Comment on "Carbon content drives high temperature superconductivity in a carbonaceous sulfur hydride below 100 GPa" by G. A. Smith, I. E. Collings, E. Snider, D. Smith, S. Petitgirard, J. S. Smith, M. White, E. Jones, P. Ellison, K. V. Lawler, R. P. Dias and A. Salamat, Chem. Commun. , 2022, 58 , 9064

Experimental data supporting the claim that a carbonaceous sulfur hydride (CSH) under pressure is a high temperature superconductor were presented. Here we report results of a mathematical analysis that indicates that with probability larger than 1-10 some of those data were not measured in a labora...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Chemical communications (Cambridge, England) England), 2023-05, Vol.59 (38), p.5765-5770
1. Verfasser: Hirsch, J E
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page 5770
container_issue 38
container_start_page 5765
container_title Chemical communications (Cambridge, England)
container_volume 59
creator Hirsch, J E
description Experimental data supporting the claim that a carbonaceous sulfur hydride (CSH) under pressure is a high temperature superconductor were presented. Here we report results of a mathematical analysis that indicates that with probability larger than 1-10 some of those data were not measured in a laboratory, contrary to what the papers claim. This finding undermines confidence in the claim that of the experimental evidence reported in those papers reflects the properties of real physical samples of CSH.
doi_str_mv 10.1039/d2cc05277f
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_2805031583</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>2811203819</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c274t-2dcd22e6c7f2998aa9e1b346163893ac0c35d44af8745907601d393cfeaea5723</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNpdkltv0zAUxwMCsTF44QOgo_GCUOr5kuvjlG5lo4iKcnuLXMdZPCV2Zzub-u1xurIHLFnn9jt_Hdknit4RjAhm5VlDhcApzfP2eXRMWJbM0qT482Ly03KWsyQ9il47d4vDIWnxKjpiOS7CTY6fnVVmGKT2YDScVtxughVG-ynVWHUvHXTqpgMvh6203I9WghuDG6BmFF7dK78DpYGD2HdzIc3oAtO3o4VuF0QaCRvZmwcgGMNixU9hs4MFgnME60H5LoYrBBcIKtP3St-4eArWOvTZGOZP0BrBSnrlb5TltonhGk2pQ_Ergt-d8nLfe220DCqroBoUndExfEHwC8GSP_ST6Hc0FeeKO-C62Q_Cez5wH0PVyWEaZRhGjSAGiimNIS2CW-IseRO9bHnv5NuDPYl-Xl78qD7Plt8WV9X5ciZonvgZbURDqcxE3tKyLDgvJdmwJCMZK0rGBRYsbZKEt0WepCXOM0waVjLRSi55mlN2En181N1aczdK5-tBOSH7nuvpfWta4BSz8JssoB_-Q2_NaHWYLlCEUMwKUgbq0yMlrHHOyrbeWjVwu6sJrqc1que0qvZrdBng9wfJcTPI5gn9tzfsLziluOI</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>2811203819</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Comment on "Carbon content drives high temperature superconductivity in a carbonaceous sulfur hydride below 100 GPa" by G. A. Smith, I. E. Collings, E. Snider, D. Smith, S. Petitgirard, J. S. Smith, M. White, E. Jones, P. Ellison, K. V. Lawler, R. P. Dias and A. Salamat, Chem. Commun. , 2022, 58 , 9064</title><source>Royal Society Of Chemistry Journals 2008-</source><source>Alma/SFX Local Collection</source><creator>Hirsch, J E</creator><creatorcontrib>Hirsch, J E</creatorcontrib><description>Experimental data supporting the claim that a carbonaceous sulfur hydride (CSH) under pressure is a high temperature superconductor were presented. Here we report results of a mathematical analysis that indicates that with probability larger than 1-10 some of those data were not measured in a laboratory, contrary to what the papers claim. This finding undermines confidence in the claim that of the experimental evidence reported in those papers reflects the properties of real physical samples of CSH.</description><identifier>ISSN: 1359-7345</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1364-548X</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1039/d2cc05277f</identifier><identifier>PMID: 37083704</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>England: Royal Society of Chemistry</publisher><subject>Carbon content ; High temperature superconductors ; Hydrides ; Mathematical analysis ; Sulfur ; Superconductivity</subject><ispartof>Chemical communications (Cambridge, England), 2023-05, Vol.59 (38), p.5765-5770</ispartof><rights>Copyright Royal Society of Chemistry 2023</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c274t-2dcd22e6c7f2998aa9e1b346163893ac0c35d44af8745907601d393cfeaea5723</cites><orcidid>0000-0001-7175-3497</orcidid></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><link.rule.ids>314,776,780,27901,27902</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37083704$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Hirsch, J E</creatorcontrib><title>Comment on "Carbon content drives high temperature superconductivity in a carbonaceous sulfur hydride below 100 GPa" by G. A. Smith, I. E. Collings, E. Snider, D. Smith, S. Petitgirard, J. S. Smith, M. White, E. Jones, P. Ellison, K. V. Lawler, R. P. Dias and A. Salamat, Chem. Commun. , 2022, 58 , 9064</title><title>Chemical communications (Cambridge, England)</title><addtitle>Chem Commun (Camb)</addtitle><description>Experimental data supporting the claim that a carbonaceous sulfur hydride (CSH) under pressure is a high temperature superconductor were presented. Here we report results of a mathematical analysis that indicates that with probability larger than 1-10 some of those data were not measured in a laboratory, contrary to what the papers claim. This finding undermines confidence in the claim that of the experimental evidence reported in those papers reflects the properties of real physical samples of CSH.</description><subject>Carbon content</subject><subject>High temperature superconductors</subject><subject>Hydrides</subject><subject>Mathematical analysis</subject><subject>Sulfur</subject><subject>Superconductivity</subject><issn>1359-7345</issn><issn>1364-548X</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2023</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><recordid>eNpdkltv0zAUxwMCsTF44QOgo_GCUOr5kuvjlG5lo4iKcnuLXMdZPCV2Zzub-u1xurIHLFnn9jt_Hdknit4RjAhm5VlDhcApzfP2eXRMWJbM0qT482Ly03KWsyQ9il47d4vDIWnxKjpiOS7CTY6fnVVmGKT2YDScVtxughVG-ynVWHUvHXTqpgMvh6203I9WghuDG6BmFF7dK78DpYGD2HdzIc3oAtO3o4VuF0QaCRvZmwcgGMNixU9hs4MFgnME60H5LoYrBBcIKtP3St-4eArWOvTZGOZP0BrBSnrlb5TltonhGk2pQ_Ergt-d8nLfe220DCqroBoUndExfEHwC8GSP_ST6Hc0FeeKO-C62Q_Cez5wH0PVyWEaZRhGjSAGiimNIS2CW-IseRO9bHnv5NuDPYl-Xl78qD7Plt8WV9X5ciZonvgZbURDqcxE3tKyLDgvJdmwJCMZK0rGBRYsbZKEt0WepCXOM0waVjLRSi55mlN2En181N1aczdK5-tBOSH7nuvpfWta4BSz8JssoB_-Q2_NaHWYLlCEUMwKUgbq0yMlrHHOyrbeWjVwu6sJrqc1que0qvZrdBng9wfJcTPI5gn9tzfsLziluOI</recordid><startdate>20230509</startdate><enddate>20230509</enddate><creator>Hirsch, J E</creator><general>Royal Society of Chemistry</general><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7SR</scope><scope>7U5</scope><scope>8BQ</scope><scope>8FD</scope><scope>JG9</scope><scope>L7M</scope><scope>7X8</scope><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0001-7175-3497</orcidid></search><sort><creationdate>20230509</creationdate><title>Comment on "Carbon content drives high temperature superconductivity in a carbonaceous sulfur hydride below 100 GPa" by G. A. Smith, I. E. Collings, E. Snider, D. Smith, S. Petitgirard, J. S. Smith, M. White, E. Jones, P. Ellison, K. V. Lawler, R. P. Dias and A. Salamat, Chem. Commun. , 2022, 58 , 9064</title><author>Hirsch, J E</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c274t-2dcd22e6c7f2998aa9e1b346163893ac0c35d44af8745907601d393cfeaea5723</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2023</creationdate><topic>Carbon content</topic><topic>High temperature superconductors</topic><topic>Hydrides</topic><topic>Mathematical analysis</topic><topic>Sulfur</topic><topic>Superconductivity</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Hirsch, J E</creatorcontrib><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>Engineered Materials Abstracts</collection><collection>Solid State and Superconductivity Abstracts</collection><collection>METADEX</collection><collection>Technology Research Database</collection><collection>Materials Research Database</collection><collection>Advanced Technologies Database with Aerospace</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><jtitle>Chemical communications (Cambridge, England)</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Hirsch, J E</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Comment on "Carbon content drives high temperature superconductivity in a carbonaceous sulfur hydride below 100 GPa" by G. A. Smith, I. E. Collings, E. Snider, D. Smith, S. Petitgirard, J. S. Smith, M. White, E. Jones, P. Ellison, K. V. Lawler, R. P. Dias and A. Salamat, Chem. Commun. , 2022, 58 , 9064</atitle><jtitle>Chemical communications (Cambridge, England)</jtitle><addtitle>Chem Commun (Camb)</addtitle><date>2023-05-09</date><risdate>2023</risdate><volume>59</volume><issue>38</issue><spage>5765</spage><epage>5770</epage><pages>5765-5770</pages><issn>1359-7345</issn><eissn>1364-548X</eissn><abstract>Experimental data supporting the claim that a carbonaceous sulfur hydride (CSH) under pressure is a high temperature superconductor were presented. Here we report results of a mathematical analysis that indicates that with probability larger than 1-10 some of those data were not measured in a laboratory, contrary to what the papers claim. This finding undermines confidence in the claim that of the experimental evidence reported in those papers reflects the properties of real physical samples of CSH.</abstract><cop>England</cop><pub>Royal Society of Chemistry</pub><pmid>37083704</pmid><doi>10.1039/d2cc05277f</doi><tpages>6</tpages><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0001-7175-3497</orcidid></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 1359-7345
ispartof Chemical communications (Cambridge, England), 2023-05, Vol.59 (38), p.5765-5770
issn 1359-7345
1364-548X
language eng
recordid cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_2805031583
source Royal Society Of Chemistry Journals 2008-; Alma/SFX Local Collection
subjects Carbon content
High temperature superconductors
Hydrides
Mathematical analysis
Sulfur
Superconductivity
title Comment on "Carbon content drives high temperature superconductivity in a carbonaceous sulfur hydride below 100 GPa" by G. A. Smith, I. E. Collings, E. Snider, D. Smith, S. Petitgirard, J. S. Smith, M. White, E. Jones, P. Ellison, K. V. Lawler, R. P. Dias and A. Salamat, Chem. Commun. , 2022, 58 , 9064
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-02-12T16%3A11%3A15IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Comment%20on%20%22Carbon%20content%20drives%20high%20temperature%20superconductivity%20in%20a%20carbonaceous%20sulfur%20hydride%20below%20100%20GPa%22%20by%20G.%20A.%20Smith,%20I.%20E.%20Collings,%20E.%20Snider,%20D.%20Smith,%20S.%20Petitgirard,%20J.%20S.%20Smith,%20M.%20White,%20E.%20Jones,%20P.%20Ellison,%20K.%20V.%20Lawler,%20R.%20P.%20Dias%20and%20A.%20Salamat,%20Chem.%20Commun.%20,%202022,%2058%20,%209064&rft.jtitle=Chemical%20communications%20(Cambridge,%20England)&rft.au=Hirsch,%20J%20E&rft.date=2023-05-09&rft.volume=59&rft.issue=38&rft.spage=5765&rft.epage=5770&rft.pages=5765-5770&rft.issn=1359-7345&rft.eissn=1364-548X&rft_id=info:doi/10.1039/d2cc05277f&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E2811203819%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=2811203819&rft_id=info:pmid/37083704&rfr_iscdi=true