Estimation of Left Ventricular Stroke Work for Rotary Left Ventricular Assist Devices

Continuous monitoring of left ventricular stroke work (LVSW) may improve the medical management of patients with rotary left ventricular assist devices (LVAD). However, implantable pressure–volume sensors are limited by measurement drift and hemocompatibility. Instead, estimator algorithms derived f...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:ASAIO journal (1992) 2023-09, Vol.69 (9), p.817-826
Hauptverfasser: Wu, Eric L., Maw, Martin, Stephens, Andrew F., Stevens, Michael C., Fraser, John F., Tansley, Geoffrey, Moscato, Francesco, Gregory, Shaun D.
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page 826
container_issue 9
container_start_page 817
container_title ASAIO journal (1992)
container_volume 69
creator Wu, Eric L.
Maw, Martin
Stephens, Andrew F.
Stevens, Michael C.
Fraser, John F.
Tansley, Geoffrey
Moscato, Francesco
Gregory, Shaun D.
description Continuous monitoring of left ventricular stroke work (LVSW) may improve the medical management of patients with rotary left ventricular assist devices (LVAD). However, implantable pressure–volume sensors are limited by measurement drift and hemocompatibility. Instead, estimator algorithms derived from rotary LVAD signals may be a suitable alternative. An LVSW estimator algorithm was developed and evaluated in a range of in vitro and ex vivo cardiovascular conditions during full assist (closed aortic valve [AoV]) and partial assist (opening AoV) mode. For full assist, the LVSW estimator algorithm was based on LVAD flow, speed, and pump pressure head, whereas for partial assist, the LVSW estimator combined the full assist algorithm with an estimate of AoV flow. During full assist, the LVSW estimator demonstrated a good fit in vitro and ex vivo (R20.97 and 0.86, respectively) with errors of ± 0.07 J. However, LVSW estimator performance was reduced during partial assist, with in vitroR20.88 and an error of ± 0.16 J and ex vivoR20.48 with errors of ± 0.11 J. Further investigations are required to improve the LVSW estimate with partial assist; however, this study demonstrated promising results for a continuous estimate of LVSW for rotary LVADs.
doi_str_mv 10.1097/MAT.0000000000001972
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_2814528151</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>2814528151</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c3018-d4ced7490a0e186fc5312794cbbac31c7f9817411ad227dc145f7dda89e6326d3</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNplkF1PwjAUhhujEUT_gTG79GbYs3brekkQPxKMiYJ6t5TuLEwGxbaT8O-dgB_Rc3FOc_K-70kfQk6BdoFKcXHXG3XprwIpoj3ShpiloeTsZb950zgNIwlJixw599poYsbgkLSYAAlcyDYZD5wv58qXZhGYIhhi4YMnXHhb6rpSNnj01swweDZ2FhTGBg_GK7v-r-s5VzofXOJ7qdEdk4NCVQ5PdrNDxleDUf8mHN5f3_Z7w1AzCmmYc4254JIqipAmhY4ZREJyPZkozUCLQqYgOIDKo0jkGnhciDxXqcSERUnOOuR8m7u05q1G57N56TRWlVqgqV0WpY2laTE0Ur6Vamucs1hkS9t83K4zoNkn0KwBmv0F2tjOdhfqyRzzb9MXwZ_clak8Wjer6hXabIqq8tNNXsRTGkq5Sw03C_YB9vGAVQ</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>2814528151</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Estimation of Left Ventricular Stroke Work for Rotary Left Ventricular Assist Devices</title><source>Journals@Ovid LWW Legacy Archive</source><source>Elektronische Zeitschriftenbibliothek - Frei zugängliche E-Journals</source><creator>Wu, Eric L. ; Maw, Martin ; Stephens, Andrew F. ; Stevens, Michael C. ; Fraser, John F. ; Tansley, Geoffrey ; Moscato, Francesco ; Gregory, Shaun D.</creator><creatorcontrib>Wu, Eric L. ; Maw, Martin ; Stephens, Andrew F. ; Stevens, Michael C. ; Fraser, John F. ; Tansley, Geoffrey ; Moscato, Francesco ; Gregory, Shaun D.</creatorcontrib><description>Continuous monitoring of left ventricular stroke work (LVSW) may improve the medical management of patients with rotary left ventricular assist devices (LVAD). However, implantable pressure–volume sensors are limited by measurement drift and hemocompatibility. Instead, estimator algorithms derived from rotary LVAD signals may be a suitable alternative. An LVSW estimator algorithm was developed and evaluated in a range of in vitro and ex vivo cardiovascular conditions during full assist (closed aortic valve [AoV]) and partial assist (opening AoV) mode. For full assist, the LVSW estimator algorithm was based on LVAD flow, speed, and pump pressure head, whereas for partial assist, the LVSW estimator combined the full assist algorithm with an estimate of AoV flow. During full assist, the LVSW estimator demonstrated a good fit in vitro and ex vivo (R20.97 and 0.86, respectively) with errors of ± 0.07 J. However, LVSW estimator performance was reduced during partial assist, with in vitroR20.88 and an error of ± 0.16 J and ex vivoR20.48 with errors of ± 0.11 J. Further investigations are required to improve the LVSW estimate with partial assist; however, this study demonstrated promising results for a continuous estimate of LVSW for rotary LVADs.</description><identifier>ISSN: 1058-2916</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1538-943X</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1097/MAT.0000000000001972</identifier><identifier>PMID: 37191479</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>United States: Lippincott Williams &amp; Wilkins</publisher><ispartof>ASAIO journal (1992), 2023-09, Vol.69 (9), p.817-826</ispartof><rights>Lippincott Williams &amp; Wilkins</rights><rights>Copyright © ASAIO 2023.</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c3018-d4ced7490a0e186fc5312794cbbac31c7f9817411ad227dc145f7dda89e6326d3</cites><orcidid>0000-0002-2271-750 ; 0000-0002-2271-750X</orcidid></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktohtml>$$Uhttp://ovidsp.ovid.com/ovidweb.cgi?T=JS&amp;NEWS=n&amp;CSC=Y&amp;PAGE=fulltext&amp;D=ovft&amp;AN=00002480-990000000-00248$$EHTML$$P50$$Gwolterskluwer$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,776,780,4595,27901,27902,65206</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37191479$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Wu, Eric L.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Maw, Martin</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Stephens, Andrew F.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Stevens, Michael C.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Fraser, John F.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Tansley, Geoffrey</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Moscato, Francesco</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Gregory, Shaun D.</creatorcontrib><title>Estimation of Left Ventricular Stroke Work for Rotary Left Ventricular Assist Devices</title><title>ASAIO journal (1992)</title><addtitle>ASAIO J</addtitle><description>Continuous monitoring of left ventricular stroke work (LVSW) may improve the medical management of patients with rotary left ventricular assist devices (LVAD). However, implantable pressure–volume sensors are limited by measurement drift and hemocompatibility. Instead, estimator algorithms derived from rotary LVAD signals may be a suitable alternative. An LVSW estimator algorithm was developed and evaluated in a range of in vitro and ex vivo cardiovascular conditions during full assist (closed aortic valve [AoV]) and partial assist (opening AoV) mode. For full assist, the LVSW estimator algorithm was based on LVAD flow, speed, and pump pressure head, whereas for partial assist, the LVSW estimator combined the full assist algorithm with an estimate of AoV flow. During full assist, the LVSW estimator demonstrated a good fit in vitro and ex vivo (R20.97 and 0.86, respectively) with errors of ± 0.07 J. However, LVSW estimator performance was reduced during partial assist, with in vitroR20.88 and an error of ± 0.16 J and ex vivoR20.48 with errors of ± 0.11 J. Further investigations are required to improve the LVSW estimate with partial assist; however, this study demonstrated promising results for a continuous estimate of LVSW for rotary LVADs.</description><issn>1058-2916</issn><issn>1538-943X</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2023</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><recordid>eNplkF1PwjAUhhujEUT_gTG79GbYs3brekkQPxKMiYJ6t5TuLEwGxbaT8O-dgB_Rc3FOc_K-70kfQk6BdoFKcXHXG3XprwIpoj3ShpiloeTsZb950zgNIwlJixw599poYsbgkLSYAAlcyDYZD5wv58qXZhGYIhhi4YMnXHhb6rpSNnj01swweDZ2FhTGBg_GK7v-r-s5VzofXOJ7qdEdk4NCVQ5PdrNDxleDUf8mHN5f3_Z7w1AzCmmYc4254JIqipAmhY4ZREJyPZkozUCLQqYgOIDKo0jkGnhciDxXqcSERUnOOuR8m7u05q1G57N56TRWlVqgqV0WpY2laTE0Ur6Vamucs1hkS9t83K4zoNkn0KwBmv0F2tjOdhfqyRzzb9MXwZ_clak8Wjer6hXabIqq8tNNXsRTGkq5Sw03C_YB9vGAVQ</recordid><startdate>20230901</startdate><enddate>20230901</enddate><creator>Wu, Eric L.</creator><creator>Maw, Martin</creator><creator>Stephens, Andrew F.</creator><creator>Stevens, Michael C.</creator><creator>Fraser, John F.</creator><creator>Tansley, Geoffrey</creator><creator>Moscato, Francesco</creator><creator>Gregory, Shaun D.</creator><general>Lippincott Williams &amp; Wilkins</general><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7X8</scope><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-2271-750</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-2271-750X</orcidid></search><sort><creationdate>20230901</creationdate><title>Estimation of Left Ventricular Stroke Work for Rotary Left Ventricular Assist Devices</title><author>Wu, Eric L. ; Maw, Martin ; Stephens, Andrew F. ; Stevens, Michael C. ; Fraser, John F. ; Tansley, Geoffrey ; Moscato, Francesco ; Gregory, Shaun D.</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c3018-d4ced7490a0e186fc5312794cbbac31c7f9817411ad227dc145f7dda89e6326d3</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2023</creationdate><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Wu, Eric L.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Maw, Martin</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Stephens, Andrew F.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Stevens, Michael C.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Fraser, John F.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Tansley, Geoffrey</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Moscato, Francesco</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Gregory, Shaun D.</creatorcontrib><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><jtitle>ASAIO journal (1992)</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Wu, Eric L.</au><au>Maw, Martin</au><au>Stephens, Andrew F.</au><au>Stevens, Michael C.</au><au>Fraser, John F.</au><au>Tansley, Geoffrey</au><au>Moscato, Francesco</au><au>Gregory, Shaun D.</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Estimation of Left Ventricular Stroke Work for Rotary Left Ventricular Assist Devices</atitle><jtitle>ASAIO journal (1992)</jtitle><addtitle>ASAIO J</addtitle><date>2023-09-01</date><risdate>2023</risdate><volume>69</volume><issue>9</issue><spage>817</spage><epage>826</epage><pages>817-826</pages><issn>1058-2916</issn><eissn>1538-943X</eissn><abstract>Continuous monitoring of left ventricular stroke work (LVSW) may improve the medical management of patients with rotary left ventricular assist devices (LVAD). However, implantable pressure–volume sensors are limited by measurement drift and hemocompatibility. Instead, estimator algorithms derived from rotary LVAD signals may be a suitable alternative. An LVSW estimator algorithm was developed and evaluated in a range of in vitro and ex vivo cardiovascular conditions during full assist (closed aortic valve [AoV]) and partial assist (opening AoV) mode. For full assist, the LVSW estimator algorithm was based on LVAD flow, speed, and pump pressure head, whereas for partial assist, the LVSW estimator combined the full assist algorithm with an estimate of AoV flow. During full assist, the LVSW estimator demonstrated a good fit in vitro and ex vivo (R20.97 and 0.86, respectively) with errors of ± 0.07 J. However, LVSW estimator performance was reduced during partial assist, with in vitroR20.88 and an error of ± 0.16 J and ex vivoR20.48 with errors of ± 0.11 J. Further investigations are required to improve the LVSW estimate with partial assist; however, this study demonstrated promising results for a continuous estimate of LVSW for rotary LVADs.</abstract><cop>United States</cop><pub>Lippincott Williams &amp; Wilkins</pub><pmid>37191479</pmid><doi>10.1097/MAT.0000000000001972</doi><tpages>10</tpages><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-2271-750</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-2271-750X</orcidid></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 1058-2916
ispartof ASAIO journal (1992), 2023-09, Vol.69 (9), p.817-826
issn 1058-2916
1538-943X
language eng
recordid cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_2814528151
source Journals@Ovid LWW Legacy Archive; Elektronische Zeitschriftenbibliothek - Frei zugängliche E-Journals
title Estimation of Left Ventricular Stroke Work for Rotary Left Ventricular Assist Devices
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-30T05%3A08%3A26IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Estimation%20of%20Left%20Ventricular%20Stroke%20Work%20for%20Rotary%20Left%20Ventricular%20Assist%20Devices&rft.jtitle=ASAIO%20journal%20(1992)&rft.au=Wu,%20Eric%20L.&rft.date=2023-09-01&rft.volume=69&rft.issue=9&rft.spage=817&rft.epage=826&rft.pages=817-826&rft.issn=1058-2916&rft.eissn=1538-943X&rft_id=info:doi/10.1097/MAT.0000000000001972&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E2814528151%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=2814528151&rft_id=info:pmid/37191479&rfr_iscdi=true