Forced surgical extrusion using an axial tooth extraction system as a practicable technique for preserving severely destroyed teeth? ‐ Clinical outcomes up to 4.8 years
Objective Several extrusion techniques have been described to restore teeth with insufficient coronal tooth structure and to avoid their extraction. Still, there is little evidence for a treatment concept combining surgical extrusion using an atraumatic axial extraction system. Materials and Methods...
Gespeichert in:
Veröffentlicht in: | Journal of esthetic and restorative dentistry 2023-10, Vol.35 (7), p.1152-1161 |
---|---|
Hauptverfasser: | , , , , , , |
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | eng |
Schlagworte: | |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
container_end_page | 1161 |
---|---|
container_issue | 7 |
container_start_page | 1152 |
container_title | Journal of esthetic and restorative dentistry |
container_volume | 35 |
creator | Graf, Tobias Stimmelmayr, Michael Gutmann, Pauline Güth, Jan‐Frederik Krennmair, Gerald Edelhoff, Daniel Schubert, Oliver |
description | Objective
Several extrusion techniques have been described to restore teeth with insufficient coronal tooth structure and to avoid their extraction. Still, there is little evidence for a treatment concept combining surgical extrusion using an atraumatic axial extraction system.
Materials and Methods
A total of nine patients, each with an iso‐ or subgingival fractured tooth, were retrospectively examined. Treatment of the damaged tooth comprised an atraumatic forced surgical extrusion performed with an axial tooth extraction system and a more coronal positioning within the socket. The teeth were initially splinted and subsequently restored. The follow‐up period was up to 57.1 months and averaged 36.5 (SD: ±13.5) months.
Results
All nine teeth were still in situ, without signs of inflammation. During the period of the provisional restoration, six prosthetic complications occurred, which were resolved with little effort, whereas, success rate for the definitive restoration was 100%. No biological complications were observed concerning the root apex or soft tissue. The radiographically measured mean extrusion distance was 3.4 (SD: ±1.0) mm, so that a sufficient prosthetic ferrule could be reestablished.
Conclusions
Surgical extrusions using an axial tooth extraction system demonstrate low biological and prosthetic complications rates over observation time.
Clinical Significance
The presented extrusion approach preserves soft and hard tissue and is an efficient treatment option for severely destroyed teeth. Saving hopeless teeth by this relatively predictable and feasible procedure has hardly any disadvantages for patients, and in case of failure, an implant or fixed partial denture are still an option. |
doi_str_mv | 10.1111/jerd.13059 |
format | Article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_2806073252</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>2806073252</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c3659-e1e91100e402c9942d9d8b21a7198ff62811cd8722c07d9845dea4039034e2c03</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp9kc9O3DAQxi3Uiv-XPkDlY4WUre04iX2qqi2UVkiVKjhHXnvCBiXx1uNQcuPKjQfpU_EkeHehR3ywR_P99M1YHyEfOJvxdD7fQHAznrNC75B9XjGVKSHZu1RLXWaSF8UeOUC8YYwXla52yV5eMV2qstgn_858sOAojuG6taajcBfDiK0faLqHa2oGau7aJETv43IjGxvXOk4YoacGqaGrTdOaRQc0gl0O7Z8RaONDUgAh3K6tEG4hQDdRBxiDn9LYCBCXX-jT_SOdd-2w2cCP0foekI6rNJTKmXq6f5jABDwi7xvTIRy_vIfk6uz0cn6eXfz6_mP-9SKzeVnoDDhozhkDyYTVWgqnnVoIbiquVdOUQnFunaqEsKxyWsnCgZEs1yyXkHr5Ifm09V0Fn_6Bse5btNB1ZgA_Yi0UK1mVi0Ik9GSL2uARAzT1KrS9CVPNWb1Op16nU2_SSfDHF99x0YP7j77GkQC-Bf62HUxvWNU_T39_25o-A8hQnwU</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>2806073252</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Forced surgical extrusion using an axial tooth extraction system as a practicable technique for preserving severely destroyed teeth? ‐ Clinical outcomes up to 4.8 years</title><source>Wiley Online Library Journals Frontfile Complete</source><creator>Graf, Tobias ; Stimmelmayr, Michael ; Gutmann, Pauline ; Güth, Jan‐Frederik ; Krennmair, Gerald ; Edelhoff, Daniel ; Schubert, Oliver</creator><creatorcontrib>Graf, Tobias ; Stimmelmayr, Michael ; Gutmann, Pauline ; Güth, Jan‐Frederik ; Krennmair, Gerald ; Edelhoff, Daniel ; Schubert, Oliver</creatorcontrib><description>Objective
Several extrusion techniques have been described to restore teeth with insufficient coronal tooth structure and to avoid their extraction. Still, there is little evidence for a treatment concept combining surgical extrusion using an atraumatic axial extraction system.
Materials and Methods
A total of nine patients, each with an iso‐ or subgingival fractured tooth, were retrospectively examined. Treatment of the damaged tooth comprised an atraumatic forced surgical extrusion performed with an axial tooth extraction system and a more coronal positioning within the socket. The teeth were initially splinted and subsequently restored. The follow‐up period was up to 57.1 months and averaged 36.5 (SD: ±13.5) months.
Results
All nine teeth were still in situ, without signs of inflammation. During the period of the provisional restoration, six prosthetic complications occurred, which were resolved with little effort, whereas, success rate for the definitive restoration was 100%. No biological complications were observed concerning the root apex or soft tissue. The radiographically measured mean extrusion distance was 3.4 (SD: ±1.0) mm, so that a sufficient prosthetic ferrule could be reestablished.
Conclusions
Surgical extrusions using an axial tooth extraction system demonstrate low biological and prosthetic complications rates over observation time.
Clinical Significance
The presented extrusion approach preserves soft and hard tissue and is an efficient treatment option for severely destroyed teeth. Saving hopeless teeth by this relatively predictable and feasible procedure has hardly any disadvantages for patients, and in case of failure, an implant or fixed partial denture are still an option.</description><identifier>ISSN: 1496-4155</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1708-8240</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1111/jerd.13059</identifier><identifier>PMID: 37096865</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Hoboken, USA: John Wiley & Sons, Inc</publisher><subject>axial extraction system ; ferrule design ; restorative dentistry ; root‐to‐crown ratio ; surgical extrusion ; tooth preservation</subject><ispartof>Journal of esthetic and restorative dentistry, 2023-10, Vol.35 (7), p.1152-1161</ispartof><rights>2023 The Authors. published by Wiley Periodicals LLC.</rights><rights>2023 The Authors. Journal of Esthetic and Restorative Dentistry published by Wiley Periodicals LLC.</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c3659-e1e91100e402c9942d9d8b21a7198ff62811cd8722c07d9845dea4039034e2c03</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c3659-e1e91100e402c9942d9d8b21a7198ff62811cd8722c07d9845dea4039034e2c03</cites><orcidid>0000-0002-2391-5399 ; 0009-0006-3938-7988</orcidid></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/pdf/10.1111%2Fjerd.13059$$EPDF$$P50$$Gwiley$$Hfree_for_read</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/full/10.1111%2Fjerd.13059$$EHTML$$P50$$Gwiley$$Hfree_for_read</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,776,780,1411,27903,27904,45553,45554</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37096865$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Graf, Tobias</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Stimmelmayr, Michael</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Gutmann, Pauline</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Güth, Jan‐Frederik</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Krennmair, Gerald</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Edelhoff, Daniel</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Schubert, Oliver</creatorcontrib><title>Forced surgical extrusion using an axial tooth extraction system as a practicable technique for preserving severely destroyed teeth? ‐ Clinical outcomes up to 4.8 years</title><title>Journal of esthetic and restorative dentistry</title><addtitle>J Esthet Restor Dent</addtitle><description>Objective
Several extrusion techniques have been described to restore teeth with insufficient coronal tooth structure and to avoid their extraction. Still, there is little evidence for a treatment concept combining surgical extrusion using an atraumatic axial extraction system.
Materials and Methods
A total of nine patients, each with an iso‐ or subgingival fractured tooth, were retrospectively examined. Treatment of the damaged tooth comprised an atraumatic forced surgical extrusion performed with an axial tooth extraction system and a more coronal positioning within the socket. The teeth were initially splinted and subsequently restored. The follow‐up period was up to 57.1 months and averaged 36.5 (SD: ±13.5) months.
Results
All nine teeth were still in situ, without signs of inflammation. During the period of the provisional restoration, six prosthetic complications occurred, which were resolved with little effort, whereas, success rate for the definitive restoration was 100%. No biological complications were observed concerning the root apex or soft tissue. The radiographically measured mean extrusion distance was 3.4 (SD: ±1.0) mm, so that a sufficient prosthetic ferrule could be reestablished.
Conclusions
Surgical extrusions using an axial tooth extraction system demonstrate low biological and prosthetic complications rates over observation time.
Clinical Significance
The presented extrusion approach preserves soft and hard tissue and is an efficient treatment option for severely destroyed teeth. Saving hopeless teeth by this relatively predictable and feasible procedure has hardly any disadvantages for patients, and in case of failure, an implant or fixed partial denture are still an option.</description><subject>axial extraction system</subject><subject>ferrule design</subject><subject>restorative dentistry</subject><subject>root‐to‐crown ratio</subject><subject>surgical extrusion</subject><subject>tooth preservation</subject><issn>1496-4155</issn><issn>1708-8240</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2023</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>24P</sourceid><sourceid>WIN</sourceid><recordid>eNp9kc9O3DAQxi3Uiv-XPkDlY4WUre04iX2qqi2UVkiVKjhHXnvCBiXx1uNQcuPKjQfpU_EkeHehR3ywR_P99M1YHyEfOJvxdD7fQHAznrNC75B9XjGVKSHZu1RLXWaSF8UeOUC8YYwXla52yV5eMV2qstgn_858sOAojuG6taajcBfDiK0faLqHa2oGau7aJETv43IjGxvXOk4YoacGqaGrTdOaRQc0gl0O7Z8RaONDUgAh3K6tEG4hQDdRBxiDn9LYCBCXX-jT_SOdd-2w2cCP0foekI6rNJTKmXq6f5jABDwi7xvTIRy_vIfk6uz0cn6eXfz6_mP-9SKzeVnoDDhozhkDyYTVWgqnnVoIbiquVdOUQnFunaqEsKxyWsnCgZEs1yyXkHr5Ifm09V0Fn_6Bse5btNB1ZgA_Yi0UK1mVi0Ik9GSL2uARAzT1KrS9CVPNWb1Op16nU2_SSfDHF99x0YP7j77GkQC-Bf62HUxvWNU_T39_25o-A8hQnwU</recordid><startdate>202310</startdate><enddate>202310</enddate><creator>Graf, Tobias</creator><creator>Stimmelmayr, Michael</creator><creator>Gutmann, Pauline</creator><creator>Güth, Jan‐Frederik</creator><creator>Krennmair, Gerald</creator><creator>Edelhoff, Daniel</creator><creator>Schubert, Oliver</creator><general>John Wiley & Sons, Inc</general><scope>24P</scope><scope>WIN</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7X8</scope><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-2391-5399</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0009-0006-3938-7988</orcidid></search><sort><creationdate>202310</creationdate><title>Forced surgical extrusion using an axial tooth extraction system as a practicable technique for preserving severely destroyed teeth? ‐ Clinical outcomes up to 4.8 years</title><author>Graf, Tobias ; Stimmelmayr, Michael ; Gutmann, Pauline ; Güth, Jan‐Frederik ; Krennmair, Gerald ; Edelhoff, Daniel ; Schubert, Oliver</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c3659-e1e91100e402c9942d9d8b21a7198ff62811cd8722c07d9845dea4039034e2c03</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2023</creationdate><topic>axial extraction system</topic><topic>ferrule design</topic><topic>restorative dentistry</topic><topic>root‐to‐crown ratio</topic><topic>surgical extrusion</topic><topic>tooth preservation</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Graf, Tobias</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Stimmelmayr, Michael</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Gutmann, Pauline</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Güth, Jan‐Frederik</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Krennmair, Gerald</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Edelhoff, Daniel</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Schubert, Oliver</creatorcontrib><collection>Wiley Online Library Open Access</collection><collection>Wiley Free Content</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><jtitle>Journal of esthetic and restorative dentistry</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Graf, Tobias</au><au>Stimmelmayr, Michael</au><au>Gutmann, Pauline</au><au>Güth, Jan‐Frederik</au><au>Krennmair, Gerald</au><au>Edelhoff, Daniel</au><au>Schubert, Oliver</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Forced surgical extrusion using an axial tooth extraction system as a practicable technique for preserving severely destroyed teeth? ‐ Clinical outcomes up to 4.8 years</atitle><jtitle>Journal of esthetic and restorative dentistry</jtitle><addtitle>J Esthet Restor Dent</addtitle><date>2023-10</date><risdate>2023</risdate><volume>35</volume><issue>7</issue><spage>1152</spage><epage>1161</epage><pages>1152-1161</pages><issn>1496-4155</issn><eissn>1708-8240</eissn><abstract>Objective
Several extrusion techniques have been described to restore teeth with insufficient coronal tooth structure and to avoid their extraction. Still, there is little evidence for a treatment concept combining surgical extrusion using an atraumatic axial extraction system.
Materials and Methods
A total of nine patients, each with an iso‐ or subgingival fractured tooth, were retrospectively examined. Treatment of the damaged tooth comprised an atraumatic forced surgical extrusion performed with an axial tooth extraction system and a more coronal positioning within the socket. The teeth were initially splinted and subsequently restored. The follow‐up period was up to 57.1 months and averaged 36.5 (SD: ±13.5) months.
Results
All nine teeth were still in situ, without signs of inflammation. During the period of the provisional restoration, six prosthetic complications occurred, which were resolved with little effort, whereas, success rate for the definitive restoration was 100%. No biological complications were observed concerning the root apex or soft tissue. The radiographically measured mean extrusion distance was 3.4 (SD: ±1.0) mm, so that a sufficient prosthetic ferrule could be reestablished.
Conclusions
Surgical extrusions using an axial tooth extraction system demonstrate low biological and prosthetic complications rates over observation time.
Clinical Significance
The presented extrusion approach preserves soft and hard tissue and is an efficient treatment option for severely destroyed teeth. Saving hopeless teeth by this relatively predictable and feasible procedure has hardly any disadvantages for patients, and in case of failure, an implant or fixed partial denture are still an option.</abstract><cop>Hoboken, USA</cop><pub>John Wiley & Sons, Inc</pub><pmid>37096865</pmid><doi>10.1111/jerd.13059</doi><tpages>10</tpages><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-2391-5399</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0009-0006-3938-7988</orcidid><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | ISSN: 1496-4155 |
ispartof | Journal of esthetic and restorative dentistry, 2023-10, Vol.35 (7), p.1152-1161 |
issn | 1496-4155 1708-8240 |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_2806073252 |
source | Wiley Online Library Journals Frontfile Complete |
subjects | axial extraction system ferrule design restorative dentistry root‐to‐crown ratio surgical extrusion tooth preservation |
title | Forced surgical extrusion using an axial tooth extraction system as a practicable technique for preserving severely destroyed teeth? ‐ Clinical outcomes up to 4.8 years |
url | https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-23T06%3A32%3A58IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Forced%20surgical%20extrusion%20using%20an%20axial%20tooth%20extraction%20system%20as%20a%20practicable%20technique%20for%20preserving%20severely%20destroyed%20teeth?%20%E2%80%90%20Clinical%20outcomes%20up%20to%204.8%E2%80%89years&rft.jtitle=Journal%20of%20esthetic%20and%20restorative%20dentistry&rft.au=Graf,%20Tobias&rft.date=2023-10&rft.volume=35&rft.issue=7&rft.spage=1152&rft.epage=1161&rft.pages=1152-1161&rft.issn=1496-4155&rft.eissn=1708-8240&rft_id=info:doi/10.1111/jerd.13059&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E2806073252%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=2806073252&rft_id=info:pmid/37096865&rfr_iscdi=true |