Giant cell tumor of bone in the pediatric population: a retrospective study highlighting cases of metaphyseal only location and increased local recurrence rates in skeletally immature patients
Objective To describe the presentation of giant cell tumors (GCT) of the bone in the pediatric population to (1) improve the differential diagnosis of pediatric bone tumors and (2) identify the origin of GCT. Understanding the origin of bone tumors assists in establishing appropriate diagnoses and r...
Gespeichert in:
Veröffentlicht in: | Skeletal radiology 2023-12, Vol.52 (12), p.2399-2408 |
---|---|
Hauptverfasser: | , , , , , , , , , |
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | eng |
Schlagworte: | |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
container_end_page | 2408 |
---|---|
container_issue | 12 |
container_start_page | 2399 |
container_title | Skeletal radiology |
container_volume | 52 |
creator | Tabarestani, Troy Q. Levine, Nicole Sachs, Elizabeth Scholl, Ashley Colglazier, Roy French, Robert Al-Rohil, Rami Brigman, Brian Eward, William Visgauss, Julia |
description | Objective
To describe the presentation of giant cell tumors (GCT) of the bone in the pediatric population to (1) improve the differential diagnosis of pediatric bone tumors and (2) identify the origin of GCT. Understanding the origin of bone tumors assists in establishing appropriate diagnoses and recommending treatment options. This is particularly important in children, where evaluating the need for invasive procedures is balanced with the desire to avoid overtreatment. GCT have historically been considered epiphyseal lesions with potential metaphyseal extension. Therefore, GCT may be inappropriately excluded from the differential diagnosis of metaphyseal lesions in the skeletally immature.
Materials and methods
We identified 14 patients from 1981 to 2021 at a single institution who had histologic confirmation of GCT and were less than 18 years old at diagnosis. Patient characteristics, tumor location, surgical treatment, and local recurrence rates were collected.
Results and conclusions
Ten (71%) patients were female. Eleven (78.6%) were epiphysiometaphyseal (1 epiphyseal, 4 metaphyseal, 6 epiphysiometaphyseal). Five patients had an open adjacent physis, of which three (60%) had tumors confined solely to the metaphysis. Of the five patients with open physis, four (80%) developed local recurrence while only one patient (11%) with a closed physis had local recurrence (
p
value = 0.0023). Our results illustrate that for the skeletally immature, GCT can (and in our results more commonly did) occur in the metaphyseal location. These findings suggest that GCT should be included in the differential diagnosis of primary metaphyseal-only lesions in the skeletally immature. |
doi_str_mv | 10.1007/s00256-023-04359-8 |
format | Article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>gale_proqu</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_2811565902</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><galeid>A769374530</galeid><sourcerecordid>A769374530</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c442t-7c15febfa24eec1dedd8ad9c9e2707ae6b457654c5680f23d161770bfc553ac3</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp9kt9qFDEUxgdR7Fp9AS8k4I03U_N3MutdKVqFgje9D9nMmd3UTDImGWHfro_m2d1qUURCCCTf98uXnNM0rxm9YJTq94VSrrqWctFSKdS67Z80KyYFbznr2NNmRUUnWy5kf9a8KOWOUqa16p43Z0IzJXstVs39tbexEgchkLpMKZM0kk2KQHwkdQdkhsHbmr0jc5qXYKtP8QOxJEPNqczgqv8BpNRl2JOd3-4CzurjljhboBxoE1Q77_YFbCAphj0JyR0xxMYBr3EZUDoctwNy3ZIzRAck24oEzFG-QUBIQK-fJluXjLkQAbGWl82z0YYCrx7W8-b208fbq8_tzdfrL1eXN62TktdWO6ZG2IyWSwDHBhiG3g5rtwauqbbQbaTSnZJOdT0duRjwB7Wmm9EpJawT5827E3bO6fsCpZrJl8Ov2QhpKYb3jKlOrbEY583bv6R3ackRw6FK90wpLfWjamsDGB_HVLN1B6i51N1aaKkERdXFP1Q4Bpi8wzKNHvf_MPCTwWF1SobRzNlPNu8No-bQNebUNQaDmmPXmB5Nbx4SL5sJht-WX22CAnESFDyKW8iPT_oP9icaptEm</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>2878155747</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Giant cell tumor of bone in the pediatric population: a retrospective study highlighting cases of metaphyseal only location and increased local recurrence rates in skeletally immature patients</title><source>SpringerNature Journals</source><creator>Tabarestani, Troy Q. ; Levine, Nicole ; Sachs, Elizabeth ; Scholl, Ashley ; Colglazier, Roy ; French, Robert ; Al-Rohil, Rami ; Brigman, Brian ; Eward, William ; Visgauss, Julia</creator><creatorcontrib>Tabarestani, Troy Q. ; Levine, Nicole ; Sachs, Elizabeth ; Scholl, Ashley ; Colglazier, Roy ; French, Robert ; Al-Rohil, Rami ; Brigman, Brian ; Eward, William ; Visgauss, Julia</creatorcontrib><description>Objective
To describe the presentation of giant cell tumors (GCT) of the bone in the pediatric population to (1) improve the differential diagnosis of pediatric bone tumors and (2) identify the origin of GCT. Understanding the origin of bone tumors assists in establishing appropriate diagnoses and recommending treatment options. This is particularly important in children, where evaluating the need for invasive procedures is balanced with the desire to avoid overtreatment. GCT have historically been considered epiphyseal lesions with potential metaphyseal extension. Therefore, GCT may be inappropriately excluded from the differential diagnosis of metaphyseal lesions in the skeletally immature.
Materials and methods
We identified 14 patients from 1981 to 2021 at a single institution who had histologic confirmation of GCT and were less than 18 years old at diagnosis. Patient characteristics, tumor location, surgical treatment, and local recurrence rates were collected.
Results and conclusions
Ten (71%) patients were female. Eleven (78.6%) were epiphysiometaphyseal (1 epiphyseal, 4 metaphyseal, 6 epiphysiometaphyseal). Five patients had an open adjacent physis, of which three (60%) had tumors confined solely to the metaphysis. Of the five patients with open physis, four (80%) developed local recurrence while only one patient (11%) with a closed physis had local recurrence (
p
value = 0.0023). Our results illustrate that for the skeletally immature, GCT can (and in our results more commonly did) occur in the metaphyseal location. These findings suggest that GCT should be included in the differential diagnosis of primary metaphyseal-only lesions in the skeletally immature.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0364-2348</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1432-2161</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1007/s00256-023-04359-8</identifier><identifier>PMID: 37154873</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Berlin/Heidelberg: Springer Berlin Heidelberg</publisher><subject>Bone cancer ; Bone tumors ; Care and treatment ; Diagnosis ; Differential diagnosis ; Diseases ; Imaging ; Lesions ; Medicine ; Medicine & Public Health ; Metaphysis ; Nuclear Medicine ; Orthopedics ; Pathology ; Patients ; Pediatrics ; Population studies ; Radiology ; Relapse ; Scientific Article ; Statistics ; Tumors</subject><ispartof>Skeletal radiology, 2023-12, Vol.52 (12), p.2399-2408</ispartof><rights>The Author(s), under exclusive licence to International Skeletal Society (ISS) 2023. Springer Nature or its licensor (e.g. a society or other partner) holds exclusive rights to this article under a publishing agreement with the author(s) or other rightsholder(s); author self-archiving of the accepted manuscript version of this article is solely governed by the terms of such publishing agreement and applicable law.</rights><rights>2023. The Author(s), under exclusive licence to International Skeletal Society (ISS).</rights><rights>COPYRIGHT 2023 Springer</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c442t-7c15febfa24eec1dedd8ad9c9e2707ae6b457654c5680f23d161770bfc553ac3</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c442t-7c15febfa24eec1dedd8ad9c9e2707ae6b457654c5680f23d161770bfc553ac3</cites><orcidid>0000-0003-1485-3605</orcidid></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://link.springer.com/content/pdf/10.1007/s00256-023-04359-8$$EPDF$$P50$$Gspringer$$H</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://link.springer.com/10.1007/s00256-023-04359-8$$EHTML$$P50$$Gspringer$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,780,784,27924,27925,41488,42557,51319</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37154873$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Tabarestani, Troy Q.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Levine, Nicole</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Sachs, Elizabeth</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Scholl, Ashley</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Colglazier, Roy</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>French, Robert</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Al-Rohil, Rami</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Brigman, Brian</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Eward, William</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Visgauss, Julia</creatorcontrib><title>Giant cell tumor of bone in the pediatric population: a retrospective study highlighting cases of metaphyseal only location and increased local recurrence rates in skeletally immature patients</title><title>Skeletal radiology</title><addtitle>Skeletal Radiol</addtitle><addtitle>Skeletal Radiol</addtitle><description>Objective
To describe the presentation of giant cell tumors (GCT) of the bone in the pediatric population to (1) improve the differential diagnosis of pediatric bone tumors and (2) identify the origin of GCT. Understanding the origin of bone tumors assists in establishing appropriate diagnoses and recommending treatment options. This is particularly important in children, where evaluating the need for invasive procedures is balanced with the desire to avoid overtreatment. GCT have historically been considered epiphyseal lesions with potential metaphyseal extension. Therefore, GCT may be inappropriately excluded from the differential diagnosis of metaphyseal lesions in the skeletally immature.
Materials and methods
We identified 14 patients from 1981 to 2021 at a single institution who had histologic confirmation of GCT and were less than 18 years old at diagnosis. Patient characteristics, tumor location, surgical treatment, and local recurrence rates were collected.
Results and conclusions
Ten (71%) patients were female. Eleven (78.6%) were epiphysiometaphyseal (1 epiphyseal, 4 metaphyseal, 6 epiphysiometaphyseal). Five patients had an open adjacent physis, of which three (60%) had tumors confined solely to the metaphysis. Of the five patients with open physis, four (80%) developed local recurrence while only one patient (11%) with a closed physis had local recurrence (
p
value = 0.0023). Our results illustrate that for the skeletally immature, GCT can (and in our results more commonly did) occur in the metaphyseal location. These findings suggest that GCT should be included in the differential diagnosis of primary metaphyseal-only lesions in the skeletally immature.</description><subject>Bone cancer</subject><subject>Bone tumors</subject><subject>Care and treatment</subject><subject>Diagnosis</subject><subject>Differential diagnosis</subject><subject>Diseases</subject><subject>Imaging</subject><subject>Lesions</subject><subject>Medicine</subject><subject>Medicine & Public Health</subject><subject>Metaphysis</subject><subject>Nuclear Medicine</subject><subject>Orthopedics</subject><subject>Pathology</subject><subject>Patients</subject><subject>Pediatrics</subject><subject>Population studies</subject><subject>Radiology</subject><subject>Relapse</subject><subject>Scientific Article</subject><subject>Statistics</subject><subject>Tumors</subject><issn>0364-2348</issn><issn>1432-2161</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2023</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>ABUWG</sourceid><sourceid>AFKRA</sourceid><sourceid>AZQEC</sourceid><sourceid>BENPR</sourceid><sourceid>CCPQU</sourceid><sourceid>DWQXO</sourceid><sourceid>GNUQQ</sourceid><recordid>eNp9kt9qFDEUxgdR7Fp9AS8k4I03U_N3MutdKVqFgje9D9nMmd3UTDImGWHfro_m2d1qUURCCCTf98uXnNM0rxm9YJTq94VSrrqWctFSKdS67Z80KyYFbznr2NNmRUUnWy5kf9a8KOWOUqa16p43Z0IzJXstVs39tbexEgchkLpMKZM0kk2KQHwkdQdkhsHbmr0jc5qXYKtP8QOxJEPNqczgqv8BpNRl2JOd3-4CzurjljhboBxoE1Q77_YFbCAphj0JyR0xxMYBr3EZUDoctwNy3ZIzRAck24oEzFG-QUBIQK-fJluXjLkQAbGWl82z0YYCrx7W8-b208fbq8_tzdfrL1eXN62TktdWO6ZG2IyWSwDHBhiG3g5rtwauqbbQbaTSnZJOdT0duRjwB7Wmm9EpJawT5827E3bO6fsCpZrJl8Ov2QhpKYb3jKlOrbEY583bv6R3ackRw6FK90wpLfWjamsDGB_HVLN1B6i51N1aaKkERdXFP1Q4Bpi8wzKNHvf_MPCTwWF1SobRzNlPNu8No-bQNebUNQaDmmPXmB5Nbx4SL5sJht-WX22CAnESFDyKW8iPT_oP9icaptEm</recordid><startdate>20231201</startdate><enddate>20231201</enddate><creator>Tabarestani, Troy Q.</creator><creator>Levine, Nicole</creator><creator>Sachs, Elizabeth</creator><creator>Scholl, Ashley</creator><creator>Colglazier, Roy</creator><creator>French, Robert</creator><creator>Al-Rohil, Rami</creator><creator>Brigman, Brian</creator><creator>Eward, William</creator><creator>Visgauss, Julia</creator><general>Springer Berlin Heidelberg</general><general>Springer</general><general>Springer Nature B.V</general><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>3V.</scope><scope>7QP</scope><scope>7RV</scope><scope>7X7</scope><scope>7XB</scope><scope>88E</scope><scope>8AO</scope><scope>8FE</scope><scope>8FG</scope><scope>8FH</scope><scope>8FI</scope><scope>8FJ</scope><scope>8FK</scope><scope>ABUWG</scope><scope>AFKRA</scope><scope>ARAPS</scope><scope>AZQEC</scope><scope>BBNVY</scope><scope>BENPR</scope><scope>BGLVJ</scope><scope>BHPHI</scope><scope>CCPQU</scope><scope>DWQXO</scope><scope>FYUFA</scope><scope>GHDGH</scope><scope>GNUQQ</scope><scope>HCIFZ</scope><scope>K9.</scope><scope>KB0</scope><scope>LK8</scope><scope>M0S</scope><scope>M1P</scope><scope>M7P</scope><scope>NAPCQ</scope><scope>P5Z</scope><scope>P62</scope><scope>PQEST</scope><scope>PQQKQ</scope><scope>PQUKI</scope><scope>7X8</scope><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0003-1485-3605</orcidid></search><sort><creationdate>20231201</creationdate><title>Giant cell tumor of bone in the pediatric population: a retrospective study highlighting cases of metaphyseal only location and increased local recurrence rates in skeletally immature patients</title><author>Tabarestani, Troy Q. ; Levine, Nicole ; Sachs, Elizabeth ; Scholl, Ashley ; Colglazier, Roy ; French, Robert ; Al-Rohil, Rami ; Brigman, Brian ; Eward, William ; Visgauss, Julia</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c442t-7c15febfa24eec1dedd8ad9c9e2707ae6b457654c5680f23d161770bfc553ac3</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2023</creationdate><topic>Bone cancer</topic><topic>Bone tumors</topic><topic>Care and treatment</topic><topic>Diagnosis</topic><topic>Differential diagnosis</topic><topic>Diseases</topic><topic>Imaging</topic><topic>Lesions</topic><topic>Medicine</topic><topic>Medicine & Public Health</topic><topic>Metaphysis</topic><topic>Nuclear Medicine</topic><topic>Orthopedics</topic><topic>Pathology</topic><topic>Patients</topic><topic>Pediatrics</topic><topic>Population studies</topic><topic>Radiology</topic><topic>Relapse</topic><topic>Scientific Article</topic><topic>Statistics</topic><topic>Tumors</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Tabarestani, Troy Q.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Levine, Nicole</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Sachs, Elizabeth</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Scholl, Ashley</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Colglazier, Roy</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>French, Robert</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Al-Rohil, Rami</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Brigman, Brian</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Eward, William</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Visgauss, Julia</creatorcontrib><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Corporate)</collection><collection>Calcium & Calcified Tissue Abstracts</collection><collection>Nursing & Allied Health Database</collection><collection>Health & Medical Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>Medical Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Pharma Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest SciTech Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Technology Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Natural Science Collection</collection><collection>Hospital Premium Collection</collection><collection>Hospital Premium Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni) (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central UK/Ireland</collection><collection>Advanced Technologies & Aerospace Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Essentials</collection><collection>Biological Science Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>Technology Collection</collection><collection>Natural Science Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest One Community College</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Korea</collection><collection>Health Research Premium Collection</collection><collection>Health Research Premium Collection (Alumni)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Student</collection><collection>SciTech Premium Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Health & Medical Complete (Alumni)</collection><collection>Nursing & Allied Health Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Biological Science Collection</collection><collection>Health & Medical Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Medical Database</collection><collection>Biological Science Database</collection><collection>Nursing & Allied Health Premium</collection><collection>Advanced Technologies & Aerospace Database</collection><collection>ProQuest Advanced Technologies & Aerospace Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic Eastern Edition (DO NOT USE)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic UKI Edition</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><jtitle>Skeletal radiology</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Tabarestani, Troy Q.</au><au>Levine, Nicole</au><au>Sachs, Elizabeth</au><au>Scholl, Ashley</au><au>Colglazier, Roy</au><au>French, Robert</au><au>Al-Rohil, Rami</au><au>Brigman, Brian</au><au>Eward, William</au><au>Visgauss, Julia</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Giant cell tumor of bone in the pediatric population: a retrospective study highlighting cases of metaphyseal only location and increased local recurrence rates in skeletally immature patients</atitle><jtitle>Skeletal radiology</jtitle><stitle>Skeletal Radiol</stitle><addtitle>Skeletal Radiol</addtitle><date>2023-12-01</date><risdate>2023</risdate><volume>52</volume><issue>12</issue><spage>2399</spage><epage>2408</epage><pages>2399-2408</pages><issn>0364-2348</issn><eissn>1432-2161</eissn><abstract>Objective
To describe the presentation of giant cell tumors (GCT) of the bone in the pediatric population to (1) improve the differential diagnosis of pediatric bone tumors and (2) identify the origin of GCT. Understanding the origin of bone tumors assists in establishing appropriate diagnoses and recommending treatment options. This is particularly important in children, where evaluating the need for invasive procedures is balanced with the desire to avoid overtreatment. GCT have historically been considered epiphyseal lesions with potential metaphyseal extension. Therefore, GCT may be inappropriately excluded from the differential diagnosis of metaphyseal lesions in the skeletally immature.
Materials and methods
We identified 14 patients from 1981 to 2021 at a single institution who had histologic confirmation of GCT and were less than 18 years old at diagnosis. Patient characteristics, tumor location, surgical treatment, and local recurrence rates were collected.
Results and conclusions
Ten (71%) patients were female. Eleven (78.6%) were epiphysiometaphyseal (1 epiphyseal, 4 metaphyseal, 6 epiphysiometaphyseal). Five patients had an open adjacent physis, of which three (60%) had tumors confined solely to the metaphysis. Of the five patients with open physis, four (80%) developed local recurrence while only one patient (11%) with a closed physis had local recurrence (
p
value = 0.0023). Our results illustrate that for the skeletally immature, GCT can (and in our results more commonly did) occur in the metaphyseal location. These findings suggest that GCT should be included in the differential diagnosis of primary metaphyseal-only lesions in the skeletally immature.</abstract><cop>Berlin/Heidelberg</cop><pub>Springer Berlin Heidelberg</pub><pmid>37154873</pmid><doi>10.1007/s00256-023-04359-8</doi><tpages>10</tpages><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0003-1485-3605</orcidid></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | ISSN: 0364-2348 |
ispartof | Skeletal radiology, 2023-12, Vol.52 (12), p.2399-2408 |
issn | 0364-2348 1432-2161 |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_2811565902 |
source | SpringerNature Journals |
subjects | Bone cancer Bone tumors Care and treatment Diagnosis Differential diagnosis Diseases Imaging Lesions Medicine Medicine & Public Health Metaphysis Nuclear Medicine Orthopedics Pathology Patients Pediatrics Population studies Radiology Relapse Scientific Article Statistics Tumors |
title | Giant cell tumor of bone in the pediatric population: a retrospective study highlighting cases of metaphyseal only location and increased local recurrence rates in skeletally immature patients |
url | https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-01T17%3A05%3A56IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-gale_proqu&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Giant%20cell%20tumor%20of%20bone%20in%20the%20pediatric%20population:%20a%20retrospective%20study%20highlighting%20cases%20of%20metaphyseal%20only%20location%20and%20increased%20local%20recurrence%20rates%20in%20skeletally%20immature%20patients&rft.jtitle=Skeletal%20radiology&rft.au=Tabarestani,%20Troy%20Q.&rft.date=2023-12-01&rft.volume=52&rft.issue=12&rft.spage=2399&rft.epage=2408&rft.pages=2399-2408&rft.issn=0364-2348&rft.eissn=1432-2161&rft_id=info:doi/10.1007/s00256-023-04359-8&rft_dat=%3Cgale_proqu%3EA769374530%3C/gale_proqu%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=2878155747&rft_id=info:pmid/37154873&rft_galeid=A769374530&rfr_iscdi=true |