Comparative Statistical Analysis of Test Parts Manufactured in Production Environments
Estimating error uncertainties arising in production parts is not a well-understood process. An approach to estimate these uncertainties was developed in this study. Machine tool error components were measured on a three-axis vertical machining center. Multiple parts were produced on the measured ma...
Gespeichert in:
| Veröffentlicht in: | Journal of manufacturing science and engineering 2004-02, Vol.126 (1), p.189-199 |
|---|---|
| Hauptverfasser: | , |
| Format: | Artikel |
| Sprache: | eng |
| Schlagworte: | |
| Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
| Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
| container_end_page | 199 |
|---|---|
| container_issue | 1 |
| container_start_page | 189 |
| container_title | Journal of manufacturing science and engineering |
| container_volume | 126 |
| creator | Gilsinn, David E Ling, Alice V |
| description | Estimating error uncertainties arising in production parts is not a well-understood process. An approach to estimate these uncertainties was developed in this study. Machine tool error components were measured on a three-axis vertical machining center. Multiple parts were produced on the measured machining center then measured on a coordinate measuring machine. Uncertainty models for hole-center to hole-center lengths and orthogonalities were developed using measured machine tool errors. These estimated uncertainties were compared against measured uncertainties. The main conclusion from the study is that the Law of Propagation of Uncertainties can be used to estimate machining uncertainties. |
| doi_str_mv | 10.1115/1.1645876 |
| format | Article |
| fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_28120661</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>28120661</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-a268t-58d5ee18c3a7a371b0abe2576f9661ed82040495e1561a22801d4604090419f23</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNpFkE1LxDAQhoso-Hnw7CUXBQ_VTNqk6VEWv0BxwY9rGNsUIm2yZtIF_72RXfD0DsMzL8NTFKfArwBAXsMVqFrqRu0UByCFLnVbyd08c92UUMlmvzgk-uIcQNfVQfGxCNMKIya3tuw15aTkOhzZjcfxhxyxMLA3S4ktMSZiz-jnAbs0R9sz59kyhn7ukgue3fq1i8FP1ic6LvYGHMmebPOoeL-7fVs8lE8v94-Lm6cShdKplLqX1oLuKmywauCT46cVslFDqxTYXgte87qVFqQCFEJz6GuVdy2voR1EdVRcbHpXMXzP-U0zOersOKK3YSYjNAieqzJ4uQG7GIiiHcwqugnjjwFu_swZMFtzmT3fliJlFUNE3zn6P5BKtA1UmTvbcEiTNV9hjtkZmVoJDnX1C_TJdW0</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>28120661</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Comparative Statistical Analysis of Test Parts Manufactured in Production Environments</title><source>ASME Transactions Journals (Current)</source><creator>Gilsinn, David E ; Ling, Alice V</creator><creatorcontrib>Gilsinn, David E ; Ling, Alice V</creatorcontrib><description>Estimating error uncertainties arising in production parts is not a well-understood process. An approach to estimate these uncertainties was developed in this study. Machine tool error components were measured on a three-axis vertical machining center. Multiple parts were produced on the measured machining center then measured on a coordinate measuring machine. Uncertainty models for hole-center to hole-center lengths and orthogonalities were developed using measured machine tool errors. These estimated uncertainties were compared against measured uncertainties. The main conclusion from the study is that the Law of Propagation of Uncertainties can be used to estimate machining uncertainties.</description><identifier>ISSN: 1087-1357</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1528-8935</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1115/1.1645876</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>New York, NY: ASME</publisher><subject>Applied sciences ; Exact sciences and technology ; Mechanical engineering. Machine design</subject><ispartof>Journal of manufacturing science and engineering, 2004-02, Vol.126 (1), p.189-199</ispartof><rights>2004 INIST-CNRS</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-a268t-58d5ee18c3a7a371b0abe2576f9661ed82040495e1561a22801d4604090419f23</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><link.rule.ids>314,776,780,27901,27902,38497</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttp://pascal-francis.inist.fr/vibad/index.php?action=getRecordDetail&idt=15629713$$DView record in Pascal Francis$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Gilsinn, David E</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Ling, Alice V</creatorcontrib><title>Comparative Statistical Analysis of Test Parts Manufactured in Production Environments</title><title>Journal of manufacturing science and engineering</title><addtitle>J. Manuf. Sci. Eng</addtitle><description>Estimating error uncertainties arising in production parts is not a well-understood process. An approach to estimate these uncertainties was developed in this study. Machine tool error components were measured on a three-axis vertical machining center. Multiple parts were produced on the measured machining center then measured on a coordinate measuring machine. Uncertainty models for hole-center to hole-center lengths and orthogonalities were developed using measured machine tool errors. These estimated uncertainties were compared against measured uncertainties. The main conclusion from the study is that the Law of Propagation of Uncertainties can be used to estimate machining uncertainties.</description><subject>Applied sciences</subject><subject>Exact sciences and technology</subject><subject>Mechanical engineering. Machine design</subject><issn>1087-1357</issn><issn>1528-8935</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2004</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><recordid>eNpFkE1LxDAQhoso-Hnw7CUXBQ_VTNqk6VEWv0BxwY9rGNsUIm2yZtIF_72RXfD0DsMzL8NTFKfArwBAXsMVqFrqRu0UByCFLnVbyd08c92UUMlmvzgk-uIcQNfVQfGxCNMKIya3tuw15aTkOhzZjcfxhxyxMLA3S4ktMSZiz-jnAbs0R9sz59kyhn7ukgue3fq1i8FP1ic6LvYGHMmebPOoeL-7fVs8lE8v94-Lm6cShdKplLqX1oLuKmywauCT46cVslFDqxTYXgte87qVFqQCFEJz6GuVdy2voR1EdVRcbHpXMXzP-U0zOersOKK3YSYjNAieqzJ4uQG7GIiiHcwqugnjjwFu_swZMFtzmT3fliJlFUNE3zn6P5BKtA1UmTvbcEiTNV9hjtkZmVoJDnX1C_TJdW0</recordid><startdate>20040201</startdate><enddate>20040201</enddate><creator>Gilsinn, David E</creator><creator>Ling, Alice V</creator><general>ASME</general><general>American Society of Mechanical Engineers</general><scope>IQODW</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7TB</scope><scope>8FD</scope><scope>FR3</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20040201</creationdate><title>Comparative Statistical Analysis of Test Parts Manufactured in Production Environments</title><author>Gilsinn, David E ; Ling, Alice V</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-a268t-58d5ee18c3a7a371b0abe2576f9661ed82040495e1561a22801d4604090419f23</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2004</creationdate><topic>Applied sciences</topic><topic>Exact sciences and technology</topic><topic>Mechanical engineering. Machine design</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Gilsinn, David E</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Ling, Alice V</creatorcontrib><collection>Pascal-Francis</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>Mechanical & Transportation Engineering Abstracts</collection><collection>Technology Research Database</collection><collection>Engineering Research Database</collection><jtitle>Journal of manufacturing science and engineering</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Gilsinn, David E</au><au>Ling, Alice V</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Comparative Statistical Analysis of Test Parts Manufactured in Production Environments</atitle><jtitle>Journal of manufacturing science and engineering</jtitle><stitle>J. Manuf. Sci. Eng</stitle><date>2004-02-01</date><risdate>2004</risdate><volume>126</volume><issue>1</issue><spage>189</spage><epage>199</epage><pages>189-199</pages><issn>1087-1357</issn><eissn>1528-8935</eissn><abstract>Estimating error uncertainties arising in production parts is not a well-understood process. An approach to estimate these uncertainties was developed in this study. Machine tool error components were measured on a three-axis vertical machining center. Multiple parts were produced on the measured machining center then measured on a coordinate measuring machine. Uncertainty models for hole-center to hole-center lengths and orthogonalities were developed using measured machine tool errors. These estimated uncertainties were compared against measured uncertainties. The main conclusion from the study is that the Law of Propagation of Uncertainties can be used to estimate machining uncertainties.</abstract><cop>New York, NY</cop><pub>ASME</pub><doi>10.1115/1.1645876</doi><tpages>11</tpages></addata></record> |
| fulltext | fulltext |
| identifier | ISSN: 1087-1357 |
| ispartof | Journal of manufacturing science and engineering, 2004-02, Vol.126 (1), p.189-199 |
| issn | 1087-1357 1528-8935 |
| language | eng |
| recordid | cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_28120661 |
| source | ASME Transactions Journals (Current) |
| subjects | Applied sciences Exact sciences and technology Mechanical engineering. Machine design |
| title | Comparative Statistical Analysis of Test Parts Manufactured in Production Environments |
| url | https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-02-08T07%3A54%3A02IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Comparative%20Statistical%20Analysis%20of%20Test%20Parts%20Manufactured%20in%20Production%20Environments&rft.jtitle=Journal%20of%20manufacturing%20science%20and%20engineering&rft.au=Gilsinn,%20David%20E&rft.date=2004-02-01&rft.volume=126&rft.issue=1&rft.spage=189&rft.epage=199&rft.pages=189-199&rft.issn=1087-1357&rft.eissn=1528-8935&rft_id=info:doi/10.1115/1.1645876&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E28120661%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=28120661&rft_id=info:pmid/&rfr_iscdi=true |