Core outcome set for perinatal interventions for congenital diaphragmatic hernia

ABSTRACT Objective To develop a core set of prenatal and neonatal outcomes for clinical studies evaluating perinatal interventions for congenital diaphragmatic hernia, using a validated consensus‐building method. Methods An international steering group comprising 13 leading maternal–fetal medicine s...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Ultrasound in obstetrics & gynecology 2023-09, Vol.62 (3), p.374-382
Hauptverfasser: Vergote, S., De Bie, F. R., Duffy, J. M. N., Bosteels, J., Benachi, A., Power, B., Meijer, F., Hedrick, H. L., Fernandes, C. J., Reiss, I. K. M., De Coppi, P., Lally, K. P., Deprest, J. A.
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page 382
container_issue 3
container_start_page 374
container_title Ultrasound in obstetrics & gynecology
container_volume 62
creator Vergote, S.
De Bie, F. R.
Duffy, J. M. N.
Bosteels, J.
Benachi, A.
Power, B.
Meijer, F.
Hedrick, H. L.
Fernandes, C. J.
Reiss, I. K. M.
De Coppi, P.
Lally, K. P.
Deprest, J. A.
description ABSTRACT Objective To develop a core set of prenatal and neonatal outcomes for clinical studies evaluating perinatal interventions for congenital diaphragmatic hernia, using a validated consensus‐building method. Methods An international steering group comprising 13 leading maternal–fetal medicine specialists, neonatologists, pediatric surgeons, patient representatives, researchers and methodologists guided the development of this core outcome set. Potential outcomes were collected through a systematic review of the literature and entered into a two‐round online Delphi survey. A call was made for stakeholders with experience of congenital diaphragmatic hernia to review the list and score outcomes based on their perceived relevance. Outcomes that fulfilled the consensus criteria defined a priori were discussed subsequently in online breakout meetings. Results were reviewed in a consensus meeting, during which the core outcome set was defined. Finally, the definitions, measurement methods and aspirational outcomes were defined in online and in‐person definition meetings by a selection of 45 stakeholders. Results Overall, 221 stakeholders participated in the Delphi survey and 198 completed both rounds. Fifty outcomes met the consensus criteria and were discussed and rescored by 78 stakeholders in the breakout meetings. During the consensus meeting, 93 stakeholders agreed eventually on eight outcomes, which constituted the core outcome set. Maternal and obstetric outcomes included maternal morbidity related to the intervention and gestational age at delivery. Fetal outcomes included intrauterine demise, interval between intervention and delivery and change in lung size in utero around the time of the intervention. Neonatal outcomes included neonatal mortality, pulmonary hypertension and use of extracorporeal membrane oxygenation. Definitions and measurement methods were formulated by 45 stakeholders, who also added three aspirational outcomes: duration of invasive ventilation, duration of oxygen supplementation and use of pulmonary vasodilators at discharge. Conclusions We developed with relevant stakeholders a core outcome set for studies evaluating perinatal interventions in congenital diaphragmatic hernia. Its implementation should facilitate the comparison and combination of trial results, enabling future research to better guide clinical practice. © 2023 International Society of Ultrasound in Obstetrics and Gynecology.
doi_str_mv 10.1002/uog.26235
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_2806996054</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>2858650188</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c3535-36578c8da107b42d9f89982589e986a10131d8c0573271d52ceb64898ba27f663</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp10MtKxDAUBuAgio6XhS8gBTe66JhLc1vK4A0EXei6ZNLTMdImY9Iq8_ZmHHUhuDqQ8_GT8yN0TPCUYEwvxrCYUkEZ30ITUgldYon5NppgLXAphaZ7aD-lV4yxqJjYRXtMYq2lYBP0OAsRijAONvRQJBiKNsRiCdF5M5iucH6A-A5-cMGnr50NfgHerZeNM8uXaBa9GZwtXiB6Zw7RTmu6BEff8wA9X189zW7L-4ebu9nlfWkZZ7xkgktlVWMIlvOKNrpVWivKlQatRH4ljDTKYi4ZlaTh1MJcVEqruaGyFYIdoLNN7jKGtxHSUPcuWeg64yGMqaYKC53v51Wmp3_oaxijz7_LiivBMVEqq_ONsjGkFKGtl9H1Jq5qgut1zXWuuf6qOduT78Rx3kPzK396zeBiAz5cB6v_k-rnh5tN5CekV4WA</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>2858650188</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Core outcome set for perinatal interventions for congenital diaphragmatic hernia</title><source>Wiley Online Library - AutoHoldings Journals</source><source>MEDLINE</source><source>EZB-FREE-00999 freely available EZB journals</source><source>Wiley Online Library (Open Access Collection)</source><creator>Vergote, S. ; De Bie, F. R. ; Duffy, J. M. N. ; Bosteels, J. ; Benachi, A. ; Power, B. ; Meijer, F. ; Hedrick, H. L. ; Fernandes, C. J. ; Reiss, I. K. M. ; De Coppi, P. ; Lally, K. P. ; Deprest, J. A.</creator><creatorcontrib>Vergote, S. ; De Bie, F. R. ; Duffy, J. M. N. ; Bosteels, J. ; Benachi, A. ; Power, B. ; Meijer, F. ; Hedrick, H. L. ; Fernandes, C. J. ; Reiss, I. K. M. ; De Coppi, P. ; Lally, K. P. ; Deprest, J. A.</creatorcontrib><description>ABSTRACT Objective To develop a core set of prenatal and neonatal outcomes for clinical studies evaluating perinatal interventions for congenital diaphragmatic hernia, using a validated consensus‐building method. Methods An international steering group comprising 13 leading maternal–fetal medicine specialists, neonatologists, pediatric surgeons, patient representatives, researchers and methodologists guided the development of this core outcome set. Potential outcomes were collected through a systematic review of the literature and entered into a two‐round online Delphi survey. A call was made for stakeholders with experience of congenital diaphragmatic hernia to review the list and score outcomes based on their perceived relevance. Outcomes that fulfilled the consensus criteria defined a priori were discussed subsequently in online breakout meetings. Results were reviewed in a consensus meeting, during which the core outcome set was defined. Finally, the definitions, measurement methods and aspirational outcomes were defined in online and in‐person definition meetings by a selection of 45 stakeholders. Results Overall, 221 stakeholders participated in the Delphi survey and 198 completed both rounds. Fifty outcomes met the consensus criteria and were discussed and rescored by 78 stakeholders in the breakout meetings. During the consensus meeting, 93 stakeholders agreed eventually on eight outcomes, which constituted the core outcome set. Maternal and obstetric outcomes included maternal morbidity related to the intervention and gestational age at delivery. Fetal outcomes included intrauterine demise, interval between intervention and delivery and change in lung size in utero around the time of the intervention. Neonatal outcomes included neonatal mortality, pulmonary hypertension and use of extracorporeal membrane oxygenation. Definitions and measurement methods were formulated by 45 stakeholders, who also added three aspirational outcomes: duration of invasive ventilation, duration of oxygen supplementation and use of pulmonary vasodilators at discharge. Conclusions We developed with relevant stakeholders a core outcome set for studies evaluating perinatal interventions in congenital diaphragmatic hernia. Its implementation should facilitate the comparison and combination of trial results, enabling future research to better guide clinical practice. © 2023 International Society of Ultrasound in Obstetrics and Gynecology.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0960-7692</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1469-0705</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1002/uog.26235</identifier><identifier>PMID: 37099763</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Chichester, UK: John Wiley &amp; Sons, Ltd</publisher><subject>Child ; congenital diaphragmatic hernia ; core outcome set ; Criteria ; Delphi survey ; Delphi Technique ; Diaphragm ; Female ; Fetuses ; Gestational age ; Gynecology ; Hernia ; Hernias ; Hernias, Diaphragmatic, Congenital - diagnostic imaging ; Hernias, Diaphragmatic, Congenital - therapy ; Humans ; Hypertension ; Infant, Newborn ; Intervention ; Literature reviews ; Measurement methods ; Meetings ; Morbidity ; Neonates ; Obstetrics ; Outcome Assessment, Health Care ; Oxygenation ; Pediatrics ; perinatal intervention ; Pregnancy ; Prenatal Care - methods ; Research Design ; Surveys ; Treatment Outcome</subject><ispartof>Ultrasound in obstetrics &amp; gynecology, 2023-09, Vol.62 (3), p.374-382</ispartof><rights>2023 International Society of Ultrasound in Obstetrics and Gynecology.</rights><rights>Copyright © 2023 ISUOG. Published by John Wiley &amp; Sons Ltd</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c3535-36578c8da107b42d9f89982589e986a10131d8c0573271d52ceb64898ba27f663</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c3535-36578c8da107b42d9f89982589e986a10131d8c0573271d52ceb64898ba27f663</cites><orcidid>0000-0002-4920-945X ; 0000-0002-8372-6434</orcidid></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/pdf/10.1002%2Fuog.26235$$EPDF$$P50$$Gwiley$$H</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/full/10.1002%2Fuog.26235$$EHTML$$P50$$Gwiley$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>315,781,785,1418,1434,27929,27930,45579,45580,46414,46838</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37099763$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Vergote, S.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>De Bie, F. R.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Duffy, J. M. N.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Bosteels, J.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Benachi, A.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Power, B.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Meijer, F.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Hedrick, H. L.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Fernandes, C. J.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Reiss, I. K. M.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>De Coppi, P.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Lally, K. P.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Deprest, J. A.</creatorcontrib><title>Core outcome set for perinatal interventions for congenital diaphragmatic hernia</title><title>Ultrasound in obstetrics &amp; gynecology</title><addtitle>Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol</addtitle><description>ABSTRACT Objective To develop a core set of prenatal and neonatal outcomes for clinical studies evaluating perinatal interventions for congenital diaphragmatic hernia, using a validated consensus‐building method. Methods An international steering group comprising 13 leading maternal–fetal medicine specialists, neonatologists, pediatric surgeons, patient representatives, researchers and methodologists guided the development of this core outcome set. Potential outcomes were collected through a systematic review of the literature and entered into a two‐round online Delphi survey. A call was made for stakeholders with experience of congenital diaphragmatic hernia to review the list and score outcomes based on their perceived relevance. Outcomes that fulfilled the consensus criteria defined a priori were discussed subsequently in online breakout meetings. Results were reviewed in a consensus meeting, during which the core outcome set was defined. Finally, the definitions, measurement methods and aspirational outcomes were defined in online and in‐person definition meetings by a selection of 45 stakeholders. Results Overall, 221 stakeholders participated in the Delphi survey and 198 completed both rounds. Fifty outcomes met the consensus criteria and were discussed and rescored by 78 stakeholders in the breakout meetings. During the consensus meeting, 93 stakeholders agreed eventually on eight outcomes, which constituted the core outcome set. Maternal and obstetric outcomes included maternal morbidity related to the intervention and gestational age at delivery. Fetal outcomes included intrauterine demise, interval between intervention and delivery and change in lung size in utero around the time of the intervention. Neonatal outcomes included neonatal mortality, pulmonary hypertension and use of extracorporeal membrane oxygenation. Definitions and measurement methods were formulated by 45 stakeholders, who also added three aspirational outcomes: duration of invasive ventilation, duration of oxygen supplementation and use of pulmonary vasodilators at discharge. Conclusions We developed with relevant stakeholders a core outcome set for studies evaluating perinatal interventions in congenital diaphragmatic hernia. Its implementation should facilitate the comparison and combination of trial results, enabling future research to better guide clinical practice. © 2023 International Society of Ultrasound in Obstetrics and Gynecology.</description><subject>Child</subject><subject>congenital diaphragmatic hernia</subject><subject>core outcome set</subject><subject>Criteria</subject><subject>Delphi survey</subject><subject>Delphi Technique</subject><subject>Diaphragm</subject><subject>Female</subject><subject>Fetuses</subject><subject>Gestational age</subject><subject>Gynecology</subject><subject>Hernia</subject><subject>Hernias</subject><subject>Hernias, Diaphragmatic, Congenital - diagnostic imaging</subject><subject>Hernias, Diaphragmatic, Congenital - therapy</subject><subject>Humans</subject><subject>Hypertension</subject><subject>Infant, Newborn</subject><subject>Intervention</subject><subject>Literature reviews</subject><subject>Measurement methods</subject><subject>Meetings</subject><subject>Morbidity</subject><subject>Neonates</subject><subject>Obstetrics</subject><subject>Outcome Assessment, Health Care</subject><subject>Oxygenation</subject><subject>Pediatrics</subject><subject>perinatal intervention</subject><subject>Pregnancy</subject><subject>Prenatal Care - methods</subject><subject>Research Design</subject><subject>Surveys</subject><subject>Treatment Outcome</subject><issn>0960-7692</issn><issn>1469-0705</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2023</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>EIF</sourceid><recordid>eNp10MtKxDAUBuAgio6XhS8gBTe66JhLc1vK4A0EXei6ZNLTMdImY9Iq8_ZmHHUhuDqQ8_GT8yN0TPCUYEwvxrCYUkEZ30ITUgldYon5NppgLXAphaZ7aD-lV4yxqJjYRXtMYq2lYBP0OAsRijAONvRQJBiKNsRiCdF5M5iucH6A-A5-cMGnr50NfgHerZeNM8uXaBa9GZwtXiB6Zw7RTmu6BEff8wA9X189zW7L-4ebu9nlfWkZZ7xkgktlVWMIlvOKNrpVWivKlQatRH4ljDTKYi4ZlaTh1MJcVEqruaGyFYIdoLNN7jKGtxHSUPcuWeg64yGMqaYKC53v51Wmp3_oaxijz7_LiivBMVEqq_ONsjGkFKGtl9H1Jq5qgut1zXWuuf6qOduT78Rx3kPzK396zeBiAz5cB6v_k-rnh5tN5CekV4WA</recordid><startdate>202309</startdate><enddate>202309</enddate><creator>Vergote, S.</creator><creator>De Bie, F. R.</creator><creator>Duffy, J. M. N.</creator><creator>Bosteels, J.</creator><creator>Benachi, A.</creator><creator>Power, B.</creator><creator>Meijer, F.</creator><creator>Hedrick, H. L.</creator><creator>Fernandes, C. J.</creator><creator>Reiss, I. K. M.</creator><creator>De Coppi, P.</creator><creator>Lally, K. P.</creator><creator>Deprest, J. A.</creator><general>John Wiley &amp; Sons, Ltd</general><general>Wiley Subscription Services, Inc</general><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7QO</scope><scope>8FD</scope><scope>FR3</scope><scope>K9.</scope><scope>P64</scope><scope>7X8</scope><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-4920-945X</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-8372-6434</orcidid></search><sort><creationdate>202309</creationdate><title>Core outcome set for perinatal interventions for congenital diaphragmatic hernia</title><author>Vergote, S. ; De Bie, F. R. ; Duffy, J. M. N. ; Bosteels, J. ; Benachi, A. ; Power, B. ; Meijer, F. ; Hedrick, H. L. ; Fernandes, C. J. ; Reiss, I. K. M. ; De Coppi, P. ; Lally, K. P. ; Deprest, J. A.</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c3535-36578c8da107b42d9f89982589e986a10131d8c0573271d52ceb64898ba27f663</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2023</creationdate><topic>Child</topic><topic>congenital diaphragmatic hernia</topic><topic>core outcome set</topic><topic>Criteria</topic><topic>Delphi survey</topic><topic>Delphi Technique</topic><topic>Diaphragm</topic><topic>Female</topic><topic>Fetuses</topic><topic>Gestational age</topic><topic>Gynecology</topic><topic>Hernia</topic><topic>Hernias</topic><topic>Hernias, Diaphragmatic, Congenital - diagnostic imaging</topic><topic>Hernias, Diaphragmatic, Congenital - therapy</topic><topic>Humans</topic><topic>Hypertension</topic><topic>Infant, Newborn</topic><topic>Intervention</topic><topic>Literature reviews</topic><topic>Measurement methods</topic><topic>Meetings</topic><topic>Morbidity</topic><topic>Neonates</topic><topic>Obstetrics</topic><topic>Outcome Assessment, Health Care</topic><topic>Oxygenation</topic><topic>Pediatrics</topic><topic>perinatal intervention</topic><topic>Pregnancy</topic><topic>Prenatal Care - methods</topic><topic>Research Design</topic><topic>Surveys</topic><topic>Treatment Outcome</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Vergote, S.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>De Bie, F. R.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Duffy, J. M. N.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Bosteels, J.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Benachi, A.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Power, B.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Meijer, F.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Hedrick, H. L.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Fernandes, C. J.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Reiss, I. K. M.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>De Coppi, P.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Lally, K. P.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Deprest, J. A.</creatorcontrib><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>Biotechnology Research Abstracts</collection><collection>Technology Research Database</collection><collection>Engineering Research Database</collection><collection>ProQuest Health &amp; Medical Complete (Alumni)</collection><collection>Biotechnology and BioEngineering Abstracts</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><jtitle>Ultrasound in obstetrics &amp; gynecology</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Vergote, S.</au><au>De Bie, F. R.</au><au>Duffy, J. M. N.</au><au>Bosteels, J.</au><au>Benachi, A.</au><au>Power, B.</au><au>Meijer, F.</au><au>Hedrick, H. L.</au><au>Fernandes, C. J.</au><au>Reiss, I. K. M.</au><au>De Coppi, P.</au><au>Lally, K. P.</au><au>Deprest, J. A.</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Core outcome set for perinatal interventions for congenital diaphragmatic hernia</atitle><jtitle>Ultrasound in obstetrics &amp; gynecology</jtitle><addtitle>Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol</addtitle><date>2023-09</date><risdate>2023</risdate><volume>62</volume><issue>3</issue><spage>374</spage><epage>382</epage><pages>374-382</pages><issn>0960-7692</issn><eissn>1469-0705</eissn><abstract>ABSTRACT Objective To develop a core set of prenatal and neonatal outcomes for clinical studies evaluating perinatal interventions for congenital diaphragmatic hernia, using a validated consensus‐building method. Methods An international steering group comprising 13 leading maternal–fetal medicine specialists, neonatologists, pediatric surgeons, patient representatives, researchers and methodologists guided the development of this core outcome set. Potential outcomes were collected through a systematic review of the literature and entered into a two‐round online Delphi survey. A call was made for stakeholders with experience of congenital diaphragmatic hernia to review the list and score outcomes based on their perceived relevance. Outcomes that fulfilled the consensus criteria defined a priori were discussed subsequently in online breakout meetings. Results were reviewed in a consensus meeting, during which the core outcome set was defined. Finally, the definitions, measurement methods and aspirational outcomes were defined in online and in‐person definition meetings by a selection of 45 stakeholders. Results Overall, 221 stakeholders participated in the Delphi survey and 198 completed both rounds. Fifty outcomes met the consensus criteria and were discussed and rescored by 78 stakeholders in the breakout meetings. During the consensus meeting, 93 stakeholders agreed eventually on eight outcomes, which constituted the core outcome set. Maternal and obstetric outcomes included maternal morbidity related to the intervention and gestational age at delivery. Fetal outcomes included intrauterine demise, interval between intervention and delivery and change in lung size in utero around the time of the intervention. Neonatal outcomes included neonatal mortality, pulmonary hypertension and use of extracorporeal membrane oxygenation. Definitions and measurement methods were formulated by 45 stakeholders, who also added three aspirational outcomes: duration of invasive ventilation, duration of oxygen supplementation and use of pulmonary vasodilators at discharge. Conclusions We developed with relevant stakeholders a core outcome set for studies evaluating perinatal interventions in congenital diaphragmatic hernia. Its implementation should facilitate the comparison and combination of trial results, enabling future research to better guide clinical practice. © 2023 International Society of Ultrasound in Obstetrics and Gynecology.</abstract><cop>Chichester, UK</cop><pub>John Wiley &amp; Sons, Ltd</pub><pmid>37099763</pmid><doi>10.1002/uog.26235</doi><tpages>9</tpages><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-4920-945X</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-8372-6434</orcidid></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 0960-7692
ispartof Ultrasound in obstetrics & gynecology, 2023-09, Vol.62 (3), p.374-382
issn 0960-7692
1469-0705
language eng
recordid cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_2806996054
source Wiley Online Library - AutoHoldings Journals; MEDLINE; EZB-FREE-00999 freely available EZB journals; Wiley Online Library (Open Access Collection)
subjects Child
congenital diaphragmatic hernia
core outcome set
Criteria
Delphi survey
Delphi Technique
Diaphragm
Female
Fetuses
Gestational age
Gynecology
Hernia
Hernias
Hernias, Diaphragmatic, Congenital - diagnostic imaging
Hernias, Diaphragmatic, Congenital - therapy
Humans
Hypertension
Infant, Newborn
Intervention
Literature reviews
Measurement methods
Meetings
Morbidity
Neonates
Obstetrics
Outcome Assessment, Health Care
Oxygenation
Pediatrics
perinatal intervention
Pregnancy
Prenatal Care - methods
Research Design
Surveys
Treatment Outcome
title Core outcome set for perinatal interventions for congenital diaphragmatic hernia
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2024-12-11T10%3A39%3A32IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Core%20outcome%20set%20for%20perinatal%20interventions%20for%20congenital%20diaphragmatic%20hernia&rft.jtitle=Ultrasound%20in%20obstetrics%20&%20gynecology&rft.au=Vergote,%20S.&rft.date=2023-09&rft.volume=62&rft.issue=3&rft.spage=374&rft.epage=382&rft.pages=374-382&rft.issn=0960-7692&rft.eissn=1469-0705&rft_id=info:doi/10.1002/uog.26235&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E2858650188%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=2858650188&rft_id=info:pmid/37099763&rfr_iscdi=true