US and international per‐ and polyfluoroalkyl substances surface water quality criteria: A review of the status, challenges, and implications for use in chemical management and risk assessment
Regulation of per‐ and polyfluorinated substances (PFAS) in surface water is a work‐in‐progress with relatively few criteria promulgated in the United States and internationally. Surface water quality criteria (SWQC) or screening values derived for perfluorooctane sulfonic acid (PFOS) and perfluoroo...
Gespeichert in:
Veröffentlicht in: | Integrated environmental assessment and management 2024-01, Vol.20 (1), p.36-58 |
---|---|
Hauptverfasser: | , , , , , , , |
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | eng |
Schlagworte: | |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
container_end_page | 58 |
---|---|
container_issue | 1 |
container_start_page | 36 |
container_title | Integrated environmental assessment and management |
container_volume | 20 |
creator | Ruffle, Betsy Archer, Christine Vosnakis, Kelly Butler, Josh D. Davis, Craig W. Goldsworthy, Belinda Parkman, Rick Key, Trent A. |
description | Regulation of per‐ and polyfluorinated substances (PFAS) in surface water is a work‐in‐progress with relatively few criteria promulgated in the United States and internationally. Surface water quality criteria (SWQC) or screening values derived for perfluorooctane sulfonic acid (PFOS) and perfluorooctanoic acid (PFOA) by Australia, Canada, the European Union (EU), and four US states (Florida, Michigan, Minnesota, and Wisconsin), and the San Francisco Bay Regional Water Quality Control Board (SFB RWQCB; California) were compared. Across these eight jurisdictions, promulgated numeric criteria for the same compound and receptor span over five orders of magnitude as a result of different approaches and data interpretations. Human health criteria for PFOS range from 0.0047 to 600 ng/L depending on route of exposure (e.g., fish consumption or drinking water) and are lower than most ecological criteria for protection of aquatic and wildlife receptors. Data gaps and uncertainty in chronic toxicity and bioaccumulation of PFOS and PFOA, as well as the use of conservative assumptions regarding intake and exposure, have resulted in some criteria falling at or below ambient background concentrations and current analytical detection limits (around 1 ng/L for commercial laboratories). Some jurisdictions (e.g., Australia, Canada) have deemed uncertainty in quantifying water‐fish bioaccumulation too great and set fish tissue action levels in lieu of water criteria. Current dynamics associated with the emerging and evolving science of PFAS toxicity, exposure, and environmental fate (i.e., data gaps and uncertainty), as well as the continuous release of scientific updates, pose a challenge to setting regulatory limits. Integr Environ Assess Manag 2024;20:36–58. © 2023 AECOM Technical Services, Inc and The Authors. Integrated Environmental Assessment and Management published by Wiley Periodicals LLC on behalf of Society of Environmental Toxicology & Chemistry (SETAC).
Key Points
Surface water quality criteria (SWQC) for per‐ and polyfluorinated substances (PFAS) are currently limited.
Across the eight jurisdictions reviewed, numeric SWQC for the same compound and receptor span over five orders of magnitude as a result of different mechanistic and empirical approaches and data interpretations.
Some SWQC are below ambient background levels and analytical detection limits.
Data gaps and uncertainty in PFAS toxicity, exposure, and environmental fate, as well as rapidly evolving s |
doi_str_mv | 10.1002/ieam.4776 |
format | Article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_2802885534</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>2802885534</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c3886-e155acbbe4b04cc84233211e7dde412058a2584fd4e1ed3a4eb1e1717d8ed1763</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp1kcFu1DAQhiMEoqVw4AWQJS4gsa0dO7GX26oqUKmIA_QcTZxJ69aJU0_CKjcegWfiUXgSvNnSAxIn_x5_8481f5a9FPxYcJ6fOITuWGldPsoORVGIldRr-fhBa32QPSO64VzJXOZPswOpebnWcn2Y_br8yqBvmOtHjD2MLvTg2YDx94-fy8MQ_Nz6KcQA_nb2jKaaRugtUpKxBYtsC6mX3U3g3TgzG126OnjPNizid4dbFlo2XiNLfeNE75i9Bu-xv8Kkl9nd4J1dZhNrQ2QTYfpQ4rBLdc866OEKO-zHhY-ObhkQIdGu9jx70oInfHF_HmWXH86-nX5aXXz5eH66uVhZaUy5wrQNsHWNqubKWqNyKXMhUDcNKpHzwkBeGNU2CgU2EhTWAoUWujHYCF3Ko-zN3neI4W5CGqvOkUXvoccwUZUbnhtTFFIl9PU_6E2Y0np9ota80EWphEnU2z1lYyCK2FZDdB3EuRK82gVb7YKtdsEm9tW941R32DyQf5NMwMke2DqP8_-dqvOzzefF8g90a7KX</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>2905756418</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>US and international per‐ and polyfluoroalkyl substances surface water quality criteria: A review of the status, challenges, and implications for use in chemical management and risk assessment</title><source>Wiley Online Library - AutoHoldings Journals</source><creator>Ruffle, Betsy ; Archer, Christine ; Vosnakis, Kelly ; Butler, Josh D. ; Davis, Craig W. ; Goldsworthy, Belinda ; Parkman, Rick ; Key, Trent A.</creator><creatorcontrib>Ruffle, Betsy ; Archer, Christine ; Vosnakis, Kelly ; Butler, Josh D. ; Davis, Craig W. ; Goldsworthy, Belinda ; Parkman, Rick ; Key, Trent A.</creatorcontrib><description>Regulation of per‐ and polyfluorinated substances (PFAS) in surface water is a work‐in‐progress with relatively few criteria promulgated in the United States and internationally. Surface water quality criteria (SWQC) or screening values derived for perfluorooctane sulfonic acid (PFOS) and perfluorooctanoic acid (PFOA) by Australia, Canada, the European Union (EU), and four US states (Florida, Michigan, Minnesota, and Wisconsin), and the San Francisco Bay Regional Water Quality Control Board (SFB RWQCB; California) were compared. Across these eight jurisdictions, promulgated numeric criteria for the same compound and receptor span over five orders of magnitude as a result of different approaches and data interpretations. Human health criteria for PFOS range from 0.0047 to 600 ng/L depending on route of exposure (e.g., fish consumption or drinking water) and are lower than most ecological criteria for protection of aquatic and wildlife receptors. Data gaps and uncertainty in chronic toxicity and bioaccumulation of PFOS and PFOA, as well as the use of conservative assumptions regarding intake and exposure, have resulted in some criteria falling at or below ambient background concentrations and current analytical detection limits (around 1 ng/L for commercial laboratories). Some jurisdictions (e.g., Australia, Canada) have deemed uncertainty in quantifying water‐fish bioaccumulation too great and set fish tissue action levels in lieu of water criteria. Current dynamics associated with the emerging and evolving science of PFAS toxicity, exposure, and environmental fate (i.e., data gaps and uncertainty), as well as the continuous release of scientific updates, pose a challenge to setting regulatory limits. Integr Environ Assess Manag 2024;20:36–58. © 2023 AECOM Technical Services, Inc and The Authors. Integrated Environmental Assessment and Management published by Wiley Periodicals LLC on behalf of Society of Environmental Toxicology & Chemistry (SETAC).
Key Points
Surface water quality criteria (SWQC) for per‐ and polyfluorinated substances (PFAS) are currently limited.
Across the eight jurisdictions reviewed, numeric SWQC for the same compound and receptor span over five orders of magnitude as a result of different mechanistic and empirical approaches and data interpretations.
Some SWQC are below ambient background levels and analytical detection limits.
Data gaps and uncertainty in PFAS toxicity, exposure, and environmental fate, as well as rapidly evolving science, pose a challenge to setting regulatory limits.</description><identifier>ISSN: 1551-3777</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1551-3793</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1002/ieam.4776</identifier><identifier>PMID: 37069739</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>United States: Blackwell Publishing Ltd</publisher><subject>Animal tissues ; Bioaccumulation ; Chronic toxicity ; Criteria ; Criteria development ; Detection limits ; Drinking water ; Environmental assessment ; Environmental Impact Assessment ; Environmental management ; Exposure ; Fish ; Fish consumption ; Integrated environmental assessment ; Jurisdiction ; Perfluoroalkyl & polyfluoroalkyl substances ; Perfluorochemicals ; Perfluorooctane sulfonic acid ; Perfluorooctanoic acid ; Per‐ and polyfluoroalkyl substances ; Quality control ; Receptors ; Risk assessment ; Risk management ; Sulfonic acid ; Surface water ; Surface water quality criteria ; Technical services ; Toxicity ; Toxicology ; Uncertainty ; Water quality ; Water quality control ; Wildlife</subject><ispartof>Integrated environmental assessment and management, 2024-01, Vol.20 (1), p.36-58</ispartof><rights>2023 AECOM Technical Services, Inc and The Authors. published by Wiley Periodicals LLC on behalf of Society of Environmental Toxicology & Chemistry (SETAC).</rights><rights>2023 AECOM Technical Services, Inc and The Authors. Integrated Environmental Assessment and Management published by Wiley Periodicals LLC on behalf of Society of Environmental Toxicology & Chemistry (SETAC).</rights><rights>2023. This article is published under http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/ (the “License”). Notwithstanding the ProQuest Terms and Conditions, you may use this content in accordance with the terms of the License.</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c3886-e155acbbe4b04cc84233211e7dde412058a2584fd4e1ed3a4eb1e1717d8ed1763</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c3886-e155acbbe4b04cc84233211e7dde412058a2584fd4e1ed3a4eb1e1717d8ed1763</cites><orcidid>0000-0002-6184-2864</orcidid></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/pdf/10.1002%2Fieam.4776$$EPDF$$P50$$Gwiley$$Hfree_for_read</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/full/10.1002%2Fieam.4776$$EHTML$$P50$$Gwiley$$Hfree_for_read</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,780,784,1417,27924,27925,45574,45575</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37069739$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Ruffle, Betsy</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Archer, Christine</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Vosnakis, Kelly</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Butler, Josh D.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Davis, Craig W.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Goldsworthy, Belinda</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Parkman, Rick</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Key, Trent A.</creatorcontrib><title>US and international per‐ and polyfluoroalkyl substances surface water quality criteria: A review of the status, challenges, and implications for use in chemical management and risk assessment</title><title>Integrated environmental assessment and management</title><addtitle>Integr Environ Assess Manag</addtitle><description>Regulation of per‐ and polyfluorinated substances (PFAS) in surface water is a work‐in‐progress with relatively few criteria promulgated in the United States and internationally. Surface water quality criteria (SWQC) or screening values derived for perfluorooctane sulfonic acid (PFOS) and perfluorooctanoic acid (PFOA) by Australia, Canada, the European Union (EU), and four US states (Florida, Michigan, Minnesota, and Wisconsin), and the San Francisco Bay Regional Water Quality Control Board (SFB RWQCB; California) were compared. Across these eight jurisdictions, promulgated numeric criteria for the same compound and receptor span over five orders of magnitude as a result of different approaches and data interpretations. Human health criteria for PFOS range from 0.0047 to 600 ng/L depending on route of exposure (e.g., fish consumption or drinking water) and are lower than most ecological criteria for protection of aquatic and wildlife receptors. Data gaps and uncertainty in chronic toxicity and bioaccumulation of PFOS and PFOA, as well as the use of conservative assumptions regarding intake and exposure, have resulted in some criteria falling at or below ambient background concentrations and current analytical detection limits (around 1 ng/L for commercial laboratories). Some jurisdictions (e.g., Australia, Canada) have deemed uncertainty in quantifying water‐fish bioaccumulation too great and set fish tissue action levels in lieu of water criteria. Current dynamics associated with the emerging and evolving science of PFAS toxicity, exposure, and environmental fate (i.e., data gaps and uncertainty), as well as the continuous release of scientific updates, pose a challenge to setting regulatory limits. Integr Environ Assess Manag 2024;20:36–58. © 2023 AECOM Technical Services, Inc and The Authors. Integrated Environmental Assessment and Management published by Wiley Periodicals LLC on behalf of Society of Environmental Toxicology & Chemistry (SETAC).
Key Points
Surface water quality criteria (SWQC) for per‐ and polyfluorinated substances (PFAS) are currently limited.
Across the eight jurisdictions reviewed, numeric SWQC for the same compound and receptor span over five orders of magnitude as a result of different mechanistic and empirical approaches and data interpretations.
Some SWQC are below ambient background levels and analytical detection limits.
Data gaps and uncertainty in PFAS toxicity, exposure, and environmental fate, as well as rapidly evolving science, pose a challenge to setting regulatory limits.</description><subject>Animal tissues</subject><subject>Bioaccumulation</subject><subject>Chronic toxicity</subject><subject>Criteria</subject><subject>Criteria development</subject><subject>Detection limits</subject><subject>Drinking water</subject><subject>Environmental assessment</subject><subject>Environmental Impact Assessment</subject><subject>Environmental management</subject><subject>Exposure</subject><subject>Fish</subject><subject>Fish consumption</subject><subject>Integrated environmental assessment</subject><subject>Jurisdiction</subject><subject>Perfluoroalkyl & polyfluoroalkyl substances</subject><subject>Perfluorochemicals</subject><subject>Perfluorooctane sulfonic acid</subject><subject>Perfluorooctanoic acid</subject><subject>Per‐ and polyfluoroalkyl substances</subject><subject>Quality control</subject><subject>Receptors</subject><subject>Risk assessment</subject><subject>Risk management</subject><subject>Sulfonic acid</subject><subject>Surface water</subject><subject>Surface water quality criteria</subject><subject>Technical services</subject><subject>Toxicity</subject><subject>Toxicology</subject><subject>Uncertainty</subject><subject>Water quality</subject><subject>Water quality control</subject><subject>Wildlife</subject><issn>1551-3777</issn><issn>1551-3793</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2024</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>24P</sourceid><sourceid>WIN</sourceid><recordid>eNp1kcFu1DAQhiMEoqVw4AWQJS4gsa0dO7GX26oqUKmIA_QcTZxJ69aJU0_CKjcegWfiUXgSvNnSAxIn_x5_8481f5a9FPxYcJ6fOITuWGldPsoORVGIldRr-fhBa32QPSO64VzJXOZPswOpebnWcn2Y_br8yqBvmOtHjD2MLvTg2YDx94-fy8MQ_Nz6KcQA_nb2jKaaRugtUpKxBYtsC6mX3U3g3TgzG126OnjPNizid4dbFlo2XiNLfeNE75i9Bu-xv8Kkl9nd4J1dZhNrQ2QTYfpQ4rBLdc866OEKO-zHhY-ObhkQIdGu9jx70oInfHF_HmWXH86-nX5aXXz5eH66uVhZaUy5wrQNsHWNqubKWqNyKXMhUDcNKpHzwkBeGNU2CgU2EhTWAoUWujHYCF3Ko-zN3neI4W5CGqvOkUXvoccwUZUbnhtTFFIl9PU_6E2Y0np9ota80EWphEnU2z1lYyCK2FZDdB3EuRK82gVb7YKtdsEm9tW941R32DyQf5NMwMke2DqP8_-dqvOzzefF8g90a7KX</recordid><startdate>202401</startdate><enddate>202401</enddate><creator>Ruffle, Betsy</creator><creator>Archer, Christine</creator><creator>Vosnakis, Kelly</creator><creator>Butler, Josh D.</creator><creator>Davis, Craig W.</creator><creator>Goldsworthy, Belinda</creator><creator>Parkman, Rick</creator><creator>Key, Trent A.</creator><general>Blackwell Publishing Ltd</general><scope>24P</scope><scope>WIN</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7QH</scope><scope>7SN</scope><scope>7ST</scope><scope>7U7</scope><scope>7UA</scope><scope>C1K</scope><scope>F1W</scope><scope>H97</scope><scope>K9.</scope><scope>L.G</scope><scope>SOI</scope><scope>7X8</scope><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-6184-2864</orcidid></search><sort><creationdate>202401</creationdate><title>US and international per‐ and polyfluoroalkyl substances surface water quality criteria: A review of the status, challenges, and implications for use in chemical management and risk assessment</title><author>Ruffle, Betsy ; Archer, Christine ; Vosnakis, Kelly ; Butler, Josh D. ; Davis, Craig W. ; Goldsworthy, Belinda ; Parkman, Rick ; Key, Trent A.</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c3886-e155acbbe4b04cc84233211e7dde412058a2584fd4e1ed3a4eb1e1717d8ed1763</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2024</creationdate><topic>Animal tissues</topic><topic>Bioaccumulation</topic><topic>Chronic toxicity</topic><topic>Criteria</topic><topic>Criteria development</topic><topic>Detection limits</topic><topic>Drinking water</topic><topic>Environmental assessment</topic><topic>Environmental Impact Assessment</topic><topic>Environmental management</topic><topic>Exposure</topic><topic>Fish</topic><topic>Fish consumption</topic><topic>Integrated environmental assessment</topic><topic>Jurisdiction</topic><topic>Perfluoroalkyl & polyfluoroalkyl substances</topic><topic>Perfluorochemicals</topic><topic>Perfluorooctane sulfonic acid</topic><topic>Perfluorooctanoic acid</topic><topic>Per‐ and polyfluoroalkyl substances</topic><topic>Quality control</topic><topic>Receptors</topic><topic>Risk assessment</topic><topic>Risk management</topic><topic>Sulfonic acid</topic><topic>Surface water</topic><topic>Surface water quality criteria</topic><topic>Technical services</topic><topic>Toxicity</topic><topic>Toxicology</topic><topic>Uncertainty</topic><topic>Water quality</topic><topic>Water quality control</topic><topic>Wildlife</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Ruffle, Betsy</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Archer, Christine</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Vosnakis, Kelly</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Butler, Josh D.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Davis, Craig W.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Goldsworthy, Belinda</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Parkman, Rick</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Key, Trent A.</creatorcontrib><collection>Wiley Online Library (Open Access Collection)</collection><collection>Wiley Online Library (Open Access Collection)</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>Aqualine</collection><collection>Ecology Abstracts</collection><collection>Environment Abstracts</collection><collection>Toxicology Abstracts</collection><collection>Water Resources Abstracts</collection><collection>Environmental Sciences and Pollution Management</collection><collection>ASFA: Aquatic Sciences and Fisheries Abstracts</collection><collection>Aquatic Science & Fisheries Abstracts (ASFA) 3: Aquatic Pollution & Environmental Quality</collection><collection>ProQuest Health & Medical Complete (Alumni)</collection><collection>Aquatic Science & Fisheries Abstracts (ASFA) Professional</collection><collection>Environment Abstracts</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><jtitle>Integrated environmental assessment and management</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Ruffle, Betsy</au><au>Archer, Christine</au><au>Vosnakis, Kelly</au><au>Butler, Josh D.</au><au>Davis, Craig W.</au><au>Goldsworthy, Belinda</au><au>Parkman, Rick</au><au>Key, Trent A.</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>US and international per‐ and polyfluoroalkyl substances surface water quality criteria: A review of the status, challenges, and implications for use in chemical management and risk assessment</atitle><jtitle>Integrated environmental assessment and management</jtitle><addtitle>Integr Environ Assess Manag</addtitle><date>2024-01</date><risdate>2024</risdate><volume>20</volume><issue>1</issue><spage>36</spage><epage>58</epage><pages>36-58</pages><issn>1551-3777</issn><eissn>1551-3793</eissn><abstract>Regulation of per‐ and polyfluorinated substances (PFAS) in surface water is a work‐in‐progress with relatively few criteria promulgated in the United States and internationally. Surface water quality criteria (SWQC) or screening values derived for perfluorooctane sulfonic acid (PFOS) and perfluorooctanoic acid (PFOA) by Australia, Canada, the European Union (EU), and four US states (Florida, Michigan, Minnesota, and Wisconsin), and the San Francisco Bay Regional Water Quality Control Board (SFB RWQCB; California) were compared. Across these eight jurisdictions, promulgated numeric criteria for the same compound and receptor span over five orders of magnitude as a result of different approaches and data interpretations. Human health criteria for PFOS range from 0.0047 to 600 ng/L depending on route of exposure (e.g., fish consumption or drinking water) and are lower than most ecological criteria for protection of aquatic and wildlife receptors. Data gaps and uncertainty in chronic toxicity and bioaccumulation of PFOS and PFOA, as well as the use of conservative assumptions regarding intake and exposure, have resulted in some criteria falling at or below ambient background concentrations and current analytical detection limits (around 1 ng/L for commercial laboratories). Some jurisdictions (e.g., Australia, Canada) have deemed uncertainty in quantifying water‐fish bioaccumulation too great and set fish tissue action levels in lieu of water criteria. Current dynamics associated with the emerging and evolving science of PFAS toxicity, exposure, and environmental fate (i.e., data gaps and uncertainty), as well as the continuous release of scientific updates, pose a challenge to setting regulatory limits. Integr Environ Assess Manag 2024;20:36–58. © 2023 AECOM Technical Services, Inc and The Authors. Integrated Environmental Assessment and Management published by Wiley Periodicals LLC on behalf of Society of Environmental Toxicology & Chemistry (SETAC).
Key Points
Surface water quality criteria (SWQC) for per‐ and polyfluorinated substances (PFAS) are currently limited.
Across the eight jurisdictions reviewed, numeric SWQC for the same compound and receptor span over five orders of magnitude as a result of different mechanistic and empirical approaches and data interpretations.
Some SWQC are below ambient background levels and analytical detection limits.
Data gaps and uncertainty in PFAS toxicity, exposure, and environmental fate, as well as rapidly evolving science, pose a challenge to setting regulatory limits.</abstract><cop>United States</cop><pub>Blackwell Publishing Ltd</pub><pmid>37069739</pmid><doi>10.1002/ieam.4776</doi><tpages>23</tpages><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-6184-2864</orcidid><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | ISSN: 1551-3777 |
ispartof | Integrated environmental assessment and management, 2024-01, Vol.20 (1), p.36-58 |
issn | 1551-3777 1551-3793 |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_2802885534 |
source | Wiley Online Library - AutoHoldings Journals |
subjects | Animal tissues Bioaccumulation Chronic toxicity Criteria Criteria development Detection limits Drinking water Environmental assessment Environmental Impact Assessment Environmental management Exposure Fish Fish consumption Integrated environmental assessment Jurisdiction Perfluoroalkyl & polyfluoroalkyl substances Perfluorochemicals Perfluorooctane sulfonic acid Perfluorooctanoic acid Per‐ and polyfluoroalkyl substances Quality control Receptors Risk assessment Risk management Sulfonic acid Surface water Surface water quality criteria Technical services Toxicity Toxicology Uncertainty Water quality Water quality control Wildlife |
title | US and international per‐ and polyfluoroalkyl substances surface water quality criteria: A review of the status, challenges, and implications for use in chemical management and risk assessment |
url | https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2024-12-27T08%3A52%3A08IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=US%20and%20international%20per%E2%80%90%20and%20polyfluoroalkyl%20substances%20surface%20water%20quality%20criteria:%20A%20review%20of%20the%20status,%20challenges,%20and%20implications%20for%20use%20in%20chemical%20management%20and%20risk%20assessment&rft.jtitle=Integrated%20environmental%20assessment%20and%20management&rft.au=Ruffle,%20Betsy&rft.date=2024-01&rft.volume=20&rft.issue=1&rft.spage=36&rft.epage=58&rft.pages=36-58&rft.issn=1551-3777&rft.eissn=1551-3793&rft_id=info:doi/10.1002/ieam.4776&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E2802885534%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=2905756418&rft_id=info:pmid/37069739&rfr_iscdi=true |