A Comparative Study of Single-Phase AC and Multiphase DC Resistance Spot Welding
This paper presents a comparative study of the AC and MFDC resistance spot welding process. Both experiments and finite element simulation were conducted to compare the weld size and energy consumption. The experiments were performed on two identical spot welding machines, one with a single phase ac...
Gespeichert in:
Veröffentlicht in: | Journal of manufacturing science and engineering 2005-08, Vol.127 (3), p.583-589 |
---|---|
Hauptverfasser: | , , |
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | eng |
Schlagworte: | |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
container_end_page | 589 |
---|---|
container_issue | 3 |
container_start_page | 583 |
container_title | Journal of manufacturing science and engineering |
container_volume | 127 |
creator | Li, Wei Cerjanec, Daniel Grzadzinski, Gerald A |
description | This paper presents a comparative study of the AC and MFDC resistance spot welding process. Both experiments and finite element simulation were conducted to compare the weld size and energy consumption. The experiments were performed on two identical spot welding machines, one with a single phase ac and the other with a mid-frequency DC weld control. The machines were instrumented such that both the primary and secondary voltage and current signals could be collected for energy calculation. The finite element simulation model was developed to understand the underlying mechanisms of the difference between the ac and MFDC processes. The effect of the current waveform was investigated by using the actual process measurements as an input to the simulation model. It is shown that the MFDC process generally produces larger welds than the AC process with the same root-mean-square welding current. However, this difference is more prominent when the welding current is relatively low. Overall, the AC welding process consumes more energy to make a same sized weld than the MFDC process. The larger the welding current is used, the less efficient the AC welding process will become. The differences between the two welding processes are caused by the contact resistance behavior and the electrical inductance in the AC welding process. |
doi_str_mv | 10.1115/1.1949621 |
format | Article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_28113366</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>28113366</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-a310t-dff2ffcc3e48f29f58cc0f60bf2ebfbe9fb798078990a356c6f37afaec443ed63</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNpFkM1LxDAUxIMouK4ePHvJRcFD17ymbZLjUj9hxcVVPIY0fdEu_bJphf3v7boLnt7w-M3ADCHnwGYAEN_ADFSkkhAOyATiUAZS8fhw1EyKAHgsjsmJ92vGAGTEJ2Q5p2lTtaYzffGDdNUP-YY2jq6K-rPEYPllPNJ5Sk2d0-eh7Iv273Ob0lf0he9NbUdX2_T0A8t8NJ2SI2dKj2f7OyXv93dv6WOweHl4SueLwHBgfZA7FzpnLcdIulC5WFrLXMIyF2LmMlQuE0oyIZVihseJTRwXxhm0UcQxT_iUXO1y2675HtD3uiq8xbI0NTaD16EE4DzZgtc70HaN9x063XZFZbqNBqa3m2nQ-81G9nIfarw1pevGeoX_NwgmIqHCkbvYccZXqNfN0NVjVx0JEELwX0cRdAY</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>28113366</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>A Comparative Study of Single-Phase AC and Multiphase DC Resistance Spot Welding</title><source>ASME Transactions Journals (Current)</source><creator>Li, Wei ; Cerjanec, Daniel ; Grzadzinski, Gerald A</creator><creatorcontrib>Li, Wei ; Cerjanec, Daniel ; Grzadzinski, Gerald A</creatorcontrib><description>This paper presents a comparative study of the AC and MFDC resistance spot welding process. Both experiments and finite element simulation were conducted to compare the weld size and energy consumption. The experiments were performed on two identical spot welding machines, one with a single phase ac and the other with a mid-frequency DC weld control. The machines were instrumented such that both the primary and secondary voltage and current signals could be collected for energy calculation. The finite element simulation model was developed to understand the underlying mechanisms of the difference between the ac and MFDC processes. The effect of the current waveform was investigated by using the actual process measurements as an input to the simulation model. It is shown that the MFDC process generally produces larger welds than the AC process with the same root-mean-square welding current. However, this difference is more prominent when the welding current is relatively low. Overall, the AC welding process consumes more energy to make a same sized weld than the MFDC process. The larger the welding current is used, the less efficient the AC welding process will become. The differences between the two welding processes are caused by the contact resistance behavior and the electrical inductance in the AC welding process.</description><identifier>ISSN: 1087-1357</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1528-8935</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1115/1.1949621</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>New York, NY: ASME</publisher><subject>Applied sciences ; Exact sciences and technology ; Joining, thermal cutting: metallurgical aspects ; Mechanical engineering. Machine design ; Metals. Metallurgy ; Welding</subject><ispartof>Journal of manufacturing science and engineering, 2005-08, Vol.127 (3), p.583-589</ispartof><rights>2005 INIST-CNRS</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-a310t-dff2ffcc3e48f29f58cc0f60bf2ebfbe9fb798078990a356c6f37afaec443ed63</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-a310t-dff2ffcc3e48f29f58cc0f60bf2ebfbe9fb798078990a356c6f37afaec443ed63</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><link.rule.ids>314,776,780,27901,27902,38497</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttp://pascal-francis.inist.fr/vibad/index.php?action=getRecordDetail&idt=17074792$$DView record in Pascal Francis$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Li, Wei</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Cerjanec, Daniel</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Grzadzinski, Gerald A</creatorcontrib><title>A Comparative Study of Single-Phase AC and Multiphase DC Resistance Spot Welding</title><title>Journal of manufacturing science and engineering</title><addtitle>J. Manuf. Sci. Eng</addtitle><description>This paper presents a comparative study of the AC and MFDC resistance spot welding process. Both experiments and finite element simulation were conducted to compare the weld size and energy consumption. The experiments were performed on two identical spot welding machines, one with a single phase ac and the other with a mid-frequency DC weld control. The machines were instrumented such that both the primary and secondary voltage and current signals could be collected for energy calculation. The finite element simulation model was developed to understand the underlying mechanisms of the difference between the ac and MFDC processes. The effect of the current waveform was investigated by using the actual process measurements as an input to the simulation model. It is shown that the MFDC process generally produces larger welds than the AC process with the same root-mean-square welding current. However, this difference is more prominent when the welding current is relatively low. Overall, the AC welding process consumes more energy to make a same sized weld than the MFDC process. The larger the welding current is used, the less efficient the AC welding process will become. The differences between the two welding processes are caused by the contact resistance behavior and the electrical inductance in the AC welding process.</description><subject>Applied sciences</subject><subject>Exact sciences and technology</subject><subject>Joining, thermal cutting: metallurgical aspects</subject><subject>Mechanical engineering. Machine design</subject><subject>Metals. Metallurgy</subject><subject>Welding</subject><issn>1087-1357</issn><issn>1528-8935</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2005</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><recordid>eNpFkM1LxDAUxIMouK4ePHvJRcFD17ymbZLjUj9hxcVVPIY0fdEu_bJphf3v7boLnt7w-M3ADCHnwGYAEN_ADFSkkhAOyATiUAZS8fhw1EyKAHgsjsmJ92vGAGTEJ2Q5p2lTtaYzffGDdNUP-YY2jq6K-rPEYPllPNJ5Sk2d0-eh7Iv273Ob0lf0he9NbUdX2_T0A8t8NJ2SI2dKj2f7OyXv93dv6WOweHl4SueLwHBgfZA7FzpnLcdIulC5WFrLXMIyF2LmMlQuE0oyIZVihseJTRwXxhm0UcQxT_iUXO1y2675HtD3uiq8xbI0NTaD16EE4DzZgtc70HaN9x063XZFZbqNBqa3m2nQ-81G9nIfarw1pevGeoX_NwgmIqHCkbvYccZXqNfN0NVjVx0JEELwX0cRdAY</recordid><startdate>20050801</startdate><enddate>20050801</enddate><creator>Li, Wei</creator><creator>Cerjanec, Daniel</creator><creator>Grzadzinski, Gerald A</creator><general>ASME</general><general>American Society of Mechanical Engineers</general><scope>IQODW</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7TB</scope><scope>8FD</scope><scope>FR3</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20050801</creationdate><title>A Comparative Study of Single-Phase AC and Multiphase DC Resistance Spot Welding</title><author>Li, Wei ; Cerjanec, Daniel ; Grzadzinski, Gerald A</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-a310t-dff2ffcc3e48f29f58cc0f60bf2ebfbe9fb798078990a356c6f37afaec443ed63</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2005</creationdate><topic>Applied sciences</topic><topic>Exact sciences and technology</topic><topic>Joining, thermal cutting: metallurgical aspects</topic><topic>Mechanical engineering. Machine design</topic><topic>Metals. Metallurgy</topic><topic>Welding</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Li, Wei</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Cerjanec, Daniel</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Grzadzinski, Gerald A</creatorcontrib><collection>Pascal-Francis</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>Mechanical & Transportation Engineering Abstracts</collection><collection>Technology Research Database</collection><collection>Engineering Research Database</collection><jtitle>Journal of manufacturing science and engineering</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Li, Wei</au><au>Cerjanec, Daniel</au><au>Grzadzinski, Gerald A</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>A Comparative Study of Single-Phase AC and Multiphase DC Resistance Spot Welding</atitle><jtitle>Journal of manufacturing science and engineering</jtitle><stitle>J. Manuf. Sci. Eng</stitle><date>2005-08-01</date><risdate>2005</risdate><volume>127</volume><issue>3</issue><spage>583</spage><epage>589</epage><pages>583-589</pages><issn>1087-1357</issn><eissn>1528-8935</eissn><abstract>This paper presents a comparative study of the AC and MFDC resistance spot welding process. Both experiments and finite element simulation were conducted to compare the weld size and energy consumption. The experiments were performed on two identical spot welding machines, one with a single phase ac and the other with a mid-frequency DC weld control. The machines were instrumented such that both the primary and secondary voltage and current signals could be collected for energy calculation. The finite element simulation model was developed to understand the underlying mechanisms of the difference between the ac and MFDC processes. The effect of the current waveform was investigated by using the actual process measurements as an input to the simulation model. It is shown that the MFDC process generally produces larger welds than the AC process with the same root-mean-square welding current. However, this difference is more prominent when the welding current is relatively low. Overall, the AC welding process consumes more energy to make a same sized weld than the MFDC process. The larger the welding current is used, the less efficient the AC welding process will become. The differences between the two welding processes are caused by the contact resistance behavior and the electrical inductance in the AC welding process.</abstract><cop>New York, NY</cop><pub>ASME</pub><doi>10.1115/1.1949621</doi><tpages>7</tpages></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | ISSN: 1087-1357 |
ispartof | Journal of manufacturing science and engineering, 2005-08, Vol.127 (3), p.583-589 |
issn | 1087-1357 1528-8935 |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_28113366 |
source | ASME Transactions Journals (Current) |
subjects | Applied sciences Exact sciences and technology Joining, thermal cutting: metallurgical aspects Mechanical engineering. Machine design Metals. Metallurgy Welding |
title | A Comparative Study of Single-Phase AC and Multiphase DC Resistance Spot Welding |
url | https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-02-09T00%3A01%3A51IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=A%20Comparative%20Study%20of%20Single-Phase%20AC%20and%20Multiphase%20DC%20Resistance%20Spot%20Welding&rft.jtitle=Journal%20of%20manufacturing%20science%20and%20engineering&rft.au=Li,%20Wei&rft.date=2005-08-01&rft.volume=127&rft.issue=3&rft.spage=583&rft.epage=589&rft.pages=583-589&rft.issn=1087-1357&rft.eissn=1528-8935&rft_id=info:doi/10.1115/1.1949621&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E28113366%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=28113366&rft_id=info:pmid/&rfr_iscdi=true |