Does a three-hour delayed pushing benefit the mode of delivery?

Does a three-hour delayed pushing benefit the mode of delivery?

The objective of this study was to compare two strategies for passive second stage management: three-hour vs two-hour delayed pushing after the diagnosis of full cervical dilation on mode of delivery and perinatal outcomes. This retrospective observational study included low-risk nulliparous women w...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Journal of gynecology obstetrics and human reproduction 2023-06, Vol.52 (6), p.102589-102589, Article 102589
Hauptverfasser: Rollet, C, Chantry, AA, Azria, E, Le Ray, C, Girault, A
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Delayed pushing
Labor
Low risk
Primiparous
Second stage
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page 102589
container_issue 6
container_start_page 102589
container_title Journal of gynecology obstetrics and human reproduction
container_volume 52
creator Rollet, C
Chantry, AA
Azria, E
Le Ray, C
Girault, A
description The objective of this study was to compare two strategies for passive second stage management: three-hour vs two-hour delayed pushing after the diagnosis of full cervical dilation on mode of delivery and perinatal outcomes. This retrospective observational study included low-risk nulliparous women who reatched full cervical dilation under epidural analgesia with a single term fetus in cephalic presentation and normal fetal heart rate, between September and December 2016. Mode of delivery (spontaneous vaginal delivery versus operative delivery including cesarean section and instrumental vaginal delivery) and perinatal outcomes (post-partum hemorrhage, perineal lacerations, 5-min Apgar score, umbilical cord pH and transfer to neonatal intensive care unit) were compared between two maternity units: maternity unit A, where women could have up to a three-hour delayed pushing period after full cervical dilation diagnosis, and maternity unit B, where the delayed pushing period was a maximum of 2 h. Outcomes were compared using univariate and multivariable analyses. Adjusted odds ratios (aOR) were estimated using a logistic regression multivariable model that included potential cofounders. During the study period, 614 women were included, 305 in maternity unit A and 309 in maternity unit B. Women's pre-existing characteristics were comparable between the two maternity units. Women delivering in the maternity unit A had significantly lower risks of having an operative delivery compared to women delivering in the maternity unit B (respectively 18.4 vs 26.9%; aOR = 0.64; 95%CI [0.43 – 0.96]). Perinatal outcomes were comparable in the two maternity units, particularly in terms of post-partum hemorrhage rates (7.4 vs 7.8%; aOR = 1,19 [0.65 - 2.19]). Increasing the possible length of the delayed pushing period from 2 to 3 h after the diagnosis of full cervical dilation in low-risk nulliparous women appears to reduce operative deliveries without adverse effects on maternal or neonatal morbidity.
doi_str_mv 10.1016/j.jogoh.2023.102589
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_2801980837</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><els_id>S2468784723000569</els_id><sourcerecordid>2801980837</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c404t-8d4181f5f138cfb5a770c0727180920d7c53545dec7a38fc7f2d98a10d26ad603</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp9kE1LAzEQhoMotmh_gSB79LJ1kuxusgcpUj-h4EXPIU0mbUrb1GS30H_v1lbx5GmG4XlnmIeQKwpDCrS6XQwXYRbmQwaMdxNWyvqE9FlRyVzIQpz-6XtkkNICAKhkVcWrc9LjAsqaA_TJ6CFgynTWzCNiPg9tzCwu9Q5ttmnT3K9n2RTX6HzTIZitgsUsuD3jtxh3o0ty5vQy4eBYL8jH0-P7-CWfvD2_ju8nuSmgaHJpCyqpKx3l0rhpqYUAA4IJKqFmYIUpeVmUFo3QXDojHLO11BQsq7StgF-Qm8PeTQyfLaZGrXwyuFzqNYY2KSaB1hIkFx3KD6iJIaWITm2iX-m4UxTUXp5aqG95ai9PHeR1qevjgXa6Qvub-VHVAXcHALs3tx6jSsbj2qD1EU2jbPD_HvgCUUZ_Jg</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>2801980837</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Does a three-hour delayed pushing benefit the mode of delivery?</title><source>Alma/SFX Local Collection</source><creator>Rollet, C ; Chantry, AA ; Azria, E ; Le Ray, C ; Girault, A</creator><creatorcontrib>Rollet, C ; Chantry, AA ; Azria, E ; Le Ray, C ; Girault, A</creatorcontrib><description>The objective of this study was to compare two strategies for passive second stage management: three-hour vs two-hour delayed pushing after the diagnosis of full cervical dilation on mode of delivery and perinatal outcomes. This retrospective observational study included low-risk nulliparous women who reatched full cervical dilation under epidural analgesia with a single term fetus in cephalic presentation and normal fetal heart rate, between September and December 2016. Mode of delivery (spontaneous vaginal delivery versus operative delivery including cesarean section and instrumental vaginal delivery) and perinatal outcomes (post-partum hemorrhage, perineal lacerations, 5-min Apgar score, umbilical cord pH and transfer to neonatal intensive care unit) were compared between two maternity units: maternity unit A, where women could have up to a three-hour delayed pushing period after full cervical dilation diagnosis, and maternity unit B, where the delayed pushing period was a maximum of 2 h. Outcomes were compared using univariate and multivariable analyses. Adjusted odds ratios (aOR) were estimated using a logistic regression multivariable model that included potential cofounders. During the study period, 614 women were included, 305 in maternity unit A and 309 in maternity unit B. Women's pre-existing characteristics were comparable between the two maternity units. Women delivering in the maternity unit A had significantly lower risks of having an operative delivery compared to women delivering in the maternity unit B (respectively 18.4 vs 26.9%; aOR = 0.64; 95%CI [0.43 – 0.96]). Perinatal outcomes were comparable in the two maternity units, particularly in terms of post-partum hemorrhage rates (7.4 vs 7.8%; aOR = 1,19 [0.65 - 2.19]). Increasing the possible length of the delayed pushing period from 2 to 3 h after the diagnosis of full cervical dilation in low-risk nulliparous women appears to reduce operative deliveries without adverse effects on maternal or neonatal morbidity.</description><identifier>ISSN: 2468-7847</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 2468-7847</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1016/j.jogoh.2023.102589</identifier><identifier>PMID: 37059300</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>France: Elsevier Masson SAS</publisher><subject>Delayed pushing ; Labor ; Low risk ; Primiparous ; Second stage</subject><ispartof>Journal of gynecology obstetrics and human reproduction, 2023-06, Vol.52 (6), p.102589-102589, Article 102589</ispartof><rights>2023 Elsevier Masson SAS</rights><rights>Copyright © 2023 Elsevier Masson SAS. All rights reserved.</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c404t-8d4181f5f138cfb5a770c0727180920d7c53545dec7a38fc7f2d98a10d26ad603</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c404t-8d4181f5f138cfb5a770c0727180920d7c53545dec7a38fc7f2d98a10d26ad603</cites><orcidid>0000-0002-2637-4065</orcidid></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><link.rule.ids>314,776,780,27901,27902</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37059300$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Rollet, C</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Chantry, AA</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Azria, E</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Le Ray, C</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Girault, A</creatorcontrib><title>Does a three-hour delayed pushing benefit the mode of delivery?</title><title>Journal of gynecology obstetrics and human reproduction</title><addtitle>J Gynecol Obstet Hum Reprod</addtitle><description>The objective of this study was to compare two strategies for passive second stage management: three-hour vs two-hour delayed pushing after the diagnosis of full cervical dilation on mode of delivery and perinatal outcomes. This retrospective observational study included low-risk nulliparous women who reatched full cervical dilation under epidural analgesia with a single term fetus in cephalic presentation and normal fetal heart rate, between September and December 2016. Mode of delivery (spontaneous vaginal delivery versus operative delivery including cesarean section and instrumental vaginal delivery) and perinatal outcomes (post-partum hemorrhage, perineal lacerations, 5-min Apgar score, umbilical cord pH and transfer to neonatal intensive care unit) were compared between two maternity units: maternity unit A, where women could have up to a three-hour delayed pushing period after full cervical dilation diagnosis, and maternity unit B, where the delayed pushing period was a maximum of 2 h. Outcomes were compared using univariate and multivariable analyses. Adjusted odds ratios (aOR) were estimated using a logistic regression multivariable model that included potential cofounders. During the study period, 614 women were included, 305 in maternity unit A and 309 in maternity unit B. Women's pre-existing characteristics were comparable between the two maternity units. Women delivering in the maternity unit A had significantly lower risks of having an operative delivery compared to women delivering in the maternity unit B (respectively 18.4 vs 26.9%; aOR = 0.64; 95%CI [0.43 – 0.96]). Perinatal outcomes were comparable in the two maternity units, particularly in terms of post-partum hemorrhage rates (7.4 vs 7.8%; aOR = 1,19 [0.65 - 2.19]). Increasing the possible length of the delayed pushing period from 2 to 3 h after the diagnosis of full cervical dilation in low-risk nulliparous women appears to reduce operative deliveries without adverse effects on maternal or neonatal morbidity.</description><subject>Delayed pushing</subject><subject>Labor</subject><subject>Low risk</subject><subject>Primiparous</subject><subject>Second stage</subject><issn>2468-7847</issn><issn>2468-7847</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2023</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><recordid>eNp9kE1LAzEQhoMotmh_gSB79LJ1kuxusgcpUj-h4EXPIU0mbUrb1GS30H_v1lbx5GmG4XlnmIeQKwpDCrS6XQwXYRbmQwaMdxNWyvqE9FlRyVzIQpz-6XtkkNICAKhkVcWrc9LjAsqaA_TJ6CFgynTWzCNiPg9tzCwu9Q5ttmnT3K9n2RTX6HzTIZitgsUsuD3jtxh3o0ty5vQy4eBYL8jH0-P7-CWfvD2_ju8nuSmgaHJpCyqpKx3l0rhpqYUAA4IJKqFmYIUpeVmUFo3QXDojHLO11BQsq7StgF-Qm8PeTQyfLaZGrXwyuFzqNYY2KSaB1hIkFx3KD6iJIaWITm2iX-m4UxTUXp5aqG95ai9PHeR1qevjgXa6Qvub-VHVAXcHALs3tx6jSsbj2qD1EU2jbPD_HvgCUUZ_Jg</recordid><startdate>202306</startdate><enddate>202306</enddate><creator>Rollet, C</creator><creator>Chantry, AA</creator><creator>Azria, E</creator><creator>Le Ray, C</creator><creator>Girault, A</creator><general>Elsevier Masson SAS</general><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7X8</scope><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-2637-4065</orcidid></search><sort><creationdate>202306</creationdate><title>Does a three-hour delayed pushing benefit the mode of delivery?</title><author>Rollet, C ; Chantry, AA ; Azria, E ; Le Ray, C ; Girault, A</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c404t-8d4181f5f138cfb5a770c0727180920d7c53545dec7a38fc7f2d98a10d26ad603</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2023</creationdate><topic>Delayed pushing</topic><topic>Labor</topic><topic>Low risk</topic><topic>Primiparous</topic><topic>Second stage</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Rollet, C</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Chantry, AA</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Azria, E</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Le Ray, C</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Girault, A</creatorcontrib><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><jtitle>Journal of gynecology obstetrics and human reproduction</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Rollet, C</au><au>Chantry, AA</au><au>Azria, E</au><au>Le Ray, C</au><au>Girault, A</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Does a three-hour delayed pushing benefit the mode of delivery?</atitle><jtitle>Journal of gynecology obstetrics and human reproduction</jtitle><addtitle>J Gynecol Obstet Hum Reprod</addtitle><date>2023-06</date><risdate>2023</risdate><volume>52</volume><issue>6</issue><spage>102589</spage><epage>102589</epage><pages>102589-102589</pages><artnum>102589</artnum><issn>2468-7847</issn><eissn>2468-7847</eissn><abstract>The objective of this study was to compare two strategies for passive second stage management: three-hour vs two-hour delayed pushing after the diagnosis of full cervical dilation on mode of delivery and perinatal outcomes. This retrospective observational study included low-risk nulliparous women who reatched full cervical dilation under epidural analgesia with a single term fetus in cephalic presentation and normal fetal heart rate, between September and December 2016. Mode of delivery (spontaneous vaginal delivery versus operative delivery including cesarean section and instrumental vaginal delivery) and perinatal outcomes (post-partum hemorrhage, perineal lacerations, 5-min Apgar score, umbilical cord pH and transfer to neonatal intensive care unit) were compared between two maternity units: maternity unit A, where women could have up to a three-hour delayed pushing period after full cervical dilation diagnosis, and maternity unit B, where the delayed pushing period was a maximum of 2 h. Outcomes were compared using univariate and multivariable analyses. Adjusted odds ratios (aOR) were estimated using a logistic regression multivariable model that included potential cofounders. During the study period, 614 women were included, 305 in maternity unit A and 309 in maternity unit B. Women's pre-existing characteristics were comparable between the two maternity units. Women delivering in the maternity unit A had significantly lower risks of having an operative delivery compared to women delivering in the maternity unit B (respectively 18.4 vs 26.9%; aOR = 0.64; 95%CI [0.43 – 0.96]). Perinatal outcomes were comparable in the two maternity units, particularly in terms of post-partum hemorrhage rates (7.4 vs 7.8%; aOR = 1,19 [0.65 - 2.19]). Increasing the possible length of the delayed pushing period from 2 to 3 h after the diagnosis of full cervical dilation in low-risk nulliparous women appears to reduce operative deliveries without adverse effects on maternal or neonatal morbidity.</abstract><cop>France</cop><pub>Elsevier Masson SAS</pub><pmid>37059300</pmid><doi>10.1016/j.jogoh.2023.102589</doi><tpages>1</tpages><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-2637-4065</orcidid><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 2468-7847
ispartof Journal of gynecology obstetrics and human reproduction, 2023-06, Vol.52 (6), p.102589-102589, Article 102589
issn 2468-7847
2468-7847
language eng
recordid cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_2801980837
source Alma/SFX Local Collection
subjects Delayed pushing
Labor
Low risk
Primiparous
Second stage
title Does a three-hour delayed pushing benefit the mode of delivery?
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-02-09T07%3A00%3A18IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Does%20a%20three-hour%20delayed%20pushing%20benefit%20the%20mode%20of%20delivery?&rft.jtitle=Journal%20of%20gynecology%20obstetrics%20and%20human%20reproduction&rft.au=Rollet,%20C&rft.date=2023-06&rft.volume=52&rft.issue=6&rft.spage=102589&rft.epage=102589&rft.pages=102589-102589&rft.artnum=102589&rft.issn=2468-7847&rft.eissn=2468-7847&rft_id=info:doi/10.1016/j.jogoh.2023.102589&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E2801980837%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=2801980837&rft_id=info:pmid/37059300&rft_els_id=S2468784723000569&rfr_iscdi=true