Closure to "History and Evaluation of Hargreaves Evapotranspiration Equation" by George H. Hargreaves and Richard G. Allen

The authors welcome the discussion by Samani on our paper and appreciate his cautionary statements regarding the assumption of constancy of KRS in the original Eq. (6), especially in humid or equatorial climates. Samani's findings, based on the prediction of monthly solar radiation from Knapp e...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Journal of irrigation and drainage engineering 2004-09, Vol.130 (5), p.448-449
Hauptverfasser: Hargreaves, George H, Allen, Richard G
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page 449
container_issue 5
container_start_page 448
container_title Journal of irrigation and drainage engineering
container_volume 130
creator Hargreaves, George H
Allen, Richard G
description The authors welcome the discussion by Samani on our paper and appreciate his cautionary statements regarding the assumption of constancy of KRS in the original Eq. (6), especially in humid or equatorial climates. Samani's findings, based on the prediction of monthly solar radiation from Knapp et al. (1980) using temperature range (TR) (daily maximum temperature minus daily minimum temperature), indicate the need for KRS larger than the 0.17 constant implicit to the original Eq. (8) when the TR is relatively small (less than about 7'C). It is worthwhile to note that in Samani's Fig. 1, KRS appears to only be statistically different from 0.17 in the 8-16 deg C range. TR does tend to be smaller in humid and subhumid climates than in semiarid and and climates.
doi_str_mv 10.1061/(ASCE)0733-9437(2003)129:1(53)
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_28111775</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>28111775</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-proquest_miscellaneous_281117753</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNqNjL1uwjAURj20UunPO1wxoGQgtWOoSzcUBTLT7sjABVy5drjXQaJPXyGqqiPTN5xzPiEGShZKvqjnbPpe1bk0Wg8nI22yUkqdq3LyprKxzm9E7w_diXvmTynVyEjZE9-Vj9wRQorQbxynSCewYQP10frOJhcDxC00lnaE9oh8Bm1MZAO3ji5CfbiYfVidYI6RdghN8T86Py7cem9pA_MCpt5jeBS3W-sZn373QQxm9UfVDFuKhw45Lb8cr9F7GzB2vCxflVLGjPXV4g8liFep</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>28111775</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Closure to "History and Evaluation of Hargreaves Evapotranspiration Equation" by George H. Hargreaves and Richard G. Allen</title><source>American Society of Civil Engineers:NESLI2:Journals:2014</source><creator>Hargreaves, George H ; Allen, Richard G</creator><creatorcontrib>Hargreaves, George H ; Allen, Richard G</creatorcontrib><description>The authors welcome the discussion by Samani on our paper and appreciate his cautionary statements regarding the assumption of constancy of KRS in the original Eq. (6), especially in humid or equatorial climates. Samani's findings, based on the prediction of monthly solar radiation from Knapp et al. (1980) using temperature range (TR) (daily maximum temperature minus daily minimum temperature), indicate the need for KRS larger than the 0.17 constant implicit to the original Eq. (8) when the TR is relatively small (less than about 7'C). It is worthwhile to note that in Samani's Fig. 1, KRS appears to only be statistically different from 0.17 in the 8-16 deg C range. TR does tend to be smaller in humid and subhumid climates than in semiarid and and climates.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0733-9437</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1061/(ASCE)0733-9437(2003)129:1(53)</identifier><language>eng</language><ispartof>Journal of irrigation and drainage engineering, 2004-09, Vol.130 (5), p.448-449</ispartof><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><link.rule.ids>314,780,784,27924,27925</link.rule.ids></links><search><creatorcontrib>Hargreaves, George H</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Allen, Richard G</creatorcontrib><title>Closure to "History and Evaluation of Hargreaves Evapotranspiration Equation" by George H. Hargreaves and Richard G. Allen</title><title>Journal of irrigation and drainage engineering</title><description>The authors welcome the discussion by Samani on our paper and appreciate his cautionary statements regarding the assumption of constancy of KRS in the original Eq. (6), especially in humid or equatorial climates. Samani's findings, based on the prediction of monthly solar radiation from Knapp et al. (1980) using temperature range (TR) (daily maximum temperature minus daily minimum temperature), indicate the need for KRS larger than the 0.17 constant implicit to the original Eq. (8) when the TR is relatively small (less than about 7'C). It is worthwhile to note that in Samani's Fig. 1, KRS appears to only be statistically different from 0.17 in the 8-16 deg C range. TR does tend to be smaller in humid and subhumid climates than in semiarid and and climates.</description><issn>0733-9437</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2004</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><recordid>eNqNjL1uwjAURj20UunPO1wxoGQgtWOoSzcUBTLT7sjABVy5drjXQaJPXyGqqiPTN5xzPiEGShZKvqjnbPpe1bk0Wg8nI22yUkqdq3LyprKxzm9E7w_diXvmTynVyEjZE9-Vj9wRQorQbxynSCewYQP10frOJhcDxC00lnaE9oh8Bm1MZAO3ji5CfbiYfVidYI6RdghN8T86Py7cem9pA_MCpt5jeBS3W-sZn373QQxm9UfVDFuKhw45Lb8cr9F7GzB2vCxflVLGjPXV4g8liFep</recordid><startdate>20040901</startdate><enddate>20040901</enddate><creator>Hargreaves, George H</creator><creator>Allen, Richard G</creator><scope>8FD</scope><scope>FR3</scope><scope>KR7</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20040901</creationdate><title>Closure to "History and Evaluation of Hargreaves Evapotranspiration Equation" by George H. Hargreaves and Richard G. Allen</title><author>Hargreaves, George H ; Allen, Richard G</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-proquest_miscellaneous_281117753</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2004</creationdate><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Hargreaves, George H</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Allen, Richard G</creatorcontrib><collection>Technology Research Database</collection><collection>Engineering Research Database</collection><collection>Civil Engineering Abstracts</collection><jtitle>Journal of irrigation and drainage engineering</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Hargreaves, George H</au><au>Allen, Richard G</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Closure to "History and Evaluation of Hargreaves Evapotranspiration Equation" by George H. Hargreaves and Richard G. Allen</atitle><jtitle>Journal of irrigation and drainage engineering</jtitle><date>2004-09-01</date><risdate>2004</risdate><volume>130</volume><issue>5</issue><spage>448</spage><epage>449</epage><pages>448-449</pages><issn>0733-9437</issn><abstract>The authors welcome the discussion by Samani on our paper and appreciate his cautionary statements regarding the assumption of constancy of KRS in the original Eq. (6), especially in humid or equatorial climates. Samani's findings, based on the prediction of monthly solar radiation from Knapp et al. (1980) using temperature range (TR) (daily maximum temperature minus daily minimum temperature), indicate the need for KRS larger than the 0.17 constant implicit to the original Eq. (8) when the TR is relatively small (less than about 7'C). It is worthwhile to note that in Samani's Fig. 1, KRS appears to only be statistically different from 0.17 in the 8-16 deg C range. TR does tend to be smaller in humid and subhumid climates than in semiarid and and climates.</abstract><doi>10.1061/(ASCE)0733-9437(2003)129:1(53)</doi></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 0733-9437
ispartof Journal of irrigation and drainage engineering, 2004-09, Vol.130 (5), p.448-449
issn 0733-9437
language eng
recordid cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_28111775
source American Society of Civil Engineers:NESLI2:Journals:2014
title Closure to "History and Evaluation of Hargreaves Evapotranspiration Equation" by George H. Hargreaves and Richard G. Allen
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2024-12-25T01%3A21%3A49IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Closure%20to%20%22History%20and%20Evaluation%20of%20Hargreaves%20Evapotranspiration%20Equation%22%20by%20George%20H.%20Hargreaves%20and%20Richard%20G.%20Allen&rft.jtitle=Journal%20of%20irrigation%20and%20drainage%20engineering&rft.au=Hargreaves,%20George%20H&rft.date=2004-09-01&rft.volume=130&rft.issue=5&rft.spage=448&rft.epage=449&rft.pages=448-449&rft.issn=0733-9437&rft_id=info:doi/10.1061/(ASCE)0733-9437(2003)129:1(53)&rft_dat=%3Cproquest%3E28111775%3C/proquest%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=28111775&rft_id=info:pmid/&rfr_iscdi=true