Scoping Review of the Use of the Edinburgh Postnatal Depression Scale in the United States
To evaluate the validity of the Edinburgh Postnatal Depression Scale (EPDS) for screening during the perinatal period in the United States and concerns regarding its acceptability and performance. We conducted a systematic search in OVID MEDLINE, EMBASE (OVID), Cumulative Index to Nursing and Allied...
Gespeichert in:
Veröffentlicht in: | Journal of women's health (Larchmont, N.Y. 2002) N.Y. 2002), 2023-07, Vol.32 (7), p.767-778 |
---|---|
Hauptverfasser: | , , , |
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | eng |
Schlagworte: | |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
container_end_page | 778 |
---|---|
container_issue | 7 |
container_start_page | 767 |
container_title | Journal of women's health (Larchmont, N.Y. 2002) |
container_volume | 32 |
creator | Moyer, Sara Wagner Brown, Roy Jallo, Nancy Kinser, Patricia Anne |
description | To evaluate the validity of the Edinburgh Postnatal Depression Scale (EPDS) for screening during the perinatal period in the United States and concerns regarding its acceptability and performance.
We conducted a systematic search in OVID MEDLINE, EMBASE (OVID), Cumulative Index to Nursing and Allied Health Literature (CINAHL), and PsycInfo (EBSCO) for articles published from inception of the database through February 2023. We included primary quantitative and qualitative studies on the validation of the EPDS in the United States and identified 880 articles of which 9 met criteria for inclusion. We extracted data related to aim, study population, setting, methods, outcomes, and key findings from each study into a table based on Joanna Briggs Institute (JBI) Scoping Review Guidelines.
We found no evidence that the original wording of the EPDS, which was developed in the United Kingdom, was adapted before validation in the United States.
Our findings suggest that adaptation of the EPDS for use in the United States with a focus on contextual equivalence and validity could improve the performance of the tool and patients' experiences with completing the tool. Future research is warranted on optimal methods to adapt the EPDS for mental health screening in the perinatal period in the United States. |
doi_str_mv | 10.1089/jwh.2022.0520 |
format | Article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>proquest_pubme</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_2811939612</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>2811939612</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-p211t-8fd14ea52ea3020e0b4c3c0f9445bc503c801f067e6bfde1151b4c2e37e624653</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNo1kE1Lw0AQhhdBbK0evcoevSTO7CZpcpRaP6CgWAviJWw2k3ZLuonZjcV_b6DtaV7mfWYOD2M3CCFCmt1v95tQgBAhxALO2BgziUEaya8Ru3RuC0OFABdsJKeYSAHxmH0vddMau-Yf9Gtoz5uK-w3xlaNTnJfGFn233vD3xnmrvKr5I7UdOWcay5da1cSNPZxZ46nkS688uSt2Xqna0fVxTtjqaf45ewkWb8-vs4dF0ApEH6RViRGpWJCSIICgiLTUUGVRFBc6BqlTwAqSKSVFVRJijAMhSA4LESWxnLC7w9-2a356cj7fGaeprpWlpne5SHEQkSUoBvT2iPbFjsq87cxOdX_5yYf8B9fbX1w</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>2811939612</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Scoping Review of the Use of the Edinburgh Postnatal Depression Scale in the United States</title><source>MEDLINE</source><source>Alma/SFX Local Collection</source><creator>Moyer, Sara Wagner ; Brown, Roy ; Jallo, Nancy ; Kinser, Patricia Anne</creator><creatorcontrib>Moyer, Sara Wagner ; Brown, Roy ; Jallo, Nancy ; Kinser, Patricia Anne</creatorcontrib><description>To evaluate the validity of the Edinburgh Postnatal Depression Scale (EPDS) for screening during the perinatal period in the United States and concerns regarding its acceptability and performance.
We conducted a systematic search in OVID MEDLINE, EMBASE (OVID), Cumulative Index to Nursing and Allied Health Literature (CINAHL), and PsycInfo (EBSCO) for articles published from inception of the database through February 2023. We included primary quantitative and qualitative studies on the validation of the EPDS in the United States and identified 880 articles of which 9 met criteria for inclusion. We extracted data related to aim, study population, setting, methods, outcomes, and key findings from each study into a table based on Joanna Briggs Institute (JBI) Scoping Review Guidelines.
We found no evidence that the original wording of the EPDS, which was developed in the United Kingdom, was adapted before validation in the United States.
Our findings suggest that adaptation of the EPDS for use in the United States with a focus on contextual equivalence and validity could improve the performance of the tool and patients' experiences with completing the tool. Future research is warranted on optimal methods to adapt the EPDS for mental health screening in the perinatal period in the United States.</description><identifier>EISSN: 1931-843X</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1089/jwh.2022.0520</identifier><identifier>PMID: 37163205</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>United States</publisher><subject>Depression, Postpartum - diagnosis ; Depression, Postpartum - epidemiology ; Female ; Humans ; Mass Screening - methods ; Pregnancy ; Psychiatric Status Rating Scales ; United Kingdom</subject><ispartof>Journal of women's health (Larchmont, N.Y. 2002), 2023-07, Vol.32 (7), p.767-778</ispartof><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><orcidid>0000-0001-9319-8922 ; 0000-002-6980-3528 ; 0000-0002-4655-5883 ; 0000-0002-0627-9132</orcidid></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><link.rule.ids>314,777,781,27905,27906</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37163205$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Moyer, Sara Wagner</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Brown, Roy</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Jallo, Nancy</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Kinser, Patricia Anne</creatorcontrib><title>Scoping Review of the Use of the Edinburgh Postnatal Depression Scale in the United States</title><title>Journal of women's health (Larchmont, N.Y. 2002)</title><addtitle>J Womens Health (Larchmt)</addtitle><description>To evaluate the validity of the Edinburgh Postnatal Depression Scale (EPDS) for screening during the perinatal period in the United States and concerns regarding its acceptability and performance.
We conducted a systematic search in OVID MEDLINE, EMBASE (OVID), Cumulative Index to Nursing and Allied Health Literature (CINAHL), and PsycInfo (EBSCO) for articles published from inception of the database through February 2023. We included primary quantitative and qualitative studies on the validation of the EPDS in the United States and identified 880 articles of which 9 met criteria for inclusion. We extracted data related to aim, study population, setting, methods, outcomes, and key findings from each study into a table based on Joanna Briggs Institute (JBI) Scoping Review Guidelines.
We found no evidence that the original wording of the EPDS, which was developed in the United Kingdom, was adapted before validation in the United States.
Our findings suggest that adaptation of the EPDS for use in the United States with a focus on contextual equivalence and validity could improve the performance of the tool and patients' experiences with completing the tool. Future research is warranted on optimal methods to adapt the EPDS for mental health screening in the perinatal period in the United States.</description><subject>Depression, Postpartum - diagnosis</subject><subject>Depression, Postpartum - epidemiology</subject><subject>Female</subject><subject>Humans</subject><subject>Mass Screening - methods</subject><subject>Pregnancy</subject><subject>Psychiatric Status Rating Scales</subject><subject>United Kingdom</subject><issn>1931-843X</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2023</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>EIF</sourceid><recordid>eNo1kE1Lw0AQhhdBbK0evcoevSTO7CZpcpRaP6CgWAviJWw2k3ZLuonZjcV_b6DtaV7mfWYOD2M3CCFCmt1v95tQgBAhxALO2BgziUEaya8Ru3RuC0OFABdsJKeYSAHxmH0vddMau-Yf9Gtoz5uK-w3xlaNTnJfGFn233vD3xnmrvKr5I7UdOWcay5da1cSNPZxZ46nkS688uSt2Xqna0fVxTtjqaf45ewkWb8-vs4dF0ApEH6RViRGpWJCSIICgiLTUUGVRFBc6BqlTwAqSKSVFVRJijAMhSA4LESWxnLC7w9-2a356cj7fGaeprpWlpne5SHEQkSUoBvT2iPbFjsq87cxOdX_5yYf8B9fbX1w</recordid><startdate>202307</startdate><enddate>202307</enddate><creator>Moyer, Sara Wagner</creator><creator>Brown, Roy</creator><creator>Jallo, Nancy</creator><creator>Kinser, Patricia Anne</creator><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>7X8</scope><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0001-9319-8922</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-002-6980-3528</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-4655-5883</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-0627-9132</orcidid></search><sort><creationdate>202307</creationdate><title>Scoping Review of the Use of the Edinburgh Postnatal Depression Scale in the United States</title><author>Moyer, Sara Wagner ; Brown, Roy ; Jallo, Nancy ; Kinser, Patricia Anne</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-p211t-8fd14ea52ea3020e0b4c3c0f9445bc503c801f067e6bfde1151b4c2e37e624653</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2023</creationdate><topic>Depression, Postpartum - diagnosis</topic><topic>Depression, Postpartum - epidemiology</topic><topic>Female</topic><topic>Humans</topic><topic>Mass Screening - methods</topic><topic>Pregnancy</topic><topic>Psychiatric Status Rating Scales</topic><topic>United Kingdom</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Moyer, Sara Wagner</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Brown, Roy</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Jallo, Nancy</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Kinser, Patricia Anne</creatorcontrib><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><jtitle>Journal of women's health (Larchmont, N.Y. 2002)</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Moyer, Sara Wagner</au><au>Brown, Roy</au><au>Jallo, Nancy</au><au>Kinser, Patricia Anne</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Scoping Review of the Use of the Edinburgh Postnatal Depression Scale in the United States</atitle><jtitle>Journal of women's health (Larchmont, N.Y. 2002)</jtitle><addtitle>J Womens Health (Larchmt)</addtitle><date>2023-07</date><risdate>2023</risdate><volume>32</volume><issue>7</issue><spage>767</spage><epage>778</epage><pages>767-778</pages><eissn>1931-843X</eissn><abstract>To evaluate the validity of the Edinburgh Postnatal Depression Scale (EPDS) for screening during the perinatal period in the United States and concerns regarding its acceptability and performance.
We conducted a systematic search in OVID MEDLINE, EMBASE (OVID), Cumulative Index to Nursing and Allied Health Literature (CINAHL), and PsycInfo (EBSCO) for articles published from inception of the database through February 2023. We included primary quantitative and qualitative studies on the validation of the EPDS in the United States and identified 880 articles of which 9 met criteria for inclusion. We extracted data related to aim, study population, setting, methods, outcomes, and key findings from each study into a table based on Joanna Briggs Institute (JBI) Scoping Review Guidelines.
We found no evidence that the original wording of the EPDS, which was developed in the United Kingdom, was adapted before validation in the United States.
Our findings suggest that adaptation of the EPDS for use in the United States with a focus on contextual equivalence and validity could improve the performance of the tool and patients' experiences with completing the tool. Future research is warranted on optimal methods to adapt the EPDS for mental health screening in the perinatal period in the United States.</abstract><cop>United States</cop><pmid>37163205</pmid><doi>10.1089/jwh.2022.0520</doi><tpages>12</tpages><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0001-9319-8922</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-002-6980-3528</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-4655-5883</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-0627-9132</orcidid></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | EISSN: 1931-843X |
ispartof | Journal of women's health (Larchmont, N.Y. 2002), 2023-07, Vol.32 (7), p.767-778 |
issn | 1931-843X |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_2811939612 |
source | MEDLINE; Alma/SFX Local Collection |
subjects | Depression, Postpartum - diagnosis Depression, Postpartum - epidemiology Female Humans Mass Screening - methods Pregnancy Psychiatric Status Rating Scales United Kingdom |
title | Scoping Review of the Use of the Edinburgh Postnatal Depression Scale in the United States |
url | https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-18T09%3A38%3A59IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_pubme&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Scoping%20Review%20of%20the%20Use%20of%20the%20Edinburgh%20Postnatal%20Depression%20Scale%20in%20the%20United%20States&rft.jtitle=Journal%20of%20women's%20health%20(Larchmont,%20N.Y.%202002)&rft.au=Moyer,%20Sara%20Wagner&rft.date=2023-07&rft.volume=32&rft.issue=7&rft.spage=767&rft.epage=778&rft.pages=767-778&rft.eissn=1931-843X&rft_id=info:doi/10.1089/jwh.2022.0520&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_pubme%3E2811939612%3C/proquest_pubme%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=2811939612&rft_id=info:pmid/37163205&rfr_iscdi=true |