Disparities in refusal of surgery for gynecologic cancer

To identify sociodemographic and clinical factors associated with refusal of gynecologic cancer surgery and to estimate its effect on overall survival. The National Cancer Database was surveyed for patients with uterine, cervical or ovarian/fallopian tube/primary peritoneal cancer treated between 20...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Gynecologic oncology 2023-07, Vol.174, p.1-10
Hauptverfasser: Samuel, David, Kwon, Deukwoo, Huang, Marilyn, Zhao, Wei, Roy, Molly, Tabuyo-Martin, Angel, Siemon, John, Schlumbrecht, Matthew P., Pearson, J. Matt, Sinno, Abdulrahman K.
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page 10
container_issue
container_start_page 1
container_title Gynecologic oncology
container_volume 174
creator Samuel, David
Kwon, Deukwoo
Huang, Marilyn
Zhao, Wei
Roy, Molly
Tabuyo-Martin, Angel
Siemon, John
Schlumbrecht, Matthew P.
Pearson, J. Matt
Sinno, Abdulrahman K.
description To identify sociodemographic and clinical factors associated with refusal of gynecologic cancer surgery and to estimate its effect on overall survival. The National Cancer Database was surveyed for patients with uterine, cervical or ovarian/fallopian tube/primary peritoneal cancer treated between 2004 and 2017. Univariate and multivariate logistic regression were used to assess associations between clinico-demographic variables and refusal of surgery. Overall survival was estimated using the Kaplan-Meier method. Trends in refusal over time were evaluated using joinpoint regression. Of 788,164 women included in our analysis, 5875 (0.75%) patients refused surgery recommended by their treating oncologist. Patients who refused surgery were older at diagnosis (72.4 vs 60.3 years, p 
doi_str_mv 10.1016/j.ygyno.2023.04.017
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_2810923390</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><els_id>S0090825823001889</els_id><sourcerecordid>2810923390</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c359t-f920a4e2efd0a93f6885e0550d40d775f37394f159f6ef6aafa711c27d31e4783</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp9kD1PwzAURS0EoqXwC5BQRpaEZztO7IEBlU-pEgvMlnGeK1dpXewGqf8elxZGprec-67uIeSSQkWBNjeLajvfrkLFgPEK6gpoe0TGFJQoGynUMRkDKCglE3JEzlJaAAAHyk7JiLe0ppI2YyLvfVqb6DceU-FXRUQ3JNMXwRVpiHOM28KFWOQitKEPc28La1YW4zk5caZPeHG4E_L--PA2fS5nr08v07tZablQm9IpBqZGhq4Do7hrpBQIQkBXQ9e2wvGWq9pRoVyDrjHGmZZSy9qOU6xbySfkev93HcPngGmjlz5Z7HuzwjAkzWRezDhXkFG-R20MKeUleh390sStpqB3yvRC_yjTO2Uaap2V5dTVoWD4WGL3l_l1lIHbPYB55pfHqJP1mB10PqLd6C74fwu-AZLgfXM</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>2810923390</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Disparities in refusal of surgery for gynecologic cancer</title><source>Access via ScienceDirect (Elsevier)</source><creator>Samuel, David ; Kwon, Deukwoo ; Huang, Marilyn ; Zhao, Wei ; Roy, Molly ; Tabuyo-Martin, Angel ; Siemon, John ; Schlumbrecht, Matthew P. ; Pearson, J. Matt ; Sinno, Abdulrahman K.</creator><creatorcontrib>Samuel, David ; Kwon, Deukwoo ; Huang, Marilyn ; Zhao, Wei ; Roy, Molly ; Tabuyo-Martin, Angel ; Siemon, John ; Schlumbrecht, Matthew P. ; Pearson, J. Matt ; Sinno, Abdulrahman K.</creatorcontrib><description>To identify sociodemographic and clinical factors associated with refusal of gynecologic cancer surgery and to estimate its effect on overall survival. The National Cancer Database was surveyed for patients with uterine, cervical or ovarian/fallopian tube/primary peritoneal cancer treated between 2004 and 2017. Univariate and multivariate logistic regression were used to assess associations between clinico-demographic variables and refusal of surgery. Overall survival was estimated using the Kaplan-Meier method. Trends in refusal over time were evaluated using joinpoint regression. Of 788,164 women included in our analysis, 5875 (0.75%) patients refused surgery recommended by their treating oncologist. Patients who refused surgery were older at diagnosis (72.4 vs 60.3 years, p &lt; 0.001) and more likely Black (OR 1.77 95% CI 1.62–1.92). Refusal of surgery was associated with uninsured status (OR 2.94 95% CI 2.49–3.46), Medicaid coverage (OR 2.79 95% CI 2.46–3.18), low regional high school graduation (OR 1.18 95% CI 1.05–1.33) and treatment at a community hospital (OR 1.59 95% CI 1.42–1.78). Patients who refused surgery had lower median overall survival (1.0 vs 14.0 years, p &lt; 0.01) and this difference persisted across disease sites. Between 2008 and 2017, there was a significant increase in refusal of surgery annually (annual percent change +1.41%, p &lt; 0.05). Multiple social determinants of health are independently associated with refusal of surgery for gynecologic cancer. Given that patients who refuse surgery are more likely from vulnerable, underserved populations and have inferior survival, refusal of surgery should be considered a surgical healthcare disparity and tackled as such. •Patients who refuse gynecologic cancer surgery are more likely to be from vulnerable and underserved populations.•Refusing gynecologic cancer surgery is associated with decreased overall survival, regardless of disease site.•Since 2008, the incidence of refusal of gynecologic cancer surgery has been increasing annually.•Refusal of surgery should be considered an oncologic and surgical disparity, and tackled as such</description><identifier>ISSN: 0090-8258</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1095-6859</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1016/j.ygyno.2023.04.017</identifier><identifier>PMID: 37141816</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>United States: Elsevier Inc</publisher><subject>Gynecologic oncology ; Healthcare disparities ; National cancer database ; Refusal of surgery</subject><ispartof>Gynecologic oncology, 2023-07, Vol.174, p.1-10</ispartof><rights>2023 Elsevier Inc.</rights><rights>Copyright © 2023 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c359t-f920a4e2efd0a93f6885e0550d40d775f37394f159f6ef6aafa711c27d31e4783</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c359t-f920a4e2efd0a93f6885e0550d40d775f37394f159f6ef6aafa711c27d31e4783</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.ygyno.2023.04.017$$EHTML$$P50$$Gelsevier$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,780,784,3550,27924,27925,45995</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37141816$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Samuel, David</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Kwon, Deukwoo</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Huang, Marilyn</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Zhao, Wei</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Roy, Molly</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Tabuyo-Martin, Angel</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Siemon, John</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Schlumbrecht, Matthew P.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Pearson, J. Matt</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Sinno, Abdulrahman K.</creatorcontrib><title>Disparities in refusal of surgery for gynecologic cancer</title><title>Gynecologic oncology</title><addtitle>Gynecol Oncol</addtitle><description>To identify sociodemographic and clinical factors associated with refusal of gynecologic cancer surgery and to estimate its effect on overall survival. The National Cancer Database was surveyed for patients with uterine, cervical or ovarian/fallopian tube/primary peritoneal cancer treated between 2004 and 2017. Univariate and multivariate logistic regression were used to assess associations between clinico-demographic variables and refusal of surgery. Overall survival was estimated using the Kaplan-Meier method. Trends in refusal over time were evaluated using joinpoint regression. Of 788,164 women included in our analysis, 5875 (0.75%) patients refused surgery recommended by their treating oncologist. Patients who refused surgery were older at diagnosis (72.4 vs 60.3 years, p &lt; 0.001) and more likely Black (OR 1.77 95% CI 1.62–1.92). Refusal of surgery was associated with uninsured status (OR 2.94 95% CI 2.49–3.46), Medicaid coverage (OR 2.79 95% CI 2.46–3.18), low regional high school graduation (OR 1.18 95% CI 1.05–1.33) and treatment at a community hospital (OR 1.59 95% CI 1.42–1.78). Patients who refused surgery had lower median overall survival (1.0 vs 14.0 years, p &lt; 0.01) and this difference persisted across disease sites. Between 2008 and 2017, there was a significant increase in refusal of surgery annually (annual percent change +1.41%, p &lt; 0.05). Multiple social determinants of health are independently associated with refusal of surgery for gynecologic cancer. Given that patients who refuse surgery are more likely from vulnerable, underserved populations and have inferior survival, refusal of surgery should be considered a surgical healthcare disparity and tackled as such. •Patients who refuse gynecologic cancer surgery are more likely to be from vulnerable and underserved populations.•Refusing gynecologic cancer surgery is associated with decreased overall survival, regardless of disease site.•Since 2008, the incidence of refusal of gynecologic cancer surgery has been increasing annually.•Refusal of surgery should be considered an oncologic and surgical disparity, and tackled as such</description><subject>Gynecologic oncology</subject><subject>Healthcare disparities</subject><subject>National cancer database</subject><subject>Refusal of surgery</subject><issn>0090-8258</issn><issn>1095-6859</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2023</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><recordid>eNp9kD1PwzAURS0EoqXwC5BQRpaEZztO7IEBlU-pEgvMlnGeK1dpXewGqf8elxZGprec-67uIeSSQkWBNjeLajvfrkLFgPEK6gpoe0TGFJQoGynUMRkDKCglE3JEzlJaAAAHyk7JiLe0ppI2YyLvfVqb6DceU-FXRUQ3JNMXwRVpiHOM28KFWOQitKEPc28La1YW4zk5caZPeHG4E_L--PA2fS5nr08v07tZablQm9IpBqZGhq4Do7hrpBQIQkBXQ9e2wvGWq9pRoVyDrjHGmZZSy9qOU6xbySfkev93HcPngGmjlz5Z7HuzwjAkzWRezDhXkFG-R20MKeUleh390sStpqB3yvRC_yjTO2Uaap2V5dTVoWD4WGL3l_l1lIHbPYB55pfHqJP1mB10PqLd6C74fwu-AZLgfXM</recordid><startdate>202307</startdate><enddate>202307</enddate><creator>Samuel, David</creator><creator>Kwon, Deukwoo</creator><creator>Huang, Marilyn</creator><creator>Zhao, Wei</creator><creator>Roy, Molly</creator><creator>Tabuyo-Martin, Angel</creator><creator>Siemon, John</creator><creator>Schlumbrecht, Matthew P.</creator><creator>Pearson, J. Matt</creator><creator>Sinno, Abdulrahman K.</creator><general>Elsevier Inc</general><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7X8</scope></search><sort><creationdate>202307</creationdate><title>Disparities in refusal of surgery for gynecologic cancer</title><author>Samuel, David ; Kwon, Deukwoo ; Huang, Marilyn ; Zhao, Wei ; Roy, Molly ; Tabuyo-Martin, Angel ; Siemon, John ; Schlumbrecht, Matthew P. ; Pearson, J. Matt ; Sinno, Abdulrahman K.</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c359t-f920a4e2efd0a93f6885e0550d40d775f37394f159f6ef6aafa711c27d31e4783</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2023</creationdate><topic>Gynecologic oncology</topic><topic>Healthcare disparities</topic><topic>National cancer database</topic><topic>Refusal of surgery</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Samuel, David</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Kwon, Deukwoo</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Huang, Marilyn</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Zhao, Wei</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Roy, Molly</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Tabuyo-Martin, Angel</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Siemon, John</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Schlumbrecht, Matthew P.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Pearson, J. Matt</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Sinno, Abdulrahman K.</creatorcontrib><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><jtitle>Gynecologic oncology</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Samuel, David</au><au>Kwon, Deukwoo</au><au>Huang, Marilyn</au><au>Zhao, Wei</au><au>Roy, Molly</au><au>Tabuyo-Martin, Angel</au><au>Siemon, John</au><au>Schlumbrecht, Matthew P.</au><au>Pearson, J. Matt</au><au>Sinno, Abdulrahman K.</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Disparities in refusal of surgery for gynecologic cancer</atitle><jtitle>Gynecologic oncology</jtitle><addtitle>Gynecol Oncol</addtitle><date>2023-07</date><risdate>2023</risdate><volume>174</volume><spage>1</spage><epage>10</epage><pages>1-10</pages><issn>0090-8258</issn><eissn>1095-6859</eissn><abstract>To identify sociodemographic and clinical factors associated with refusal of gynecologic cancer surgery and to estimate its effect on overall survival. The National Cancer Database was surveyed for patients with uterine, cervical or ovarian/fallopian tube/primary peritoneal cancer treated between 2004 and 2017. Univariate and multivariate logistic regression were used to assess associations between clinico-demographic variables and refusal of surgery. Overall survival was estimated using the Kaplan-Meier method. Trends in refusal over time were evaluated using joinpoint regression. Of 788,164 women included in our analysis, 5875 (0.75%) patients refused surgery recommended by their treating oncologist. Patients who refused surgery were older at diagnosis (72.4 vs 60.3 years, p &lt; 0.001) and more likely Black (OR 1.77 95% CI 1.62–1.92). Refusal of surgery was associated with uninsured status (OR 2.94 95% CI 2.49–3.46), Medicaid coverage (OR 2.79 95% CI 2.46–3.18), low regional high school graduation (OR 1.18 95% CI 1.05–1.33) and treatment at a community hospital (OR 1.59 95% CI 1.42–1.78). Patients who refused surgery had lower median overall survival (1.0 vs 14.0 years, p &lt; 0.01) and this difference persisted across disease sites. Between 2008 and 2017, there was a significant increase in refusal of surgery annually (annual percent change +1.41%, p &lt; 0.05). Multiple social determinants of health are independently associated with refusal of surgery for gynecologic cancer. Given that patients who refuse surgery are more likely from vulnerable, underserved populations and have inferior survival, refusal of surgery should be considered a surgical healthcare disparity and tackled as such. •Patients who refuse gynecologic cancer surgery are more likely to be from vulnerable and underserved populations.•Refusing gynecologic cancer surgery is associated with decreased overall survival, regardless of disease site.•Since 2008, the incidence of refusal of gynecologic cancer surgery has been increasing annually.•Refusal of surgery should be considered an oncologic and surgical disparity, and tackled as such</abstract><cop>United States</cop><pub>Elsevier Inc</pub><pmid>37141816</pmid><doi>10.1016/j.ygyno.2023.04.017</doi><tpages>10</tpages></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 0090-8258
ispartof Gynecologic oncology, 2023-07, Vol.174, p.1-10
issn 0090-8258
1095-6859
language eng
recordid cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_2810923390
source Access via ScienceDirect (Elsevier)
subjects Gynecologic oncology
Healthcare disparities
National cancer database
Refusal of surgery
title Disparities in refusal of surgery for gynecologic cancer
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2024-12-21T07%3A24%3A12IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Disparities%20in%20refusal%20of%20surgery%20for%20gynecologic%20cancer&rft.jtitle=Gynecologic%20oncology&rft.au=Samuel,%20David&rft.date=2023-07&rft.volume=174&rft.spage=1&rft.epage=10&rft.pages=1-10&rft.issn=0090-8258&rft.eissn=1095-6859&rft_id=info:doi/10.1016/j.ygyno.2023.04.017&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E2810923390%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=2810923390&rft_id=info:pmid/37141816&rft_els_id=S0090825823001889&rfr_iscdi=true