Bee diversity decreases rapidly with time since harvest in intensively managed conifer forests

Despite widespread concerns about the anthropogenic drivers of global pollinator declines, little information is available about the impacts of land management practices on wild bees outside of agricultural systems, including in forests managed intensively for wood production. We assessed changes in...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Ecological applications 2023-07, Vol.33 (5), p.e2855-n/a
Hauptverfasser: Zitomer, Rachel A., Galbraith, Sara M., Betts, Matthew G., Moldenke, Andrew R., Progar, Robert A., Rivers, James W.
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page n/a
container_issue 5
container_start_page e2855
container_title Ecological applications
container_volume 33
creator Zitomer, Rachel A.
Galbraith, Sara M.
Betts, Matthew G.
Moldenke, Andrew R.
Progar, Robert A.
Rivers, James W.
description Despite widespread concerns about the anthropogenic drivers of global pollinator declines, little information is available about the impacts of land management practices on wild bees outside of agricultural systems, including in forests managed intensively for wood production. We assessed changes in wild bee communities with time since harvest in 60 intensively managed Douglas‐fir (Pseudotsuga menziesii) stands across a gradient in stand ages spanning a typical harvest rotation. We measured bee abundance, species richness, and alpha and beta diversity, as well as habitat characteristics (i.e., floral resources, nesting substrates, understory vegetation, and early seral forest in the surrounding landscape) during the spring and summer of 2018 and 2019. We found that bee abundance and species richness declined rapidly with stand age, decreasing by 61% and 48%, respectively, for every 5 years since timber harvest. Asymptotic estimates of Shannon and Simpson diversity were highest in stands 6–10 years post‐harvest and lowest after the forest canopy had closed, ~11 years post‐harvest. Bee communities in older stands were nested subsets of bee communities found in younger stands, indicating that changes were due to species loss rather than turnover as the stands aged. Bee abundance—but not species richness—was positively associated with floral resource density, and neither metric was associated with floral richness. The amount of early seral forest in the surrounding landscape seemed to enhance bee species richness in older, closed‐canopy stands, but otherwise had little effect. Changes in the relative abundance of bee species did not relate to bee functional characteristics such as sociality, diet breadth, or nesting substrate. Our study demonstrates that Douglas‐fir plantations develop diverse communities of wild bees shortly after harvest, but those communities erode rapidly over time as forest canopies close. Therefore, stand‐scale management activities that prolong the precanopy closure period and enhance floral resources during the initial stage of stand regeneration will provide the greatest opportunity to enhance bee diversity in landscapes dominated by intensively managed conifer forests.
doi_str_mv 10.1002/eap.2855
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_2799827909</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>2835235684</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c3835-e765222faaa9a43afcf8944f58889b0eba26cfc80da800624e21e5a9b453670c3</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp1kE1LxDAURYMoOo6Cv0ACbtxU07Rpk6WKXzCgC90aXtMXJ0O_TDrK_HujjgqCISRZnJx3uYQcpOwkZYyfIgwnXAqxQSapylQihOSb8c1EmrCySHfIbggLFhfnfJvsZCXLGWd8Qp7OEWntXtEHN65ojcYjBAzUw-DqZkXf3Dino2uRBtcZpHPwrxhG6rq4R-xC_BuxFjp4xpqavnMWPbW9j1TYI1sWmoD763tKHq8uHy5uktnd9e3F2SwxmcxEgmUhYjILAAryDKyxUuW5FVJKVTGsgBfGGslqkIwVPEeeogBV5SIrSmayKTn-8g6-f1nGybp1wWDTQIf9MmheKiXjwVREj_6gi37pu5hO85iFZ6KQ-a_Q-D4Ej1YP3rXgVzpl-qNzHTvXH51H9HAtXFYt1j_gd8kRSL6AN9fg6l-Rvjy7_xS-A1SqirE</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>2835235684</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Bee diversity decreases rapidly with time since harvest in intensively managed conifer forests</title><source>Wiley Online Library Journals Frontfile Complete</source><creator>Zitomer, Rachel A. ; Galbraith, Sara M. ; Betts, Matthew G. ; Moldenke, Andrew R. ; Progar, Robert A. ; Rivers, James W.</creator><creatorcontrib>Zitomer, Rachel A. ; Galbraith, Sara M. ; Betts, Matthew G. ; Moldenke, Andrew R. ; Progar, Robert A. ; Rivers, James W.</creatorcontrib><description>Despite widespread concerns about the anthropogenic drivers of global pollinator declines, little information is available about the impacts of land management practices on wild bees outside of agricultural systems, including in forests managed intensively for wood production. We assessed changes in wild bee communities with time since harvest in 60 intensively managed Douglas‐fir (Pseudotsuga menziesii) stands across a gradient in stand ages spanning a typical harvest rotation. We measured bee abundance, species richness, and alpha and beta diversity, as well as habitat characteristics (i.e., floral resources, nesting substrates, understory vegetation, and early seral forest in the surrounding landscape) during the spring and summer of 2018 and 2019. We found that bee abundance and species richness declined rapidly with stand age, decreasing by 61% and 48%, respectively, for every 5 years since timber harvest. Asymptotic estimates of Shannon and Simpson diversity were highest in stands 6–10 years post‐harvest and lowest after the forest canopy had closed, ~11 years post‐harvest. Bee communities in older stands were nested subsets of bee communities found in younger stands, indicating that changes were due to species loss rather than turnover as the stands aged. Bee abundance—but not species richness—was positively associated with floral resource density, and neither metric was associated with floral richness. The amount of early seral forest in the surrounding landscape seemed to enhance bee species richness in older, closed‐canopy stands, but otherwise had little effect. Changes in the relative abundance of bee species did not relate to bee functional characteristics such as sociality, diet breadth, or nesting substrate. Our study demonstrates that Douglas‐fir plantations develop diverse communities of wild bees shortly after harvest, but those communities erode rapidly over time as forest canopies close. Therefore, stand‐scale management activities that prolong the precanopy closure period and enhance floral resources during the initial stage of stand regeneration will provide the greatest opportunity to enhance bee diversity in landscapes dominated by intensively managed conifer forests.</description><identifier>ISSN: 1051-0761</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1939-5582</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1002/eap.2855</identifier><identifier>PMID: 37040202</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Hoboken, USA: John Wiley &amp; Sons, Inc</publisher><subject>Abundance ; Anthropogenic factors ; Bees ; Canopies ; Coniferous forests ; Conifers ; early seral forest ; Farming systems ; forest biodiversity ; Forest management ; Forests ; Harvest ; Harvesting ; Human influences ; intensive forest management ; Land management ; Landscape ; Nesting ; pollinator ; Pollinators ; Population decline ; Pseudotsuga menziesii ; Relative abundance ; Species richness ; Substrates ; timber plantation ; Understory</subject><ispartof>Ecological applications, 2023-07, Vol.33 (5), p.e2855-n/a</ispartof><rights>2023 The Ecological Society of America.</rights><rights>Copyright Ecological Society of America Jul 2023</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c3835-e765222faaa9a43afcf8944f58889b0eba26cfc80da800624e21e5a9b453670c3</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c3835-e765222faaa9a43afcf8944f58889b0eba26cfc80da800624e21e5a9b453670c3</cites><orcidid>0000-0002-7100-2551 ; 0000-0001-5041-6002 ; 0000-0002-1888-1817 ; 0000-0002-5138-3297</orcidid></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/pdf/10.1002%2Feap.2855$$EPDF$$P50$$Gwiley$$H</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/full/10.1002%2Feap.2855$$EHTML$$P50$$Gwiley$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,776,780,1411,27903,27904,45553,45554</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37040202$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Zitomer, Rachel A.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Galbraith, Sara M.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Betts, Matthew G.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Moldenke, Andrew R.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Progar, Robert A.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Rivers, James W.</creatorcontrib><title>Bee diversity decreases rapidly with time since harvest in intensively managed conifer forests</title><title>Ecological applications</title><addtitle>Ecol Appl</addtitle><description>Despite widespread concerns about the anthropogenic drivers of global pollinator declines, little information is available about the impacts of land management practices on wild bees outside of agricultural systems, including in forests managed intensively for wood production. We assessed changes in wild bee communities with time since harvest in 60 intensively managed Douglas‐fir (Pseudotsuga menziesii) stands across a gradient in stand ages spanning a typical harvest rotation. We measured bee abundance, species richness, and alpha and beta diversity, as well as habitat characteristics (i.e., floral resources, nesting substrates, understory vegetation, and early seral forest in the surrounding landscape) during the spring and summer of 2018 and 2019. We found that bee abundance and species richness declined rapidly with stand age, decreasing by 61% and 48%, respectively, for every 5 years since timber harvest. Asymptotic estimates of Shannon and Simpson diversity were highest in stands 6–10 years post‐harvest and lowest after the forest canopy had closed, ~11 years post‐harvest. Bee communities in older stands were nested subsets of bee communities found in younger stands, indicating that changes were due to species loss rather than turnover as the stands aged. Bee abundance—but not species richness—was positively associated with floral resource density, and neither metric was associated with floral richness. The amount of early seral forest in the surrounding landscape seemed to enhance bee species richness in older, closed‐canopy stands, but otherwise had little effect. Changes in the relative abundance of bee species did not relate to bee functional characteristics such as sociality, diet breadth, or nesting substrate. Our study demonstrates that Douglas‐fir plantations develop diverse communities of wild bees shortly after harvest, but those communities erode rapidly over time as forest canopies close. Therefore, stand‐scale management activities that prolong the precanopy closure period and enhance floral resources during the initial stage of stand regeneration will provide the greatest opportunity to enhance bee diversity in landscapes dominated by intensively managed conifer forests.</description><subject>Abundance</subject><subject>Anthropogenic factors</subject><subject>Bees</subject><subject>Canopies</subject><subject>Coniferous forests</subject><subject>Conifers</subject><subject>early seral forest</subject><subject>Farming systems</subject><subject>forest biodiversity</subject><subject>Forest management</subject><subject>Forests</subject><subject>Harvest</subject><subject>Harvesting</subject><subject>Human influences</subject><subject>intensive forest management</subject><subject>Land management</subject><subject>Landscape</subject><subject>Nesting</subject><subject>pollinator</subject><subject>Pollinators</subject><subject>Population decline</subject><subject>Pseudotsuga menziesii</subject><subject>Relative abundance</subject><subject>Species richness</subject><subject>Substrates</subject><subject>timber plantation</subject><subject>Understory</subject><issn>1051-0761</issn><issn>1939-5582</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2023</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><recordid>eNp1kE1LxDAURYMoOo6Cv0ACbtxU07Rpk6WKXzCgC90aXtMXJ0O_TDrK_HujjgqCISRZnJx3uYQcpOwkZYyfIgwnXAqxQSapylQihOSb8c1EmrCySHfIbggLFhfnfJvsZCXLGWd8Qp7OEWntXtEHN65ojcYjBAzUw-DqZkXf3Dino2uRBtcZpHPwrxhG6rq4R-xC_BuxFjp4xpqavnMWPbW9j1TYI1sWmoD763tKHq8uHy5uktnd9e3F2SwxmcxEgmUhYjILAAryDKyxUuW5FVJKVTGsgBfGGslqkIwVPEeeogBV5SIrSmayKTn-8g6-f1nGybp1wWDTQIf9MmheKiXjwVREj_6gi37pu5hO85iFZ6KQ-a_Q-D4Ej1YP3rXgVzpl-qNzHTvXH51H9HAtXFYt1j_gd8kRSL6AN9fg6l-Rvjy7_xS-A1SqirE</recordid><startdate>202307</startdate><enddate>202307</enddate><creator>Zitomer, Rachel A.</creator><creator>Galbraith, Sara M.</creator><creator>Betts, Matthew G.</creator><creator>Moldenke, Andrew R.</creator><creator>Progar, Robert A.</creator><creator>Rivers, James W.</creator><general>John Wiley &amp; Sons, Inc</general><general>Ecological Society of America</general><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7QG</scope><scope>7SN</scope><scope>7SS</scope><scope>7ST</scope><scope>7U7</scope><scope>8FD</scope><scope>C1K</scope><scope>FR3</scope><scope>M7N</scope><scope>P64</scope><scope>RC3</scope><scope>SOI</scope><scope>7X8</scope><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-7100-2551</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0001-5041-6002</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-1888-1817</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-5138-3297</orcidid></search><sort><creationdate>202307</creationdate><title>Bee diversity decreases rapidly with time since harvest in intensively managed conifer forests</title><author>Zitomer, Rachel A. ; Galbraith, Sara M. ; Betts, Matthew G. ; Moldenke, Andrew R. ; Progar, Robert A. ; Rivers, James W.</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c3835-e765222faaa9a43afcf8944f58889b0eba26cfc80da800624e21e5a9b453670c3</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2023</creationdate><topic>Abundance</topic><topic>Anthropogenic factors</topic><topic>Bees</topic><topic>Canopies</topic><topic>Coniferous forests</topic><topic>Conifers</topic><topic>early seral forest</topic><topic>Farming systems</topic><topic>forest biodiversity</topic><topic>Forest management</topic><topic>Forests</topic><topic>Harvest</topic><topic>Harvesting</topic><topic>Human influences</topic><topic>intensive forest management</topic><topic>Land management</topic><topic>Landscape</topic><topic>Nesting</topic><topic>pollinator</topic><topic>Pollinators</topic><topic>Population decline</topic><topic>Pseudotsuga menziesii</topic><topic>Relative abundance</topic><topic>Species richness</topic><topic>Substrates</topic><topic>timber plantation</topic><topic>Understory</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Zitomer, Rachel A.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Galbraith, Sara M.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Betts, Matthew G.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Moldenke, Andrew R.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Progar, Robert A.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Rivers, James W.</creatorcontrib><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>Animal Behavior Abstracts</collection><collection>Ecology Abstracts</collection><collection>Entomology Abstracts (Full archive)</collection><collection>Environment Abstracts</collection><collection>Toxicology Abstracts</collection><collection>Technology Research Database</collection><collection>Environmental Sciences and Pollution Management</collection><collection>Engineering Research Database</collection><collection>Algology Mycology and Protozoology Abstracts (Microbiology C)</collection><collection>Biotechnology and BioEngineering Abstracts</collection><collection>Genetics Abstracts</collection><collection>Environment Abstracts</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><jtitle>Ecological applications</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Zitomer, Rachel A.</au><au>Galbraith, Sara M.</au><au>Betts, Matthew G.</au><au>Moldenke, Andrew R.</au><au>Progar, Robert A.</au><au>Rivers, James W.</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Bee diversity decreases rapidly with time since harvest in intensively managed conifer forests</atitle><jtitle>Ecological applications</jtitle><addtitle>Ecol Appl</addtitle><date>2023-07</date><risdate>2023</risdate><volume>33</volume><issue>5</issue><spage>e2855</spage><epage>n/a</epage><pages>e2855-n/a</pages><issn>1051-0761</issn><eissn>1939-5582</eissn><abstract>Despite widespread concerns about the anthropogenic drivers of global pollinator declines, little information is available about the impacts of land management practices on wild bees outside of agricultural systems, including in forests managed intensively for wood production. We assessed changes in wild bee communities with time since harvest in 60 intensively managed Douglas‐fir (Pseudotsuga menziesii) stands across a gradient in stand ages spanning a typical harvest rotation. We measured bee abundance, species richness, and alpha and beta diversity, as well as habitat characteristics (i.e., floral resources, nesting substrates, understory vegetation, and early seral forest in the surrounding landscape) during the spring and summer of 2018 and 2019. We found that bee abundance and species richness declined rapidly with stand age, decreasing by 61% and 48%, respectively, for every 5 years since timber harvest. Asymptotic estimates of Shannon and Simpson diversity were highest in stands 6–10 years post‐harvest and lowest after the forest canopy had closed, ~11 years post‐harvest. Bee communities in older stands were nested subsets of bee communities found in younger stands, indicating that changes were due to species loss rather than turnover as the stands aged. Bee abundance—but not species richness—was positively associated with floral resource density, and neither metric was associated with floral richness. The amount of early seral forest in the surrounding landscape seemed to enhance bee species richness in older, closed‐canopy stands, but otherwise had little effect. Changes in the relative abundance of bee species did not relate to bee functional characteristics such as sociality, diet breadth, or nesting substrate. Our study demonstrates that Douglas‐fir plantations develop diverse communities of wild bees shortly after harvest, but those communities erode rapidly over time as forest canopies close. Therefore, stand‐scale management activities that prolong the precanopy closure period and enhance floral resources during the initial stage of stand regeneration will provide the greatest opportunity to enhance bee diversity in landscapes dominated by intensively managed conifer forests.</abstract><cop>Hoboken, USA</cop><pub>John Wiley &amp; Sons, Inc</pub><pmid>37040202</pmid><doi>10.1002/eap.2855</doi><tpages>21</tpages><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-7100-2551</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0001-5041-6002</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-1888-1817</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-5138-3297</orcidid><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 1051-0761
ispartof Ecological applications, 2023-07, Vol.33 (5), p.e2855-n/a
issn 1051-0761
1939-5582
language eng
recordid cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_2799827909
source Wiley Online Library Journals Frontfile Complete
subjects Abundance
Anthropogenic factors
Bees
Canopies
Coniferous forests
Conifers
early seral forest
Farming systems
forest biodiversity
Forest management
Forests
Harvest
Harvesting
Human influences
intensive forest management
Land management
Landscape
Nesting
pollinator
Pollinators
Population decline
Pseudotsuga menziesii
Relative abundance
Species richness
Substrates
timber plantation
Understory
title Bee diversity decreases rapidly with time since harvest in intensively managed conifer forests
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-24T12%3A21%3A04IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Bee%20diversity%20decreases%20rapidly%20with%20time%20since%20harvest%20in%20intensively%20managed%20conifer%20forests&rft.jtitle=Ecological%20applications&rft.au=Zitomer,%20Rachel%20A.&rft.date=2023-07&rft.volume=33&rft.issue=5&rft.spage=e2855&rft.epage=n/a&rft.pages=e2855-n/a&rft.issn=1051-0761&rft.eissn=1939-5582&rft_id=info:doi/10.1002/eap.2855&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E2835235684%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=2835235684&rft_id=info:pmid/37040202&rfr_iscdi=true