Ethics. Incidental findings in brain imaging research
Research imaging studies have provided a steady stream of fundamental knowledge about the relation between brain and behavior in health and disease. Recent reports of clinical findings detected incidentally in this research (-), however, have created interest in the implications and ethics of how th...
Gespeichert in:
Veröffentlicht in: | Science (American Association for the Advancement of Science) 2006-02, Vol.311 (5762), p.783-784 |
---|---|
Hauptverfasser: | , , , , , , , , , , , |
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | eng |
Schlagworte: | |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
container_end_page | 784 |
---|---|
container_issue | 5762 |
container_start_page | 783 |
container_title | Science (American Association for the Advancement of Science) |
container_volume | 311 |
creator | Illes, Judy Kirschen, Matthew P Edwards, Emmeline Stanford, L R Bandettini, Peter Cho, Mildred K Ford, Paul J Glover, Gary H Kulynych, Jennifer Macklin, Ruth Michael, Daniel B Wolf, Susan M |
description | Research imaging studies have provided a steady stream of fundamental knowledge about the relation between brain and behavior in health and disease. Recent reports of clinical findings detected incidentally in this research (-), however, have created interest in the implications and ethics of how these findings are handled. We define incidental findings as observations of potential clinical significance unexpectedly discovered in healthy subjects or in patients recruited to brain imaging research studies and unrelated to the purpose or variables of the study. We believe that all investigators engaged in brain imaging research should anticipate incidental findings in their experimental protocols and establish a pathway for handling them. The central issues for consideration are how to protect subject welfare and research integrity while appropriately addressing investigator responsibility, subject expectations, informed consent, professional training of the research team, and the financial cost of following up on incidental findings. Protecting human subjects is of paramount importance. |
doi_str_mv | 10.1126/science.1124665 |
format | Article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>proquest_pubme</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_28111565</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>28111565</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-p170t-660450d9dddeb76e16f6116dc03e4cfe1a732734d1739dcb083312355909d6263</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNqFkDFPwzAQhS0EoqUws6FMbCl3cXyJR1QVqFSJBebIsS-tUeqWOB349xhRZpZ7urtPp3dPiFuEOWJBD9F6DpZ_mpJInYkpgla5LkCeiymApLyGSk3EVYwfAGmn5aWYIJWkNaipUMtx622cZ6tgveMwmj7rfHA-bGLmQ9YOJlW_M5s0yQaObAa7vRYXnekj35x0Jt6flm-Ll3z9-rxaPK7zA1Yw5kRQKnDaOcdtRYzUESI5C5JL2zGaShaVLB1WUjvbQi0lFlIpDdpRQXIm7n_vHob955Hj2Ox8tNz3JvD-GJuiRkRF6l8w2alTQDKBdyfw2O7YNYch_TZ8NX-JyG-jd2GV</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>17084663</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Ethics. Incidental findings in brain imaging research</title><source>American Association for the Advancement of Science</source><source>MEDLINE</source><source>JSTOR Complete Journals</source><creator>Illes, Judy ; Kirschen, Matthew P ; Edwards, Emmeline ; Stanford, L R ; Bandettini, Peter ; Cho, Mildred K ; Ford, Paul J ; Glover, Gary H ; Kulynych, Jennifer ; Macklin, Ruth ; Michael, Daniel B ; Wolf, Susan M</creator><creatorcontrib>Illes, Judy ; Kirschen, Matthew P ; Edwards, Emmeline ; Stanford, L R ; Bandettini, Peter ; Cho, Mildred K ; Ford, Paul J ; Glover, Gary H ; Kulynych, Jennifer ; Macklin, Ruth ; Michael, Daniel B ; Wolf, Susan M ; Working Group on Incidental Findings in Brain Imaging Research</creatorcontrib><description>Research imaging studies have provided a steady stream of fundamental knowledge about the relation between brain and behavior in health and disease. Recent reports of clinical findings detected incidentally in this research (-), however, have created interest in the implications and ethics of how these findings are handled. We define incidental findings as observations of potential clinical significance unexpectedly discovered in healthy subjects or in patients recruited to brain imaging research studies and unrelated to the purpose or variables of the study. We believe that all investigators engaged in brain imaging research should anticipate incidental findings in their experimental protocols and establish a pathway for handling them. The central issues for consideration are how to protect subject welfare and research integrity while appropriately addressing investigator responsibility, subject expectations, informed consent, professional training of the research team, and the financial cost of following up on incidental findings. Protecting human subjects is of paramount importance.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0036-8075</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1095-9203</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1126/science.1124665</identifier><identifier>PMID: 16469905</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>United States</publisher><subject>Biomedical Research - ethics ; Brain - physiology ; Brain Diseases - diagnosis ; Clinical Protocols ; Costs and Cost Analysis ; Diagnostic Imaging ; Ethics Committees, Research ; Guidelines as Topic ; Humans ; Incidental Findings ; Informed Consent ; Magnetic Resonance Imaging ; Truth Disclosure - ethics</subject><ispartof>Science (American Association for the Advancement of Science), 2006-02, Vol.311 (5762), p.783-784</ispartof><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><link.rule.ids>314,776,780,27901,27902</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/16469905$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Illes, Judy</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Kirschen, Matthew P</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Edwards, Emmeline</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Stanford, L R</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Bandettini, Peter</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Cho, Mildred K</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Ford, Paul J</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Glover, Gary H</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Kulynych, Jennifer</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Macklin, Ruth</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Michael, Daniel B</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Wolf, Susan M</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Working Group on Incidental Findings in Brain Imaging Research</creatorcontrib><title>Ethics. Incidental findings in brain imaging research</title><title>Science (American Association for the Advancement of Science)</title><addtitle>Science</addtitle><description>Research imaging studies have provided a steady stream of fundamental knowledge about the relation between brain and behavior in health and disease. Recent reports of clinical findings detected incidentally in this research (-), however, have created interest in the implications and ethics of how these findings are handled. We define incidental findings as observations of potential clinical significance unexpectedly discovered in healthy subjects or in patients recruited to brain imaging research studies and unrelated to the purpose or variables of the study. We believe that all investigators engaged in brain imaging research should anticipate incidental findings in their experimental protocols and establish a pathway for handling them. The central issues for consideration are how to protect subject welfare and research integrity while appropriately addressing investigator responsibility, subject expectations, informed consent, professional training of the research team, and the financial cost of following up on incidental findings. Protecting human subjects is of paramount importance.</description><subject>Biomedical Research - ethics</subject><subject>Brain - physiology</subject><subject>Brain Diseases - diagnosis</subject><subject>Clinical Protocols</subject><subject>Costs and Cost Analysis</subject><subject>Diagnostic Imaging</subject><subject>Ethics Committees, Research</subject><subject>Guidelines as Topic</subject><subject>Humans</subject><subject>Incidental Findings</subject><subject>Informed Consent</subject><subject>Magnetic Resonance Imaging</subject><subject>Truth Disclosure - ethics</subject><issn>0036-8075</issn><issn>1095-9203</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2006</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>EIF</sourceid><recordid>eNqFkDFPwzAQhS0EoqUws6FMbCl3cXyJR1QVqFSJBebIsS-tUeqWOB349xhRZpZ7urtPp3dPiFuEOWJBD9F6DpZ_mpJInYkpgla5LkCeiymApLyGSk3EVYwfAGmn5aWYIJWkNaipUMtx622cZ6tgveMwmj7rfHA-bGLmQ9YOJlW_M5s0yQaObAa7vRYXnekj35x0Jt6flm-Ll3z9-rxaPK7zA1Yw5kRQKnDaOcdtRYzUESI5C5JL2zGaShaVLB1WUjvbQi0lFlIpDdpRQXIm7n_vHob955Hj2Ox8tNz3JvD-GJuiRkRF6l8w2alTQDKBdyfw2O7YNYch_TZ8NX-JyG-jd2GV</recordid><startdate>20060210</startdate><enddate>20060210</enddate><creator>Illes, Judy</creator><creator>Kirschen, Matthew P</creator><creator>Edwards, Emmeline</creator><creator>Stanford, L R</creator><creator>Bandettini, Peter</creator><creator>Cho, Mildred K</creator><creator>Ford, Paul J</creator><creator>Glover, Gary H</creator><creator>Kulynych, Jennifer</creator><creator>Macklin, Ruth</creator><creator>Michael, Daniel B</creator><creator>Wolf, Susan M</creator><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>7TK</scope><scope>7U5</scope><scope>8FD</scope><scope>L7M</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20060210</creationdate><title>Ethics. Incidental findings in brain imaging research</title><author>Illes, Judy ; Kirschen, Matthew P ; Edwards, Emmeline ; Stanford, L R ; Bandettini, Peter ; Cho, Mildred K ; Ford, Paul J ; Glover, Gary H ; Kulynych, Jennifer ; Macklin, Ruth ; Michael, Daniel B ; Wolf, Susan M</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-p170t-660450d9dddeb76e16f6116dc03e4cfe1a732734d1739dcb083312355909d6263</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2006</creationdate><topic>Biomedical Research - ethics</topic><topic>Brain - physiology</topic><topic>Brain Diseases - diagnosis</topic><topic>Clinical Protocols</topic><topic>Costs and Cost Analysis</topic><topic>Diagnostic Imaging</topic><topic>Ethics Committees, Research</topic><topic>Guidelines as Topic</topic><topic>Humans</topic><topic>Incidental Findings</topic><topic>Informed Consent</topic><topic>Magnetic Resonance Imaging</topic><topic>Truth Disclosure - ethics</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Illes, Judy</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Kirschen, Matthew P</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Edwards, Emmeline</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Stanford, L R</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Bandettini, Peter</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Cho, Mildred K</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Ford, Paul J</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Glover, Gary H</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Kulynych, Jennifer</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Macklin, Ruth</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Michael, Daniel B</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Wolf, Susan M</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Working Group on Incidental Findings in Brain Imaging Research</creatorcontrib><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>Neurosciences Abstracts</collection><collection>Solid State and Superconductivity Abstracts</collection><collection>Technology Research Database</collection><collection>Advanced Technologies Database with Aerospace</collection><jtitle>Science (American Association for the Advancement of Science)</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Illes, Judy</au><au>Kirschen, Matthew P</au><au>Edwards, Emmeline</au><au>Stanford, L R</au><au>Bandettini, Peter</au><au>Cho, Mildred K</au><au>Ford, Paul J</au><au>Glover, Gary H</au><au>Kulynych, Jennifer</au><au>Macklin, Ruth</au><au>Michael, Daniel B</au><au>Wolf, Susan M</au><aucorp>Working Group on Incidental Findings in Brain Imaging Research</aucorp><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Ethics. Incidental findings in brain imaging research</atitle><jtitle>Science (American Association for the Advancement of Science)</jtitle><addtitle>Science</addtitle><date>2006-02-10</date><risdate>2006</risdate><volume>311</volume><issue>5762</issue><spage>783</spage><epage>784</epage><pages>783-784</pages><issn>0036-8075</issn><eissn>1095-9203</eissn><abstract>Research imaging studies have provided a steady stream of fundamental knowledge about the relation between brain and behavior in health and disease. Recent reports of clinical findings detected incidentally in this research (-), however, have created interest in the implications and ethics of how these findings are handled. We define incidental findings as observations of potential clinical significance unexpectedly discovered in healthy subjects or in patients recruited to brain imaging research studies and unrelated to the purpose or variables of the study. We believe that all investigators engaged in brain imaging research should anticipate incidental findings in their experimental protocols and establish a pathway for handling them. The central issues for consideration are how to protect subject welfare and research integrity while appropriately addressing investigator responsibility, subject expectations, informed consent, professional training of the research team, and the financial cost of following up on incidental findings. Protecting human subjects is of paramount importance.</abstract><cop>United States</cop><pmid>16469905</pmid><doi>10.1126/science.1124665</doi><tpages>2</tpages></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | ISSN: 0036-8075 |
ispartof | Science (American Association for the Advancement of Science), 2006-02, Vol.311 (5762), p.783-784 |
issn | 0036-8075 1095-9203 |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_28111565 |
source | American Association for the Advancement of Science; MEDLINE; JSTOR Complete Journals |
subjects | Biomedical Research - ethics Brain - physiology Brain Diseases - diagnosis Clinical Protocols Costs and Cost Analysis Diagnostic Imaging Ethics Committees, Research Guidelines as Topic Humans Incidental Findings Informed Consent Magnetic Resonance Imaging Truth Disclosure - ethics |
title | Ethics. Incidental findings in brain imaging research |
url | https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-02-04T19%3A11%3A50IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_pubme&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Ethics.%20Incidental%20findings%20in%20brain%20imaging%20research&rft.jtitle=Science%20(American%20Association%20for%20the%20Advancement%20of%20Science)&rft.au=Illes,%20Judy&rft.aucorp=Working%20Group%20on%20Incidental%20Findings%20in%20Brain%20Imaging%20Research&rft.date=2006-02-10&rft.volume=311&rft.issue=5762&rft.spage=783&rft.epage=784&rft.pages=783-784&rft.issn=0036-8075&rft.eissn=1095-9203&rft_id=info:doi/10.1126/science.1124665&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_pubme%3E28111565%3C/proquest_pubme%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=17084663&rft_id=info:pmid/16469905&rfr_iscdi=true |