Ethics. Incidental findings in brain imaging research

Research imaging studies have provided a steady stream of fundamental knowledge about the relation between brain and behavior in health and disease. Recent reports of clinical findings detected incidentally in this research (-), however, have created interest in the implications and ethics of how th...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Science (American Association for the Advancement of Science) 2006-02, Vol.311 (5762), p.783-784
Hauptverfasser: Illes, Judy, Kirschen, Matthew P, Edwards, Emmeline, Stanford, L R, Bandettini, Peter, Cho, Mildred K, Ford, Paul J, Glover, Gary H, Kulynych, Jennifer, Macklin, Ruth, Michael, Daniel B, Wolf, Susan M
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page 784
container_issue 5762
container_start_page 783
container_title Science (American Association for the Advancement of Science)
container_volume 311
creator Illes, Judy
Kirschen, Matthew P
Edwards, Emmeline
Stanford, L R
Bandettini, Peter
Cho, Mildred K
Ford, Paul J
Glover, Gary H
Kulynych, Jennifer
Macklin, Ruth
Michael, Daniel B
Wolf, Susan M
description Research imaging studies have provided a steady stream of fundamental knowledge about the relation between brain and behavior in health and disease. Recent reports of clinical findings detected incidentally in this research (-), however, have created interest in the implications and ethics of how these findings are handled. We define incidental findings as observations of potential clinical significance unexpectedly discovered in healthy subjects or in patients recruited to brain imaging research studies and unrelated to the purpose or variables of the study. We believe that all investigators engaged in brain imaging research should anticipate incidental findings in their experimental protocols and establish a pathway for handling them. The central issues for consideration are how to protect subject welfare and research integrity while appropriately addressing investigator responsibility, subject expectations, informed consent, professional training of the research team, and the financial cost of following up on incidental findings. Protecting human subjects is of paramount importance.
doi_str_mv 10.1126/science.1124665
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_pubme</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_28111565</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>28111565</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-p170t-660450d9dddeb76e16f6116dc03e4cfe1a732734d1739dcb083312355909d6263</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNqFkDFPwzAQhS0EoqUws6FMbCl3cXyJR1QVqFSJBebIsS-tUeqWOB349xhRZpZ7urtPp3dPiFuEOWJBD9F6DpZ_mpJInYkpgla5LkCeiymApLyGSk3EVYwfAGmn5aWYIJWkNaipUMtx622cZ6tgveMwmj7rfHA-bGLmQ9YOJlW_M5s0yQaObAa7vRYXnekj35x0Jt6flm-Ll3z9-rxaPK7zA1Yw5kRQKnDaOcdtRYzUESI5C5JL2zGaShaVLB1WUjvbQi0lFlIpDdpRQXIm7n_vHob955Hj2Ox8tNz3JvD-GJuiRkRF6l8w2alTQDKBdyfw2O7YNYch_TZ8NX-JyG-jd2GV</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>17084663</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Ethics. Incidental findings in brain imaging research</title><source>American Association for the Advancement of Science</source><source>MEDLINE</source><source>JSTOR Complete Journals</source><creator>Illes, Judy ; Kirschen, Matthew P ; Edwards, Emmeline ; Stanford, L R ; Bandettini, Peter ; Cho, Mildred K ; Ford, Paul J ; Glover, Gary H ; Kulynych, Jennifer ; Macklin, Ruth ; Michael, Daniel B ; Wolf, Susan M</creator><creatorcontrib>Illes, Judy ; Kirschen, Matthew P ; Edwards, Emmeline ; Stanford, L R ; Bandettini, Peter ; Cho, Mildred K ; Ford, Paul J ; Glover, Gary H ; Kulynych, Jennifer ; Macklin, Ruth ; Michael, Daniel B ; Wolf, Susan M ; Working Group on Incidental Findings in Brain Imaging Research</creatorcontrib><description>Research imaging studies have provided a steady stream of fundamental knowledge about the relation between brain and behavior in health and disease. Recent reports of clinical findings detected incidentally in this research (-), however, have created interest in the implications and ethics of how these findings are handled. We define incidental findings as observations of potential clinical significance unexpectedly discovered in healthy subjects or in patients recruited to brain imaging research studies and unrelated to the purpose or variables of the study. We believe that all investigators engaged in brain imaging research should anticipate incidental findings in their experimental protocols and establish a pathway for handling them. The central issues for consideration are how to protect subject welfare and research integrity while appropriately addressing investigator responsibility, subject expectations, informed consent, professional training of the research team, and the financial cost of following up on incidental findings. Protecting human subjects is of paramount importance.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0036-8075</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1095-9203</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1126/science.1124665</identifier><identifier>PMID: 16469905</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>United States</publisher><subject>Biomedical Research - ethics ; Brain - physiology ; Brain Diseases - diagnosis ; Clinical Protocols ; Costs and Cost Analysis ; Diagnostic Imaging ; Ethics Committees, Research ; Guidelines as Topic ; Humans ; Incidental Findings ; Informed Consent ; Magnetic Resonance Imaging ; Truth Disclosure - ethics</subject><ispartof>Science (American Association for the Advancement of Science), 2006-02, Vol.311 (5762), p.783-784</ispartof><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><link.rule.ids>314,776,780,27901,27902</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/16469905$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Illes, Judy</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Kirschen, Matthew P</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Edwards, Emmeline</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Stanford, L R</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Bandettini, Peter</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Cho, Mildred K</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Ford, Paul J</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Glover, Gary H</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Kulynych, Jennifer</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Macklin, Ruth</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Michael, Daniel B</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Wolf, Susan M</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Working Group on Incidental Findings in Brain Imaging Research</creatorcontrib><title>Ethics. Incidental findings in brain imaging research</title><title>Science (American Association for the Advancement of Science)</title><addtitle>Science</addtitle><description>Research imaging studies have provided a steady stream of fundamental knowledge about the relation between brain and behavior in health and disease. Recent reports of clinical findings detected incidentally in this research (-), however, have created interest in the implications and ethics of how these findings are handled. We define incidental findings as observations of potential clinical significance unexpectedly discovered in healthy subjects or in patients recruited to brain imaging research studies and unrelated to the purpose or variables of the study. We believe that all investigators engaged in brain imaging research should anticipate incidental findings in their experimental protocols and establish a pathway for handling them. The central issues for consideration are how to protect subject welfare and research integrity while appropriately addressing investigator responsibility, subject expectations, informed consent, professional training of the research team, and the financial cost of following up on incidental findings. Protecting human subjects is of paramount importance.</description><subject>Biomedical Research - ethics</subject><subject>Brain - physiology</subject><subject>Brain Diseases - diagnosis</subject><subject>Clinical Protocols</subject><subject>Costs and Cost Analysis</subject><subject>Diagnostic Imaging</subject><subject>Ethics Committees, Research</subject><subject>Guidelines as Topic</subject><subject>Humans</subject><subject>Incidental Findings</subject><subject>Informed Consent</subject><subject>Magnetic Resonance Imaging</subject><subject>Truth Disclosure - ethics</subject><issn>0036-8075</issn><issn>1095-9203</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2006</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>EIF</sourceid><recordid>eNqFkDFPwzAQhS0EoqUws6FMbCl3cXyJR1QVqFSJBebIsS-tUeqWOB349xhRZpZ7urtPp3dPiFuEOWJBD9F6DpZ_mpJInYkpgla5LkCeiymApLyGSk3EVYwfAGmn5aWYIJWkNaipUMtx622cZ6tgveMwmj7rfHA-bGLmQ9YOJlW_M5s0yQaObAa7vRYXnekj35x0Jt6flm-Ll3z9-rxaPK7zA1Yw5kRQKnDaOcdtRYzUESI5C5JL2zGaShaVLB1WUjvbQi0lFlIpDdpRQXIm7n_vHob955Hj2Ox8tNz3JvD-GJuiRkRF6l8w2alTQDKBdyfw2O7YNYch_TZ8NX-JyG-jd2GV</recordid><startdate>20060210</startdate><enddate>20060210</enddate><creator>Illes, Judy</creator><creator>Kirschen, Matthew P</creator><creator>Edwards, Emmeline</creator><creator>Stanford, L R</creator><creator>Bandettini, Peter</creator><creator>Cho, Mildred K</creator><creator>Ford, Paul J</creator><creator>Glover, Gary H</creator><creator>Kulynych, Jennifer</creator><creator>Macklin, Ruth</creator><creator>Michael, Daniel B</creator><creator>Wolf, Susan M</creator><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>7TK</scope><scope>7U5</scope><scope>8FD</scope><scope>L7M</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20060210</creationdate><title>Ethics. Incidental findings in brain imaging research</title><author>Illes, Judy ; Kirschen, Matthew P ; Edwards, Emmeline ; Stanford, L R ; Bandettini, Peter ; Cho, Mildred K ; Ford, Paul J ; Glover, Gary H ; Kulynych, Jennifer ; Macklin, Ruth ; Michael, Daniel B ; Wolf, Susan M</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-p170t-660450d9dddeb76e16f6116dc03e4cfe1a732734d1739dcb083312355909d6263</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2006</creationdate><topic>Biomedical Research - ethics</topic><topic>Brain - physiology</topic><topic>Brain Diseases - diagnosis</topic><topic>Clinical Protocols</topic><topic>Costs and Cost Analysis</topic><topic>Diagnostic Imaging</topic><topic>Ethics Committees, Research</topic><topic>Guidelines as Topic</topic><topic>Humans</topic><topic>Incidental Findings</topic><topic>Informed Consent</topic><topic>Magnetic Resonance Imaging</topic><topic>Truth Disclosure - ethics</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Illes, Judy</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Kirschen, Matthew P</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Edwards, Emmeline</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Stanford, L R</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Bandettini, Peter</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Cho, Mildred K</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Ford, Paul J</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Glover, Gary H</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Kulynych, Jennifer</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Macklin, Ruth</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Michael, Daniel B</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Wolf, Susan M</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Working Group on Incidental Findings in Brain Imaging Research</creatorcontrib><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>Neurosciences Abstracts</collection><collection>Solid State and Superconductivity Abstracts</collection><collection>Technology Research Database</collection><collection>Advanced Technologies Database with Aerospace</collection><jtitle>Science (American Association for the Advancement of Science)</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Illes, Judy</au><au>Kirschen, Matthew P</au><au>Edwards, Emmeline</au><au>Stanford, L R</au><au>Bandettini, Peter</au><au>Cho, Mildred K</au><au>Ford, Paul J</au><au>Glover, Gary H</au><au>Kulynych, Jennifer</au><au>Macklin, Ruth</au><au>Michael, Daniel B</au><au>Wolf, Susan M</au><aucorp>Working Group on Incidental Findings in Brain Imaging Research</aucorp><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Ethics. Incidental findings in brain imaging research</atitle><jtitle>Science (American Association for the Advancement of Science)</jtitle><addtitle>Science</addtitle><date>2006-02-10</date><risdate>2006</risdate><volume>311</volume><issue>5762</issue><spage>783</spage><epage>784</epage><pages>783-784</pages><issn>0036-8075</issn><eissn>1095-9203</eissn><abstract>Research imaging studies have provided a steady stream of fundamental knowledge about the relation between brain and behavior in health and disease. Recent reports of clinical findings detected incidentally in this research (-), however, have created interest in the implications and ethics of how these findings are handled. We define incidental findings as observations of potential clinical significance unexpectedly discovered in healthy subjects or in patients recruited to brain imaging research studies and unrelated to the purpose or variables of the study. We believe that all investigators engaged in brain imaging research should anticipate incidental findings in their experimental protocols and establish a pathway for handling them. The central issues for consideration are how to protect subject welfare and research integrity while appropriately addressing investigator responsibility, subject expectations, informed consent, professional training of the research team, and the financial cost of following up on incidental findings. Protecting human subjects is of paramount importance.</abstract><cop>United States</cop><pmid>16469905</pmid><doi>10.1126/science.1124665</doi><tpages>2</tpages></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 0036-8075
ispartof Science (American Association for the Advancement of Science), 2006-02, Vol.311 (5762), p.783-784
issn 0036-8075
1095-9203
language eng
recordid cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_28111565
source American Association for the Advancement of Science; MEDLINE; JSTOR Complete Journals
subjects Biomedical Research - ethics
Brain - physiology
Brain Diseases - diagnosis
Clinical Protocols
Costs and Cost Analysis
Diagnostic Imaging
Ethics Committees, Research
Guidelines as Topic
Humans
Incidental Findings
Informed Consent
Magnetic Resonance Imaging
Truth Disclosure - ethics
title Ethics. Incidental findings in brain imaging research
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-02-04T19%3A11%3A50IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_pubme&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Ethics.%20Incidental%20findings%20in%20brain%20imaging%20research&rft.jtitle=Science%20(American%20Association%20for%20the%20Advancement%20of%20Science)&rft.au=Illes,%20Judy&rft.aucorp=Working%20Group%20on%20Incidental%20Findings%20in%20Brain%20Imaging%20Research&rft.date=2006-02-10&rft.volume=311&rft.issue=5762&rft.spage=783&rft.epage=784&rft.pages=783-784&rft.issn=0036-8075&rft.eissn=1095-9203&rft_id=info:doi/10.1126/science.1124665&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_pubme%3E28111565%3C/proquest_pubme%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=17084663&rft_id=info:pmid/16469905&rfr_iscdi=true