ileal pouch anal anastomosis
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-29T09%3A04%3A44IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Defining%20the%20safety%20of%20early%20ileostomy%20closure%20after%20ileal%20pouch%20anal%20anastomosis&rft.jtitle=Techniques%20in%20coloproctology&rft.au=Clancy,%20C.&rft.date=2023-12-01&rft.volume=27&rft.issue=12&rft.spage=1257&rft.epage=1263&rft.pages=1257-1263&rft.issn=1123-6337&rft.eissn=1128-045X&rft_id=info:doi/10.1007/s10151-023-02811-4&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E2816758923%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=2888631539&rft_id=info:pmid/37209279&rfr_iscdi=true