Clinical practice guidelines for management of head and neck squamous cell carcinoma of unknown primary: an AGREE II appraisal

Importance Squamous cell carcinoma without a known primary is an uncommon form of head and neck cancer that requires multidisciplinary collaboration for effective management. Objective To evaluate the quality of clinical practice guidelines (CPG) using the Appraisal of Guidelines for Research and Ev...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:European archives of oto-rhino-laryngology 2023-09, Vol.280 (9), p.4195-4204
Hauptverfasser: Fritz, Christian, Ng, Jinggang J., Harris, Jacob, Romeo, Dominic J., Prasad, Aman, Moreira, Alvaro, Rajasekaran, Karthik
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
Beschreibung
Zusammenfassung:Importance Squamous cell carcinoma without a known primary is an uncommon form of head and neck cancer that requires multidisciplinary collaboration for effective management. Objective To evaluate the quality of clinical practice guidelines (CPG) using the Appraisal of Guidelines for Research and Evaluation (AGREE II) instrument. Design A systematic literature search was performed to identify CPGs pertaining to the diagnosis and treatment of head and neck squamous cell carcinoma of unknown primary (HNSCCUP). Data were abstracted from guidelines meeting inclusion criteria and appraised by four independent reviewers in the six domains of quality defined by the AGREE II. Setting Online database. Participants None. Exposure None. Main outcome(s) and measure(s) Quality domain scores and intraclass correlation coefficients (ICC) were calculated across domains to qualify inter-rater reliability. Results Seven guidelines met inclusion criteria. Two guidelines achieved a score of > 60% in five or more AGREE II quality domains to gain designation as ‘high’-quality content. One “average-quality” guideline authored by the ENT UK Head and Neck Society Council achieved a score of > 60% in three quality domains. The remaining four CPGs demonstrated low-quality content, with deficits most pronounced in domains 3 and 5, suggesting a lack of rigorously developed and clinically applicable information. Conclusions and relevance As the diagnosis and treatment of head and neck cancer continues to evolve, identification of high-quality guidelines will become increasingly important. The authors recommend consulting HNSCCUP guidelines from the National Institute for Health and Care Excellence (NICE) or the American Society of Clinical Oncology (ASCO). Trial registration None.
ISSN:0937-4477
1434-4726
DOI:10.1007/s00405-023-07997-9