Redo Surgical Aortic Valve Replacement After Prior Transcatheter Versus Surgical Aortic Valve Replacement

Aortic stenosis treatment should consider risks and benefits for lifetime management. Although the feasibility of redo transcatheter aortic valve replacement (TAVR) remains unclear, concerns are emerging regarding reoperation after TAVR. The authors sought to define comparative risk of surgical aort...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:JACC. Cardiovascular interventions 2023-04, Vol.16 (8), p.942-953
Hauptverfasser: Hawkins, Robert B., Deeb, G. Michael, Sukul, Devraj, Patel, Himanshu J., Gualano, Sarah K., Chetcuti, Stanley J., Grossman, P. Michael, Ailawadi, Gorav, Fukuhara, Shinichi
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page 953
container_issue 8
container_start_page 942
container_title JACC. Cardiovascular interventions
container_volume 16
creator Hawkins, Robert B.
Deeb, G. Michael
Sukul, Devraj
Patel, Himanshu J.
Gualano, Sarah K.
Chetcuti, Stanley J.
Grossman, P. Michael
Ailawadi, Gorav
Fukuhara, Shinichi
description Aortic stenosis treatment should consider risks and benefits for lifetime management. Although the feasibility of redo transcatheter aortic valve replacement (TAVR) remains unclear, concerns are emerging regarding reoperation after TAVR. The authors sought to define comparative risk of surgical aortic valve replacement (SAVR) after prior TAVR or SAVR. Data on patients undergoing bioprosthetic SAVR after TAVR and/or SAVR were extracted from the Society of Thoracic Surgeons Database (2011-2021). Overall and isolated SAVR cohorts were analyzed. The primary outcome was operative mortality. Risk adjustment using hierarchical logistic regression as well as propensity score matching for isolated SAVR cases were performed. Of 31,106 SAVR patients, 1,126 had prior TAVR (TAVR-SAVR), 674 had prior SAVR and TAVR (SAVR-TAVR-SAVR), and 29,306 had prior SAVR (SAVR-SAVR). Yearly rates of TAVR-SAVR and SAVR-TAVR-SAVR increased over time, whereas SAVR-SAVR was stable. The TAVR-SAVR patients were older, with higher acuity, and with greater comorbidities than other cohorts. The unadjusted operative mortality was highest in the TAVR-SAVR group (17% vs 12% vs 9%, respectively; P < 0.001). Compared with SAVR-SAVR, risk-adjusted operative mortality was significantly higher for TAVR-SAVR (OR: 1.53; P = 0.004), but not SAVR-TAVR-SAVR (OR: 1.02; P = 0.927). After propensity score matching, operative mortality of isolated SAVR was 1.74 times higher for TAVR-SAVR than SAVR-SAVR patients (P = 0.020). The number of post-TAVR reoperations is increasing and represent a high-risk population. Yet even in isolated SAVR cases, SAVR after TAVR is independently associated with increased risk of mortality. Patients with life expectancy beyond a TAVR valve and unsuitable anatomy for redo-TAVR should consider a SAVR-first approach. [Display omitted]
doi_str_mv 10.1016/j.jcin.2023.03.015
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_2806995572</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><els_id>S1936879823005745</els_id><sourcerecordid>2806995572</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c356t-4cedc4726562933c3e8262bae09a45584953bb7408663357192f35d4b3dea2f93</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp9kM1KxDAUhYMoOo6-gAvp0k3H_DRJA24G8Q8GlHF0G9L0VlM67Zi0A76Nz-KTmWHUncKFe7mc88E5CJ0QPCGYiPN6UlvXTiimbILjEL6DRiSXIpUC8914KybSXKr8AB2GUGMssJJ0Hx0wSTDmXI5QPYeySx4H_-KsaZJp53tnk2fTrCGZw6oxFpbQ9sm06sEnD951Pll40wZr-lfY_J7BhyH8Ij4__mIcob3KNAGOv_cYPV1fLS5v09n9zd3ldJZaxkWfZhZKm0kquKCKMcsgp4IWBrAyGed5pjgrCpnhXAjGuCSKVoyXWcFKMLRSbIzOttyV794GCL1eumChaUwL3RA0zbFQKqanUUq3Uuu7EDxUeuXd0vh3TbDedKxrvelYbzrWOA7h0XT6zR-KJZS_lp9So-BiK4CYcu3A62AdtDGX82B7XXbuP_4X4pOOLw</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>2806995572</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Redo Surgical Aortic Valve Replacement After Prior Transcatheter Versus Surgical Aortic Valve Replacement</title><source>MEDLINE</source><source>Elsevier ScienceDirect Journals</source><source>Elektronische Zeitschriftenbibliothek - Frei zugängliche E-Journals</source><creator>Hawkins, Robert B. ; Deeb, G. Michael ; Sukul, Devraj ; Patel, Himanshu J. ; Gualano, Sarah K. ; Chetcuti, Stanley J. ; Grossman, P. Michael ; Ailawadi, Gorav ; Fukuhara, Shinichi</creator><creatorcontrib>Hawkins, Robert B. ; Deeb, G. Michael ; Sukul, Devraj ; Patel, Himanshu J. ; Gualano, Sarah K. ; Chetcuti, Stanley J. ; Grossman, P. Michael ; Ailawadi, Gorav ; Fukuhara, Shinichi</creatorcontrib><description>Aortic stenosis treatment should consider risks and benefits for lifetime management. Although the feasibility of redo transcatheter aortic valve replacement (TAVR) remains unclear, concerns are emerging regarding reoperation after TAVR. The authors sought to define comparative risk of surgical aortic valve replacement (SAVR) after prior TAVR or SAVR. Data on patients undergoing bioprosthetic SAVR after TAVR and/or SAVR were extracted from the Society of Thoracic Surgeons Database (2011-2021). Overall and isolated SAVR cohorts were analyzed. The primary outcome was operative mortality. Risk adjustment using hierarchical logistic regression as well as propensity score matching for isolated SAVR cases were performed. Of 31,106 SAVR patients, 1,126 had prior TAVR (TAVR-SAVR), 674 had prior SAVR and TAVR (SAVR-TAVR-SAVR), and 29,306 had prior SAVR (SAVR-SAVR). Yearly rates of TAVR-SAVR and SAVR-TAVR-SAVR increased over time, whereas SAVR-SAVR was stable. The TAVR-SAVR patients were older, with higher acuity, and with greater comorbidities than other cohorts. The unadjusted operative mortality was highest in the TAVR-SAVR group (17% vs 12% vs 9%, respectively; P &lt; 0.001). Compared with SAVR-SAVR, risk-adjusted operative mortality was significantly higher for TAVR-SAVR (OR: 1.53; P = 0.004), but not SAVR-TAVR-SAVR (OR: 1.02; P = 0.927). After propensity score matching, operative mortality of isolated SAVR was 1.74 times higher for TAVR-SAVR than SAVR-SAVR patients (P = 0.020). The number of post-TAVR reoperations is increasing and represent a high-risk population. Yet even in isolated SAVR cases, SAVR after TAVR is independently associated with increased risk of mortality. Patients with life expectancy beyond a TAVR valve and unsuitable anatomy for redo-TAVR should consider a SAVR-first approach. [Display omitted]</description><identifier>ISSN: 1936-8798</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1876-7605</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1016/j.jcin.2023.03.015</identifier><identifier>PMID: 37100557</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>United States: Elsevier Inc</publisher><subject>aortic stenosis ; Aortic Valve - diagnostic imaging ; Aortic Valve - surgery ; Aortic Valve Stenosis - diagnostic imaging ; Aortic Valve Stenosis - etiology ; Aortic Valve Stenosis - surgery ; Heart Valve Prosthesis Implantation - adverse effects ; Humans ; reoperation ; Risk Assessment ; Risk Factors ; Society of Thoracic Surgeons Adult Cardiac Surgery Database ; surgical aortic valve replacement ; transcatheter aortic valve replacement ; Transcatheter Aortic Valve Replacement - adverse effects ; Treatment Outcome</subject><ispartof>JACC. Cardiovascular interventions, 2023-04, Vol.16 (8), p.942-953</ispartof><rights>2023 American College of Cardiology Foundation</rights><rights>Copyright © 2023 American College of Cardiology Foundation. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c356t-4cedc4726562933c3e8262bae09a45584953bb7408663357192f35d4b3dea2f93</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c356t-4cedc4726562933c3e8262bae09a45584953bb7408663357192f35d4b3dea2f93</cites><orcidid>0000-0002-3959-8201</orcidid></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1936879823005745$$EHTML$$P50$$Gelsevier$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,776,780,3537,27901,27902,65306</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37100557$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Hawkins, Robert B.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Deeb, G. Michael</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Sukul, Devraj</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Patel, Himanshu J.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Gualano, Sarah K.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Chetcuti, Stanley J.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Grossman, P. Michael</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Ailawadi, Gorav</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Fukuhara, Shinichi</creatorcontrib><title>Redo Surgical Aortic Valve Replacement After Prior Transcatheter Versus Surgical Aortic Valve Replacement</title><title>JACC. Cardiovascular interventions</title><addtitle>JACC Cardiovasc Interv</addtitle><description>Aortic stenosis treatment should consider risks and benefits for lifetime management. Although the feasibility of redo transcatheter aortic valve replacement (TAVR) remains unclear, concerns are emerging regarding reoperation after TAVR. The authors sought to define comparative risk of surgical aortic valve replacement (SAVR) after prior TAVR or SAVR. Data on patients undergoing bioprosthetic SAVR after TAVR and/or SAVR were extracted from the Society of Thoracic Surgeons Database (2011-2021). Overall and isolated SAVR cohorts were analyzed. The primary outcome was operative mortality. Risk adjustment using hierarchical logistic regression as well as propensity score matching for isolated SAVR cases were performed. Of 31,106 SAVR patients, 1,126 had prior TAVR (TAVR-SAVR), 674 had prior SAVR and TAVR (SAVR-TAVR-SAVR), and 29,306 had prior SAVR (SAVR-SAVR). Yearly rates of TAVR-SAVR and SAVR-TAVR-SAVR increased over time, whereas SAVR-SAVR was stable. The TAVR-SAVR patients were older, with higher acuity, and with greater comorbidities than other cohorts. The unadjusted operative mortality was highest in the TAVR-SAVR group (17% vs 12% vs 9%, respectively; P &lt; 0.001). Compared with SAVR-SAVR, risk-adjusted operative mortality was significantly higher for TAVR-SAVR (OR: 1.53; P = 0.004), but not SAVR-TAVR-SAVR (OR: 1.02; P = 0.927). After propensity score matching, operative mortality of isolated SAVR was 1.74 times higher for TAVR-SAVR than SAVR-SAVR patients (P = 0.020). The number of post-TAVR reoperations is increasing and represent a high-risk population. Yet even in isolated SAVR cases, SAVR after TAVR is independently associated with increased risk of mortality. Patients with life expectancy beyond a TAVR valve and unsuitable anatomy for redo-TAVR should consider a SAVR-first approach. [Display omitted]</description><subject>aortic stenosis</subject><subject>Aortic Valve - diagnostic imaging</subject><subject>Aortic Valve - surgery</subject><subject>Aortic Valve Stenosis - diagnostic imaging</subject><subject>Aortic Valve Stenosis - etiology</subject><subject>Aortic Valve Stenosis - surgery</subject><subject>Heart Valve Prosthesis Implantation - adverse effects</subject><subject>Humans</subject><subject>reoperation</subject><subject>Risk Assessment</subject><subject>Risk Factors</subject><subject>Society of Thoracic Surgeons Adult Cardiac Surgery Database</subject><subject>surgical aortic valve replacement</subject><subject>transcatheter aortic valve replacement</subject><subject>Transcatheter Aortic Valve Replacement - adverse effects</subject><subject>Treatment Outcome</subject><issn>1936-8798</issn><issn>1876-7605</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2023</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>EIF</sourceid><recordid>eNp9kM1KxDAUhYMoOo6-gAvp0k3H_DRJA24G8Q8GlHF0G9L0VlM67Zi0A76Nz-KTmWHUncKFe7mc88E5CJ0QPCGYiPN6UlvXTiimbILjEL6DRiSXIpUC8914KybSXKr8AB2GUGMssJJ0Hx0wSTDmXI5QPYeySx4H_-KsaZJp53tnk2fTrCGZw6oxFpbQ9sm06sEnD951Pll40wZr-lfY_J7BhyH8Ij4__mIcob3KNAGOv_cYPV1fLS5v09n9zd3ldJZaxkWfZhZKm0kquKCKMcsgp4IWBrAyGed5pjgrCpnhXAjGuCSKVoyXWcFKMLRSbIzOttyV794GCL1eumChaUwL3RA0zbFQKqanUUq3Uuu7EDxUeuXd0vh3TbDedKxrvelYbzrWOA7h0XT6zR-KJZS_lp9So-BiK4CYcu3A62AdtDGX82B7XXbuP_4X4pOOLw</recordid><startdate>20230424</startdate><enddate>20230424</enddate><creator>Hawkins, Robert B.</creator><creator>Deeb, G. Michael</creator><creator>Sukul, Devraj</creator><creator>Patel, Himanshu J.</creator><creator>Gualano, Sarah K.</creator><creator>Chetcuti, Stanley J.</creator><creator>Grossman, P. Michael</creator><creator>Ailawadi, Gorav</creator><creator>Fukuhara, Shinichi</creator><general>Elsevier Inc</general><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7X8</scope><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-3959-8201</orcidid></search><sort><creationdate>20230424</creationdate><title>Redo Surgical Aortic Valve Replacement After Prior Transcatheter Versus Surgical Aortic Valve Replacement</title><author>Hawkins, Robert B. ; Deeb, G. Michael ; Sukul, Devraj ; Patel, Himanshu J. ; Gualano, Sarah K. ; Chetcuti, Stanley J. ; Grossman, P. Michael ; Ailawadi, Gorav ; Fukuhara, Shinichi</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c356t-4cedc4726562933c3e8262bae09a45584953bb7408663357192f35d4b3dea2f93</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2023</creationdate><topic>aortic stenosis</topic><topic>Aortic Valve - diagnostic imaging</topic><topic>Aortic Valve - surgery</topic><topic>Aortic Valve Stenosis - diagnostic imaging</topic><topic>Aortic Valve Stenosis - etiology</topic><topic>Aortic Valve Stenosis - surgery</topic><topic>Heart Valve Prosthesis Implantation - adverse effects</topic><topic>Humans</topic><topic>reoperation</topic><topic>Risk Assessment</topic><topic>Risk Factors</topic><topic>Society of Thoracic Surgeons Adult Cardiac Surgery Database</topic><topic>surgical aortic valve replacement</topic><topic>transcatheter aortic valve replacement</topic><topic>Transcatheter Aortic Valve Replacement - adverse effects</topic><topic>Treatment Outcome</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Hawkins, Robert B.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Deeb, G. Michael</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Sukul, Devraj</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Patel, Himanshu J.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Gualano, Sarah K.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Chetcuti, Stanley J.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Grossman, P. Michael</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Ailawadi, Gorav</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Fukuhara, Shinichi</creatorcontrib><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><jtitle>JACC. Cardiovascular interventions</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Hawkins, Robert B.</au><au>Deeb, G. Michael</au><au>Sukul, Devraj</au><au>Patel, Himanshu J.</au><au>Gualano, Sarah K.</au><au>Chetcuti, Stanley J.</au><au>Grossman, P. Michael</au><au>Ailawadi, Gorav</au><au>Fukuhara, Shinichi</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Redo Surgical Aortic Valve Replacement After Prior Transcatheter Versus Surgical Aortic Valve Replacement</atitle><jtitle>JACC. Cardiovascular interventions</jtitle><addtitle>JACC Cardiovasc Interv</addtitle><date>2023-04-24</date><risdate>2023</risdate><volume>16</volume><issue>8</issue><spage>942</spage><epage>953</epage><pages>942-953</pages><issn>1936-8798</issn><eissn>1876-7605</eissn><abstract>Aortic stenosis treatment should consider risks and benefits for lifetime management. Although the feasibility of redo transcatheter aortic valve replacement (TAVR) remains unclear, concerns are emerging regarding reoperation after TAVR. The authors sought to define comparative risk of surgical aortic valve replacement (SAVR) after prior TAVR or SAVR. Data on patients undergoing bioprosthetic SAVR after TAVR and/or SAVR were extracted from the Society of Thoracic Surgeons Database (2011-2021). Overall and isolated SAVR cohorts were analyzed. The primary outcome was operative mortality. Risk adjustment using hierarchical logistic regression as well as propensity score matching for isolated SAVR cases were performed. Of 31,106 SAVR patients, 1,126 had prior TAVR (TAVR-SAVR), 674 had prior SAVR and TAVR (SAVR-TAVR-SAVR), and 29,306 had prior SAVR (SAVR-SAVR). Yearly rates of TAVR-SAVR and SAVR-TAVR-SAVR increased over time, whereas SAVR-SAVR was stable. The TAVR-SAVR patients were older, with higher acuity, and with greater comorbidities than other cohorts. The unadjusted operative mortality was highest in the TAVR-SAVR group (17% vs 12% vs 9%, respectively; P &lt; 0.001). Compared with SAVR-SAVR, risk-adjusted operative mortality was significantly higher for TAVR-SAVR (OR: 1.53; P = 0.004), but not SAVR-TAVR-SAVR (OR: 1.02; P = 0.927). After propensity score matching, operative mortality of isolated SAVR was 1.74 times higher for TAVR-SAVR than SAVR-SAVR patients (P = 0.020). The number of post-TAVR reoperations is increasing and represent a high-risk population. Yet even in isolated SAVR cases, SAVR after TAVR is independently associated with increased risk of mortality. Patients with life expectancy beyond a TAVR valve and unsuitable anatomy for redo-TAVR should consider a SAVR-first approach. [Display omitted]</abstract><cop>United States</cop><pub>Elsevier Inc</pub><pmid>37100557</pmid><doi>10.1016/j.jcin.2023.03.015</doi><tpages>12</tpages><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-3959-8201</orcidid></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 1936-8798
ispartof JACC. Cardiovascular interventions, 2023-04, Vol.16 (8), p.942-953
issn 1936-8798
1876-7605
language eng
recordid cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_2806995572
source MEDLINE; Elsevier ScienceDirect Journals; Elektronische Zeitschriftenbibliothek - Frei zugängliche E-Journals
subjects aortic stenosis
Aortic Valve - diagnostic imaging
Aortic Valve - surgery
Aortic Valve Stenosis - diagnostic imaging
Aortic Valve Stenosis - etiology
Aortic Valve Stenosis - surgery
Heart Valve Prosthesis Implantation - adverse effects
Humans
reoperation
Risk Assessment
Risk Factors
Society of Thoracic Surgeons Adult Cardiac Surgery Database
surgical aortic valve replacement
transcatheter aortic valve replacement
Transcatheter Aortic Valve Replacement - adverse effects
Treatment Outcome
title Redo Surgical Aortic Valve Replacement After Prior Transcatheter Versus Surgical Aortic Valve Replacement
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-02-06T20%3A01%3A40IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Redo%20Surgical%20Aortic%20Valve%20Replacement%20After%20Prior%20Transcatheter%20Versus%20Surgical%C2%A0Aortic%20Valve%20Replacement&rft.jtitle=JACC.%20Cardiovascular%20interventions&rft.au=Hawkins,%20Robert%20B.&rft.date=2023-04-24&rft.volume=16&rft.issue=8&rft.spage=942&rft.epage=953&rft.pages=942-953&rft.issn=1936-8798&rft.eissn=1876-7605&rft_id=info:doi/10.1016/j.jcin.2023.03.015&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E2806995572%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=2806995572&rft_id=info:pmid/37100557&rft_els_id=S1936879823005745&rfr_iscdi=true