Distinct differences between calvarial and long bone osteocytes in cell morphologies, gene expression and aging responses
Osteocytes are the terminally differentiated bone cells resulted from bone formation. Although there are two distinct processes of bone formation, intramembranous and endochondral ossifications contributing to the formation of calvarial and long bones, it is not clear whether the distinct pathways d...
Gespeichert in:
Veröffentlicht in: | The FEBS journal 2023-08, Vol.290 (16), p.4074-4091 |
---|---|
Hauptverfasser: | , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , |
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | eng |
Schlagworte: | |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
container_end_page | 4091 |
---|---|
container_issue | 16 |
container_start_page | 4074 |
container_title | The FEBS journal |
container_volume | 290 |
creator | Gao, Minhao Zhu, Bin Fan, Jing Gao, Youshui Xue, Feng Li, Guangyi Hubbard, Alysia Gao, Xiangrong Sun, Jing Ling, Jing Cao, Longxiang Liu, Delin Yuan, Jun Jiang, Qing Papadimitriou, John Zou, Weiguo Feng, Jian Q. Yang, Liu Zhang, Changqing Gao, Junjie Zheng, Minghao |
description | Osteocytes are the terminally differentiated bone cells resulted from bone formation. Although there are two distinct processes of bone formation, intramembranous and endochondral ossifications contributing to the formation of calvarial and long bones, it is not clear whether the distinct pathways determine the differences between calvaria and femoral cortical bone derived osteocytes. In the present study, we employed confocal structured illumination microscopy and mRNA‐sequencing analysis to characterize the morphologic and transcriptomic expression of osteocytes from murine calvaria and mid‐shaft femoral cortical bone. Structured illumination microscopy and geometric modelling showed round shaped and irregularly scattered calvarial osteocytes compared to spindle shaped and orderly arrayed cortical osteocytes. mRNA‐sequencing analysis indicated different transcriptomic profiles between calvarial and cortical osteocytes and provided evidence that mechanical response of osteocytes may contribute to geometrical differences. Furthermore, transcriptomic analysis showed that these two groups of osteocytes come from distinct pathways with 121 ossification‐related genes differentially expressed. Analysis of correlation between ossification and osteocyte geometries via a Venn diagram showed that several genes related to ossification, cytoskeleton organization and dendrite development were differentially expressed between calvarial and cortical osteocytes. Finally, we demonstrated that aging disrupted the organization of dendrites and cortical osteocytes but had no significant effects on calvarial osteocytes. Together, we conclude that calvarial and cortical osteocytes are different in various aspects, which is probably the consequence of their distinct pathways of ossification.
Intramembranous and endochondral ossification are two different processes of bone formation. In the present study, we found that osteocytes derived from these two distinct ossification processes displayed morphological and genetical differences. Aging had significant impact on osteocytes derived from endochondral ossification but not on those from intramembranous ossification. Our study indicated that the characteristics of osteocytes are not only determined by their mechanical environment, but also by the process of ossification. |
doi_str_mv | 10.1111/febs.16797 |
format | Article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_2800147882</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>2800147882</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c3577-560351204df4f543bb1c55d3ec23a4c15cc2705c0f683fcccf3fc8de5f3068a03</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp90UtPxCAQB3BiNL4vfgBD4sUYV6FA2z36WB_JJh7UxFtD6bBiulCZrrrfXtZVDx7kAIT8ZjLhT8geZyc8rVMLNZ7wvBgWK2STFzIbyFyVq793-bRBthBfGBNKDofrZEMUTGZZyTbJ_NJh77zpaeOshQjeANIa-ncAT41u33R0uqXaN7QNfkLr4IEG7CGYeZ-oSwralk5D7J5DGyYO8JhOICn46CIguuC_yvXEpfr00gWPgDtkzeoWYff73CaPV6OHi5vB-O769uJsPDBCFcVA5WlqnjHZWGmVFHXNjVKNAJMJLQ1XxmQFU4bZvBTWGGPTXjagrGB5qZnYJofLvl0MrzPAvpo6XIysPYQZVukbGJdFWWaJHvyhL2EWfZouKcWZykslkjpaKhMDYgRbddFNdZxXnFWLQKpFINVXIAnvf7ec1VNofulPAgnwJXh3Lcz_aVVdjc7vl00_AW7cl5k</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>2851056853</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Distinct differences between calvarial and long bone osteocytes in cell morphologies, gene expression and aging responses</title><source>Wiley Online Library Journals Frontfile Complete</source><source>Wiley Online Library Free Content</source><source>Free Full-Text Journals in Chemistry</source><creator>Gao, Minhao ; Zhu, Bin ; Fan, Jing ; Gao, Youshui ; Xue, Feng ; Li, Guangyi ; Hubbard, Alysia ; Gao, Xiangrong ; Sun, Jing ; Ling, Jing ; Cao, Longxiang ; Liu, Delin ; Yuan, Jun ; Jiang, Qing ; Papadimitriou, John ; Zou, Weiguo ; Feng, Jian Q. ; Yang, Liu ; Zhang, Changqing ; Gao, Junjie ; Zheng, Minghao</creator><creatorcontrib>Gao, Minhao ; Zhu, Bin ; Fan, Jing ; Gao, Youshui ; Xue, Feng ; Li, Guangyi ; Hubbard, Alysia ; Gao, Xiangrong ; Sun, Jing ; Ling, Jing ; Cao, Longxiang ; Liu, Delin ; Yuan, Jun ; Jiang, Qing ; Papadimitriou, John ; Zou, Weiguo ; Feng, Jian Q. ; Yang, Liu ; Zhang, Changqing ; Gao, Junjie ; Zheng, Minghao</creatorcontrib><description>Osteocytes are the terminally differentiated bone cells resulted from bone formation. Although there are two distinct processes of bone formation, intramembranous and endochondral ossifications contributing to the formation of calvarial and long bones, it is not clear whether the distinct pathways determine the differences between calvaria and femoral cortical bone derived osteocytes. In the present study, we employed confocal structured illumination microscopy and mRNA‐sequencing analysis to characterize the morphologic and transcriptomic expression of osteocytes from murine calvaria and mid‐shaft femoral cortical bone. Structured illumination microscopy and geometric modelling showed round shaped and irregularly scattered calvarial osteocytes compared to spindle shaped and orderly arrayed cortical osteocytes. mRNA‐sequencing analysis indicated different transcriptomic profiles between calvarial and cortical osteocytes and provided evidence that mechanical response of osteocytes may contribute to geometrical differences. Furthermore, transcriptomic analysis showed that these two groups of osteocytes come from distinct pathways with 121 ossification‐related genes differentially expressed. Analysis of correlation between ossification and osteocyte geometries via a Venn diagram showed that several genes related to ossification, cytoskeleton organization and dendrite development were differentially expressed between calvarial and cortical osteocytes. Finally, we demonstrated that aging disrupted the organization of dendrites and cortical osteocytes but had no significant effects on calvarial osteocytes. Together, we conclude that calvarial and cortical osteocytes are different in various aspects, which is probably the consequence of their distinct pathways of ossification.
Intramembranous and endochondral ossification are two different processes of bone formation. In the present study, we found that osteocytes derived from these two distinct ossification processes displayed morphological and genetical differences. Aging had significant impact on osteocytes derived from endochondral ossification but not on those from intramembranous ossification. Our study indicated that the characteristics of osteocytes are not only determined by their mechanical environment, but also by the process of ossification.</description><identifier>ISSN: 1742-464X</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1742-4658</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1111/febs.16797</identifier><identifier>PMID: 37042280</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>England: Blackwell Publishing Ltd</publisher><subject>Aging ; Bone growth ; Bones ; Calvaria ; Cell differentiation ; Cortical bone ; Cytoskeleton ; Dendrites ; Endochondral bone ; Femur ; Gene expression ; Gene sequencing ; Genes ; Illumination ; Intramembraneous bone ; Long bone ; Mechanical analysis ; Microscopy ; morphology ; Ossification ; Osteocytes ; Osteogenesis ; RNA‐seq ; Sequence analysis ; Transcriptomics ; Venn diagrams</subject><ispartof>The FEBS journal, 2023-08, Vol.290 (16), p.4074-4091</ispartof><rights>2023 Federation of European Biochemical Societies.</rights><rights>Copyright © 2023 Federation of European Biochemical Societies</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c3577-560351204df4f543bb1c55d3ec23a4c15cc2705c0f683fcccf3fc8de5f3068a03</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c3577-560351204df4f543bb1c55d3ec23a4c15cc2705c0f683fcccf3fc8de5f3068a03</cites><orcidid>0000-0002-6498-4702 ; 0000-0001-9242-2486 ; 0000-0001-6967-5055</orcidid></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/pdf/10.1111%2Ffebs.16797$$EPDF$$P50$$Gwiley$$H</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/full/10.1111%2Ffebs.16797$$EHTML$$P50$$Gwiley$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,780,784,1416,1432,27915,27916,45565,45566,46400,46824</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37042280$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Gao, Minhao</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Zhu, Bin</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Fan, Jing</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Gao, Youshui</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Xue, Feng</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Li, Guangyi</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Hubbard, Alysia</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Gao, Xiangrong</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Sun, Jing</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Ling, Jing</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Cao, Longxiang</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Liu, Delin</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Yuan, Jun</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Jiang, Qing</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Papadimitriou, John</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Zou, Weiguo</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Feng, Jian Q.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Yang, Liu</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Zhang, Changqing</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Gao, Junjie</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Zheng, Minghao</creatorcontrib><title>Distinct differences between calvarial and long bone osteocytes in cell morphologies, gene expression and aging responses</title><title>The FEBS journal</title><addtitle>FEBS J</addtitle><description>Osteocytes are the terminally differentiated bone cells resulted from bone formation. Although there are two distinct processes of bone formation, intramembranous and endochondral ossifications contributing to the formation of calvarial and long bones, it is not clear whether the distinct pathways determine the differences between calvaria and femoral cortical bone derived osteocytes. In the present study, we employed confocal structured illumination microscopy and mRNA‐sequencing analysis to characterize the morphologic and transcriptomic expression of osteocytes from murine calvaria and mid‐shaft femoral cortical bone. Structured illumination microscopy and geometric modelling showed round shaped and irregularly scattered calvarial osteocytes compared to spindle shaped and orderly arrayed cortical osteocytes. mRNA‐sequencing analysis indicated different transcriptomic profiles between calvarial and cortical osteocytes and provided evidence that mechanical response of osteocytes may contribute to geometrical differences. Furthermore, transcriptomic analysis showed that these two groups of osteocytes come from distinct pathways with 121 ossification‐related genes differentially expressed. Analysis of correlation between ossification and osteocyte geometries via a Venn diagram showed that several genes related to ossification, cytoskeleton organization and dendrite development were differentially expressed between calvarial and cortical osteocytes. Finally, we demonstrated that aging disrupted the organization of dendrites and cortical osteocytes but had no significant effects on calvarial osteocytes. Together, we conclude that calvarial and cortical osteocytes are different in various aspects, which is probably the consequence of their distinct pathways of ossification.
Intramembranous and endochondral ossification are two different processes of bone formation. In the present study, we found that osteocytes derived from these two distinct ossification processes displayed morphological and genetical differences. Aging had significant impact on osteocytes derived from endochondral ossification but not on those from intramembranous ossification. Our study indicated that the characteristics of osteocytes are not only determined by their mechanical environment, but also by the process of ossification.</description><subject>Aging</subject><subject>Bone growth</subject><subject>Bones</subject><subject>Calvaria</subject><subject>Cell differentiation</subject><subject>Cortical bone</subject><subject>Cytoskeleton</subject><subject>Dendrites</subject><subject>Endochondral bone</subject><subject>Femur</subject><subject>Gene expression</subject><subject>Gene sequencing</subject><subject>Genes</subject><subject>Illumination</subject><subject>Intramembraneous bone</subject><subject>Long bone</subject><subject>Mechanical analysis</subject><subject>Microscopy</subject><subject>morphology</subject><subject>Ossification</subject><subject>Osteocytes</subject><subject>Osteogenesis</subject><subject>RNA‐seq</subject><subject>Sequence analysis</subject><subject>Transcriptomics</subject><subject>Venn diagrams</subject><issn>1742-464X</issn><issn>1742-4658</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2023</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><recordid>eNp90UtPxCAQB3BiNL4vfgBD4sUYV6FA2z36WB_JJh7UxFtD6bBiulCZrrrfXtZVDx7kAIT8ZjLhT8geZyc8rVMLNZ7wvBgWK2STFzIbyFyVq793-bRBthBfGBNKDofrZEMUTGZZyTbJ_NJh77zpaeOshQjeANIa-ncAT41u33R0uqXaN7QNfkLr4IEG7CGYeZ-oSwralk5D7J5DGyYO8JhOICn46CIguuC_yvXEpfr00gWPgDtkzeoWYff73CaPV6OHi5vB-O769uJsPDBCFcVA5WlqnjHZWGmVFHXNjVKNAJMJLQ1XxmQFU4bZvBTWGGPTXjagrGB5qZnYJofLvl0MrzPAvpo6XIysPYQZVukbGJdFWWaJHvyhL2EWfZouKcWZykslkjpaKhMDYgRbddFNdZxXnFWLQKpFINVXIAnvf7ec1VNofulPAgnwJXh3Lcz_aVVdjc7vl00_AW7cl5k</recordid><startdate>202308</startdate><enddate>202308</enddate><creator>Gao, Minhao</creator><creator>Zhu, Bin</creator><creator>Fan, Jing</creator><creator>Gao, Youshui</creator><creator>Xue, Feng</creator><creator>Li, Guangyi</creator><creator>Hubbard, Alysia</creator><creator>Gao, Xiangrong</creator><creator>Sun, Jing</creator><creator>Ling, Jing</creator><creator>Cao, Longxiang</creator><creator>Liu, Delin</creator><creator>Yuan, Jun</creator><creator>Jiang, Qing</creator><creator>Papadimitriou, John</creator><creator>Zou, Weiguo</creator><creator>Feng, Jian Q.</creator><creator>Yang, Liu</creator><creator>Zhang, Changqing</creator><creator>Gao, Junjie</creator><creator>Zheng, Minghao</creator><general>Blackwell Publishing Ltd</general><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7QL</scope><scope>7QP</scope><scope>7QR</scope><scope>7TK</scope><scope>7TM</scope><scope>7U9</scope><scope>8FD</scope><scope>C1K</scope><scope>FR3</scope><scope>H94</scope><scope>M7N</scope><scope>P64</scope><scope>RC3</scope><scope>7X8</scope><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-6498-4702</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0001-9242-2486</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0001-6967-5055</orcidid></search><sort><creationdate>202308</creationdate><title>Distinct differences between calvarial and long bone osteocytes in cell morphologies, gene expression and aging responses</title><author>Gao, Minhao ; Zhu, Bin ; Fan, Jing ; Gao, Youshui ; Xue, Feng ; Li, Guangyi ; Hubbard, Alysia ; Gao, Xiangrong ; Sun, Jing ; Ling, Jing ; Cao, Longxiang ; Liu, Delin ; Yuan, Jun ; Jiang, Qing ; Papadimitriou, John ; Zou, Weiguo ; Feng, Jian Q. ; Yang, Liu ; Zhang, Changqing ; Gao, Junjie ; Zheng, Minghao</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c3577-560351204df4f543bb1c55d3ec23a4c15cc2705c0f683fcccf3fc8de5f3068a03</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2023</creationdate><topic>Aging</topic><topic>Bone growth</topic><topic>Bones</topic><topic>Calvaria</topic><topic>Cell differentiation</topic><topic>Cortical bone</topic><topic>Cytoskeleton</topic><topic>Dendrites</topic><topic>Endochondral bone</topic><topic>Femur</topic><topic>Gene expression</topic><topic>Gene sequencing</topic><topic>Genes</topic><topic>Illumination</topic><topic>Intramembraneous bone</topic><topic>Long bone</topic><topic>Mechanical analysis</topic><topic>Microscopy</topic><topic>morphology</topic><topic>Ossification</topic><topic>Osteocytes</topic><topic>Osteogenesis</topic><topic>RNA‐seq</topic><topic>Sequence analysis</topic><topic>Transcriptomics</topic><topic>Venn diagrams</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Gao, Minhao</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Zhu, Bin</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Fan, Jing</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Gao, Youshui</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Xue, Feng</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Li, Guangyi</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Hubbard, Alysia</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Gao, Xiangrong</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Sun, Jing</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Ling, Jing</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Cao, Longxiang</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Liu, Delin</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Yuan, Jun</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Jiang, Qing</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Papadimitriou, John</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Zou, Weiguo</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Feng, Jian Q.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Yang, Liu</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Zhang, Changqing</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Gao, Junjie</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Zheng, Minghao</creatorcontrib><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>Bacteriology Abstracts (Microbiology B)</collection><collection>Calcium & Calcified Tissue Abstracts</collection><collection>Chemoreception Abstracts</collection><collection>Neurosciences Abstracts</collection><collection>Nucleic Acids Abstracts</collection><collection>Virology and AIDS Abstracts</collection><collection>Technology Research Database</collection><collection>Environmental Sciences and Pollution Management</collection><collection>Engineering Research Database</collection><collection>AIDS and Cancer Research Abstracts</collection><collection>Algology Mycology and Protozoology Abstracts (Microbiology C)</collection><collection>Biotechnology and BioEngineering Abstracts</collection><collection>Genetics Abstracts</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><jtitle>The FEBS journal</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Gao, Minhao</au><au>Zhu, Bin</au><au>Fan, Jing</au><au>Gao, Youshui</au><au>Xue, Feng</au><au>Li, Guangyi</au><au>Hubbard, Alysia</au><au>Gao, Xiangrong</au><au>Sun, Jing</au><au>Ling, Jing</au><au>Cao, Longxiang</au><au>Liu, Delin</au><au>Yuan, Jun</au><au>Jiang, Qing</au><au>Papadimitriou, John</au><au>Zou, Weiguo</au><au>Feng, Jian Q.</au><au>Yang, Liu</au><au>Zhang, Changqing</au><au>Gao, Junjie</au><au>Zheng, Minghao</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Distinct differences between calvarial and long bone osteocytes in cell morphologies, gene expression and aging responses</atitle><jtitle>The FEBS journal</jtitle><addtitle>FEBS J</addtitle><date>2023-08</date><risdate>2023</risdate><volume>290</volume><issue>16</issue><spage>4074</spage><epage>4091</epage><pages>4074-4091</pages><issn>1742-464X</issn><eissn>1742-4658</eissn><abstract>Osteocytes are the terminally differentiated bone cells resulted from bone formation. Although there are two distinct processes of bone formation, intramembranous and endochondral ossifications contributing to the formation of calvarial and long bones, it is not clear whether the distinct pathways determine the differences between calvaria and femoral cortical bone derived osteocytes. In the present study, we employed confocal structured illumination microscopy and mRNA‐sequencing analysis to characterize the morphologic and transcriptomic expression of osteocytes from murine calvaria and mid‐shaft femoral cortical bone. Structured illumination microscopy and geometric modelling showed round shaped and irregularly scattered calvarial osteocytes compared to spindle shaped and orderly arrayed cortical osteocytes. mRNA‐sequencing analysis indicated different transcriptomic profiles between calvarial and cortical osteocytes and provided evidence that mechanical response of osteocytes may contribute to geometrical differences. Furthermore, transcriptomic analysis showed that these two groups of osteocytes come from distinct pathways with 121 ossification‐related genes differentially expressed. Analysis of correlation between ossification and osteocyte geometries via a Venn diagram showed that several genes related to ossification, cytoskeleton organization and dendrite development were differentially expressed between calvarial and cortical osteocytes. Finally, we demonstrated that aging disrupted the organization of dendrites and cortical osteocytes but had no significant effects on calvarial osteocytes. Together, we conclude that calvarial and cortical osteocytes are different in various aspects, which is probably the consequence of their distinct pathways of ossification.
Intramembranous and endochondral ossification are two different processes of bone formation. In the present study, we found that osteocytes derived from these two distinct ossification processes displayed morphological and genetical differences. Aging had significant impact on osteocytes derived from endochondral ossification but not on those from intramembranous ossification. Our study indicated that the characteristics of osteocytes are not only determined by their mechanical environment, but also by the process of ossification.</abstract><cop>England</cop><pub>Blackwell Publishing Ltd</pub><pmid>37042280</pmid><doi>10.1111/febs.16797</doi><tpages>4091</tpages><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-6498-4702</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0001-9242-2486</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0001-6967-5055</orcidid></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | ISSN: 1742-464X |
ispartof | The FEBS journal, 2023-08, Vol.290 (16), p.4074-4091 |
issn | 1742-464X 1742-4658 |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_2800147882 |
source | Wiley Online Library Journals Frontfile Complete; Wiley Online Library Free Content; Free Full-Text Journals in Chemistry |
subjects | Aging Bone growth Bones Calvaria Cell differentiation Cortical bone Cytoskeleton Dendrites Endochondral bone Femur Gene expression Gene sequencing Genes Illumination Intramembraneous bone Long bone Mechanical analysis Microscopy morphology Ossification Osteocytes Osteogenesis RNA‐seq Sequence analysis Transcriptomics Venn diagrams |
title | Distinct differences between calvarial and long bone osteocytes in cell morphologies, gene expression and aging responses |
url | https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-14T21%3A11%3A55IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Distinct%20differences%20between%20calvarial%20and%20long%20bone%20osteocytes%20in%20cell%20morphologies,%20gene%20expression%20and%20aging%20responses&rft.jtitle=The%20FEBS%20journal&rft.au=Gao,%20Minhao&rft.date=2023-08&rft.volume=290&rft.issue=16&rft.spage=4074&rft.epage=4091&rft.pages=4074-4091&rft.issn=1742-464X&rft.eissn=1742-4658&rft_id=info:doi/10.1111/febs.16797&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E2800147882%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=2851056853&rft_id=info:pmid/37042280&rfr_iscdi=true |