Comparison of wellbeing structures based on survey responses and social media language: A network analysis
Wellbeing is predominantly measured through surveys but is increasingly measured by analysing individuals' language on social media platforms using social media text mining (SMTM). To investigate whether the structure of wellbeing is similar across both data collection methods, we compared netw...
Gespeichert in:
Veröffentlicht in: | Applied psychology : health and well-being 2023-11, Vol.15 (4), p.1555-1582 |
---|---|
Hauptverfasser: | , , , , |
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | eng |
Schlagworte: | |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
container_end_page | 1582 |
---|---|
container_issue | 4 |
container_start_page | 1555 |
container_title | Applied psychology : health and well-being |
container_volume | 15 |
creator | Sametoğlu, Selim Pelt, Dirk H M Eichstaedt, Johannes C Ungar, Lyle H Bartels, Meike |
description | Wellbeing is predominantly measured through surveys but is increasingly measured by analysing individuals' language on social media platforms using social media text mining (SMTM). To investigate whether the structure of wellbeing is similar across both data collection methods, we compared networks derived from survey items and social media language features collected from the same participants. The dataset was split into an independent exploration (n = 1169) and a final subset (n = 1000). After estimating exploration networks, redundant survey items and language topics were eliminated. Final networks were then estimated using exploratory graph analysis (EGA). The networks of survey items and those from language topics were similar, both consisting of five wellbeing dimensions. The dimensions in the survey- and SMTM-based assessment of wellbeing showed convergent structures congruent with theories of wellbeing. Specific dimensions found in each network reflected the unique aspects of each type of data (survey and social media language). Networks derived from both language features and survey items show similar structures. Survey and SMTM methods may provide complementary methods to understand differences in human wellbeing. |
doi_str_mv | 10.1111/aphw.12451 |
format | Article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_2811940724</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>2885416183</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c351t-d6057c3e525d861eaf7f6f46d9082f10a7d94889731bac2fc4746f60c126c0e43</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNpdkU1PwzAMhiMEYmNw4QegSFwQUkfcpmnLbZr4kiZxgXOVpsno6JoSt0z796Rs7IAvtuxHlv2-hFwCm4KPO9l-bKYQ8hiOyBiSOA1YGvPjQ83FiJwhrhgTsQBxSkZRAgIyBmOymtt1K12FtqHW0I2u60JXzZJi53rV9U4jLSTqknoAe_ett9T3Wtugn8impGhVJWu61mUlaS2bZS-X-p7OaKO7jXWfHpL1Fis8JydG1qgv9nlC3h8f3ubPweL16WU-WwQqiqELSsHiREU6DuMyFaClSYwwXJQZS0MDTCZlxtM0SyIopAqN4gkXRjAFoVBM82hCbnZ7W2e_eo1dvq5Q-cdko22PeZgCZJwl4YBe_0NXtnf-3oHyGnqV0shTtztKOYvotMlbV62l2-bA8sGBfHAg_3XAw1f7lX3hNTmgf5JHP4Wvgdk</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>2885416183</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Comparison of wellbeing structures based on survey responses and social media language: A network analysis</title><source>Wiley Journals</source><source>Applied Social Sciences Index & Abstracts (ASSIA)</source><creator>Sametoğlu, Selim ; Pelt, Dirk H M ; Eichstaedt, Johannes C ; Ungar, Lyle H ; Bartels, Meike</creator><creatorcontrib>Sametoğlu, Selim ; Pelt, Dirk H M ; Eichstaedt, Johannes C ; Ungar, Lyle H ; Bartels, Meike</creatorcontrib><description>Wellbeing is predominantly measured through surveys but is increasingly measured by analysing individuals' language on social media platforms using social media text mining (SMTM). To investigate whether the structure of wellbeing is similar across both data collection methods, we compared networks derived from survey items and social media language features collected from the same participants. The dataset was split into an independent exploration (n = 1169) and a final subset (n = 1000). After estimating exploration networks, redundant survey items and language topics were eliminated. Final networks were then estimated using exploratory graph analysis (EGA). The networks of survey items and those from language topics were similar, both consisting of five wellbeing dimensions. The dimensions in the survey- and SMTM-based assessment of wellbeing showed convergent structures congruent with theories of wellbeing. Specific dimensions found in each network reflected the unique aspects of each type of data (survey and social media language). Networks derived from both language features and survey items show similar structures. Survey and SMTM methods may provide complementary methods to understand differences in human wellbeing.</description><identifier>ISSN: 1758-0846</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1758-0854</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1111/aphw.12451</identifier><identifier>PMID: 37161901</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>England: Wiley Subscription Services, Inc</publisher><subject>Data mining ; Language ; Network analysis ; Polls & surveys ; Social media ; Social networks ; Well being</subject><ispartof>Applied psychology : health and well-being, 2023-11, Vol.15 (4), p.1555-1582</ispartof><rights>2023 The Authors. Applied Psychology: Health and Well-Being published by John Wiley & Sons Ltd on behalf of International Association of Applied Psychology.</rights><rights>2023. This article is published under http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ (the “License”). Notwithstanding the ProQuest Terms and Conditions, you may use this content in accordance with the terms of the License.</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c351t-d6057c3e525d861eaf7f6f46d9082f10a7d94889731bac2fc4746f60c126c0e43</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c351t-d6057c3e525d861eaf7f6f46d9082f10a7d94889731bac2fc4746f60c126c0e43</cites><orcidid>0000-0002-5447-5410</orcidid></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><link.rule.ids>314,780,784,27924,27925,30999</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37161901$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Sametoğlu, Selim</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Pelt, Dirk H M</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Eichstaedt, Johannes C</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Ungar, Lyle H</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Bartels, Meike</creatorcontrib><title>Comparison of wellbeing structures based on survey responses and social media language: A network analysis</title><title>Applied psychology : health and well-being</title><addtitle>Appl Psychol Health Well Being</addtitle><description>Wellbeing is predominantly measured through surveys but is increasingly measured by analysing individuals' language on social media platforms using social media text mining (SMTM). To investigate whether the structure of wellbeing is similar across both data collection methods, we compared networks derived from survey items and social media language features collected from the same participants. The dataset was split into an independent exploration (n = 1169) and a final subset (n = 1000). After estimating exploration networks, redundant survey items and language topics were eliminated. Final networks were then estimated using exploratory graph analysis (EGA). The networks of survey items and those from language topics were similar, both consisting of five wellbeing dimensions. The dimensions in the survey- and SMTM-based assessment of wellbeing showed convergent structures congruent with theories of wellbeing. Specific dimensions found in each network reflected the unique aspects of each type of data (survey and social media language). Networks derived from both language features and survey items show similar structures. Survey and SMTM methods may provide complementary methods to understand differences in human wellbeing.</description><subject>Data mining</subject><subject>Language</subject><subject>Network analysis</subject><subject>Polls & surveys</subject><subject>Social media</subject><subject>Social networks</subject><subject>Well being</subject><issn>1758-0846</issn><issn>1758-0854</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2023</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>7QJ</sourceid><recordid>eNpdkU1PwzAMhiMEYmNw4QegSFwQUkfcpmnLbZr4kiZxgXOVpsno6JoSt0z796Rs7IAvtuxHlv2-hFwCm4KPO9l-bKYQ8hiOyBiSOA1YGvPjQ83FiJwhrhgTsQBxSkZRAgIyBmOymtt1K12FtqHW0I2u60JXzZJi53rV9U4jLSTqknoAe_ett9T3Wtugn8impGhVJWu61mUlaS2bZS-X-p7OaKO7jXWfHpL1Fis8JydG1qgv9nlC3h8f3ubPweL16WU-WwQqiqELSsHiREU6DuMyFaClSYwwXJQZS0MDTCZlxtM0SyIopAqN4gkXRjAFoVBM82hCbnZ7W2e_eo1dvq5Q-cdko22PeZgCZJwl4YBe_0NXtnf-3oHyGnqV0shTtztKOYvotMlbV62l2-bA8sGBfHAg_3XAw1f7lX3hNTmgf5JHP4Wvgdk</recordid><startdate>20231101</startdate><enddate>20231101</enddate><creator>Sametoğlu, Selim</creator><creator>Pelt, Dirk H M</creator><creator>Eichstaedt, Johannes C</creator><creator>Ungar, Lyle H</creator><creator>Bartels, Meike</creator><general>Wiley Subscription Services, Inc</general><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7QJ</scope><scope>7X8</scope><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-5447-5410</orcidid></search><sort><creationdate>20231101</creationdate><title>Comparison of wellbeing structures based on survey responses and social media language: A network analysis</title><author>Sametoğlu, Selim ; Pelt, Dirk H M ; Eichstaedt, Johannes C ; Ungar, Lyle H ; Bartels, Meike</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c351t-d6057c3e525d861eaf7f6f46d9082f10a7d94889731bac2fc4746f60c126c0e43</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2023</creationdate><topic>Data mining</topic><topic>Language</topic><topic>Network analysis</topic><topic>Polls & surveys</topic><topic>Social media</topic><topic>Social networks</topic><topic>Well being</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Sametoğlu, Selim</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Pelt, Dirk H M</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Eichstaedt, Johannes C</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Ungar, Lyle H</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Bartels, Meike</creatorcontrib><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>Applied Social Sciences Index & Abstracts (ASSIA)</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><jtitle>Applied psychology : health and well-being</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Sametoğlu, Selim</au><au>Pelt, Dirk H M</au><au>Eichstaedt, Johannes C</au><au>Ungar, Lyle H</au><au>Bartels, Meike</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Comparison of wellbeing structures based on survey responses and social media language: A network analysis</atitle><jtitle>Applied psychology : health and well-being</jtitle><addtitle>Appl Psychol Health Well Being</addtitle><date>2023-11-01</date><risdate>2023</risdate><volume>15</volume><issue>4</issue><spage>1555</spage><epage>1582</epage><pages>1555-1582</pages><issn>1758-0846</issn><eissn>1758-0854</eissn><abstract>Wellbeing is predominantly measured through surveys but is increasingly measured by analysing individuals' language on social media platforms using social media text mining (SMTM). To investigate whether the structure of wellbeing is similar across both data collection methods, we compared networks derived from survey items and social media language features collected from the same participants. The dataset was split into an independent exploration (n = 1169) and a final subset (n = 1000). After estimating exploration networks, redundant survey items and language topics were eliminated. Final networks were then estimated using exploratory graph analysis (EGA). The networks of survey items and those from language topics were similar, both consisting of five wellbeing dimensions. The dimensions in the survey- and SMTM-based assessment of wellbeing showed convergent structures congruent with theories of wellbeing. Specific dimensions found in each network reflected the unique aspects of each type of data (survey and social media language). Networks derived from both language features and survey items show similar structures. Survey and SMTM methods may provide complementary methods to understand differences in human wellbeing.</abstract><cop>England</cop><pub>Wiley Subscription Services, Inc</pub><pmid>37161901</pmid><doi>10.1111/aphw.12451</doi><tpages>28</tpages><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-5447-5410</orcidid><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | ISSN: 1758-0846 |
ispartof | Applied psychology : health and well-being, 2023-11, Vol.15 (4), p.1555-1582 |
issn | 1758-0846 1758-0854 |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_2811940724 |
source | Wiley Journals; Applied Social Sciences Index & Abstracts (ASSIA) |
subjects | Data mining Language Network analysis Polls & surveys Social media Social networks Well being |
title | Comparison of wellbeing structures based on survey responses and social media language: A network analysis |
url | https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2024-12-25T20%3A07%3A28IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Comparison%20of%20wellbeing%20structures%20based%20on%20survey%20responses%20and%20social%20media%20language:%20A%20network%20analysis&rft.jtitle=Applied%20psychology%20:%20health%20and%20well-being&rft.au=Sameto%C4%9Flu,%20Selim&rft.date=2023-11-01&rft.volume=15&rft.issue=4&rft.spage=1555&rft.epage=1582&rft.pages=1555-1582&rft.issn=1758-0846&rft.eissn=1758-0854&rft_id=info:doi/10.1111/aphw.12451&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E2885416183%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=2885416183&rft_id=info:pmid/37161901&rfr_iscdi=true |