Comparison between two minimally invasive techniques for Hirschsprung disease: transanal endorectal pull-through (TERPT) versus laparoscopic-TERPT

Introduction Surgical treatment for Hirschsprung disease (HD) has recently evolved into different minimally invasive techniques. The aim of the present study is to compare results from two different minimal invasive approaches, transanal endorectal pull-through (TERPT) and laparoscopic-assisted endo...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Pediatric surgery international 2023-05, Vol.39 (1), p.198-198, Article 198
Hauptverfasser: Cantone, Noemi, Catania, Vincenzo Davide, Zulli, Andrea, Thomas, Eduje, Severi, Elisa, Francesca, Tocchioni, Nicola, Centonze, Enrico, Ciardini, Bruno, Noccioli, Michele, Libri, Tommaso, Gargano, Mario, Lima
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
Beschreibung
Zusammenfassung:Introduction Surgical treatment for Hirschsprung disease (HD) has recently evolved into different minimally invasive techniques. The aim of the present study is to compare results from two different minimal invasive approaches, transanal endorectal pull-through (TERPT) and laparoscopic-assisted endorectal pull-through (LA-TERPT). Methods Patients have been divided into two groups according to surgical technique. Data of HD patients treated by TERPT and those treated by LA-TERPT, respectively, performed at two different centers from January 2007 to December 2017, were retrospectively collected. Patients with aganglionosis confined to the recto-sigmoid colon with a minimum follow-up period of 4 years have been included. Demographic, clinical, surgical and functional outcome data were reviewed for each group using Chi-square and Fisher tests (statistical differences were considered for p  
ISSN:1437-9813
0179-0358
1437-9813
DOI:10.1007/s00383-023-05473-3