Evaluation of Models for Estimating Hydraulic Conductivity in Glacial Aquifers with NMR Logging

Nuclear magnetic resonance (NMR) logging is a promising method for estimating hydraulic conductivity (K). During the past ∼60 years, NMR logging has been used for petroleum applications, and different models have been developed for deriving estimates of permeability. These models involve calibration...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Ground water 2023-11, Vol.61 (6), p.778-792
Hauptverfasser: Kendrick, Alexander K, Knight, Rosemary, Johnson, Carole D, Liu, Gaisheng, Hart, David J, Butler, Jr, James J, Hunt, Randall J
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page 792
container_issue 6
container_start_page 778
container_title Ground water
container_volume 61
creator Kendrick, Alexander K
Knight, Rosemary
Johnson, Carole D
Liu, Gaisheng
Hart, David J
Butler, Jr, James J
Hunt, Randall J
description Nuclear magnetic resonance (NMR) logging is a promising method for estimating hydraulic conductivity (K). During the past ∼60 years, NMR logging has been used for petroleum applications, and different models have been developed for deriving estimates of permeability. These models involve calibration parameters whose values were determined through decades of research on sandstones and carbonates. We assessed the use of five models to derive estimates of K in glacial aquifers from NMR logging data acquired in two wells at each of two field sites in central Wisconsin, USA. Measurements of K, obtained with a direct push permeameter (DPP), K , were used to obtain the calibration parameters in the Schlumberger-Doll Research, Seevers, Timur-Coates, Kozeny-Godefroy, and sum-of-echoes (SOE) models so as to predict K from the NMR data; and were also used to assess the ability of the models to predict K . We obtained four well-scale calibration parameter values for each model using the NMR and DPP measurements in each well; and one study-scale parameter value for each model by using all data. The SOE model achieved an agreement with K that matched or exceeded that of the other models. The Timur-Coates estimates of K were found to be substantially different from K . Although the well-scale parameter values for the Schlumberger-Doll, Seevers, and SOE models were found to vary by less than a factor of 2, more research is needed to confirm their general applicability so that site-specific calibration is not required to obtain accurate estimates of K from NMR logging data.
doi_str_mv 10.1111/gwat.13318
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_2801977335</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>2881363580</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-a374t-1772aeb150eb5025590d6022f9804a5b875691ecb5e96155919e064490a265283</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNpdkEFLwzAUx4Mobk4vfgAJeBGh86VpmuYoY27CpiAK3krapjWja7ak3di3N3PTg-_yDv_f-_P4IXRNYEj8PFRb2Q4JpSQ5QX3CIxbELIlOUR-A8CCK-WcPXTi3AAAqQJyjHuXAOA9FH6Xjjaw72WrTYFPiuSlU7XBpLB67Vi990FR4uius7Gqd45Fpii5v9Ua3O6wbPKllrmWNH9edLpV1eKvbL_wyf8MzU1X-9hKdlbJ26uq4B-jjafw-mgaz18nz6HEWSMqjNiD-G6kywkBlDELGBBQxhGEpEogkyxLOYkFUnjElYuJjIhTEUSRAhjELEzpAd4felTXrTrk2XWqXq7qWjTKdS8MEiOCcUubR23_ownS28d95KiE0piwBT90fqNwa56wq05X1PuwuJZDutad77emPdg_fHCu7bKmKP_TXM_0GNTZ7sA</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>2881363580</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Evaluation of Models for Estimating Hydraulic Conductivity in Glacial Aquifers with NMR Logging</title><source>Access via Wiley Online Library</source><creator>Kendrick, Alexander K ; Knight, Rosemary ; Johnson, Carole D ; Liu, Gaisheng ; Hart, David J ; Butler, Jr, James J ; Hunt, Randall J</creator><creatorcontrib>Kendrick, Alexander K ; Knight, Rosemary ; Johnson, Carole D ; Liu, Gaisheng ; Hart, David J ; Butler, Jr, James J ; Hunt, Randall J</creatorcontrib><description>Nuclear magnetic resonance (NMR) logging is a promising method for estimating hydraulic conductivity (K). During the past ∼60 years, NMR logging has been used for petroleum applications, and different models have been developed for deriving estimates of permeability. These models involve calibration parameters whose values were determined through decades of research on sandstones and carbonates. We assessed the use of five models to derive estimates of K in glacial aquifers from NMR logging data acquired in two wells at each of two field sites in central Wisconsin, USA. Measurements of K, obtained with a direct push permeameter (DPP), K , were used to obtain the calibration parameters in the Schlumberger-Doll Research, Seevers, Timur-Coates, Kozeny-Godefroy, and sum-of-echoes (SOE) models so as to predict K from the NMR data; and were also used to assess the ability of the models to predict K . We obtained four well-scale calibration parameter values for each model using the NMR and DPP measurements in each well; and one study-scale parameter value for each model by using all data. The SOE model achieved an agreement with K that matched or exceeded that of the other models. The Timur-Coates estimates of K were found to be substantially different from K . Although the well-scale parameter values for the Schlumberger-Doll, Seevers, and SOE models were found to vary by less than a factor of 2, more research is needed to confirm their general applicability so that site-specific calibration is not required to obtain accurate estimates of K from NMR logging data.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0017-467X</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1745-6584</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1111/gwat.13318</identifier><identifier>PMID: 37057729</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>United States: Ground Water Publishing Company</publisher><subject>Aquifers ; Calibration ; Carbonates ; Data acquisition ; Data logging ; Echoes ; Estimates ; Glacial aquifers ; Hydraulic conductivity ; Logging ; Mathematical models ; NMR ; Nuclear magnetic resonance ; Parameters ; Permeability ; Petroleum ; Sandstone</subject><ispartof>Ground water, 2023-11, Vol.61 (6), p.778-792</ispartof><rights>2023 The Authors. Groundwater published by Wiley Periodicals LLC on behalf of National Ground Water Association.</rights><rights>2023. This article is published under http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/ (the “License”). Notwithstanding the ProQuest Terms and Conditions, you may use this content in accordance with the terms of the License.</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-a374t-1772aeb150eb5025590d6022f9804a5b875691ecb5e96155919e064490a265283</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-a374t-1772aeb150eb5025590d6022f9804a5b875691ecb5e96155919e064490a265283</cites><orcidid>0000-0002-6682-266X</orcidid></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><link.rule.ids>314,780,784,27924,27925</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37057729$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Kendrick, Alexander K</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Knight, Rosemary</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Johnson, Carole D</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Liu, Gaisheng</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Hart, David J</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Butler, Jr, James J</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Hunt, Randall J</creatorcontrib><title>Evaluation of Models for Estimating Hydraulic Conductivity in Glacial Aquifers with NMR Logging</title><title>Ground water</title><addtitle>Ground Water</addtitle><description>Nuclear magnetic resonance (NMR) logging is a promising method for estimating hydraulic conductivity (K). During the past ∼60 years, NMR logging has been used for petroleum applications, and different models have been developed for deriving estimates of permeability. These models involve calibration parameters whose values were determined through decades of research on sandstones and carbonates. We assessed the use of five models to derive estimates of K in glacial aquifers from NMR logging data acquired in two wells at each of two field sites in central Wisconsin, USA. Measurements of K, obtained with a direct push permeameter (DPP), K , were used to obtain the calibration parameters in the Schlumberger-Doll Research, Seevers, Timur-Coates, Kozeny-Godefroy, and sum-of-echoes (SOE) models so as to predict K from the NMR data; and were also used to assess the ability of the models to predict K . We obtained four well-scale calibration parameter values for each model using the NMR and DPP measurements in each well; and one study-scale parameter value for each model by using all data. The SOE model achieved an agreement with K that matched or exceeded that of the other models. The Timur-Coates estimates of K were found to be substantially different from K . Although the well-scale parameter values for the Schlumberger-Doll, Seevers, and SOE models were found to vary by less than a factor of 2, more research is needed to confirm their general applicability so that site-specific calibration is not required to obtain accurate estimates of K from NMR logging data.</description><subject>Aquifers</subject><subject>Calibration</subject><subject>Carbonates</subject><subject>Data acquisition</subject><subject>Data logging</subject><subject>Echoes</subject><subject>Estimates</subject><subject>Glacial aquifers</subject><subject>Hydraulic conductivity</subject><subject>Logging</subject><subject>Mathematical models</subject><subject>NMR</subject><subject>Nuclear magnetic resonance</subject><subject>Parameters</subject><subject>Permeability</subject><subject>Petroleum</subject><subject>Sandstone</subject><issn>0017-467X</issn><issn>1745-6584</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2023</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><recordid>eNpdkEFLwzAUx4Mobk4vfgAJeBGh86VpmuYoY27CpiAK3krapjWja7ak3di3N3PTg-_yDv_f-_P4IXRNYEj8PFRb2Q4JpSQ5QX3CIxbELIlOUR-A8CCK-WcPXTi3AAAqQJyjHuXAOA9FH6Xjjaw72WrTYFPiuSlU7XBpLB67Vi990FR4uius7Gqd45Fpii5v9Ua3O6wbPKllrmWNH9edLpV1eKvbL_wyf8MzU1X-9hKdlbJ26uq4B-jjafw-mgaz18nz6HEWSMqjNiD-G6kywkBlDELGBBQxhGEpEogkyxLOYkFUnjElYuJjIhTEUSRAhjELEzpAd4felTXrTrk2XWqXq7qWjTKdS8MEiOCcUubR23_ownS28d95KiE0piwBT90fqNwa56wq05X1PuwuJZDutad77emPdg_fHCu7bKmKP_TXM_0GNTZ7sA</recordid><startdate>20231101</startdate><enddate>20231101</enddate><creator>Kendrick, Alexander K</creator><creator>Knight, Rosemary</creator><creator>Johnson, Carole D</creator><creator>Liu, Gaisheng</creator><creator>Hart, David J</creator><creator>Butler, Jr, James J</creator><creator>Hunt, Randall J</creator><general>Ground Water Publishing Company</general><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7QH</scope><scope>7ST</scope><scope>7UA</scope><scope>C1K</scope><scope>F1W</scope><scope>H96</scope><scope>H97</scope><scope>K9.</scope><scope>L.G</scope><scope>SOI</scope><scope>7X8</scope><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-6682-266X</orcidid></search><sort><creationdate>20231101</creationdate><title>Evaluation of Models for Estimating Hydraulic Conductivity in Glacial Aquifers with NMR Logging</title><author>Kendrick, Alexander K ; Knight, Rosemary ; Johnson, Carole D ; Liu, Gaisheng ; Hart, David J ; Butler, Jr, James J ; Hunt, Randall J</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-a374t-1772aeb150eb5025590d6022f9804a5b875691ecb5e96155919e064490a265283</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2023</creationdate><topic>Aquifers</topic><topic>Calibration</topic><topic>Carbonates</topic><topic>Data acquisition</topic><topic>Data logging</topic><topic>Echoes</topic><topic>Estimates</topic><topic>Glacial aquifers</topic><topic>Hydraulic conductivity</topic><topic>Logging</topic><topic>Mathematical models</topic><topic>NMR</topic><topic>Nuclear magnetic resonance</topic><topic>Parameters</topic><topic>Permeability</topic><topic>Petroleum</topic><topic>Sandstone</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Kendrick, Alexander K</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Knight, Rosemary</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Johnson, Carole D</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Liu, Gaisheng</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Hart, David J</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Butler, Jr, James J</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Hunt, Randall J</creatorcontrib><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>Aqualine</collection><collection>Environment Abstracts</collection><collection>Water Resources Abstracts</collection><collection>Environmental Sciences and Pollution Management</collection><collection>ASFA: Aquatic Sciences and Fisheries Abstracts</collection><collection>Aquatic Science &amp; Fisheries Abstracts (ASFA) 2: Ocean Technology, Policy &amp; Non-Living Resources</collection><collection>Aquatic Science &amp; Fisheries Abstracts (ASFA) 3: Aquatic Pollution &amp; Environmental Quality</collection><collection>ProQuest Health &amp; Medical Complete (Alumni)</collection><collection>Aquatic Science &amp; Fisheries Abstracts (ASFA) Professional</collection><collection>Environment Abstracts</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><jtitle>Ground water</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Kendrick, Alexander K</au><au>Knight, Rosemary</au><au>Johnson, Carole D</au><au>Liu, Gaisheng</au><au>Hart, David J</au><au>Butler, Jr, James J</au><au>Hunt, Randall J</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Evaluation of Models for Estimating Hydraulic Conductivity in Glacial Aquifers with NMR Logging</atitle><jtitle>Ground water</jtitle><addtitle>Ground Water</addtitle><date>2023-11-01</date><risdate>2023</risdate><volume>61</volume><issue>6</issue><spage>778</spage><epage>792</epage><pages>778-792</pages><issn>0017-467X</issn><eissn>1745-6584</eissn><abstract>Nuclear magnetic resonance (NMR) logging is a promising method for estimating hydraulic conductivity (K). During the past ∼60 years, NMR logging has been used for petroleum applications, and different models have been developed for deriving estimates of permeability. These models involve calibration parameters whose values were determined through decades of research on sandstones and carbonates. We assessed the use of five models to derive estimates of K in glacial aquifers from NMR logging data acquired in two wells at each of two field sites in central Wisconsin, USA. Measurements of K, obtained with a direct push permeameter (DPP), K , were used to obtain the calibration parameters in the Schlumberger-Doll Research, Seevers, Timur-Coates, Kozeny-Godefroy, and sum-of-echoes (SOE) models so as to predict K from the NMR data; and were also used to assess the ability of the models to predict K . We obtained four well-scale calibration parameter values for each model using the NMR and DPP measurements in each well; and one study-scale parameter value for each model by using all data. The SOE model achieved an agreement with K that matched or exceeded that of the other models. The Timur-Coates estimates of K were found to be substantially different from K . Although the well-scale parameter values for the Schlumberger-Doll, Seevers, and SOE models were found to vary by less than a factor of 2, more research is needed to confirm their general applicability so that site-specific calibration is not required to obtain accurate estimates of K from NMR logging data.</abstract><cop>United States</cop><pub>Ground Water Publishing Company</pub><pmid>37057729</pmid><doi>10.1111/gwat.13318</doi><tpages>15</tpages><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-6682-266X</orcidid><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 0017-467X
ispartof Ground water, 2023-11, Vol.61 (6), p.778-792
issn 0017-467X
1745-6584
language eng
recordid cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_2801977335
source Access via Wiley Online Library
subjects Aquifers
Calibration
Carbonates
Data acquisition
Data logging
Echoes
Estimates
Glacial aquifers
Hydraulic conductivity
Logging
Mathematical models
NMR
Nuclear magnetic resonance
Parameters
Permeability
Petroleum
Sandstone
title Evaluation of Models for Estimating Hydraulic Conductivity in Glacial Aquifers with NMR Logging
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2024-12-28T15%3A17%3A33IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Evaluation%20of%20Models%20for%20Estimating%20Hydraulic%20Conductivity%20in%20Glacial%20Aquifers%20with%20NMR%20Logging&rft.jtitle=Ground%20water&rft.au=Kendrick,%20Alexander%20K&rft.date=2023-11-01&rft.volume=61&rft.issue=6&rft.spage=778&rft.epage=792&rft.pages=778-792&rft.issn=0017-467X&rft.eissn=1745-6584&rft_id=info:doi/10.1111/gwat.13318&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E2881363580%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=2881363580&rft_id=info:pmid/37057729&rfr_iscdi=true