Distinct differences between calvarial and long bone osteocytes in cell morphologies, gene expression and aging responses

Osteocytes are the terminally differentiated bone cells resulted from bone formation. Although there are two distinct processes of bone formation, intramembranous and endochondral ossifications contributing to the formation of calvarial and long bones, it is not clear whether the distinct pathways d...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:The FEBS journal 2023-08, Vol.290 (16), p.4074-4091
Hauptverfasser: Gao, Minhao, Zhu, Bin, Fan, Jing, Gao, Youshui, Xue, Feng, Li, Guangyi, Hubbard, Alysia, Gao, Xiangrong, Sun, Jing, Ling, Jing, Cao, Longxiang, Liu, Delin, Yuan, Jun, Jiang, Qing, Papadimitriou, John, Zou, Weiguo, Feng, Jian Q., Yang, Liu, Zhang, Changqing, Gao, Junjie, Zheng, Minghao
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page 4091
container_issue 16
container_start_page 4074
container_title The FEBS journal
container_volume 290
creator Gao, Minhao
Zhu, Bin
Fan, Jing
Gao, Youshui
Xue, Feng
Li, Guangyi
Hubbard, Alysia
Gao, Xiangrong
Sun, Jing
Ling, Jing
Cao, Longxiang
Liu, Delin
Yuan, Jun
Jiang, Qing
Papadimitriou, John
Zou, Weiguo
Feng, Jian Q.
Yang, Liu
Zhang, Changqing
Gao, Junjie
Zheng, Minghao
description Osteocytes are the terminally differentiated bone cells resulted from bone formation. Although there are two distinct processes of bone formation, intramembranous and endochondral ossifications contributing to the formation of calvarial and long bones, it is not clear whether the distinct pathways determine the differences between calvaria and femoral cortical bone derived osteocytes. In the present study, we employed confocal structured illumination microscopy and mRNA‐sequencing analysis to characterize the morphologic and transcriptomic expression of osteocytes from murine calvaria and mid‐shaft femoral cortical bone. Structured illumination microscopy and geometric modelling showed round shaped and irregularly scattered calvarial osteocytes compared to spindle shaped and orderly arrayed cortical osteocytes. mRNA‐sequencing analysis indicated different transcriptomic profiles between calvarial and cortical osteocytes and provided evidence that mechanical response of osteocytes may contribute to geometrical differences. Furthermore, transcriptomic analysis showed that these two groups of osteocytes come from distinct pathways with 121 ossification‐related genes differentially expressed. Analysis of correlation between ossification and osteocyte geometries via a Venn diagram showed that several genes related to ossification, cytoskeleton organization and dendrite development were differentially expressed between calvarial and cortical osteocytes. Finally, we demonstrated that aging disrupted the organization of dendrites and cortical osteocytes but had no significant effects on calvarial osteocytes. Together, we conclude that calvarial and cortical osteocytes are different in various aspects, which is probably the consequence of their distinct pathways of ossification. Intramembranous and endochondral ossification are two different processes of bone formation. In the present study, we found that osteocytes derived from these two distinct ossification processes displayed morphological and genetical differences. Aging had significant impact on osteocytes derived from endochondral ossification but not on those from intramembranous ossification. Our study indicated that the characteristics of osteocytes are not only determined by their mechanical environment, but also by the process of ossification.
doi_str_mv 10.1111/febs.16797
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_2800147882</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>2800147882</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c3577-560351204df4f543bb1c55d3ec23a4c15cc2705c0f683fcccf3fc8de5f3068a03</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp90UtPxCAQB3BiNL4vfgBD4sUYV6FA2z36WB_JJh7UxFtD6bBiulCZrrrfXtZVDx7kAIT8ZjLhT8geZyc8rVMLNZ7wvBgWK2STFzIbyFyVq793-bRBthBfGBNKDofrZEMUTGZZyTbJ_NJh77zpaeOshQjeANIa-ncAT41u33R0uqXaN7QNfkLr4IEG7CGYeZ-oSwralk5D7J5DGyYO8JhOICn46CIguuC_yvXEpfr00gWPgDtkzeoWYff73CaPV6OHi5vB-O769uJsPDBCFcVA5WlqnjHZWGmVFHXNjVKNAJMJLQ1XxmQFU4bZvBTWGGPTXjagrGB5qZnYJofLvl0MrzPAvpo6XIysPYQZVukbGJdFWWaJHvyhL2EWfZouKcWZykslkjpaKhMDYgRbddFNdZxXnFWLQKpFINVXIAnvf7ec1VNofulPAgnwJXh3Lcz_aVVdjc7vl00_AW7cl5k</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>2851056853</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Distinct differences between calvarial and long bone osteocytes in cell morphologies, gene expression and aging responses</title><source>Wiley Online Library Journals Frontfile Complete</source><source>Wiley Online Library Free Content</source><source>Free Full-Text Journals in Chemistry</source><creator>Gao, Minhao ; Zhu, Bin ; Fan, Jing ; Gao, Youshui ; Xue, Feng ; Li, Guangyi ; Hubbard, Alysia ; Gao, Xiangrong ; Sun, Jing ; Ling, Jing ; Cao, Longxiang ; Liu, Delin ; Yuan, Jun ; Jiang, Qing ; Papadimitriou, John ; Zou, Weiguo ; Feng, Jian Q. ; Yang, Liu ; Zhang, Changqing ; Gao, Junjie ; Zheng, Minghao</creator><creatorcontrib>Gao, Minhao ; Zhu, Bin ; Fan, Jing ; Gao, Youshui ; Xue, Feng ; Li, Guangyi ; Hubbard, Alysia ; Gao, Xiangrong ; Sun, Jing ; Ling, Jing ; Cao, Longxiang ; Liu, Delin ; Yuan, Jun ; Jiang, Qing ; Papadimitriou, John ; Zou, Weiguo ; Feng, Jian Q. ; Yang, Liu ; Zhang, Changqing ; Gao, Junjie ; Zheng, Minghao</creatorcontrib><description>Osteocytes are the terminally differentiated bone cells resulted from bone formation. Although there are two distinct processes of bone formation, intramembranous and endochondral ossifications contributing to the formation of calvarial and long bones, it is not clear whether the distinct pathways determine the differences between calvaria and femoral cortical bone derived osteocytes. In the present study, we employed confocal structured illumination microscopy and mRNA‐sequencing analysis to characterize the morphologic and transcriptomic expression of osteocytes from murine calvaria and mid‐shaft femoral cortical bone. Structured illumination microscopy and geometric modelling showed round shaped and irregularly scattered calvarial osteocytes compared to spindle shaped and orderly arrayed cortical osteocytes. mRNA‐sequencing analysis indicated different transcriptomic profiles between calvarial and cortical osteocytes and provided evidence that mechanical response of osteocytes may contribute to geometrical differences. Furthermore, transcriptomic analysis showed that these two groups of osteocytes come from distinct pathways with 121 ossification‐related genes differentially expressed. Analysis of correlation between ossification and osteocyte geometries via a Venn diagram showed that several genes related to ossification, cytoskeleton organization and dendrite development were differentially expressed between calvarial and cortical osteocytes. Finally, we demonstrated that aging disrupted the organization of dendrites and cortical osteocytes but had no significant effects on calvarial osteocytes. Together, we conclude that calvarial and cortical osteocytes are different in various aspects, which is probably the consequence of their distinct pathways of ossification. Intramembranous and endochondral ossification are two different processes of bone formation. In the present study, we found that osteocytes derived from these two distinct ossification processes displayed morphological and genetical differences. Aging had significant impact on osteocytes derived from endochondral ossification but not on those from intramembranous ossification. Our study indicated that the characteristics of osteocytes are not only determined by their mechanical environment, but also by the process of ossification.</description><identifier>ISSN: 1742-464X</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1742-4658</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1111/febs.16797</identifier><identifier>PMID: 37042280</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>England: Blackwell Publishing Ltd</publisher><subject>Aging ; Bone growth ; Bones ; Calvaria ; Cell differentiation ; Cortical bone ; Cytoskeleton ; Dendrites ; Endochondral bone ; Femur ; Gene expression ; Gene sequencing ; Genes ; Illumination ; Intramembraneous bone ; Long bone ; Mechanical analysis ; Microscopy ; morphology ; Ossification ; Osteocytes ; Osteogenesis ; RNA‐seq ; Sequence analysis ; Transcriptomics ; Venn diagrams</subject><ispartof>The FEBS journal, 2023-08, Vol.290 (16), p.4074-4091</ispartof><rights>2023 Federation of European Biochemical Societies.</rights><rights>Copyright © 2023 Federation of European Biochemical Societies</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c3577-560351204df4f543bb1c55d3ec23a4c15cc2705c0f683fcccf3fc8de5f3068a03</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c3577-560351204df4f543bb1c55d3ec23a4c15cc2705c0f683fcccf3fc8de5f3068a03</cites><orcidid>0000-0002-6498-4702 ; 0000-0001-9242-2486 ; 0000-0001-6967-5055</orcidid></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/pdf/10.1111%2Ffebs.16797$$EPDF$$P50$$Gwiley$$H</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/full/10.1111%2Ffebs.16797$$EHTML$$P50$$Gwiley$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,780,784,1416,1432,27915,27916,45565,45566,46400,46824</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37042280$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Gao, Minhao</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Zhu, Bin</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Fan, Jing</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Gao, Youshui</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Xue, Feng</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Li, Guangyi</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Hubbard, Alysia</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Gao, Xiangrong</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Sun, Jing</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Ling, Jing</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Cao, Longxiang</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Liu, Delin</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Yuan, Jun</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Jiang, Qing</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Papadimitriou, John</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Zou, Weiguo</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Feng, Jian Q.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Yang, Liu</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Zhang, Changqing</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Gao, Junjie</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Zheng, Minghao</creatorcontrib><title>Distinct differences between calvarial and long bone osteocytes in cell morphologies, gene expression and aging responses</title><title>The FEBS journal</title><addtitle>FEBS J</addtitle><description>Osteocytes are the terminally differentiated bone cells resulted from bone formation. Although there are two distinct processes of bone formation, intramembranous and endochondral ossifications contributing to the formation of calvarial and long bones, it is not clear whether the distinct pathways determine the differences between calvaria and femoral cortical bone derived osteocytes. In the present study, we employed confocal structured illumination microscopy and mRNA‐sequencing analysis to characterize the morphologic and transcriptomic expression of osteocytes from murine calvaria and mid‐shaft femoral cortical bone. Structured illumination microscopy and geometric modelling showed round shaped and irregularly scattered calvarial osteocytes compared to spindle shaped and orderly arrayed cortical osteocytes. mRNA‐sequencing analysis indicated different transcriptomic profiles between calvarial and cortical osteocytes and provided evidence that mechanical response of osteocytes may contribute to geometrical differences. Furthermore, transcriptomic analysis showed that these two groups of osteocytes come from distinct pathways with 121 ossification‐related genes differentially expressed. Analysis of correlation between ossification and osteocyte geometries via a Venn diagram showed that several genes related to ossification, cytoskeleton organization and dendrite development were differentially expressed between calvarial and cortical osteocytes. Finally, we demonstrated that aging disrupted the organization of dendrites and cortical osteocytes but had no significant effects on calvarial osteocytes. Together, we conclude that calvarial and cortical osteocytes are different in various aspects, which is probably the consequence of their distinct pathways of ossification. Intramembranous and endochondral ossification are two different processes of bone formation. In the present study, we found that osteocytes derived from these two distinct ossification processes displayed morphological and genetical differences. Aging had significant impact on osteocytes derived from endochondral ossification but not on those from intramembranous ossification. Our study indicated that the characteristics of osteocytes are not only determined by their mechanical environment, but also by the process of ossification.</description><subject>Aging</subject><subject>Bone growth</subject><subject>Bones</subject><subject>Calvaria</subject><subject>Cell differentiation</subject><subject>Cortical bone</subject><subject>Cytoskeleton</subject><subject>Dendrites</subject><subject>Endochondral bone</subject><subject>Femur</subject><subject>Gene expression</subject><subject>Gene sequencing</subject><subject>Genes</subject><subject>Illumination</subject><subject>Intramembraneous bone</subject><subject>Long bone</subject><subject>Mechanical analysis</subject><subject>Microscopy</subject><subject>morphology</subject><subject>Ossification</subject><subject>Osteocytes</subject><subject>Osteogenesis</subject><subject>RNA‐seq</subject><subject>Sequence analysis</subject><subject>Transcriptomics</subject><subject>Venn diagrams</subject><issn>1742-464X</issn><issn>1742-4658</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2023</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><recordid>eNp90UtPxCAQB3BiNL4vfgBD4sUYV6FA2z36WB_JJh7UxFtD6bBiulCZrrrfXtZVDx7kAIT8ZjLhT8geZyc8rVMLNZ7wvBgWK2STFzIbyFyVq793-bRBthBfGBNKDofrZEMUTGZZyTbJ_NJh77zpaeOshQjeANIa-ncAT41u33R0uqXaN7QNfkLr4IEG7CGYeZ-oSwralk5D7J5DGyYO8JhOICn46CIguuC_yvXEpfr00gWPgDtkzeoWYff73CaPV6OHi5vB-O769uJsPDBCFcVA5WlqnjHZWGmVFHXNjVKNAJMJLQ1XxmQFU4bZvBTWGGPTXjagrGB5qZnYJofLvl0MrzPAvpo6XIysPYQZVukbGJdFWWaJHvyhL2EWfZouKcWZykslkjpaKhMDYgRbddFNdZxXnFWLQKpFINVXIAnvf7ec1VNofulPAgnwJXh3Lcz_aVVdjc7vl00_AW7cl5k</recordid><startdate>202308</startdate><enddate>202308</enddate><creator>Gao, Minhao</creator><creator>Zhu, Bin</creator><creator>Fan, Jing</creator><creator>Gao, Youshui</creator><creator>Xue, Feng</creator><creator>Li, Guangyi</creator><creator>Hubbard, Alysia</creator><creator>Gao, Xiangrong</creator><creator>Sun, Jing</creator><creator>Ling, Jing</creator><creator>Cao, Longxiang</creator><creator>Liu, Delin</creator><creator>Yuan, Jun</creator><creator>Jiang, Qing</creator><creator>Papadimitriou, John</creator><creator>Zou, Weiguo</creator><creator>Feng, Jian Q.</creator><creator>Yang, Liu</creator><creator>Zhang, Changqing</creator><creator>Gao, Junjie</creator><creator>Zheng, Minghao</creator><general>Blackwell Publishing Ltd</general><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7QL</scope><scope>7QP</scope><scope>7QR</scope><scope>7TK</scope><scope>7TM</scope><scope>7U9</scope><scope>8FD</scope><scope>C1K</scope><scope>FR3</scope><scope>H94</scope><scope>M7N</scope><scope>P64</scope><scope>RC3</scope><scope>7X8</scope><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-6498-4702</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0001-9242-2486</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0001-6967-5055</orcidid></search><sort><creationdate>202308</creationdate><title>Distinct differences between calvarial and long bone osteocytes in cell morphologies, gene expression and aging responses</title><author>Gao, Minhao ; Zhu, Bin ; Fan, Jing ; Gao, Youshui ; Xue, Feng ; Li, Guangyi ; Hubbard, Alysia ; Gao, Xiangrong ; Sun, Jing ; Ling, Jing ; Cao, Longxiang ; Liu, Delin ; Yuan, Jun ; Jiang, Qing ; Papadimitriou, John ; Zou, Weiguo ; Feng, Jian Q. ; Yang, Liu ; Zhang, Changqing ; Gao, Junjie ; Zheng, Minghao</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c3577-560351204df4f543bb1c55d3ec23a4c15cc2705c0f683fcccf3fc8de5f3068a03</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2023</creationdate><topic>Aging</topic><topic>Bone growth</topic><topic>Bones</topic><topic>Calvaria</topic><topic>Cell differentiation</topic><topic>Cortical bone</topic><topic>Cytoskeleton</topic><topic>Dendrites</topic><topic>Endochondral bone</topic><topic>Femur</topic><topic>Gene expression</topic><topic>Gene sequencing</topic><topic>Genes</topic><topic>Illumination</topic><topic>Intramembraneous bone</topic><topic>Long bone</topic><topic>Mechanical analysis</topic><topic>Microscopy</topic><topic>morphology</topic><topic>Ossification</topic><topic>Osteocytes</topic><topic>Osteogenesis</topic><topic>RNA‐seq</topic><topic>Sequence analysis</topic><topic>Transcriptomics</topic><topic>Venn diagrams</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Gao, Minhao</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Zhu, Bin</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Fan, Jing</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Gao, Youshui</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Xue, Feng</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Li, Guangyi</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Hubbard, Alysia</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Gao, Xiangrong</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Sun, Jing</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Ling, Jing</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Cao, Longxiang</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Liu, Delin</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Yuan, Jun</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Jiang, Qing</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Papadimitriou, John</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Zou, Weiguo</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Feng, Jian Q.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Yang, Liu</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Zhang, Changqing</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Gao, Junjie</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Zheng, Minghao</creatorcontrib><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>Bacteriology Abstracts (Microbiology B)</collection><collection>Calcium &amp; Calcified Tissue Abstracts</collection><collection>Chemoreception Abstracts</collection><collection>Neurosciences Abstracts</collection><collection>Nucleic Acids Abstracts</collection><collection>Virology and AIDS Abstracts</collection><collection>Technology Research Database</collection><collection>Environmental Sciences and Pollution Management</collection><collection>Engineering Research Database</collection><collection>AIDS and Cancer Research Abstracts</collection><collection>Algology Mycology and Protozoology Abstracts (Microbiology C)</collection><collection>Biotechnology and BioEngineering Abstracts</collection><collection>Genetics Abstracts</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><jtitle>The FEBS journal</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Gao, Minhao</au><au>Zhu, Bin</au><au>Fan, Jing</au><au>Gao, Youshui</au><au>Xue, Feng</au><au>Li, Guangyi</au><au>Hubbard, Alysia</au><au>Gao, Xiangrong</au><au>Sun, Jing</au><au>Ling, Jing</au><au>Cao, Longxiang</au><au>Liu, Delin</au><au>Yuan, Jun</au><au>Jiang, Qing</au><au>Papadimitriou, John</au><au>Zou, Weiguo</au><au>Feng, Jian Q.</au><au>Yang, Liu</au><au>Zhang, Changqing</au><au>Gao, Junjie</au><au>Zheng, Minghao</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Distinct differences between calvarial and long bone osteocytes in cell morphologies, gene expression and aging responses</atitle><jtitle>The FEBS journal</jtitle><addtitle>FEBS J</addtitle><date>2023-08</date><risdate>2023</risdate><volume>290</volume><issue>16</issue><spage>4074</spage><epage>4091</epage><pages>4074-4091</pages><issn>1742-464X</issn><eissn>1742-4658</eissn><abstract>Osteocytes are the terminally differentiated bone cells resulted from bone formation. Although there are two distinct processes of bone formation, intramembranous and endochondral ossifications contributing to the formation of calvarial and long bones, it is not clear whether the distinct pathways determine the differences between calvaria and femoral cortical bone derived osteocytes. In the present study, we employed confocal structured illumination microscopy and mRNA‐sequencing analysis to characterize the morphologic and transcriptomic expression of osteocytes from murine calvaria and mid‐shaft femoral cortical bone. Structured illumination microscopy and geometric modelling showed round shaped and irregularly scattered calvarial osteocytes compared to spindle shaped and orderly arrayed cortical osteocytes. mRNA‐sequencing analysis indicated different transcriptomic profiles between calvarial and cortical osteocytes and provided evidence that mechanical response of osteocytes may contribute to geometrical differences. Furthermore, transcriptomic analysis showed that these two groups of osteocytes come from distinct pathways with 121 ossification‐related genes differentially expressed. Analysis of correlation between ossification and osteocyte geometries via a Venn diagram showed that several genes related to ossification, cytoskeleton organization and dendrite development were differentially expressed between calvarial and cortical osteocytes. Finally, we demonstrated that aging disrupted the organization of dendrites and cortical osteocytes but had no significant effects on calvarial osteocytes. Together, we conclude that calvarial and cortical osteocytes are different in various aspects, which is probably the consequence of their distinct pathways of ossification. Intramembranous and endochondral ossification are two different processes of bone formation. In the present study, we found that osteocytes derived from these two distinct ossification processes displayed morphological and genetical differences. Aging had significant impact on osteocytes derived from endochondral ossification but not on those from intramembranous ossification. Our study indicated that the characteristics of osteocytes are not only determined by their mechanical environment, but also by the process of ossification.</abstract><cop>England</cop><pub>Blackwell Publishing Ltd</pub><pmid>37042280</pmid><doi>10.1111/febs.16797</doi><tpages>4091</tpages><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-6498-4702</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0001-9242-2486</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0001-6967-5055</orcidid></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 1742-464X
ispartof The FEBS journal, 2023-08, Vol.290 (16), p.4074-4091
issn 1742-464X
1742-4658
language eng
recordid cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_2800147882
source Wiley Online Library Journals Frontfile Complete; Wiley Online Library Free Content; Free Full-Text Journals in Chemistry
subjects Aging
Bone growth
Bones
Calvaria
Cell differentiation
Cortical bone
Cytoskeleton
Dendrites
Endochondral bone
Femur
Gene expression
Gene sequencing
Genes
Illumination
Intramembraneous bone
Long bone
Mechanical analysis
Microscopy
morphology
Ossification
Osteocytes
Osteogenesis
RNA‐seq
Sequence analysis
Transcriptomics
Venn diagrams
title Distinct differences between calvarial and long bone osteocytes in cell morphologies, gene expression and aging responses
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-14T21%3A11%3A55IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Distinct%20differences%20between%20calvarial%20and%20long%20bone%20osteocytes%20in%20cell%20morphologies,%20gene%20expression%20and%20aging%20responses&rft.jtitle=The%20FEBS%20journal&rft.au=Gao,%20Minhao&rft.date=2023-08&rft.volume=290&rft.issue=16&rft.spage=4074&rft.epage=4091&rft.pages=4074-4091&rft.issn=1742-464X&rft.eissn=1742-4658&rft_id=info:doi/10.1111/febs.16797&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E2800147882%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=2851056853&rft_id=info:pmid/37042280&rfr_iscdi=true