Bariatric Surgeon Perspective on Revisional Bariatric Surgery (RBS) for Weight Recurrence
Weight recurrence (WR) after bariatric surgery occurs in nearly 20% of patients. Revisional bariatric surgery (RBS) may benefit this population but remains controversial among surgeons. Explore surgeon perspectives and practices for patients with WR after primary bariatric surgery (PBS). Web-based s...
Gespeichert in:
| Veröffentlicht in: | Surgery for obesity and related diseases 2023-09, Vol.19 (9), p.972-979 |
|---|---|
| Hauptverfasser: | , , , , , , , , , |
| Format: | Artikel |
| Sprache: | eng |
| Schlagworte: | |
| Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
| Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
| container_end_page | 979 |
|---|---|
| container_issue | 9 |
| container_start_page | 972 |
| container_title | Surgery for obesity and related diseases |
| container_volume | 19 |
| creator | Giannopoulos, Spyridon Kapsampelis, Panagiotis Pokala, Bhavani Nault Connors, Jill D. Hilgendorf, William Timsina, Lava Clapp, Benjamin Ghanem, Omar Kindel, Tammy L. Stefanidis, Dimitrios |
| description | Weight recurrence (WR) after bariatric surgery occurs in nearly 20% of patients. Revisional bariatric surgery (RBS) may benefit this population but remains controversial among surgeons.
Explore surgeon perspectives and practices for patients with WR after primary bariatric surgery (PBS).
Web-based survey of bariatric surgeons.
A 21-item survey was piloted and posted on social media closed groups (Facebook) utilized by bariatric surgeons. Survey items included demographic information, questions pertaining to the definition of suboptimal and satisfactory response to bariatric surgery, and general questions related to different WR management options.
One hundred ten surgeons from 19 countries responded to the survey. Ninety-eight percent responded that WR was multifactorial, including behavioral and biological factors. Failure of PBS was defined as excess weight loss < 50% by 31.4%, as excess weight loss |
| doi_str_mv | 10.1016/j.soard.2023.02.027 |
| format | Article |
| fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_2801980225</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><els_id>S1550728923001211</els_id><sourcerecordid>2801980225</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c274t-6e949785ccfae2801f52e96f00d0b068fefc158a06ad7f74af32a6e2fe29291a3</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp9kE1LAzEQQIMotlZ_gSB7rIetk6S72T14sMUvKCitIp5Cmp3UlG23JruF_ntTWz14EAZmBt7MMI-Qcwo9CjS9mvd8pVzRY8B4D1gIcUDaNBNZLBLOD0OdJBALluUtcuL9HICniWDHpMUFpLTPRZu8D5SzqnZWR5PGzbBaRs_o_Ap1bdcYhXaMa-tttVRl9Id1m6g7HkwuI1O56A3t7KMOtG6cw6XGU3JkVOnxbJ875PXu9mX4EI-e7h-HN6NYM9Gv4xTzfi6yRGujkGVATcIwTw1AAVNIM4NG0yRTkKpCGNFXhjOVIjPIcpZTxTuku9u7ctVng76WC-s1lqVaYtV4ud2ZZ8BYElC-Q7WrvHdo5MrZhXIbSUFuncq5_HYqt04lsBAiTF3sDzTTBRa_Mz8SA3C9AzC8ubbopNd2q6CwLniURWX_PfAFqciJKw</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>2801980225</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Bariatric Surgeon Perspective on Revisional Bariatric Surgery (RBS) for Weight Recurrence</title><source>Elsevier ScienceDirect Journals</source><creator>Giannopoulos, Spyridon ; Kapsampelis, Panagiotis ; Pokala, Bhavani ; Nault Connors, Jill D. ; Hilgendorf, William ; Timsina, Lava ; Clapp, Benjamin ; Ghanem, Omar ; Kindel, Tammy L. ; Stefanidis, Dimitrios</creator><creatorcontrib>Giannopoulos, Spyridon ; Kapsampelis, Panagiotis ; Pokala, Bhavani ; Nault Connors, Jill D. ; Hilgendorf, William ; Timsina, Lava ; Clapp, Benjamin ; Ghanem, Omar ; Kindel, Tammy L. ; Stefanidis, Dimitrios</creatorcontrib><description>Weight recurrence (WR) after bariatric surgery occurs in nearly 20% of patients. Revisional bariatric surgery (RBS) may benefit this population but remains controversial among surgeons.
Explore surgeon perspectives and practices for patients with WR after primary bariatric surgery (PBS).
Web-based survey of bariatric surgeons.
A 21-item survey was piloted and posted on social media closed groups (Facebook) utilized by bariatric surgeons. Survey items included demographic information, questions pertaining to the definition of suboptimal and satisfactory response to bariatric surgery, and general questions related to different WR management options.
One hundred ten surgeons from 19 countries responded to the survey. Ninety-eight percent responded that WR was multifactorial, including behavioral and biological factors. Failure of PBS was defined as excess weight loss < 50% by 31.4%, as excess weight loss <25% by 12.8%, and as comorbidity recurrence by 17.4%. Surgeon responses differed significantly by gender (P = .036). 29.4% believed RBS was not successful, while 14.1% were unsure. Nevertheless, 73% reported that they would perform RBS if sufficient evidence of benefit existed. Most frequently performed revisional procedures included conversion of sleeve gastrectomy to Roux-en-Y gastric bypass (RYGB), adjustable gastric band to RYGB, and RYGB revision (21.9% versus 18.2% versus 15.3%, respectively).
This survey demonstrates significant variability in surgeon perception regarding causes and the effectiveness of RBS. Moreover, they disagree on what constitutes a nonsatisfactory response to PBS and to whom they offer RBS. These findings may relate to limited available clinical evidence on best management options for this patient population. Clinical trials investigating the comparative effectiveness of various treatment options are needed.
•Ninety-eight percent of surgeons suggested that WR is multifactorial.•Conversion of sleeve gastrectomy to RYGB was the most common RBS (22%).•Failure of PBS was defined as EWL<50% by 31%.•The definition of failure of PBS differed significantly by surgeon gender.</description><identifier>ISSN: 1550-7289</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1878-7533</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1016/j.soard.2023.02.027</identifier><identifier>PMID: 37061437</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>United States: Elsevier Inc</publisher><subject>Revisional bariatric surgery ; Surgeon perspectives ; Survey ; Weight recurrence</subject><ispartof>Surgery for obesity and related diseases, 2023-09, Vol.19 (9), p.972-979</ispartof><rights>2023 American Society for Metabolic and Bariatric Surgery</rights><rights>Copyright © 2023 American Society for Metabolic and Bariatric Surgery. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c274t-6e949785ccfae2801f52e96f00d0b068fefc158a06ad7f74af32a6e2fe29291a3</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c274t-6e949785ccfae2801f52e96f00d0b068fefc158a06ad7f74af32a6e2fe29291a3</cites><orcidid>0000-0002-9892-4708 ; 0000-0002-6709-1192 ; 0000-0001-7489-7189 ; 0000-0001-5144-0274 ; 0000-0002-5725-8497 ; 0000-0002-0120-8650 ; 0000-0002-2177-0763 ; 0000-0003-0497-0736</orcidid></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1550728923001211$$EHTML$$P50$$Gelsevier$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,776,780,3536,27903,27904,65309</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37061437$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Giannopoulos, Spyridon</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Kapsampelis, Panagiotis</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Pokala, Bhavani</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Nault Connors, Jill D.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Hilgendorf, William</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Timsina, Lava</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Clapp, Benjamin</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Ghanem, Omar</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Kindel, Tammy L.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Stefanidis, Dimitrios</creatorcontrib><title>Bariatric Surgeon Perspective on Revisional Bariatric Surgery (RBS) for Weight Recurrence</title><title>Surgery for obesity and related diseases</title><addtitle>Surg Obes Relat Dis</addtitle><description>Weight recurrence (WR) after bariatric surgery occurs in nearly 20% of patients. Revisional bariatric surgery (RBS) may benefit this population but remains controversial among surgeons.
Explore surgeon perspectives and practices for patients with WR after primary bariatric surgery (PBS).
Web-based survey of bariatric surgeons.
A 21-item survey was piloted and posted on social media closed groups (Facebook) utilized by bariatric surgeons. Survey items included demographic information, questions pertaining to the definition of suboptimal and satisfactory response to bariatric surgery, and general questions related to different WR management options.
One hundred ten surgeons from 19 countries responded to the survey. Ninety-eight percent responded that WR was multifactorial, including behavioral and biological factors. Failure of PBS was defined as excess weight loss < 50% by 31.4%, as excess weight loss <25% by 12.8%, and as comorbidity recurrence by 17.4%. Surgeon responses differed significantly by gender (P = .036). 29.4% believed RBS was not successful, while 14.1% were unsure. Nevertheless, 73% reported that they would perform RBS if sufficient evidence of benefit existed. Most frequently performed revisional procedures included conversion of sleeve gastrectomy to Roux-en-Y gastric bypass (RYGB), adjustable gastric band to RYGB, and RYGB revision (21.9% versus 18.2% versus 15.3%, respectively).
This survey demonstrates significant variability in surgeon perception regarding causes and the effectiveness of RBS. Moreover, they disagree on what constitutes a nonsatisfactory response to PBS and to whom they offer RBS. These findings may relate to limited available clinical evidence on best management options for this patient population. Clinical trials investigating the comparative effectiveness of various treatment options are needed.
•Ninety-eight percent of surgeons suggested that WR is multifactorial.•Conversion of sleeve gastrectomy to RYGB was the most common RBS (22%).•Failure of PBS was defined as EWL<50% by 31%.•The definition of failure of PBS differed significantly by surgeon gender.</description><subject>Revisional bariatric surgery</subject><subject>Surgeon perspectives</subject><subject>Survey</subject><subject>Weight recurrence</subject><issn>1550-7289</issn><issn>1878-7533</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2023</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><recordid>eNp9kE1LAzEQQIMotlZ_gSB7rIetk6S72T14sMUvKCitIp5Cmp3UlG23JruF_ntTWz14EAZmBt7MMI-Qcwo9CjS9mvd8pVzRY8B4D1gIcUDaNBNZLBLOD0OdJBALluUtcuL9HICniWDHpMUFpLTPRZu8D5SzqnZWR5PGzbBaRs_o_Ap1bdcYhXaMa-tttVRl9Id1m6g7HkwuI1O56A3t7KMOtG6cw6XGU3JkVOnxbJ875PXu9mX4EI-e7h-HN6NYM9Gv4xTzfi6yRGujkGVATcIwTw1AAVNIM4NG0yRTkKpCGNFXhjOVIjPIcpZTxTuku9u7ctVng76WC-s1lqVaYtV4ud2ZZ8BYElC-Q7WrvHdo5MrZhXIbSUFuncq5_HYqt04lsBAiTF3sDzTTBRa_Mz8SA3C9AzC8ubbopNd2q6CwLniURWX_PfAFqciJKw</recordid><startdate>20230901</startdate><enddate>20230901</enddate><creator>Giannopoulos, Spyridon</creator><creator>Kapsampelis, Panagiotis</creator><creator>Pokala, Bhavani</creator><creator>Nault Connors, Jill D.</creator><creator>Hilgendorf, William</creator><creator>Timsina, Lava</creator><creator>Clapp, Benjamin</creator><creator>Ghanem, Omar</creator><creator>Kindel, Tammy L.</creator><creator>Stefanidis, Dimitrios</creator><general>Elsevier Inc</general><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7X8</scope><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-9892-4708</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-6709-1192</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0001-7489-7189</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0001-5144-0274</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-5725-8497</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-0120-8650</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-2177-0763</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0003-0497-0736</orcidid></search><sort><creationdate>20230901</creationdate><title>Bariatric Surgeon Perspective on Revisional Bariatric Surgery (RBS) for Weight Recurrence</title><author>Giannopoulos, Spyridon ; Kapsampelis, Panagiotis ; Pokala, Bhavani ; Nault Connors, Jill D. ; Hilgendorf, William ; Timsina, Lava ; Clapp, Benjamin ; Ghanem, Omar ; Kindel, Tammy L. ; Stefanidis, Dimitrios</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c274t-6e949785ccfae2801f52e96f00d0b068fefc158a06ad7f74af32a6e2fe29291a3</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2023</creationdate><topic>Revisional bariatric surgery</topic><topic>Surgeon perspectives</topic><topic>Survey</topic><topic>Weight recurrence</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Giannopoulos, Spyridon</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Kapsampelis, Panagiotis</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Pokala, Bhavani</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Nault Connors, Jill D.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Hilgendorf, William</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Timsina, Lava</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Clapp, Benjamin</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Ghanem, Omar</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Kindel, Tammy L.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Stefanidis, Dimitrios</creatorcontrib><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><jtitle>Surgery for obesity and related diseases</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Giannopoulos, Spyridon</au><au>Kapsampelis, Panagiotis</au><au>Pokala, Bhavani</au><au>Nault Connors, Jill D.</au><au>Hilgendorf, William</au><au>Timsina, Lava</au><au>Clapp, Benjamin</au><au>Ghanem, Omar</au><au>Kindel, Tammy L.</au><au>Stefanidis, Dimitrios</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Bariatric Surgeon Perspective on Revisional Bariatric Surgery (RBS) for Weight Recurrence</atitle><jtitle>Surgery for obesity and related diseases</jtitle><addtitle>Surg Obes Relat Dis</addtitle><date>2023-09-01</date><risdate>2023</risdate><volume>19</volume><issue>9</issue><spage>972</spage><epage>979</epage><pages>972-979</pages><issn>1550-7289</issn><eissn>1878-7533</eissn><abstract>Weight recurrence (WR) after bariatric surgery occurs in nearly 20% of patients. Revisional bariatric surgery (RBS) may benefit this population but remains controversial among surgeons.
Explore surgeon perspectives and practices for patients with WR after primary bariatric surgery (PBS).
Web-based survey of bariatric surgeons.
A 21-item survey was piloted and posted on social media closed groups (Facebook) utilized by bariatric surgeons. Survey items included demographic information, questions pertaining to the definition of suboptimal and satisfactory response to bariatric surgery, and general questions related to different WR management options.
One hundred ten surgeons from 19 countries responded to the survey. Ninety-eight percent responded that WR was multifactorial, including behavioral and biological factors. Failure of PBS was defined as excess weight loss < 50% by 31.4%, as excess weight loss <25% by 12.8%, and as comorbidity recurrence by 17.4%. Surgeon responses differed significantly by gender (P = .036). 29.4% believed RBS was not successful, while 14.1% were unsure. Nevertheless, 73% reported that they would perform RBS if sufficient evidence of benefit existed. Most frequently performed revisional procedures included conversion of sleeve gastrectomy to Roux-en-Y gastric bypass (RYGB), adjustable gastric band to RYGB, and RYGB revision (21.9% versus 18.2% versus 15.3%, respectively).
This survey demonstrates significant variability in surgeon perception regarding causes and the effectiveness of RBS. Moreover, they disagree on what constitutes a nonsatisfactory response to PBS and to whom they offer RBS. These findings may relate to limited available clinical evidence on best management options for this patient population. Clinical trials investigating the comparative effectiveness of various treatment options are needed.
•Ninety-eight percent of surgeons suggested that WR is multifactorial.•Conversion of sleeve gastrectomy to RYGB was the most common RBS (22%).•Failure of PBS was defined as EWL<50% by 31%.•The definition of failure of PBS differed significantly by surgeon gender.</abstract><cop>United States</cop><pub>Elsevier Inc</pub><pmid>37061437</pmid><doi>10.1016/j.soard.2023.02.027</doi><tpages>8</tpages><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-9892-4708</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-6709-1192</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0001-7489-7189</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0001-5144-0274</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-5725-8497</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-0120-8650</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-2177-0763</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0003-0497-0736</orcidid></addata></record> |
| fulltext | fulltext |
| identifier | ISSN: 1550-7289 |
| ispartof | Surgery for obesity and related diseases, 2023-09, Vol.19 (9), p.972-979 |
| issn | 1550-7289 1878-7533 |
| language | eng |
| recordid | cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_2801980225 |
| source | Elsevier ScienceDirect Journals |
| subjects | Revisional bariatric surgery Surgeon perspectives Survey Weight recurrence |
| title | Bariatric Surgeon Perspective on Revisional Bariatric Surgery (RBS) for Weight Recurrence |
| url | https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-26T09%3A48%3A56IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Bariatric%20Surgeon%20Perspective%20on%20Revisional%20Bariatric%20Surgery%20(RBS)%20for%20Weight%20Recurrence&rft.jtitle=Surgery%20for%20obesity%20and%20related%20diseases&rft.au=Giannopoulos,%20Spyridon&rft.date=2023-09-01&rft.volume=19&rft.issue=9&rft.spage=972&rft.epage=979&rft.pages=972-979&rft.issn=1550-7289&rft.eissn=1878-7533&rft_id=info:doi/10.1016/j.soard.2023.02.027&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E2801980225%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=2801980225&rft_id=info:pmid/37061437&rft_els_id=S1550728923001211&rfr_iscdi=true |