Supporting conservationists' mental health through better working conditions
Biodiversity conservation work can be challenging but rewarding, and both aspects have potential consequences for conservationists' mental health. Yet, little is known about patterns of mental health among conservationists and its associated workplace protective and risk factors. A better under...
Gespeichert in:
Veröffentlicht in: | Conservation biology 2023-10, Vol.37 (5), p.e14097-e14097 |
---|---|
Hauptverfasser: | , , , , , , , , , , , , , , |
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | eng |
Schlagworte: | |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
container_end_page | e14097 |
---|---|
container_issue | 5 |
container_start_page | e14097 |
container_title | Conservation biology |
container_volume | 37 |
creator | Pienkowski, Thomas Keane, Aidan Castelló Y Tickell, Sofia de Lange, Emiel Hazenbosch, Mirjam Khanyari, Munib Arlidge, William N S Baranyi, Gergő Brittain, Stephanie Kapoor, Vena Mohan, Vik Papworth, Sarah Ravi, Roshni Smit, Izak P J Milner-Gulland, E J |
description | Biodiversity conservation work can be challenging but rewarding, and both aspects have potential consequences for conservationists' mental health. Yet, little is known about patterns of mental health among conservationists and its associated workplace protective and risk factors. A better understanding might help improve working conditions, supporting conservationists' job satisfaction, productivity, and engagement, while reducing costs from staff turnover, absenteeism, and presenteeism. We surveyed 2311 conservation professionals working in 122 countries through an internet survey shared via mailing lists, social media, and other channels. We asked them about experiences of psychological distress, working conditions, and personal characteristics. Over half were from and worked in Europe and North America, and most had a university-level education, were in desk-based academic and practitioner roles, and responded in English. Heavy workload, job demands, and organizational instability were linked to higher distress, but job stability and satisfaction with one's contributions to conservation were associated with lower distress. Respondents with low dispositional and conservation-specific optimism, poor physical health, and limited social support, women, and early-career professionals were most at risk of distress in our sample. Our results flag important risk factors that employers could consider, although further research is needed among groups underrepresented in our sample. Drawing on evidence-based occupational health interventions, we suggest measures that could promote better working conditions and thus may improve conservationists' mental health and abilities to protect nature. |
doi_str_mv | 10.1111/cobi.14097 |
format | Article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_2800147467</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>2869648570</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c351t-2ee28f44d826962fd1ed09b4e316e648de48b50c1dc293d9156b051387eba78c3</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNpdkMtOwzAQRS0EoqWw4QNQJBYgpBS_EttLVPGSKrEA1lFiT5qUJA62A-LvSWlhwWxmc-6d0UHolOA5Geda26KeE46V2ENTklAWE8HUPppiKWUspaITdOT9GmOsEsIP0YQJzClWbIqWz0PfWxfqbhVp23lwH3mobVf74C-iFrqQN1EFeROqKFTODqsqKiAEcNGndW-7mKk3GX-MDsq88XCy2zP0enf7sniIl0_3j4ubZaxZQkJMAagsOTeSpiqlpSFgsCo4MJJCyqUBLosEa2I0VcwokqQFTgiTAopcSM1m6HLb2zv7PoAPWVt7DU2Td2AHn1GJMeGCp2JEz_-hazu4bvxupMbrXCYCj9TVltLOeu-gzHpXt7n7ygjONo6zjePsx_EIn-0qh6IF84f-SmXfdft3pA</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>2869648570</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Supporting conservationists' mental health through better working conditions</title><source>Wiley Online Library All Journals</source><creator>Pienkowski, Thomas ; Keane, Aidan ; Castelló Y Tickell, Sofia ; de Lange, Emiel ; Hazenbosch, Mirjam ; Khanyari, Munib ; Arlidge, William N S ; Baranyi, Gergő ; Brittain, Stephanie ; Kapoor, Vena ; Mohan, Vik ; Papworth, Sarah ; Ravi, Roshni ; Smit, Izak P J ; Milner-Gulland, E J</creator><creatorcontrib>Pienkowski, Thomas ; Keane, Aidan ; Castelló Y Tickell, Sofia ; de Lange, Emiel ; Hazenbosch, Mirjam ; Khanyari, Munib ; Arlidge, William N S ; Baranyi, Gergő ; Brittain, Stephanie ; Kapoor, Vena ; Mohan, Vik ; Papworth, Sarah ; Ravi, Roshni ; Smit, Izak P J ; Milner-Gulland, E J</creatorcontrib><description>Biodiversity conservation work can be challenging but rewarding, and both aspects have potential consequences for conservationists' mental health. Yet, little is known about patterns of mental health among conservationists and its associated workplace protective and risk factors. A better understanding might help improve working conditions, supporting conservationists' job satisfaction, productivity, and engagement, while reducing costs from staff turnover, absenteeism, and presenteeism. We surveyed 2311 conservation professionals working in 122 countries through an internet survey shared via mailing lists, social media, and other channels. We asked them about experiences of psychological distress, working conditions, and personal characteristics. Over half were from and worked in Europe and North America, and most had a university-level education, were in desk-based academic and practitioner roles, and responded in English. Heavy workload, job demands, and organizational instability were linked to higher distress, but job stability and satisfaction with one's contributions to conservation were associated with lower distress. Respondents with low dispositional and conservation-specific optimism, poor physical health, and limited social support, women, and early-career professionals were most at risk of distress in our sample. Our results flag important risk factors that employers could consider, although further research is needed among groups underrepresented in our sample. Drawing on evidence-based occupational health interventions, we suggest measures that could promote better working conditions and thus may improve conservationists' mental health and abilities to protect nature.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0888-8892</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1523-1739</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1111/cobi.14097</identifier><identifier>PMID: 37042093</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>United States: Blackwell Publishing Ltd</publisher><subject>Absenteeism ; Biodiversity ; Careers ; Colleges & universities ; Conservation ; Educational institutions ; Health promotion ; Job satisfaction ; Mental disorders ; Mental health ; Occupational health ; Psychological stress ; Risk factors ; Social interactions ; Social media ; Wildlife conservation ; Women ; Working conditions ; Workload</subject><ispartof>Conservation biology, 2023-10, Vol.37 (5), p.e14097-e14097</ispartof><rights>2023 The Authors. Conservation Biology published by Wiley Periodicals LLC on behalf of Society for Conservation Biology.</rights><rights>2023. This article is published under http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ (the “License”). Notwithstanding the ProQuest Terms and Conditions, you may use this content in accordance with the terms of the License.</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c351t-2ee28f44d826962fd1ed09b4e316e648de48b50c1dc293d9156b051387eba78c3</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c351t-2ee28f44d826962fd1ed09b4e316e648de48b50c1dc293d9156b051387eba78c3</cites><orcidid>0000-0002-1807-4150 ; 0000-0002-5853-3657 ; 0000-0002-7865-0391 ; 0000-0002-3803-7533 ; 0000-0002-8746-1912 ; 0000-0002-9704-5576</orcidid></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><link.rule.ids>314,780,784,27923,27924</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37042093$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Pienkowski, Thomas</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Keane, Aidan</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Castelló Y Tickell, Sofia</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>de Lange, Emiel</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Hazenbosch, Mirjam</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Khanyari, Munib</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Arlidge, William N S</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Baranyi, Gergő</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Brittain, Stephanie</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Kapoor, Vena</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Mohan, Vik</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Papworth, Sarah</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Ravi, Roshni</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Smit, Izak P J</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Milner-Gulland, E J</creatorcontrib><title>Supporting conservationists' mental health through better working conditions</title><title>Conservation biology</title><addtitle>Conserv Biol</addtitle><description>Biodiversity conservation work can be challenging but rewarding, and both aspects have potential consequences for conservationists' mental health. Yet, little is known about patterns of mental health among conservationists and its associated workplace protective and risk factors. A better understanding might help improve working conditions, supporting conservationists' job satisfaction, productivity, and engagement, while reducing costs from staff turnover, absenteeism, and presenteeism. We surveyed 2311 conservation professionals working in 122 countries through an internet survey shared via mailing lists, social media, and other channels. We asked them about experiences of psychological distress, working conditions, and personal characteristics. Over half were from and worked in Europe and North America, and most had a university-level education, were in desk-based academic and practitioner roles, and responded in English. Heavy workload, job demands, and organizational instability were linked to higher distress, but job stability and satisfaction with one's contributions to conservation were associated with lower distress. Respondents with low dispositional and conservation-specific optimism, poor physical health, and limited social support, women, and early-career professionals were most at risk of distress in our sample. Our results flag important risk factors that employers could consider, although further research is needed among groups underrepresented in our sample. Drawing on evidence-based occupational health interventions, we suggest measures that could promote better working conditions and thus may improve conservationists' mental health and abilities to protect nature.</description><subject>Absenteeism</subject><subject>Biodiversity</subject><subject>Careers</subject><subject>Colleges & universities</subject><subject>Conservation</subject><subject>Educational institutions</subject><subject>Health promotion</subject><subject>Job satisfaction</subject><subject>Mental disorders</subject><subject>Mental health</subject><subject>Occupational health</subject><subject>Psychological stress</subject><subject>Risk factors</subject><subject>Social interactions</subject><subject>Social media</subject><subject>Wildlife conservation</subject><subject>Women</subject><subject>Working conditions</subject><subject>Workload</subject><issn>0888-8892</issn><issn>1523-1739</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2023</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><recordid>eNpdkMtOwzAQRS0EoqWw4QNQJBYgpBS_EttLVPGSKrEA1lFiT5qUJA62A-LvSWlhwWxmc-6d0UHolOA5Geda26KeE46V2ENTklAWE8HUPppiKWUspaITdOT9GmOsEsIP0YQJzClWbIqWz0PfWxfqbhVp23lwH3mobVf74C-iFrqQN1EFeROqKFTODqsqKiAEcNGndW-7mKk3GX-MDsq88XCy2zP0enf7sniIl0_3j4ubZaxZQkJMAagsOTeSpiqlpSFgsCo4MJJCyqUBLosEa2I0VcwokqQFTgiTAopcSM1m6HLb2zv7PoAPWVt7DU2Td2AHn1GJMeGCp2JEz_-hazu4bvxupMbrXCYCj9TVltLOeu-gzHpXt7n7ygjONo6zjePsx_EIn-0qh6IF84f-SmXfdft3pA</recordid><startdate>20231001</startdate><enddate>20231001</enddate><creator>Pienkowski, Thomas</creator><creator>Keane, Aidan</creator><creator>Castelló Y Tickell, Sofia</creator><creator>de Lange, Emiel</creator><creator>Hazenbosch, Mirjam</creator><creator>Khanyari, Munib</creator><creator>Arlidge, William N S</creator><creator>Baranyi, Gergő</creator><creator>Brittain, Stephanie</creator><creator>Kapoor, Vena</creator><creator>Mohan, Vik</creator><creator>Papworth, Sarah</creator><creator>Ravi, Roshni</creator><creator>Smit, Izak P J</creator><creator>Milner-Gulland, E J</creator><general>Blackwell Publishing Ltd</general><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7QG</scope><scope>7SN</scope><scope>7SS</scope><scope>7ST</scope><scope>7U6</scope><scope>8FD</scope><scope>C1K</scope><scope>F1W</scope><scope>FR3</scope><scope>H95</scope><scope>L.G</scope><scope>P64</scope><scope>RC3</scope><scope>SOI</scope><scope>7X8</scope><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-1807-4150</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-5853-3657</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-7865-0391</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-3803-7533</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-8746-1912</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-9704-5576</orcidid></search><sort><creationdate>20231001</creationdate><title>Supporting conservationists' mental health through better working conditions</title><author>Pienkowski, Thomas ; Keane, Aidan ; Castelló Y Tickell, Sofia ; de Lange, Emiel ; Hazenbosch, Mirjam ; Khanyari, Munib ; Arlidge, William N S ; Baranyi, Gergő ; Brittain, Stephanie ; Kapoor, Vena ; Mohan, Vik ; Papworth, Sarah ; Ravi, Roshni ; Smit, Izak P J ; Milner-Gulland, E J</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c351t-2ee28f44d826962fd1ed09b4e316e648de48b50c1dc293d9156b051387eba78c3</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2023</creationdate><topic>Absenteeism</topic><topic>Biodiversity</topic><topic>Careers</topic><topic>Colleges & universities</topic><topic>Conservation</topic><topic>Educational institutions</topic><topic>Health promotion</topic><topic>Job satisfaction</topic><topic>Mental disorders</topic><topic>Mental health</topic><topic>Occupational health</topic><topic>Psychological stress</topic><topic>Risk factors</topic><topic>Social interactions</topic><topic>Social media</topic><topic>Wildlife conservation</topic><topic>Women</topic><topic>Working conditions</topic><topic>Workload</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Pienkowski, Thomas</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Keane, Aidan</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Castelló Y Tickell, Sofia</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>de Lange, Emiel</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Hazenbosch, Mirjam</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Khanyari, Munib</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Arlidge, William N S</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Baranyi, Gergő</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Brittain, Stephanie</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Kapoor, Vena</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Mohan, Vik</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Papworth, Sarah</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Ravi, Roshni</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Smit, Izak P J</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Milner-Gulland, E J</creatorcontrib><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>Animal Behavior Abstracts</collection><collection>Ecology Abstracts</collection><collection>Entomology Abstracts (Full archive)</collection><collection>Environment Abstracts</collection><collection>Sustainability Science Abstracts</collection><collection>Technology Research Database</collection><collection>Environmental Sciences and Pollution Management</collection><collection>ASFA: Aquatic Sciences and Fisheries Abstracts</collection><collection>Engineering Research Database</collection><collection>Aquatic Science & Fisheries Abstracts (ASFA) 1: Biological Sciences & Living Resources</collection><collection>Aquatic Science & Fisheries Abstracts (ASFA) Professional</collection><collection>Biotechnology and BioEngineering Abstracts</collection><collection>Genetics Abstracts</collection><collection>Environment Abstracts</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><jtitle>Conservation biology</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Pienkowski, Thomas</au><au>Keane, Aidan</au><au>Castelló Y Tickell, Sofia</au><au>de Lange, Emiel</au><au>Hazenbosch, Mirjam</au><au>Khanyari, Munib</au><au>Arlidge, William N S</au><au>Baranyi, Gergő</au><au>Brittain, Stephanie</au><au>Kapoor, Vena</au><au>Mohan, Vik</au><au>Papworth, Sarah</au><au>Ravi, Roshni</au><au>Smit, Izak P J</au><au>Milner-Gulland, E J</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Supporting conservationists' mental health through better working conditions</atitle><jtitle>Conservation biology</jtitle><addtitle>Conserv Biol</addtitle><date>2023-10-01</date><risdate>2023</risdate><volume>37</volume><issue>5</issue><spage>e14097</spage><epage>e14097</epage><pages>e14097-e14097</pages><issn>0888-8892</issn><eissn>1523-1739</eissn><abstract>Biodiversity conservation work can be challenging but rewarding, and both aspects have potential consequences for conservationists' mental health. Yet, little is known about patterns of mental health among conservationists and its associated workplace protective and risk factors. A better understanding might help improve working conditions, supporting conservationists' job satisfaction, productivity, and engagement, while reducing costs from staff turnover, absenteeism, and presenteeism. We surveyed 2311 conservation professionals working in 122 countries through an internet survey shared via mailing lists, social media, and other channels. We asked them about experiences of psychological distress, working conditions, and personal characteristics. Over half were from and worked in Europe and North America, and most had a university-level education, were in desk-based academic and practitioner roles, and responded in English. Heavy workload, job demands, and organizational instability were linked to higher distress, but job stability and satisfaction with one's contributions to conservation were associated with lower distress. Respondents with low dispositional and conservation-specific optimism, poor physical health, and limited social support, women, and early-career professionals were most at risk of distress in our sample. Our results flag important risk factors that employers could consider, although further research is needed among groups underrepresented in our sample. Drawing on evidence-based occupational health interventions, we suggest measures that could promote better working conditions and thus may improve conservationists' mental health and abilities to protect nature.</abstract><cop>United States</cop><pub>Blackwell Publishing Ltd</pub><pmid>37042093</pmid><doi>10.1111/cobi.14097</doi><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-1807-4150</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-5853-3657</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-7865-0391</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-3803-7533</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-8746-1912</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-9704-5576</orcidid><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | ISSN: 0888-8892 |
ispartof | Conservation biology, 2023-10, Vol.37 (5), p.e14097-e14097 |
issn | 0888-8892 1523-1739 |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_2800147467 |
source | Wiley Online Library All Journals |
subjects | Absenteeism Biodiversity Careers Colleges & universities Conservation Educational institutions Health promotion Job satisfaction Mental disorders Mental health Occupational health Psychological stress Risk factors Social interactions Social media Wildlife conservation Women Working conditions Workload |
title | Supporting conservationists' mental health through better working conditions |
url | https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-11T14%3A26%3A21IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Supporting%20conservationists'%20mental%20health%20through%20better%20working%20conditions&rft.jtitle=Conservation%20biology&rft.au=Pienkowski,%20Thomas&rft.date=2023-10-01&rft.volume=37&rft.issue=5&rft.spage=e14097&rft.epage=e14097&rft.pages=e14097-e14097&rft.issn=0888-8892&rft.eissn=1523-1739&rft_id=info:doi/10.1111/cobi.14097&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E2869648570%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=2869648570&rft_id=info:pmid/37042093&rfr_iscdi=true |