Inhibin-Positive “Cholangioblastic” Variant of Intrahepatic Cholangiocarcinoma: Report of 3 New Patients With Review of the Literature
Cholangiocarcinoma is the second most common primary liver malignant neoplasm. It usually affects older individuals in their seventh decade of life with no gender predilection. Recently, a distinct subtype of cholangiocarcinoma has emerged with 2 proposed names: “cholangioblastic” and “solid tubuloc...
Gespeichert in:
Veröffentlicht in: | International journal of surgical pathology 2023-12, Vol.31 (8), p.1495-1504 |
---|---|
Hauptverfasser: | , , , , |
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | eng |
Schlagworte: | |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
Zusammenfassung: | Cholangiocarcinoma is the second most common primary liver malignant neoplasm. It usually affects older individuals in their seventh decade of life with no gender predilection. Recently, a distinct subtype of cholangiocarcinoma has emerged with 2 proposed names: “cholangioblastic” and “solid tubulocystic.” This variant predominantly occurs in younger women who lack the common risk factors for patients diagnosed with cholangiocarcinomas, such as older age and chronic liver disease or cirrhosis. We describe 3 new patients with a cholangioblastic variant of intrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma. At the time of diagnosis, the patients were aged 19-, 46-, and 28-year-old; 2 females and 1 male (the 46-year-old). None of our patients had a history of chronic liver disease or known predisposing factors for liver tumors. Tumor size ranged from 2.3 to 23 cm in greatest dimension. Histological examination of these tumors demonstrated reproducible morphology characterized by trabecular, nested, and multicystic patterns with micro and macro follicles filled with eosinophilic material. The immunohistochemical profile showed that the tumor cells were positive for keratin 7, inhibin, synaptophysin, and albumin in situ hybridization, while negative for HepPar1, arginase, and INSM1. All tumors lacked conventional intrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma/adenocarcinoma morphology. We also review the literature and emphasize that neuroendocrine tumors should be recognized as a major diagnostic pitfall of this variant. |
---|---|
ISSN: | 1066-8969 1940-2465 |
DOI: | 10.1177/10668969231157775 |