Predicting the HbA1c level following glucose-lowering interventions in individuals with HbA1c-defined prediabetes: a post-hoc analysis from the randomized controlled PRE-D trial
Purpose To investigate whether the prediction of post-treatment HbA 1c levels can be improved by adding an additional biomarker of the glucose metabolism in addition to baseline HbA 1c . Methods We performed an exploratory analysis based on data from 112 individuals with prediabetes (HbA 1c 39–47 mm...
Gespeichert in:
Veröffentlicht in: | Endocrine 2023-07, Vol.81 (1), p.67-76 |
---|---|
Hauptverfasser: | , , , , , , , , , , , |
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | eng |
Schlagworte: | |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
Zusammenfassung: | Purpose
To investigate whether the prediction of post-treatment HbA
1c
levels can be improved by adding an additional biomarker of the glucose metabolism in addition to baseline HbA
1c
.
Methods
We performed an exploratory analysis based on data from 112 individuals with prediabetes (HbA
1c
39–47 mmol) and overweight/obesity (BMI ≥ 25 kg/m
2
), who completed 13 weeks of glucose-lowering interventions (exercise, dapagliflozin, or metformin) or control (habitual living) in the PRE-D trial. Seven prediction models were tested; one basic model with baseline HbA
1c
as the sole glucometabolic marker and six models each containing one additional glucometabolic biomarker in addition to baseline HbA
1c
. The additional glucometabolic biomarkers included: 1) plasma fructosamine, 2) fasting plasma glucose, 3) fasting plasma glucose × fasting serum insulin, 4) mean glucose during a 6-day free-living period measured by a continuous glucose monitor 5) mean glucose during an oral glucose tolerance test, and 6) mean plasma glucose × mean serum insulin during the oral glucose tolerance test. The primary outcome was overall goodness of fit (
R
2
) from the internal validation step in bootstrap-based analysis using general linear models.
Results
The prediction models explained 46–50% of the variation (
R
2
) in post-treatment HbA1c with standard deviations of the estimates of ~2 mmol/mol.
R
2
was not statistically significantly different in the models containing an additional glucometabolic biomarker when compared to the basic model.
Conclusion
Adding an additional biomarker of the glucose metabolism did not improve the prediction of post-treatment HbA
1c
in individuals with HbA
1c
-defined prediabetes. |
---|---|
ISSN: | 1559-0100 1355-008X 1559-0100 |
DOI: | 10.1007/s12020-023-03384-w |