Archaeological sites in Grand Canyon National Park along the Colorado River are eroding owing to six decades of Glen Canyon Dam operations

The archaeological record documenting human history in deserts is commonly concentrated along rivers in terraces or other landforms built by river sediment deposits. Today that record is at risk in many river valleys owing to human resource and infrastructure development activities, including the co...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Journal of environmental management 2023-09, Vol.342, p.118036-118036, Article 118036
Hauptverfasser: Sankey, Joel B., East, Amy, Fairley, Helen C., Caster, Joshua, Dierker, Jennifer, Brennan, Ellen, Pilkington, Lonnie, Bransky, Nathaniel, Kasprak, Alan
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page 118036
container_issue
container_start_page 118036
container_title Journal of environmental management
container_volume 342
creator Sankey, Joel B.
East, Amy
Fairley, Helen C.
Caster, Joshua
Dierker, Jennifer
Brennan, Ellen
Pilkington, Lonnie
Bransky, Nathaniel
Kasprak, Alan
description The archaeological record documenting human history in deserts is commonly concentrated along rivers in terraces or other landforms built by river sediment deposits. Today that record is at risk in many river valleys owing to human resource and infrastructure development activities, including the construction and operation of dams. We assessed the effects of the operations of Glen Canyon Dam – which, since its closure in 1963, has imposed drastic changes to flow, sediment supply and distribution, and riparian vegetation – on a population of 362 archaeological sites in the Colorado River corridor through Grand Canyon National Park, Arizona, USA. We leverage 50 years of evidence from aerial photographs and more than 30 years of field observations and measurements of archaeological-site topography and wind patterns to evaluate changes in the physical integrity of archaeological sites using two geomorphology-based site classification systems. We find that most archaeological sites are eroding; moreover, most are at increased risk of continuing to erode, due to six decades of operations of Glen Canyon Dam. Results show that the wind-driven (aeolian) supply of river-sourced sand, essential for covering archaeological sites and protecting them from erosion, has decreased for most sites since 1973 owing to effects of long-term dam operations on river sediment supply and riparian vegetation expansion on sandbars. Results show that the proportion of sites affected by erosion from gullies controlled by the local base-level of the Colorado River has increased since 2000. These changes to landscape processes affecting archaeological site integrity limit the ability of the National Park Service and Grand Canyon-affiliated Native American Tribes to achieve environmental management goals to maintain or improve site integrity in situ. We identify three environmental management opportunities that could be used to a greater extent to decrease the risk of erosion and increase the potential for in-situ preservation of archaeological sites. Environmental management opportunities are: 1) sediment-rich controlled river floods to increase the aeolian supply of river-sourced sand, 2) extended periods of low river flow to increase the aeolian supply of river-sourced sand, 3) the removal of riparian vegetation barriers to the aeolian transport of river-sourced sand. •Integrity of 362 Colorado River archaeological sites assessed 60 years after damming.•River-sourced aeolian sand decre
doi_str_mv 10.1016/j.jenvman.2023.118036
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_2813887862</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><els_id>S0301479723008241</els_id><sourcerecordid>2813887862</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c445t-7c221753666c93ce434d8ae23f5880b774daf29554450d9336993e872ec8ff893</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNqNkc1uEzEUhS0EoqHwCCAv2Uzwz8zYXqEqhYBUAUKwtm7tO63DjB3sSaCvwFPjkJQtbO5dnO-cK_sQ8pyzJWe8f7VZbjDuJ4hLwYRccq6Z7B-QBWema3Qv2UOyYJLxplVGnZEnpWwYY1Jw9ZicScW1qMKC_LrI7hYwjekmOBhpCTMWGiJdZ4ieriDepUg_wBxSrPInyN8ojCne0PkW6ar6MvhEP4c9ZgoZKebkQ5XTj8OcU038ST068DU3DXQ9YryPvYSJpi3mP-nlKXk0wFjw2Wmfk69v33xZvWuuPq7fry6uGte23dwoJ-ojOtn3vTPSYStbrwGFHDqt2bVSrYdBmK6rNPNGyt4YiVoJdHoYtJHn5OUxd5vT9x2W2U6hOBxHiJh2xQqtlTFKGPUfKJeV1r2oaHdEXU6lZBzsNocJ8p3lzB4asxt7asweGrPHxqrvxenE7npC_9d1X1EFXh8BrH-yD5htcQGjQx8yutn6FP5x4jefqKmn</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>2813887862</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Archaeological sites in Grand Canyon National Park along the Colorado River are eroding owing to six decades of Glen Canyon Dam operations</title><source>MEDLINE</source><source>Elsevier ScienceDirect Journals</source><creator>Sankey, Joel B. ; East, Amy ; Fairley, Helen C. ; Caster, Joshua ; Dierker, Jennifer ; Brennan, Ellen ; Pilkington, Lonnie ; Bransky, Nathaniel ; Kasprak, Alan</creator><creatorcontrib>Sankey, Joel B. ; East, Amy ; Fairley, Helen C. ; Caster, Joshua ; Dierker, Jennifer ; Brennan, Ellen ; Pilkington, Lonnie ; Bransky, Nathaniel ; Kasprak, Alan</creatorcontrib><description>The archaeological record documenting human history in deserts is commonly concentrated along rivers in terraces or other landforms built by river sediment deposits. Today that record is at risk in many river valleys owing to human resource and infrastructure development activities, including the construction and operation of dams. We assessed the effects of the operations of Glen Canyon Dam – which, since its closure in 1963, has imposed drastic changes to flow, sediment supply and distribution, and riparian vegetation – on a population of 362 archaeological sites in the Colorado River corridor through Grand Canyon National Park, Arizona, USA. We leverage 50 years of evidence from aerial photographs and more than 30 years of field observations and measurements of archaeological-site topography and wind patterns to evaluate changes in the physical integrity of archaeological sites using two geomorphology-based site classification systems. We find that most archaeological sites are eroding; moreover, most are at increased risk of continuing to erode, due to six decades of operations of Glen Canyon Dam. Results show that the wind-driven (aeolian) supply of river-sourced sand, essential for covering archaeological sites and protecting them from erosion, has decreased for most sites since 1973 owing to effects of long-term dam operations on river sediment supply and riparian vegetation expansion on sandbars. Results show that the proportion of sites affected by erosion from gullies controlled by the local base-level of the Colorado River has increased since 2000. These changes to landscape processes affecting archaeological site integrity limit the ability of the National Park Service and Grand Canyon-affiliated Native American Tribes to achieve environmental management goals to maintain or improve site integrity in situ. We identify three environmental management opportunities that could be used to a greater extent to decrease the risk of erosion and increase the potential for in-situ preservation of archaeological sites. Environmental management opportunities are: 1) sediment-rich controlled river floods to increase the aeolian supply of river-sourced sand, 2) extended periods of low river flow to increase the aeolian supply of river-sourced sand, 3) the removal of riparian vegetation barriers to the aeolian transport of river-sourced sand. •Integrity of 362 Colorado River archaeological sites assessed 60 years after damming.•River-sourced aeolian sand decreased since 1973, making most sites more erosion-prone.•Proportion of sites eroding by gully processes has increased since 2000.•Erosion limits management goal to maintain or improve site integrity in situ.•Environmental management opportunities: floods, low flows, riparian plant removal.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0301-4797</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1095-8630</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1016/j.jenvman.2023.118036</identifier><identifier>PMID: 37182479</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>England: Elsevier Ltd</publisher><subject>Aeolian ; Archaeological landscapes ; Archaeology ; Arizona ; Colorado ; Colorado River ; environmental management ; Erosion ; Geomorphology ; Humans ; infrastructure ; landforms ; national parks ; Parks, Recreational ; riparian vegetation ; risk ; river flow ; River regulation ; rivers ; Rivers - chemistry ; Sand ; topography ; U.S. National Park Service ; wind</subject><ispartof>Journal of environmental management, 2023-09, Vol.342, p.118036-118036, Article 118036</ispartof><rights>2023 The US Geological Survey</rights><rights>Copyright © 2023 The US Geological Survey. Published by Elsevier Ltd.. All rights reserved.</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c445t-7c221753666c93ce434d8ae23f5880b774daf29554450d9336993e872ec8ff893</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c445t-7c221753666c93ce434d8ae23f5880b774daf29554450d9336993e872ec8ff893</cites><orcidid>0000-0003-3150-4992 ; 0000-0001-8184-6128 ; 0000-0002-9567-9460 ; 0000-0003-1192-9504 ; 0000-0003-3113-7491 ; 0000-0002-7239-9474 ; 0000-0002-2858-1228 ; 0000-0001-6151-4804</orcidid></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0301479723008241$$EHTML$$P50$$Gelsevier$$Hfree_for_read</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,776,780,3536,27903,27904,65309</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37182479$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Sankey, Joel B.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>East, Amy</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Fairley, Helen C.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Caster, Joshua</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Dierker, Jennifer</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Brennan, Ellen</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Pilkington, Lonnie</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Bransky, Nathaniel</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Kasprak, Alan</creatorcontrib><title>Archaeological sites in Grand Canyon National Park along the Colorado River are eroding owing to six decades of Glen Canyon Dam operations</title><title>Journal of environmental management</title><addtitle>J Environ Manage</addtitle><description>The archaeological record documenting human history in deserts is commonly concentrated along rivers in terraces or other landforms built by river sediment deposits. Today that record is at risk in many river valleys owing to human resource and infrastructure development activities, including the construction and operation of dams. We assessed the effects of the operations of Glen Canyon Dam – which, since its closure in 1963, has imposed drastic changes to flow, sediment supply and distribution, and riparian vegetation – on a population of 362 archaeological sites in the Colorado River corridor through Grand Canyon National Park, Arizona, USA. We leverage 50 years of evidence from aerial photographs and more than 30 years of field observations and measurements of archaeological-site topography and wind patterns to evaluate changes in the physical integrity of archaeological sites using two geomorphology-based site classification systems. We find that most archaeological sites are eroding; moreover, most are at increased risk of continuing to erode, due to six decades of operations of Glen Canyon Dam. Results show that the wind-driven (aeolian) supply of river-sourced sand, essential for covering archaeological sites and protecting them from erosion, has decreased for most sites since 1973 owing to effects of long-term dam operations on river sediment supply and riparian vegetation expansion on sandbars. Results show that the proportion of sites affected by erosion from gullies controlled by the local base-level of the Colorado River has increased since 2000. These changes to landscape processes affecting archaeological site integrity limit the ability of the National Park Service and Grand Canyon-affiliated Native American Tribes to achieve environmental management goals to maintain or improve site integrity in situ. We identify three environmental management opportunities that could be used to a greater extent to decrease the risk of erosion and increase the potential for in-situ preservation of archaeological sites. Environmental management opportunities are: 1) sediment-rich controlled river floods to increase the aeolian supply of river-sourced sand, 2) extended periods of low river flow to increase the aeolian supply of river-sourced sand, 3) the removal of riparian vegetation barriers to the aeolian transport of river-sourced sand. •Integrity of 362 Colorado River archaeological sites assessed 60 years after damming.•River-sourced aeolian sand decreased since 1973, making most sites more erosion-prone.•Proportion of sites eroding by gully processes has increased since 2000.•Erosion limits management goal to maintain or improve site integrity in situ.•Environmental management opportunities: floods, low flows, riparian plant removal.</description><subject>Aeolian</subject><subject>Archaeological landscapes</subject><subject>Archaeology</subject><subject>Arizona</subject><subject>Colorado</subject><subject>Colorado River</subject><subject>environmental management</subject><subject>Erosion</subject><subject>Geomorphology</subject><subject>Humans</subject><subject>infrastructure</subject><subject>landforms</subject><subject>national parks</subject><subject>Parks, Recreational</subject><subject>riparian vegetation</subject><subject>risk</subject><subject>river flow</subject><subject>River regulation</subject><subject>rivers</subject><subject>Rivers - chemistry</subject><subject>Sand</subject><subject>topography</subject><subject>U.S. National Park Service</subject><subject>wind</subject><issn>0301-4797</issn><issn>1095-8630</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2023</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>EIF</sourceid><recordid>eNqNkc1uEzEUhS0EoqHwCCAv2Uzwz8zYXqEqhYBUAUKwtm7tO63DjB3sSaCvwFPjkJQtbO5dnO-cK_sQ8pyzJWe8f7VZbjDuJ4hLwYRccq6Z7B-QBWema3Qv2UOyYJLxplVGnZEnpWwYY1Jw9ZicScW1qMKC_LrI7hYwjekmOBhpCTMWGiJdZ4ieriDepUg_wBxSrPInyN8ojCne0PkW6ar6MvhEP4c9ZgoZKebkQ5XTj8OcU038ST068DU3DXQ9YryPvYSJpi3mP-nlKXk0wFjw2Wmfk69v33xZvWuuPq7fry6uGte23dwoJ-ojOtn3vTPSYStbrwGFHDqt2bVSrYdBmK6rNPNGyt4YiVoJdHoYtJHn5OUxd5vT9x2W2U6hOBxHiJh2xQqtlTFKGPUfKJeV1r2oaHdEXU6lZBzsNocJ8p3lzB4asxt7asweGrPHxqrvxenE7npC_9d1X1EFXh8BrH-yD5htcQGjQx8yutn6FP5x4jefqKmn</recordid><startdate>20230915</startdate><enddate>20230915</enddate><creator>Sankey, Joel B.</creator><creator>East, Amy</creator><creator>Fairley, Helen C.</creator><creator>Caster, Joshua</creator><creator>Dierker, Jennifer</creator><creator>Brennan, Ellen</creator><creator>Pilkington, Lonnie</creator><creator>Bransky, Nathaniel</creator><creator>Kasprak, Alan</creator><general>Elsevier Ltd</general><scope>6I.</scope><scope>AAFTH</scope><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7X8</scope><scope>7S9</scope><scope>L.6</scope><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0003-3150-4992</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0001-8184-6128</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-9567-9460</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0003-1192-9504</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0003-3113-7491</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-7239-9474</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-2858-1228</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0001-6151-4804</orcidid></search><sort><creationdate>20230915</creationdate><title>Archaeological sites in Grand Canyon National Park along the Colorado River are eroding owing to six decades of Glen Canyon Dam operations</title><author>Sankey, Joel B. ; East, Amy ; Fairley, Helen C. ; Caster, Joshua ; Dierker, Jennifer ; Brennan, Ellen ; Pilkington, Lonnie ; Bransky, Nathaniel ; Kasprak, Alan</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c445t-7c221753666c93ce434d8ae23f5880b774daf29554450d9336993e872ec8ff893</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2023</creationdate><topic>Aeolian</topic><topic>Archaeological landscapes</topic><topic>Archaeology</topic><topic>Arizona</topic><topic>Colorado</topic><topic>Colorado River</topic><topic>environmental management</topic><topic>Erosion</topic><topic>Geomorphology</topic><topic>Humans</topic><topic>infrastructure</topic><topic>landforms</topic><topic>national parks</topic><topic>Parks, Recreational</topic><topic>riparian vegetation</topic><topic>risk</topic><topic>river flow</topic><topic>River regulation</topic><topic>rivers</topic><topic>Rivers - chemistry</topic><topic>Sand</topic><topic>topography</topic><topic>U.S. National Park Service</topic><topic>wind</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Sankey, Joel B.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>East, Amy</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Fairley, Helen C.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Caster, Joshua</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Dierker, Jennifer</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Brennan, Ellen</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Pilkington, Lonnie</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Bransky, Nathaniel</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Kasprak, Alan</creatorcontrib><collection>ScienceDirect Open Access Titles</collection><collection>Elsevier:ScienceDirect:Open Access</collection><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><collection>AGRICOLA</collection><collection>AGRICOLA - Academic</collection><jtitle>Journal of environmental management</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Sankey, Joel B.</au><au>East, Amy</au><au>Fairley, Helen C.</au><au>Caster, Joshua</au><au>Dierker, Jennifer</au><au>Brennan, Ellen</au><au>Pilkington, Lonnie</au><au>Bransky, Nathaniel</au><au>Kasprak, Alan</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Archaeological sites in Grand Canyon National Park along the Colorado River are eroding owing to six decades of Glen Canyon Dam operations</atitle><jtitle>Journal of environmental management</jtitle><addtitle>J Environ Manage</addtitle><date>2023-09-15</date><risdate>2023</risdate><volume>342</volume><spage>118036</spage><epage>118036</epage><pages>118036-118036</pages><artnum>118036</artnum><issn>0301-4797</issn><eissn>1095-8630</eissn><abstract>The archaeological record documenting human history in deserts is commonly concentrated along rivers in terraces or other landforms built by river sediment deposits. Today that record is at risk in many river valleys owing to human resource and infrastructure development activities, including the construction and operation of dams. We assessed the effects of the operations of Glen Canyon Dam – which, since its closure in 1963, has imposed drastic changes to flow, sediment supply and distribution, and riparian vegetation – on a population of 362 archaeological sites in the Colorado River corridor through Grand Canyon National Park, Arizona, USA. We leverage 50 years of evidence from aerial photographs and more than 30 years of field observations and measurements of archaeological-site topography and wind patterns to evaluate changes in the physical integrity of archaeological sites using two geomorphology-based site classification systems. We find that most archaeological sites are eroding; moreover, most are at increased risk of continuing to erode, due to six decades of operations of Glen Canyon Dam. Results show that the wind-driven (aeolian) supply of river-sourced sand, essential for covering archaeological sites and protecting them from erosion, has decreased for most sites since 1973 owing to effects of long-term dam operations on river sediment supply and riparian vegetation expansion on sandbars. Results show that the proportion of sites affected by erosion from gullies controlled by the local base-level of the Colorado River has increased since 2000. These changes to landscape processes affecting archaeological site integrity limit the ability of the National Park Service and Grand Canyon-affiliated Native American Tribes to achieve environmental management goals to maintain or improve site integrity in situ. We identify three environmental management opportunities that could be used to a greater extent to decrease the risk of erosion and increase the potential for in-situ preservation of archaeological sites. Environmental management opportunities are: 1) sediment-rich controlled river floods to increase the aeolian supply of river-sourced sand, 2) extended periods of low river flow to increase the aeolian supply of river-sourced sand, 3) the removal of riparian vegetation barriers to the aeolian transport of river-sourced sand. •Integrity of 362 Colorado River archaeological sites assessed 60 years after damming.•River-sourced aeolian sand decreased since 1973, making most sites more erosion-prone.•Proportion of sites eroding by gully processes has increased since 2000.•Erosion limits management goal to maintain or improve site integrity in situ.•Environmental management opportunities: floods, low flows, riparian plant removal.</abstract><cop>England</cop><pub>Elsevier Ltd</pub><pmid>37182479</pmid><doi>10.1016/j.jenvman.2023.118036</doi><tpages>1</tpages><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0003-3150-4992</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0001-8184-6128</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-9567-9460</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0003-1192-9504</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0003-3113-7491</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-7239-9474</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-2858-1228</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0001-6151-4804</orcidid><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 0301-4797
ispartof Journal of environmental management, 2023-09, Vol.342, p.118036-118036, Article 118036
issn 0301-4797
1095-8630
language eng
recordid cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_2813887862
source MEDLINE; Elsevier ScienceDirect Journals
subjects Aeolian
Archaeological landscapes
Archaeology
Arizona
Colorado
Colorado River
environmental management
Erosion
Geomorphology
Humans
infrastructure
landforms
national parks
Parks, Recreational
riparian vegetation
risk
river flow
River regulation
rivers
Rivers - chemistry
Sand
topography
U.S. National Park Service
wind
title Archaeological sites in Grand Canyon National Park along the Colorado River are eroding owing to six decades of Glen Canyon Dam operations
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-26T06%3A28%3A04IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Archaeological%20sites%20in%20Grand%20Canyon%20National%20Park%20along%20the%20Colorado%20River%20are%20eroding%20owing%20to%20six%20decades%20of%20Glen%20Canyon%20Dam%20operations&rft.jtitle=Journal%20of%20environmental%20management&rft.au=Sankey,%20Joel%20B.&rft.date=2023-09-15&rft.volume=342&rft.spage=118036&rft.epage=118036&rft.pages=118036-118036&rft.artnum=118036&rft.issn=0301-4797&rft.eissn=1095-8630&rft_id=info:doi/10.1016/j.jenvman.2023.118036&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E2813887862%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=2813887862&rft_id=info:pmid/37182479&rft_els_id=S0301479723008241&rfr_iscdi=true