Profiling the structural determinants of pyrrolidine derivative as gelatinases (MMP-2 and MMP-9) inhibitors using in silico approaches
Quantitative structure activity relationship (QSAR) studies on pyrrolidine derivatives have been established using CoMFA, CoMSIA, and Hologram QSAR analysis to estimate the values (pIC50) of gelatinase inhibitors. When the CoMFA cross-validation value, Q², was 0.625, the training set coefficient of...
Gespeichert in:
Veröffentlicht in: | Computational biology and chemistry 2023-06, Vol.104, p.107855-107855, Article 107855 |
---|---|
Hauptverfasser: | , , , , , , |
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | eng |
Schlagworte: | |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
container_end_page | 107855 |
---|---|
container_issue | |
container_start_page | 107855 |
container_title | Computational biology and chemistry |
container_volume | 104 |
creator | Tabti, Kamal Ahmad, Iqrar Zafar, Imran Sbai, Abdelouahid Maghat, Hamid Bouachrine, Mohammed Lakhlifi, Tahar |
description | Quantitative structure activity relationship (QSAR) studies on pyrrolidine derivatives have been established using CoMFA, CoMSIA, and Hologram QSAR analysis to estimate the values (pIC50) of gelatinase inhibitors. When the CoMFA cross-validation value, Q², was 0.625, the training set coefficient of determination, R² was 0.981. In CoMSIA, Q² was 0.749 and R² was 0.988. In the HQSAR, Q² was 0.84 and R² was 0.946. Visualization of these models was performed by contour maps showing favorable and unfavorable regions for activity, while visualization of HQSAR model was performed by a colored atomic contribution graph. Based on the results obtained of external validation, the CoMSIA model was statistically more significant and robust and was selected as the best model to predict new, more active inhibitors. To study the modes of interactions of the predicted compounds in the active site of MMP-2 and MMP-9, a simulation of molecular docking was realized. A combined study of MD simulations and calculation of free binding energy, were also carried out to validate the results obtained on the best predicted and most active compound in dataset and the compound NNGH as control compound. The results confirm the molecular docking results and indicate that the predicted ligands were stable in the binding site of MMP-2 and MMP-9.
[Display omitted]
•Different methods were used for QSAR modeling for gelatinases (MMP-2 and MMP-9) inhibitors•New potential gelatinases inhibitors were designed based on the QSAR model with high-predicted activity.•The newly designed compounds have good ADMET properties and drug likeness.•Molecular docking study was used to analyze the interaction between ligand/receptor.•The MD simulation and free binding energy supported the interaction stability of best ligands in the active site. |
doi_str_mv | 10.1016/j.compbiolchem.2023.107855 |
format | Article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_2798715732</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><els_id>S1476927123000464</els_id><sourcerecordid>2798715732</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c380t-d6b6e275cce9fc698afe8131bdf1c54d5367e7d5fcee9a6fc9f1bc4fcae5a66d3</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNqNkc9u1DAQxi1ERf_AKyCLUzlkGydrO-GGWihIrdoDSNwsxx53Z5XYwXZW6gvw3Hi1peLY03zSfDM_zXyEfGD1itVMXGxXJkzzgGE0G5hWTd20pSE7zl-RE7aWouqb7tfrZy3ZMTlNaVsXY13zN-S4lUWKdX1C_tzH4HBE_0DzBmjKcTF5iXqkFjLECb32OdHg6PwYYxjRoofSi7jTGXdAdaIPMBbtdYJEz29v76uGam_pXvUfKfoNDphDTHRJew56mgrRBKrnOQZdjkhvyZHTY4J3T_WM_Pz65cflt-rm7vr75eebyrRdnSsrBgGN5MZA74zoO-2gYy0brGOGry1vhQRpuTMAvRbO9I4NZu2MBq6FsO0ZOT_sLeDfC6SsJkwGxlF7CEtSjew7ybhsm2L9dLCaGFKK4NQccdLxUbFa7XNQW_V_DmqfgzrkUIbfP3GWYQL7PPrv8cVwdTBAuXaHEFUyCN6AxQgmKxvwJZy_I3SkMQ</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>2798715732</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Profiling the structural determinants of pyrrolidine derivative as gelatinases (MMP-2 and MMP-9) inhibitors using in silico approaches</title><source>MEDLINE</source><source>Access via ScienceDirect (Elsevier)</source><creator>Tabti, Kamal ; Ahmad, Iqrar ; Zafar, Imran ; Sbai, Abdelouahid ; Maghat, Hamid ; Bouachrine, Mohammed ; Lakhlifi, Tahar</creator><creatorcontrib>Tabti, Kamal ; Ahmad, Iqrar ; Zafar, Imran ; Sbai, Abdelouahid ; Maghat, Hamid ; Bouachrine, Mohammed ; Lakhlifi, Tahar</creatorcontrib><description>Quantitative structure activity relationship (QSAR) studies on pyrrolidine derivatives have been established using CoMFA, CoMSIA, and Hologram QSAR analysis to estimate the values (pIC50) of gelatinase inhibitors. When the CoMFA cross-validation value, Q², was 0.625, the training set coefficient of determination, R² was 0.981. In CoMSIA, Q² was 0.749 and R² was 0.988. In the HQSAR, Q² was 0.84 and R² was 0.946. Visualization of these models was performed by contour maps showing favorable and unfavorable regions for activity, while visualization of HQSAR model was performed by a colored atomic contribution graph. Based on the results obtained of external validation, the CoMSIA model was statistically more significant and robust and was selected as the best model to predict new, more active inhibitors. To study the modes of interactions of the predicted compounds in the active site of MMP-2 and MMP-9, a simulation of molecular docking was realized. A combined study of MD simulations and calculation of free binding energy, were also carried out to validate the results obtained on the best predicted and most active compound in dataset and the compound NNGH as control compound. The results confirm the molecular docking results and indicate that the predicted ligands were stable in the binding site of MMP-2 and MMP-9.
[Display omitted]
•Different methods were used for QSAR modeling for gelatinases (MMP-2 and MMP-9) inhibitors•New potential gelatinases inhibitors were designed based on the QSAR model with high-predicted activity.•The newly designed compounds have good ADMET properties and drug likeness.•Molecular docking study was used to analyze the interaction between ligand/receptor.•The MD simulation and free binding energy supported the interaction stability of best ligands in the active site.</description><identifier>ISSN: 1476-9271</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1476-928X</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1016/j.compbiolchem.2023.107855</identifier><identifier>PMID: 37023640</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>England: Elsevier Ltd</publisher><subject>Binding Sites ; Docking ; Gelatinases ; Matrix Metalloproteinase 2 ; Matrix Metalloproteinase 9 ; MD simulations ; MMP-2 ; MMP-9 ; Molecular Docking Simulation ; QSAR ; Quantitative Structure-Activity Relationship</subject><ispartof>Computational biology and chemistry, 2023-06, Vol.104, p.107855-107855, Article 107855</ispartof><rights>2023 Elsevier Ltd</rights><rights>Copyright © 2023 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c380t-d6b6e275cce9fc698afe8131bdf1c54d5367e7d5fcee9a6fc9f1bc4fcae5a66d3</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c380t-d6b6e275cce9fc698afe8131bdf1c54d5367e7d5fcee9a6fc9f1bc4fcae5a66d3</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.compbiolchem.2023.107855$$EHTML$$P50$$Gelsevier$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>315,781,785,3551,27929,27930,46000</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37023640$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Tabti, Kamal</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Ahmad, Iqrar</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Zafar, Imran</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Sbai, Abdelouahid</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Maghat, Hamid</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Bouachrine, Mohammed</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Lakhlifi, Tahar</creatorcontrib><title>Profiling the structural determinants of pyrrolidine derivative as gelatinases (MMP-2 and MMP-9) inhibitors using in silico approaches</title><title>Computational biology and chemistry</title><addtitle>Comput Biol Chem</addtitle><description>Quantitative structure activity relationship (QSAR) studies on pyrrolidine derivatives have been established using CoMFA, CoMSIA, and Hologram QSAR analysis to estimate the values (pIC50) of gelatinase inhibitors. When the CoMFA cross-validation value, Q², was 0.625, the training set coefficient of determination, R² was 0.981. In CoMSIA, Q² was 0.749 and R² was 0.988. In the HQSAR, Q² was 0.84 and R² was 0.946. Visualization of these models was performed by contour maps showing favorable and unfavorable regions for activity, while visualization of HQSAR model was performed by a colored atomic contribution graph. Based on the results obtained of external validation, the CoMSIA model was statistically more significant and robust and was selected as the best model to predict new, more active inhibitors. To study the modes of interactions of the predicted compounds in the active site of MMP-2 and MMP-9, a simulation of molecular docking was realized. A combined study of MD simulations and calculation of free binding energy, were also carried out to validate the results obtained on the best predicted and most active compound in dataset and the compound NNGH as control compound. The results confirm the molecular docking results and indicate that the predicted ligands were stable in the binding site of MMP-2 and MMP-9.
[Display omitted]
•Different methods were used for QSAR modeling for gelatinases (MMP-2 and MMP-9) inhibitors•New potential gelatinases inhibitors were designed based on the QSAR model with high-predicted activity.•The newly designed compounds have good ADMET properties and drug likeness.•Molecular docking study was used to analyze the interaction between ligand/receptor.•The MD simulation and free binding energy supported the interaction stability of best ligands in the active site.</description><subject>Binding Sites</subject><subject>Docking</subject><subject>Gelatinases</subject><subject>Matrix Metalloproteinase 2</subject><subject>Matrix Metalloproteinase 9</subject><subject>MD simulations</subject><subject>MMP-2</subject><subject>MMP-9</subject><subject>Molecular Docking Simulation</subject><subject>QSAR</subject><subject>Quantitative Structure-Activity Relationship</subject><issn>1476-9271</issn><issn>1476-928X</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2023</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>EIF</sourceid><recordid>eNqNkc9u1DAQxi1ERf_AKyCLUzlkGydrO-GGWihIrdoDSNwsxx53Z5XYwXZW6gvw3Hi1peLY03zSfDM_zXyEfGD1itVMXGxXJkzzgGE0G5hWTd20pSE7zl-RE7aWouqb7tfrZy3ZMTlNaVsXY13zN-S4lUWKdX1C_tzH4HBE_0DzBmjKcTF5iXqkFjLECb32OdHg6PwYYxjRoofSi7jTGXdAdaIPMBbtdYJEz29v76uGam_pXvUfKfoNDphDTHRJew56mgrRBKrnOQZdjkhvyZHTY4J3T_WM_Pz65cflt-rm7vr75eebyrRdnSsrBgGN5MZA74zoO-2gYy0brGOGry1vhQRpuTMAvRbO9I4NZu2MBq6FsO0ZOT_sLeDfC6SsJkwGxlF7CEtSjew7ybhsm2L9dLCaGFKK4NQccdLxUbFa7XNQW_V_DmqfgzrkUIbfP3GWYQL7PPrv8cVwdTBAuXaHEFUyCN6AxQgmKxvwJZy_I3SkMQ</recordid><startdate>202306</startdate><enddate>202306</enddate><creator>Tabti, Kamal</creator><creator>Ahmad, Iqrar</creator><creator>Zafar, Imran</creator><creator>Sbai, Abdelouahid</creator><creator>Maghat, Hamid</creator><creator>Bouachrine, Mohammed</creator><creator>Lakhlifi, Tahar</creator><general>Elsevier Ltd</general><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7X8</scope></search><sort><creationdate>202306</creationdate><title>Profiling the structural determinants of pyrrolidine derivative as gelatinases (MMP-2 and MMP-9) inhibitors using in silico approaches</title><author>Tabti, Kamal ; Ahmad, Iqrar ; Zafar, Imran ; Sbai, Abdelouahid ; Maghat, Hamid ; Bouachrine, Mohammed ; Lakhlifi, Tahar</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c380t-d6b6e275cce9fc698afe8131bdf1c54d5367e7d5fcee9a6fc9f1bc4fcae5a66d3</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2023</creationdate><topic>Binding Sites</topic><topic>Docking</topic><topic>Gelatinases</topic><topic>Matrix Metalloproteinase 2</topic><topic>Matrix Metalloproteinase 9</topic><topic>MD simulations</topic><topic>MMP-2</topic><topic>MMP-9</topic><topic>Molecular Docking Simulation</topic><topic>QSAR</topic><topic>Quantitative Structure-Activity Relationship</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Tabti, Kamal</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Ahmad, Iqrar</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Zafar, Imran</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Sbai, Abdelouahid</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Maghat, Hamid</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Bouachrine, Mohammed</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Lakhlifi, Tahar</creatorcontrib><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><jtitle>Computational biology and chemistry</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Tabti, Kamal</au><au>Ahmad, Iqrar</au><au>Zafar, Imran</au><au>Sbai, Abdelouahid</au><au>Maghat, Hamid</au><au>Bouachrine, Mohammed</au><au>Lakhlifi, Tahar</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Profiling the structural determinants of pyrrolidine derivative as gelatinases (MMP-2 and MMP-9) inhibitors using in silico approaches</atitle><jtitle>Computational biology and chemistry</jtitle><addtitle>Comput Biol Chem</addtitle><date>2023-06</date><risdate>2023</risdate><volume>104</volume><spage>107855</spage><epage>107855</epage><pages>107855-107855</pages><artnum>107855</artnum><issn>1476-9271</issn><eissn>1476-928X</eissn><abstract>Quantitative structure activity relationship (QSAR) studies on pyrrolidine derivatives have been established using CoMFA, CoMSIA, and Hologram QSAR analysis to estimate the values (pIC50) of gelatinase inhibitors. When the CoMFA cross-validation value, Q², was 0.625, the training set coefficient of determination, R² was 0.981. In CoMSIA, Q² was 0.749 and R² was 0.988. In the HQSAR, Q² was 0.84 and R² was 0.946. Visualization of these models was performed by contour maps showing favorable and unfavorable regions for activity, while visualization of HQSAR model was performed by a colored atomic contribution graph. Based on the results obtained of external validation, the CoMSIA model was statistically more significant and robust and was selected as the best model to predict new, more active inhibitors. To study the modes of interactions of the predicted compounds in the active site of MMP-2 and MMP-9, a simulation of molecular docking was realized. A combined study of MD simulations and calculation of free binding energy, were also carried out to validate the results obtained on the best predicted and most active compound in dataset and the compound NNGH as control compound. The results confirm the molecular docking results and indicate that the predicted ligands were stable in the binding site of MMP-2 and MMP-9.
[Display omitted]
•Different methods were used for QSAR modeling for gelatinases (MMP-2 and MMP-9) inhibitors•New potential gelatinases inhibitors were designed based on the QSAR model with high-predicted activity.•The newly designed compounds have good ADMET properties and drug likeness.•Molecular docking study was used to analyze the interaction between ligand/receptor.•The MD simulation and free binding energy supported the interaction stability of best ligands in the active site.</abstract><cop>England</cop><pub>Elsevier Ltd</pub><pmid>37023640</pmid><doi>10.1016/j.compbiolchem.2023.107855</doi><tpages>1</tpages></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | ISSN: 1476-9271 |
ispartof | Computational biology and chemistry, 2023-06, Vol.104, p.107855-107855, Article 107855 |
issn | 1476-9271 1476-928X |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_2798715732 |
source | MEDLINE; Access via ScienceDirect (Elsevier) |
subjects | Binding Sites Docking Gelatinases Matrix Metalloproteinase 2 Matrix Metalloproteinase 9 MD simulations MMP-2 MMP-9 Molecular Docking Simulation QSAR Quantitative Structure-Activity Relationship |
title | Profiling the structural determinants of pyrrolidine derivative as gelatinases (MMP-2 and MMP-9) inhibitors using in silico approaches |
url | https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2024-12-14T22%3A08%3A36IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Profiling%20the%20structural%20determinants%20of%20pyrrolidine%20derivative%20as%20gelatinases%20(MMP-2%20and%20MMP-9)%20inhibitors%20using%20in%20silico%20approaches&rft.jtitle=Computational%20biology%20and%20chemistry&rft.au=Tabti,%20Kamal&rft.date=2023-06&rft.volume=104&rft.spage=107855&rft.epage=107855&rft.pages=107855-107855&rft.artnum=107855&rft.issn=1476-9271&rft.eissn=1476-928X&rft_id=info:doi/10.1016/j.compbiolchem.2023.107855&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E2798715732%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=2798715732&rft_id=info:pmid/37023640&rft_els_id=S1476927123000464&rfr_iscdi=true |