Social and structural determinants of injection drug use‐associated bacterial and fungal infections: A qualitative systematic review and thematic synthesis
Background and aims Injection drug use‐associated bacterial and fungal infections are increasingly common, and social contexts shape individuals’ injecting practices and treatment experiences. We sought to synthesize qualitative studies of social–structural factors influencing incidence and treatmen...
Gespeichert in:
Veröffentlicht in: | Addiction (Abingdon, England) England), 2023-10, Vol.118 (10), p.1853-1877 |
---|---|
Hauptverfasser: | , , , , , , , |
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | eng |
Schlagworte: | |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
container_end_page | 1877 |
---|---|
container_issue | 10 |
container_start_page | 1853 |
container_title | Addiction (Abingdon, England) |
container_volume | 118 |
creator | Brothers, Thomas D. Bonn, Matthew Lewer, Dan Comeau, Emilie Kim, Inhwa Webster, Duncan Hayward, Andrew Harris, Magdalena |
description | Background and aims
Injection drug use‐associated bacterial and fungal infections are increasingly common, and social contexts shape individuals’ injecting practices and treatment experiences. We sought to synthesize qualitative studies of social–structural factors influencing incidence and treatment of injecting‐related infections.
Methods
We searched PubMed, EMBASE, Scopus, CINAHL and PsycINFO from 1 January 2000 to 18 February 2021. Informed by Rhodes’ ‘risk environment’ framework, we performed thematic synthesis in three stages: (1) line‐by‐line coding; (2) organizing codes into descriptive themes, reflecting interpretations of study authors; and (3) consolidating descriptive themes into conceptual categories to identify higher‐order analytical themes.
Results
We screened 4841 s and included 26 qualitative studies on experiences of injecting‐related bacterial and fungal infections. We identified six descriptive themes organized into two analytical themes. The first analytical theme, social production of risk, considered macro‐environmental influences. Four descriptive themes highlighted pathways through which this occurs: (1) unregulated drug supply, leading to poor drug quality and solubility; (2) unsafe spaces, influenced by policing practices and insecure housing; (3) health‐care policies and practices, leading to negative experiences that discourage access to care; and (4) restrictions on harm reduction programmes, including structural barriers to effective service provision. The second analytical theme, practices of care among people who use drugs, addressed protective strategies that people employ within infection risk environments. Associated descriptive themes were: (5) mutual care, including assisted‐injecting and sharing sterile equipment; and (6) self‐care, including vein health and self‐treatment. Within constraining risk environments, some protective strategies for bacterial infections precipitated other health risks (e.g. HIV transmission).
Conclusions
Injecting‐related bacterial and fungal infections are shaped by modifiable social–structural factors, including poor quality unregulated drugs, criminalization and policing enforcement, insufficient housing, limited harm reduction services and harmful health‐care practices. People who inject drugs navigate these barriers while attempting to protect themselves and their community. |
doi_str_mv | 10.1111/add.16257 |
format | Article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_2813567268</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>2813567268</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c3887-1eef68c33c9e84cb949620d4286833c2b6c4d1d7eacfe1f25e575de9a1356cae3</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp1kc1u1DAURi1ERacDC14AWWLTLtL6J4kTdqMWaKVKLIB15LFvikeJ0_rarWbHI_ACvBxPgqeZsqiEN76-Ot-RpY-Qt5yd8nzOtLWnvBaVekEWXNasYGUpX5IFa-uqELxkh-QIccMYU01bviKHUnHFGqUW5PfXyTg9UO0txRiSiSnkp4UIYXRe-4h06qnzGzDRTZ7akG5oQvjz85dG3IUjWLrWJgeeRH3yN3l0vp9D-IGu6F3Sg4s6unuguMUIY54NDXDv4OExFn_sd7j1eUaHr8lBrweEN_t7Sb5_-vjt_LK4_vL56nx1XRjZNKrgAH3dGClNC01p1m3Z1oLZUjR1k5diXZvScqtAmx54LyqoVGWh1VxWtdEgl-R49t6G6S4Bxm50aGAYtIcpYSeaHalE1i3J-2foZkrB599lquasrUQlM3UyUyZMiAH67ja4UYdtx1m366zLnXWPnWX23d6Y1iPYf-RTSRk4m4EHN8D2_6ZudXExK_8C2C2lFg</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>2861095253</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Social and structural determinants of injection drug use‐associated bacterial and fungal infections: A qualitative systematic review and thematic synthesis</title><source>Wiley Online Library Journals Frontfile Complete</source><creator>Brothers, Thomas D. ; Bonn, Matthew ; Lewer, Dan ; Comeau, Emilie ; Kim, Inhwa ; Webster, Duncan ; Hayward, Andrew ; Harris, Magdalena</creator><creatorcontrib>Brothers, Thomas D. ; Bonn, Matthew ; Lewer, Dan ; Comeau, Emilie ; Kim, Inhwa ; Webster, Duncan ; Hayward, Andrew ; Harris, Magdalena</creatorcontrib><description>Background and aims
Injection drug use‐associated bacterial and fungal infections are increasingly common, and social contexts shape individuals’ injecting practices and treatment experiences. We sought to synthesize qualitative studies of social–structural factors influencing incidence and treatment of injecting‐related infections.
Methods
We searched PubMed, EMBASE, Scopus, CINAHL and PsycINFO from 1 January 2000 to 18 February 2021. Informed by Rhodes’ ‘risk environment’ framework, we performed thematic synthesis in three stages: (1) line‐by‐line coding; (2) organizing codes into descriptive themes, reflecting interpretations of study authors; and (3) consolidating descriptive themes into conceptual categories to identify higher‐order analytical themes.
Results
We screened 4841 s and included 26 qualitative studies on experiences of injecting‐related bacterial and fungal infections. We identified six descriptive themes organized into two analytical themes. The first analytical theme, social production of risk, considered macro‐environmental influences. Four descriptive themes highlighted pathways through which this occurs: (1) unregulated drug supply, leading to poor drug quality and solubility; (2) unsafe spaces, influenced by policing practices and insecure housing; (3) health‐care policies and practices, leading to negative experiences that discourage access to care; and (4) restrictions on harm reduction programmes, including structural barriers to effective service provision. The second analytical theme, practices of care among people who use drugs, addressed protective strategies that people employ within infection risk environments. Associated descriptive themes were: (5) mutual care, including assisted‐injecting and sharing sterile equipment; and (6) self‐care, including vein health and self‐treatment. Within constraining risk environments, some protective strategies for bacterial infections precipitated other health risks (e.g. HIV transmission).
Conclusions
Injecting‐related bacterial and fungal infections are shaped by modifiable social–structural factors, including poor quality unregulated drugs, criminalization and policing enforcement, insufficient housing, limited harm reduction services and harmful health‐care practices. People who inject drugs navigate these barriers while attempting to protect themselves and their community.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0965-2140</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1360-0443</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1111/add.16257</identifier><identifier>PMID: 37170877</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>England: Blackwell Publishing Ltd</publisher><subject>Bacteria ; Bacterial infection ; Bacterial infections ; Criminalization ; Disease transmission ; Drug abuse ; Drug use ; Endocarditis ; Enforcement ; Environmental aspects ; epidural abscess ; Fungal infections ; Harm reduction ; Health risks ; HIV ; Housing ; Human immunodeficiency virus ; injecting drug use ; injection drug use ; Negative experiences ; Policing ; Qualitative research ; risk environment ; Risk factors ; Self care ; Self-medication ; skin and soft‐tissue infections ; social determinants ; Social environment ; Systematic review ; Unsafe</subject><ispartof>Addiction (Abingdon, England), 2023-10, Vol.118 (10), p.1853-1877</ispartof><rights>2023 The Authors. published by John Wiley & Sons Ltd on behalf of Society for the Study of Addiction.</rights><rights>2023 The Authors. Addiction published by John Wiley & Sons Ltd on behalf of Society for the Study of Addiction.</rights><rights>2023. This article is published under http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ (the “License”). Notwithstanding the ProQuest Terms and Conditions, you may use this content in accordance with the terms of the License.</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c3887-1eef68c33c9e84cb949620d4286833c2b6c4d1d7eacfe1f25e575de9a1356cae3</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c3887-1eef68c33c9e84cb949620d4286833c2b6c4d1d7eacfe1f25e575de9a1356cae3</cites><orcidid>0000-0001-7692-7150 ; 0000-0002-5570-5556 ; 0000-0002-6406-0171 ; 0000-0001-8718-8226 ; 0000-0003-3698-7196 ; 0000-0002-3549-6232</orcidid></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/pdf/10.1111%2Fadd.16257$$EPDF$$P50$$Gwiley$$Hfree_for_read</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/full/10.1111%2Fadd.16257$$EHTML$$P50$$Gwiley$$Hfree_for_read</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,776,780,1411,27903,27904,45553,45554</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37170877$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Brothers, Thomas D.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Bonn, Matthew</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Lewer, Dan</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Comeau, Emilie</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Kim, Inhwa</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Webster, Duncan</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Hayward, Andrew</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Harris, Magdalena</creatorcontrib><title>Social and structural determinants of injection drug use‐associated bacterial and fungal infections: A qualitative systematic review and thematic synthesis</title><title>Addiction (Abingdon, England)</title><addtitle>Addiction</addtitle><description>Background and aims
Injection drug use‐associated bacterial and fungal infections are increasingly common, and social contexts shape individuals’ injecting practices and treatment experiences. We sought to synthesize qualitative studies of social–structural factors influencing incidence and treatment of injecting‐related infections.
Methods
We searched PubMed, EMBASE, Scopus, CINAHL and PsycINFO from 1 January 2000 to 18 February 2021. Informed by Rhodes’ ‘risk environment’ framework, we performed thematic synthesis in three stages: (1) line‐by‐line coding; (2) organizing codes into descriptive themes, reflecting interpretations of study authors; and (3) consolidating descriptive themes into conceptual categories to identify higher‐order analytical themes.
Results
We screened 4841 s and included 26 qualitative studies on experiences of injecting‐related bacterial and fungal infections. We identified six descriptive themes organized into two analytical themes. The first analytical theme, social production of risk, considered macro‐environmental influences. Four descriptive themes highlighted pathways through which this occurs: (1) unregulated drug supply, leading to poor drug quality and solubility; (2) unsafe spaces, influenced by policing practices and insecure housing; (3) health‐care policies and practices, leading to negative experiences that discourage access to care; and (4) restrictions on harm reduction programmes, including structural barriers to effective service provision. The second analytical theme, practices of care among people who use drugs, addressed protective strategies that people employ within infection risk environments. Associated descriptive themes were: (5) mutual care, including assisted‐injecting and sharing sterile equipment; and (6) self‐care, including vein health and self‐treatment. Within constraining risk environments, some protective strategies for bacterial infections precipitated other health risks (e.g. HIV transmission).
Conclusions
Injecting‐related bacterial and fungal infections are shaped by modifiable social–structural factors, including poor quality unregulated drugs, criminalization and policing enforcement, insufficient housing, limited harm reduction services and harmful health‐care practices. People who inject drugs navigate these barriers while attempting to protect themselves and their community.</description><subject>Bacteria</subject><subject>Bacterial infection</subject><subject>Bacterial infections</subject><subject>Criminalization</subject><subject>Disease transmission</subject><subject>Drug abuse</subject><subject>Drug use</subject><subject>Endocarditis</subject><subject>Enforcement</subject><subject>Environmental aspects</subject><subject>epidural abscess</subject><subject>Fungal infections</subject><subject>Harm reduction</subject><subject>Health risks</subject><subject>HIV</subject><subject>Housing</subject><subject>Human immunodeficiency virus</subject><subject>injecting drug use</subject><subject>injection drug use</subject><subject>Negative experiences</subject><subject>Policing</subject><subject>Qualitative research</subject><subject>risk environment</subject><subject>Risk factors</subject><subject>Self care</subject><subject>Self-medication</subject><subject>skin and soft‐tissue infections</subject><subject>social determinants</subject><subject>Social environment</subject><subject>Systematic review</subject><subject>Unsafe</subject><issn>0965-2140</issn><issn>1360-0443</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2023</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>24P</sourceid><recordid>eNp1kc1u1DAURi1ERacDC14AWWLTLtL6J4kTdqMWaKVKLIB15LFvikeJ0_rarWbHI_ACvBxPgqeZsqiEN76-Ot-RpY-Qt5yd8nzOtLWnvBaVekEWXNasYGUpX5IFa-uqELxkh-QIccMYU01bviKHUnHFGqUW5PfXyTg9UO0txRiSiSnkp4UIYXRe-4h06qnzGzDRTZ7akG5oQvjz85dG3IUjWLrWJgeeRH3yN3l0vp9D-IGu6F3Sg4s6unuguMUIY54NDXDv4OExFn_sd7j1eUaHr8lBrweEN_t7Sb5_-vjt_LK4_vL56nx1XRjZNKrgAH3dGClNC01p1m3Z1oLZUjR1k5diXZvScqtAmx54LyqoVGWh1VxWtdEgl-R49t6G6S4Bxm50aGAYtIcpYSeaHalE1i3J-2foZkrB599lquasrUQlM3UyUyZMiAH67ja4UYdtx1m366zLnXWPnWX23d6Y1iPYf-RTSRk4m4EHN8D2_6ZudXExK_8C2C2lFg</recordid><startdate>202310</startdate><enddate>202310</enddate><creator>Brothers, Thomas D.</creator><creator>Bonn, Matthew</creator><creator>Lewer, Dan</creator><creator>Comeau, Emilie</creator><creator>Kim, Inhwa</creator><creator>Webster, Duncan</creator><creator>Hayward, Andrew</creator><creator>Harris, Magdalena</creator><general>Blackwell Publishing Ltd</general><scope>24P</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7QG</scope><scope>7TK</scope><scope>8BJ</scope><scope>FQK</scope><scope>JBE</scope><scope>K9.</scope><scope>NAPCQ</scope><scope>7X8</scope><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0001-7692-7150</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-5570-5556</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-6406-0171</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0001-8718-8226</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0003-3698-7196</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-3549-6232</orcidid></search><sort><creationdate>202310</creationdate><title>Social and structural determinants of injection drug use‐associated bacterial and fungal infections: A qualitative systematic review and thematic synthesis</title><author>Brothers, Thomas D. ; Bonn, Matthew ; Lewer, Dan ; Comeau, Emilie ; Kim, Inhwa ; Webster, Duncan ; Hayward, Andrew ; Harris, Magdalena</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c3887-1eef68c33c9e84cb949620d4286833c2b6c4d1d7eacfe1f25e575de9a1356cae3</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2023</creationdate><topic>Bacteria</topic><topic>Bacterial infection</topic><topic>Bacterial infections</topic><topic>Criminalization</topic><topic>Disease transmission</topic><topic>Drug abuse</topic><topic>Drug use</topic><topic>Endocarditis</topic><topic>Enforcement</topic><topic>Environmental aspects</topic><topic>epidural abscess</topic><topic>Fungal infections</topic><topic>Harm reduction</topic><topic>Health risks</topic><topic>HIV</topic><topic>Housing</topic><topic>Human immunodeficiency virus</topic><topic>injecting drug use</topic><topic>injection drug use</topic><topic>Negative experiences</topic><topic>Policing</topic><topic>Qualitative research</topic><topic>risk environment</topic><topic>Risk factors</topic><topic>Self care</topic><topic>Self-medication</topic><topic>skin and soft‐tissue infections</topic><topic>social determinants</topic><topic>Social environment</topic><topic>Systematic review</topic><topic>Unsafe</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Brothers, Thomas D.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Bonn, Matthew</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Lewer, Dan</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Comeau, Emilie</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Kim, Inhwa</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Webster, Duncan</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Hayward, Andrew</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Harris, Magdalena</creatorcontrib><collection>Wiley-Blackwell Open Access Titles</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>Animal Behavior Abstracts</collection><collection>Neurosciences Abstracts</collection><collection>International Bibliography of the Social Sciences (IBSS)</collection><collection>International Bibliography of the Social Sciences</collection><collection>International Bibliography of the Social Sciences</collection><collection>ProQuest Health & Medical Complete (Alumni)</collection><collection>Nursing & Allied Health Premium</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><jtitle>Addiction (Abingdon, England)</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Brothers, Thomas D.</au><au>Bonn, Matthew</au><au>Lewer, Dan</au><au>Comeau, Emilie</au><au>Kim, Inhwa</au><au>Webster, Duncan</au><au>Hayward, Andrew</au><au>Harris, Magdalena</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Social and structural determinants of injection drug use‐associated bacterial and fungal infections: A qualitative systematic review and thematic synthesis</atitle><jtitle>Addiction (Abingdon, England)</jtitle><addtitle>Addiction</addtitle><date>2023-10</date><risdate>2023</risdate><volume>118</volume><issue>10</issue><spage>1853</spage><epage>1877</epage><pages>1853-1877</pages><issn>0965-2140</issn><eissn>1360-0443</eissn><abstract>Background and aims
Injection drug use‐associated bacterial and fungal infections are increasingly common, and social contexts shape individuals’ injecting practices and treatment experiences. We sought to synthesize qualitative studies of social–structural factors influencing incidence and treatment of injecting‐related infections.
Methods
We searched PubMed, EMBASE, Scopus, CINAHL and PsycINFO from 1 January 2000 to 18 February 2021. Informed by Rhodes’ ‘risk environment’ framework, we performed thematic synthesis in three stages: (1) line‐by‐line coding; (2) organizing codes into descriptive themes, reflecting interpretations of study authors; and (3) consolidating descriptive themes into conceptual categories to identify higher‐order analytical themes.
Results
We screened 4841 s and included 26 qualitative studies on experiences of injecting‐related bacterial and fungal infections. We identified six descriptive themes organized into two analytical themes. The first analytical theme, social production of risk, considered macro‐environmental influences. Four descriptive themes highlighted pathways through which this occurs: (1) unregulated drug supply, leading to poor drug quality and solubility; (2) unsafe spaces, influenced by policing practices and insecure housing; (3) health‐care policies and practices, leading to negative experiences that discourage access to care; and (4) restrictions on harm reduction programmes, including structural barriers to effective service provision. The second analytical theme, practices of care among people who use drugs, addressed protective strategies that people employ within infection risk environments. Associated descriptive themes were: (5) mutual care, including assisted‐injecting and sharing sterile equipment; and (6) self‐care, including vein health and self‐treatment. Within constraining risk environments, some protective strategies for bacterial infections precipitated other health risks (e.g. HIV transmission).
Conclusions
Injecting‐related bacterial and fungal infections are shaped by modifiable social–structural factors, including poor quality unregulated drugs, criminalization and policing enforcement, insufficient housing, limited harm reduction services and harmful health‐care practices. People who inject drugs navigate these barriers while attempting to protect themselves and their community.</abstract><cop>England</cop><pub>Blackwell Publishing Ltd</pub><pmid>37170877</pmid><doi>10.1111/add.16257</doi><tpages>25</tpages><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0001-7692-7150</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-5570-5556</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-6406-0171</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0001-8718-8226</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0003-3698-7196</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-3549-6232</orcidid><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | ISSN: 0965-2140 |
ispartof | Addiction (Abingdon, England), 2023-10, Vol.118 (10), p.1853-1877 |
issn | 0965-2140 1360-0443 |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_2813567268 |
source | Wiley Online Library Journals Frontfile Complete |
subjects | Bacteria Bacterial infection Bacterial infections Criminalization Disease transmission Drug abuse Drug use Endocarditis Enforcement Environmental aspects epidural abscess Fungal infections Harm reduction Health risks HIV Housing Human immunodeficiency virus injecting drug use injection drug use Negative experiences Policing Qualitative research risk environment Risk factors Self care Self-medication skin and soft‐tissue infections social determinants Social environment Systematic review Unsafe |
title | Social and structural determinants of injection drug use‐associated bacterial and fungal infections: A qualitative systematic review and thematic synthesis |
url | https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-27T17%3A50%3A59IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Social%20and%20structural%20determinants%20of%20injection%20drug%20use%E2%80%90associated%20bacterial%20and%20fungal%20infections:%20A%20qualitative%20systematic%20review%20and%20thematic%20synthesis&rft.jtitle=Addiction%20(Abingdon,%20England)&rft.au=Brothers,%20Thomas%20D.&rft.date=2023-10&rft.volume=118&rft.issue=10&rft.spage=1853&rft.epage=1877&rft.pages=1853-1877&rft.issn=0965-2140&rft.eissn=1360-0443&rft_id=info:doi/10.1111/add.16257&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E2813567268%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=2861095253&rft_id=info:pmid/37170877&rfr_iscdi=true |