Safety of magnetic resonance imaging in patients with surgically implanted permanent epicardial leads

Magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) safety in patients with an epicardial cardiac implantable electronic device (CIED) is uncertain. The purpose of this study was to assess the safety and adverse effects of MRI in patients who had surgically implanted epicardial CIED. Patients with surgically implanted...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Heart rhythm 2023-08, Vol.20 (8), p.1111-1118
Hauptverfasser: Ma, Yue-Dong, Watson, Robert E., Olson, Nora E., Birgersdotter-Green, Ulrika, Patel, Kavisha, Mulpuru, Siva K., Madhavan, Malini, Deshmukh, Abhishek J., Killu, Ammar M., Friedman, Paul A., Cha, Yong-Mei
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page 1118
container_issue 8
container_start_page 1111
container_title Heart rhythm
container_volume 20
creator Ma, Yue-Dong
Watson, Robert E.
Olson, Nora E.
Birgersdotter-Green, Ulrika
Patel, Kavisha
Mulpuru, Siva K.
Madhavan, Malini
Deshmukh, Abhishek J.
Killu, Ammar M.
Friedman, Paul A.
Cha, Yong-Mei
description Magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) safety in patients with an epicardial cardiac implantable electronic device (CIED) is uncertain. The purpose of this study was to assess the safety and adverse effects of MRI in patients who had surgically implanted epicardial CIED. Patients with surgically implanted CIEDs who underwent MRI with an appropriate cardiology–radiology collaborative protocol between January 2008 and January 2021 were prospectively studied in 2 clinical centers. All patients underwent close cardiac monitoring through MRI procedures. Outcomes were compared between the epicardial CIED group and the matched non–MRI-conditional transvenous CIED group. Twenty-nine consecutive patients with epicardial CIED (41.4% male; mean age 43 years) underwent 52 MRIs in 57 anatomic regions. Sixteen patients had a pacemaker, 9 had a cardiac defibrillator or cardiac resynchronization therapy–defibrillator, and 4 had no device generator. No significant adverse events occurred in the epicardial or transvenous CIED groups. Battery life, pacing, sensing thresholds, lead impedance, and cardiac biomarkers were not significantly changed, except 1 patient had a transient decrease in atrial lead sensing function. MRI of CIEDs with epicardially implanted leads does not represent a greater risk than transvenous CIEDs when performed with a multidisciplinary collaborative protocol centered on patient safety.
doi_str_mv 10.1016/j.hrthm.2023.04.003
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_2803965230</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><els_id>S1547527123021021</els_id><sourcerecordid>2803965230</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c359t-4f4a199967b65cef61c17eed4b9c4132fa1850097215a586c745aa049a1a50a73</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp9kDtvGzEMgIUiRZOm_QUBAo1Z7kqdpJM1ZCiCPgIE6NB2Fmgdz5Zxr0hyCv_7ynWaMRMJ6iMpfoxdCagFiPbTrt7GvB3rBhpZg6oB5Bt2IbRuK7ky4uyYK1Ppxohz9j6lHUBjW5Dv2Lk0YLTV5oLRT-wpH_jc8xE3E-XgeaQ0Tzh54qHUwrThYeIL5kBTTvxPyFue9nETPA7DoTDLgFOmji8UR5wKxGkpj7ELOPCBsEsf2Nseh0Qfn-Ml-_31y6-779XDj2_3d58fKi-1zZXqFQprbWvWrfbUt8ILQ9SptfVKyKZHsdIA1jRCo1613iiNCMqiQA1o5CW7Oc1d4vy4p5TdGJKnoXyQ5n1yzQqkbXUjoaDyhPo4pxSpd0ss58aDE-COft3O_fPrjn4dKFf8lq7r5wX79UjdS89_oQW4PQFUznwKFF3yxZunLkTy2XVzeHXBXz0Zjig</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>2803965230</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Safety of magnetic resonance imaging in patients with surgically implanted permanent epicardial leads</title><source>MEDLINE</source><source>Access via ScienceDirect (Elsevier)</source><creator>Ma, Yue-Dong ; Watson, Robert E. ; Olson, Nora E. ; Birgersdotter-Green, Ulrika ; Patel, Kavisha ; Mulpuru, Siva K. ; Madhavan, Malini ; Deshmukh, Abhishek J. ; Killu, Ammar M. ; Friedman, Paul A. ; Cha, Yong-Mei</creator><creatorcontrib>Ma, Yue-Dong ; Watson, Robert E. ; Olson, Nora E. ; Birgersdotter-Green, Ulrika ; Patel, Kavisha ; Mulpuru, Siva K. ; Madhavan, Malini ; Deshmukh, Abhishek J. ; Killu, Ammar M. ; Friedman, Paul A. ; Cha, Yong-Mei</creatorcontrib><description>Magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) safety in patients with an epicardial cardiac implantable electronic device (CIED) is uncertain. The purpose of this study was to assess the safety and adverse effects of MRI in patients who had surgically implanted epicardial CIED. Patients with surgically implanted CIEDs who underwent MRI with an appropriate cardiology–radiology collaborative protocol between January 2008 and January 2021 were prospectively studied in 2 clinical centers. All patients underwent close cardiac monitoring through MRI procedures. Outcomes were compared between the epicardial CIED group and the matched non–MRI-conditional transvenous CIED group. Twenty-nine consecutive patients with epicardial CIED (41.4% male; mean age 43 years) underwent 52 MRIs in 57 anatomic regions. Sixteen patients had a pacemaker, 9 had a cardiac defibrillator or cardiac resynchronization therapy–defibrillator, and 4 had no device generator. No significant adverse events occurred in the epicardial or transvenous CIED groups. Battery life, pacing, sensing thresholds, lead impedance, and cardiac biomarkers were not significantly changed, except 1 patient had a transient decrease in atrial lead sensing function. MRI of CIEDs with epicardially implanted leads does not represent a greater risk than transvenous CIEDs when performed with a multidisciplinary collaborative protocol centered on patient safety.</description><identifier>ISSN: 1547-5271</identifier><identifier>ISSN: 1556-3871</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1556-3871</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1016/j.hrthm.2023.04.003</identifier><identifier>PMID: 37075957</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>United States: Elsevier Inc</publisher><subject>Adult ; Cardiovascular implantable electronic device ; Defibrillators, Implantable - adverse effects ; Epicardial lead ; Female ; Heart ; Humans ; Magnetic resonance imaging ; Magnetic Resonance Imaging - methods ; Male ; Pacemaker, Artificial - adverse effects ; Patient Safety ; Safety ; Transvenous leads</subject><ispartof>Heart rhythm, 2023-08, Vol.20 (8), p.1111-1118</ispartof><rights>2023</rights><rights>Copyright © 2023. Published by Elsevier Inc.</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c359t-4f4a199967b65cef61c17eed4b9c4132fa1850097215a586c745aa049a1a50a73</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c359t-4f4a199967b65cef61c17eed4b9c4132fa1850097215a586c745aa049a1a50a73</cites><orcidid>0000-0002-5897-9464</orcidid></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.hrthm.2023.04.003$$EHTML$$P50$$Gelsevier$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>315,781,785,3551,27928,27929,45999</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37075957$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Ma, Yue-Dong</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Watson, Robert E.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Olson, Nora E.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Birgersdotter-Green, Ulrika</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Patel, Kavisha</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Mulpuru, Siva K.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Madhavan, Malini</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Deshmukh, Abhishek J.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Killu, Ammar M.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Friedman, Paul A.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Cha, Yong-Mei</creatorcontrib><title>Safety of magnetic resonance imaging in patients with surgically implanted permanent epicardial leads</title><title>Heart rhythm</title><addtitle>Heart Rhythm</addtitle><description>Magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) safety in patients with an epicardial cardiac implantable electronic device (CIED) is uncertain. The purpose of this study was to assess the safety and adverse effects of MRI in patients who had surgically implanted epicardial CIED. Patients with surgically implanted CIEDs who underwent MRI with an appropriate cardiology–radiology collaborative protocol between January 2008 and January 2021 were prospectively studied in 2 clinical centers. All patients underwent close cardiac monitoring through MRI procedures. Outcomes were compared between the epicardial CIED group and the matched non–MRI-conditional transvenous CIED group. Twenty-nine consecutive patients with epicardial CIED (41.4% male; mean age 43 years) underwent 52 MRIs in 57 anatomic regions. Sixteen patients had a pacemaker, 9 had a cardiac defibrillator or cardiac resynchronization therapy–defibrillator, and 4 had no device generator. No significant adverse events occurred in the epicardial or transvenous CIED groups. Battery life, pacing, sensing thresholds, lead impedance, and cardiac biomarkers were not significantly changed, except 1 patient had a transient decrease in atrial lead sensing function. MRI of CIEDs with epicardially implanted leads does not represent a greater risk than transvenous CIEDs when performed with a multidisciplinary collaborative protocol centered on patient safety.</description><subject>Adult</subject><subject>Cardiovascular implantable electronic device</subject><subject>Defibrillators, Implantable - adverse effects</subject><subject>Epicardial lead</subject><subject>Female</subject><subject>Heart</subject><subject>Humans</subject><subject>Magnetic resonance imaging</subject><subject>Magnetic Resonance Imaging - methods</subject><subject>Male</subject><subject>Pacemaker, Artificial - adverse effects</subject><subject>Patient Safety</subject><subject>Safety</subject><subject>Transvenous leads</subject><issn>1547-5271</issn><issn>1556-3871</issn><issn>1556-3871</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2023</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>EIF</sourceid><recordid>eNp9kDtvGzEMgIUiRZOm_QUBAo1Z7kqdpJM1ZCiCPgIE6NB2Fmgdz5Zxr0hyCv_7ynWaMRMJ6iMpfoxdCagFiPbTrt7GvB3rBhpZg6oB5Bt2IbRuK7ky4uyYK1Ppxohz9j6lHUBjW5Dv2Lk0YLTV5oLRT-wpH_jc8xE3E-XgeaQ0Tzh54qHUwrThYeIL5kBTTvxPyFue9nETPA7DoTDLgFOmji8UR5wKxGkpj7ELOPCBsEsf2Nseh0Qfn-Ml-_31y6-779XDj2_3d58fKi-1zZXqFQprbWvWrfbUt8ILQ9SptfVKyKZHsdIA1jRCo1613iiNCMqiQA1o5CW7Oc1d4vy4p5TdGJKnoXyQ5n1yzQqkbXUjoaDyhPo4pxSpd0ss58aDE-COft3O_fPrjn4dKFf8lq7r5wX79UjdS89_oQW4PQFUznwKFF3yxZunLkTy2XVzeHXBXz0Zjig</recordid><startdate>202308</startdate><enddate>202308</enddate><creator>Ma, Yue-Dong</creator><creator>Watson, Robert E.</creator><creator>Olson, Nora E.</creator><creator>Birgersdotter-Green, Ulrika</creator><creator>Patel, Kavisha</creator><creator>Mulpuru, Siva K.</creator><creator>Madhavan, Malini</creator><creator>Deshmukh, Abhishek J.</creator><creator>Killu, Ammar M.</creator><creator>Friedman, Paul A.</creator><creator>Cha, Yong-Mei</creator><general>Elsevier Inc</general><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7X8</scope><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-5897-9464</orcidid></search><sort><creationdate>202308</creationdate><title>Safety of magnetic resonance imaging in patients with surgically implanted permanent epicardial leads</title><author>Ma, Yue-Dong ; Watson, Robert E. ; Olson, Nora E. ; Birgersdotter-Green, Ulrika ; Patel, Kavisha ; Mulpuru, Siva K. ; Madhavan, Malini ; Deshmukh, Abhishek J. ; Killu, Ammar M. ; Friedman, Paul A. ; Cha, Yong-Mei</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c359t-4f4a199967b65cef61c17eed4b9c4132fa1850097215a586c745aa049a1a50a73</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2023</creationdate><topic>Adult</topic><topic>Cardiovascular implantable electronic device</topic><topic>Defibrillators, Implantable - adverse effects</topic><topic>Epicardial lead</topic><topic>Female</topic><topic>Heart</topic><topic>Humans</topic><topic>Magnetic resonance imaging</topic><topic>Magnetic Resonance Imaging - methods</topic><topic>Male</topic><topic>Pacemaker, Artificial - adverse effects</topic><topic>Patient Safety</topic><topic>Safety</topic><topic>Transvenous leads</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Ma, Yue-Dong</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Watson, Robert E.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Olson, Nora E.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Birgersdotter-Green, Ulrika</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Patel, Kavisha</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Mulpuru, Siva K.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Madhavan, Malini</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Deshmukh, Abhishek J.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Killu, Ammar M.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Friedman, Paul A.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Cha, Yong-Mei</creatorcontrib><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><jtitle>Heart rhythm</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Ma, Yue-Dong</au><au>Watson, Robert E.</au><au>Olson, Nora E.</au><au>Birgersdotter-Green, Ulrika</au><au>Patel, Kavisha</au><au>Mulpuru, Siva K.</au><au>Madhavan, Malini</au><au>Deshmukh, Abhishek J.</au><au>Killu, Ammar M.</au><au>Friedman, Paul A.</au><au>Cha, Yong-Mei</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Safety of magnetic resonance imaging in patients with surgically implanted permanent epicardial leads</atitle><jtitle>Heart rhythm</jtitle><addtitle>Heart Rhythm</addtitle><date>2023-08</date><risdate>2023</risdate><volume>20</volume><issue>8</issue><spage>1111</spage><epage>1118</epage><pages>1111-1118</pages><issn>1547-5271</issn><issn>1556-3871</issn><eissn>1556-3871</eissn><abstract>Magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) safety in patients with an epicardial cardiac implantable electronic device (CIED) is uncertain. The purpose of this study was to assess the safety and adverse effects of MRI in patients who had surgically implanted epicardial CIED. Patients with surgically implanted CIEDs who underwent MRI with an appropriate cardiology–radiology collaborative protocol between January 2008 and January 2021 were prospectively studied in 2 clinical centers. All patients underwent close cardiac monitoring through MRI procedures. Outcomes were compared between the epicardial CIED group and the matched non–MRI-conditional transvenous CIED group. Twenty-nine consecutive patients with epicardial CIED (41.4% male; mean age 43 years) underwent 52 MRIs in 57 anatomic regions. Sixteen patients had a pacemaker, 9 had a cardiac defibrillator or cardiac resynchronization therapy–defibrillator, and 4 had no device generator. No significant adverse events occurred in the epicardial or transvenous CIED groups. Battery life, pacing, sensing thresholds, lead impedance, and cardiac biomarkers were not significantly changed, except 1 patient had a transient decrease in atrial lead sensing function. MRI of CIEDs with epicardially implanted leads does not represent a greater risk than transvenous CIEDs when performed with a multidisciplinary collaborative protocol centered on patient safety.</abstract><cop>United States</cop><pub>Elsevier Inc</pub><pmid>37075957</pmid><doi>10.1016/j.hrthm.2023.04.003</doi><tpages>8</tpages><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-5897-9464</orcidid></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 1547-5271
ispartof Heart rhythm, 2023-08, Vol.20 (8), p.1111-1118
issn 1547-5271
1556-3871
1556-3871
language eng
recordid cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_2803965230
source MEDLINE; Access via ScienceDirect (Elsevier)
subjects Adult
Cardiovascular implantable electronic device
Defibrillators, Implantable - adverse effects
Epicardial lead
Female
Heart
Humans
Magnetic resonance imaging
Magnetic Resonance Imaging - methods
Male
Pacemaker, Artificial - adverse effects
Patient Safety
Safety
Transvenous leads
title Safety of magnetic resonance imaging in patients with surgically implanted permanent epicardial leads
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2024-12-17T05%3A43%3A24IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Safety%20of%20magnetic%20resonance%20imaging%20in%20patients%20with%20surgically%20implanted%20permanent%20epicardial%20leads&rft.jtitle=Heart%20rhythm&rft.au=Ma,%20Yue-Dong&rft.date=2023-08&rft.volume=20&rft.issue=8&rft.spage=1111&rft.epage=1118&rft.pages=1111-1118&rft.issn=1547-5271&rft.eissn=1556-3871&rft_id=info:doi/10.1016/j.hrthm.2023.04.003&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E2803965230%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=2803965230&rft_id=info:pmid/37075957&rft_els_id=S1547527123021021&rfr_iscdi=true