Safety of magnetic resonance imaging in patients with surgically implanted permanent epicardial leads
Magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) safety in patients with an epicardial cardiac implantable electronic device (CIED) is uncertain. The purpose of this study was to assess the safety and adverse effects of MRI in patients who had surgically implanted epicardial CIED. Patients with surgically implanted...
Gespeichert in:
Veröffentlicht in: | Heart rhythm 2023-08, Vol.20 (8), p.1111-1118 |
---|---|
Hauptverfasser: | , , , , , , , , , , |
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | eng |
Schlagworte: | |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
container_end_page | 1118 |
---|---|
container_issue | 8 |
container_start_page | 1111 |
container_title | Heart rhythm |
container_volume | 20 |
creator | Ma, Yue-Dong Watson, Robert E. Olson, Nora E. Birgersdotter-Green, Ulrika Patel, Kavisha Mulpuru, Siva K. Madhavan, Malini Deshmukh, Abhishek J. Killu, Ammar M. Friedman, Paul A. Cha, Yong-Mei |
description | Magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) safety in patients with an epicardial cardiac implantable electronic device (CIED) is uncertain.
The purpose of this study was to assess the safety and adverse effects of MRI in patients who had surgically implanted epicardial CIED.
Patients with surgically implanted CIEDs who underwent MRI with an appropriate cardiology–radiology collaborative protocol between January 2008 and January 2021 were prospectively studied in 2 clinical centers. All patients underwent close cardiac monitoring through MRI procedures. Outcomes were compared between the epicardial CIED group and the matched non–MRI-conditional transvenous CIED group.
Twenty-nine consecutive patients with epicardial CIED (41.4% male; mean age 43 years) underwent 52 MRIs in 57 anatomic regions. Sixteen patients had a pacemaker, 9 had a cardiac defibrillator or cardiac resynchronization therapy–defibrillator, and 4 had no device generator. No significant adverse events occurred in the epicardial or transvenous CIED groups. Battery life, pacing, sensing thresholds, lead impedance, and cardiac biomarkers were not significantly changed, except 1 patient had a transient decrease in atrial lead sensing function.
MRI of CIEDs with epicardially implanted leads does not represent a greater risk than transvenous CIEDs when performed with a multidisciplinary collaborative protocol centered on patient safety. |
doi_str_mv | 10.1016/j.hrthm.2023.04.003 |
format | Article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_2803965230</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><els_id>S1547527123021021</els_id><sourcerecordid>2803965230</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c359t-4f4a199967b65cef61c17eed4b9c4132fa1850097215a586c745aa049a1a50a73</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp9kDtvGzEMgIUiRZOm_QUBAo1Z7kqdpJM1ZCiCPgIE6NB2Fmgdz5Zxr0hyCv_7ynWaMRMJ6iMpfoxdCagFiPbTrt7GvB3rBhpZg6oB5Bt2IbRuK7ky4uyYK1Ppxohz9j6lHUBjW5Dv2Lk0YLTV5oLRT-wpH_jc8xE3E-XgeaQ0Tzh54qHUwrThYeIL5kBTTvxPyFue9nETPA7DoTDLgFOmji8UR5wKxGkpj7ELOPCBsEsf2Nseh0Qfn-Ml-_31y6-779XDj2_3d58fKi-1zZXqFQprbWvWrfbUt8ILQ9SptfVKyKZHsdIA1jRCo1613iiNCMqiQA1o5CW7Oc1d4vy4p5TdGJKnoXyQ5n1yzQqkbXUjoaDyhPo4pxSpd0ss58aDE-COft3O_fPrjn4dKFf8lq7r5wX79UjdS89_oQW4PQFUznwKFF3yxZunLkTy2XVzeHXBXz0Zjig</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>2803965230</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Safety of magnetic resonance imaging in patients with surgically implanted permanent epicardial leads</title><source>MEDLINE</source><source>Access via ScienceDirect (Elsevier)</source><creator>Ma, Yue-Dong ; Watson, Robert E. ; Olson, Nora E. ; Birgersdotter-Green, Ulrika ; Patel, Kavisha ; Mulpuru, Siva K. ; Madhavan, Malini ; Deshmukh, Abhishek J. ; Killu, Ammar M. ; Friedman, Paul A. ; Cha, Yong-Mei</creator><creatorcontrib>Ma, Yue-Dong ; Watson, Robert E. ; Olson, Nora E. ; Birgersdotter-Green, Ulrika ; Patel, Kavisha ; Mulpuru, Siva K. ; Madhavan, Malini ; Deshmukh, Abhishek J. ; Killu, Ammar M. ; Friedman, Paul A. ; Cha, Yong-Mei</creatorcontrib><description>Magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) safety in patients with an epicardial cardiac implantable electronic device (CIED) is uncertain.
The purpose of this study was to assess the safety and adverse effects of MRI in patients who had surgically implanted epicardial CIED.
Patients with surgically implanted CIEDs who underwent MRI with an appropriate cardiology–radiology collaborative protocol between January 2008 and January 2021 were prospectively studied in 2 clinical centers. All patients underwent close cardiac monitoring through MRI procedures. Outcomes were compared between the epicardial CIED group and the matched non–MRI-conditional transvenous CIED group.
Twenty-nine consecutive patients with epicardial CIED (41.4% male; mean age 43 years) underwent 52 MRIs in 57 anatomic regions. Sixteen patients had a pacemaker, 9 had a cardiac defibrillator or cardiac resynchronization therapy–defibrillator, and 4 had no device generator. No significant adverse events occurred in the epicardial or transvenous CIED groups. Battery life, pacing, sensing thresholds, lead impedance, and cardiac biomarkers were not significantly changed, except 1 patient had a transient decrease in atrial lead sensing function.
MRI of CIEDs with epicardially implanted leads does not represent a greater risk than transvenous CIEDs when performed with a multidisciplinary collaborative protocol centered on patient safety.</description><identifier>ISSN: 1547-5271</identifier><identifier>ISSN: 1556-3871</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1556-3871</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1016/j.hrthm.2023.04.003</identifier><identifier>PMID: 37075957</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>United States: Elsevier Inc</publisher><subject>Adult ; Cardiovascular implantable electronic device ; Defibrillators, Implantable - adverse effects ; Epicardial lead ; Female ; Heart ; Humans ; Magnetic resonance imaging ; Magnetic Resonance Imaging - methods ; Male ; Pacemaker, Artificial - adverse effects ; Patient Safety ; Safety ; Transvenous leads</subject><ispartof>Heart rhythm, 2023-08, Vol.20 (8), p.1111-1118</ispartof><rights>2023</rights><rights>Copyright © 2023. Published by Elsevier Inc.</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c359t-4f4a199967b65cef61c17eed4b9c4132fa1850097215a586c745aa049a1a50a73</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c359t-4f4a199967b65cef61c17eed4b9c4132fa1850097215a586c745aa049a1a50a73</cites><orcidid>0000-0002-5897-9464</orcidid></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.hrthm.2023.04.003$$EHTML$$P50$$Gelsevier$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>315,781,785,3551,27928,27929,45999</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37075957$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Ma, Yue-Dong</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Watson, Robert E.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Olson, Nora E.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Birgersdotter-Green, Ulrika</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Patel, Kavisha</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Mulpuru, Siva K.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Madhavan, Malini</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Deshmukh, Abhishek J.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Killu, Ammar M.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Friedman, Paul A.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Cha, Yong-Mei</creatorcontrib><title>Safety of magnetic resonance imaging in patients with surgically implanted permanent epicardial leads</title><title>Heart rhythm</title><addtitle>Heart Rhythm</addtitle><description>Magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) safety in patients with an epicardial cardiac implantable electronic device (CIED) is uncertain.
The purpose of this study was to assess the safety and adverse effects of MRI in patients who had surgically implanted epicardial CIED.
Patients with surgically implanted CIEDs who underwent MRI with an appropriate cardiology–radiology collaborative protocol between January 2008 and January 2021 were prospectively studied in 2 clinical centers. All patients underwent close cardiac monitoring through MRI procedures. Outcomes were compared between the epicardial CIED group and the matched non–MRI-conditional transvenous CIED group.
Twenty-nine consecutive patients with epicardial CIED (41.4% male; mean age 43 years) underwent 52 MRIs in 57 anatomic regions. Sixteen patients had a pacemaker, 9 had a cardiac defibrillator or cardiac resynchronization therapy–defibrillator, and 4 had no device generator. No significant adverse events occurred in the epicardial or transvenous CIED groups. Battery life, pacing, sensing thresholds, lead impedance, and cardiac biomarkers were not significantly changed, except 1 patient had a transient decrease in atrial lead sensing function.
MRI of CIEDs with epicardially implanted leads does not represent a greater risk than transvenous CIEDs when performed with a multidisciplinary collaborative protocol centered on patient safety.</description><subject>Adult</subject><subject>Cardiovascular implantable electronic device</subject><subject>Defibrillators, Implantable - adverse effects</subject><subject>Epicardial lead</subject><subject>Female</subject><subject>Heart</subject><subject>Humans</subject><subject>Magnetic resonance imaging</subject><subject>Magnetic Resonance Imaging - methods</subject><subject>Male</subject><subject>Pacemaker, Artificial - adverse effects</subject><subject>Patient Safety</subject><subject>Safety</subject><subject>Transvenous leads</subject><issn>1547-5271</issn><issn>1556-3871</issn><issn>1556-3871</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2023</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>EIF</sourceid><recordid>eNp9kDtvGzEMgIUiRZOm_QUBAo1Z7kqdpJM1ZCiCPgIE6NB2Fmgdz5Zxr0hyCv_7ynWaMRMJ6iMpfoxdCagFiPbTrt7GvB3rBhpZg6oB5Bt2IbRuK7ky4uyYK1Ppxohz9j6lHUBjW5Dv2Lk0YLTV5oLRT-wpH_jc8xE3E-XgeaQ0Tzh54qHUwrThYeIL5kBTTvxPyFue9nETPA7DoTDLgFOmji8UR5wKxGkpj7ELOPCBsEsf2Nseh0Qfn-Ml-_31y6-779XDj2_3d58fKi-1zZXqFQprbWvWrfbUt8ILQ9SptfVKyKZHsdIA1jRCo1613iiNCMqiQA1o5CW7Oc1d4vy4p5TdGJKnoXyQ5n1yzQqkbXUjoaDyhPo4pxSpd0ss58aDE-COft3O_fPrjn4dKFf8lq7r5wX79UjdS89_oQW4PQFUznwKFF3yxZunLkTy2XVzeHXBXz0Zjig</recordid><startdate>202308</startdate><enddate>202308</enddate><creator>Ma, Yue-Dong</creator><creator>Watson, Robert E.</creator><creator>Olson, Nora E.</creator><creator>Birgersdotter-Green, Ulrika</creator><creator>Patel, Kavisha</creator><creator>Mulpuru, Siva K.</creator><creator>Madhavan, Malini</creator><creator>Deshmukh, Abhishek J.</creator><creator>Killu, Ammar M.</creator><creator>Friedman, Paul A.</creator><creator>Cha, Yong-Mei</creator><general>Elsevier Inc</general><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7X8</scope><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-5897-9464</orcidid></search><sort><creationdate>202308</creationdate><title>Safety of magnetic resonance imaging in patients with surgically implanted permanent epicardial leads</title><author>Ma, Yue-Dong ; Watson, Robert E. ; Olson, Nora E. ; Birgersdotter-Green, Ulrika ; Patel, Kavisha ; Mulpuru, Siva K. ; Madhavan, Malini ; Deshmukh, Abhishek J. ; Killu, Ammar M. ; Friedman, Paul A. ; Cha, Yong-Mei</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c359t-4f4a199967b65cef61c17eed4b9c4132fa1850097215a586c745aa049a1a50a73</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2023</creationdate><topic>Adult</topic><topic>Cardiovascular implantable electronic device</topic><topic>Defibrillators, Implantable - adverse effects</topic><topic>Epicardial lead</topic><topic>Female</topic><topic>Heart</topic><topic>Humans</topic><topic>Magnetic resonance imaging</topic><topic>Magnetic Resonance Imaging - methods</topic><topic>Male</topic><topic>Pacemaker, Artificial - adverse effects</topic><topic>Patient Safety</topic><topic>Safety</topic><topic>Transvenous leads</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Ma, Yue-Dong</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Watson, Robert E.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Olson, Nora E.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Birgersdotter-Green, Ulrika</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Patel, Kavisha</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Mulpuru, Siva K.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Madhavan, Malini</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Deshmukh, Abhishek J.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Killu, Ammar M.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Friedman, Paul A.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Cha, Yong-Mei</creatorcontrib><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><jtitle>Heart rhythm</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Ma, Yue-Dong</au><au>Watson, Robert E.</au><au>Olson, Nora E.</au><au>Birgersdotter-Green, Ulrika</au><au>Patel, Kavisha</au><au>Mulpuru, Siva K.</au><au>Madhavan, Malini</au><au>Deshmukh, Abhishek J.</au><au>Killu, Ammar M.</au><au>Friedman, Paul A.</au><au>Cha, Yong-Mei</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Safety of magnetic resonance imaging in patients with surgically implanted permanent epicardial leads</atitle><jtitle>Heart rhythm</jtitle><addtitle>Heart Rhythm</addtitle><date>2023-08</date><risdate>2023</risdate><volume>20</volume><issue>8</issue><spage>1111</spage><epage>1118</epage><pages>1111-1118</pages><issn>1547-5271</issn><issn>1556-3871</issn><eissn>1556-3871</eissn><abstract>Magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) safety in patients with an epicardial cardiac implantable electronic device (CIED) is uncertain.
The purpose of this study was to assess the safety and adverse effects of MRI in patients who had surgically implanted epicardial CIED.
Patients with surgically implanted CIEDs who underwent MRI with an appropriate cardiology–radiology collaborative protocol between January 2008 and January 2021 were prospectively studied in 2 clinical centers. All patients underwent close cardiac monitoring through MRI procedures. Outcomes were compared between the epicardial CIED group and the matched non–MRI-conditional transvenous CIED group.
Twenty-nine consecutive patients with epicardial CIED (41.4% male; mean age 43 years) underwent 52 MRIs in 57 anatomic regions. Sixteen patients had a pacemaker, 9 had a cardiac defibrillator or cardiac resynchronization therapy–defibrillator, and 4 had no device generator. No significant adverse events occurred in the epicardial or transvenous CIED groups. Battery life, pacing, sensing thresholds, lead impedance, and cardiac biomarkers were not significantly changed, except 1 patient had a transient decrease in atrial lead sensing function.
MRI of CIEDs with epicardially implanted leads does not represent a greater risk than transvenous CIEDs when performed with a multidisciplinary collaborative protocol centered on patient safety.</abstract><cop>United States</cop><pub>Elsevier Inc</pub><pmid>37075957</pmid><doi>10.1016/j.hrthm.2023.04.003</doi><tpages>8</tpages><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-5897-9464</orcidid></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | ISSN: 1547-5271 |
ispartof | Heart rhythm, 2023-08, Vol.20 (8), p.1111-1118 |
issn | 1547-5271 1556-3871 1556-3871 |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_2803965230 |
source | MEDLINE; Access via ScienceDirect (Elsevier) |
subjects | Adult Cardiovascular implantable electronic device Defibrillators, Implantable - adverse effects Epicardial lead Female Heart Humans Magnetic resonance imaging Magnetic Resonance Imaging - methods Male Pacemaker, Artificial - adverse effects Patient Safety Safety Transvenous leads |
title | Safety of magnetic resonance imaging in patients with surgically implanted permanent epicardial leads |
url | https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2024-12-17T05%3A43%3A24IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Safety%20of%20magnetic%20resonance%20imaging%20in%20patients%20with%20surgically%20implanted%20permanent%20epicardial%20leads&rft.jtitle=Heart%20rhythm&rft.au=Ma,%20Yue-Dong&rft.date=2023-08&rft.volume=20&rft.issue=8&rft.spage=1111&rft.epage=1118&rft.pages=1111-1118&rft.issn=1547-5271&rft.eissn=1556-3871&rft_id=info:doi/10.1016/j.hrthm.2023.04.003&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E2803965230%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=2803965230&rft_id=info:pmid/37075957&rft_els_id=S1547527123021021&rfr_iscdi=true |