Meniscal Repair Outcome in 3829 Patients With a Minimum Follow-up From 2 Years Up to 5 Years: A Meta-analysis on the Overall Failure Rate and Factors Influencing Failure

Background: The importance of meniscal repair is widely accepted because of the association of loss of meniscal tissue with the development of early-onset knee arthritis. Many factors influencing the results of meniscal repair have been reported, but results remain controversial. Purpose: This meta-...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:The American journal of sports medicine 2024-03, Vol.52 (3), p.822-831
Hauptverfasser: Schweizer, Conradin, Hanreich, Carola, Tscholl, Philippe M., Blatter, Samuel, Windhager, Reinhard, Waldstein, Wenzel
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page 831
container_issue 3
container_start_page 822
container_title The American journal of sports medicine
container_volume 52
creator Schweizer, Conradin
Hanreich, Carola
Tscholl, Philippe M.
Blatter, Samuel
Windhager, Reinhard
Waldstein, Wenzel
description Background: The importance of meniscal repair is widely accepted because of the association of loss of meniscal tissue with the development of early-onset knee arthritis. Many factors influencing the results of meniscal repair have been reported, but results remain controversial. Purpose: This meta-analysis determines the pooled meniscal repair failure rate of studies with a minimum follow-up of 2 years up to 5 years, with a mean follow-up of 43 months. Moreover, selected failure-influencing factors are analyzed. Study Design: Systematic review and meta-analysis; Level of evidence, 4. Methods: PubMed and Scopus were searched for studies published between January 2000 and November 2021 reporting on meniscal repair outcome with a minimum follow-up of 24 months. The overall pooled failure rate and pooled failure rates for possible predictors were calculated. Random-effect models were used to pool failure rates, and effect estimates in the form of odds ratios with 95% CIs were established. Results: The initial literature search identified 6519 studies. A total of 51 studies met the inclusion criteria. In total, 3931 menisci were included with an overall failure rate of 14.8%. Subgroup analysis revealed a significantly lower failure rate for meniscal repair with concomitant anterior cruciate ligament (ACL) reconstruction compared with knees without any reported injury to the ACL (8.5% vs 14%; P = .043). The pooled failure rate for lateral meniscal repair was significantly lower than that for medial meniscal repair (6.1% vs 10.8%; P = .031). Pooled failure rates of all-inside and inside-out repair were not significantly different (11.9% vs 10.6%; P > .05). Conclusion: This meta-analysis on close to 4000 patients demonstrates an overall meniscal repair failure rate of 14.8% at a minimum follow-up from 2 years up to 5 years. Meniscal repair remains a procedure with a high failure rate, especially within the first 2 postoperative years. This review and meta-analysis also identified clinically relevant factors associated with favorable outcomes such as concomitant ACL reconstruction or repair of the lateral meniscus. All-inside meniscal repair with the latest-generation devices yields failure rates of
doi_str_mv 10.1177/03635465231158385
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_2797150242</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sage_id>10.1177_03635465231158385</sage_id><sourcerecordid>2933399013</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c368t-bca0394b2b7e916be9b469ee56244b89e22f3d91e23ee7e507c9e78d129a21f53</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp1kc9u1DAQxi0EokvhAbigkbhwSfGf2I65VRULlbpaVFEhTpGTnbSuHDvYDqiPxFuS1bYggTiNZuY332jmI-QloyeMaf2WCiVkrSQXjMlGNPIRWTEpeSWEko_Jat-v9sAReZbzLaWUadU8JUdCU86VVivyc4PB5d56uMTJugTbufRxRHABRMMNfLLFYSgZvrhyAxY2LrhxHmEdvY8_qnmCdYojcPiKNmW4mqBEkIfsHZzCBoutbLD-LrsMMUC5Qdh-x2S9h7V1fk4Il7Yg2LBbCn2Ji8x5GPyMoXfh-gF6Tp4M1md8cR-PydX6_eezj9XF9sP52elF1QvVlKrrLRWm7nin0TDVoelqZRCl4nXdNQY5H8TOMOQCUaOkujeomx3jxnI2SHFM3hx0pxS_zZhLOy4PQu9twDjnlmujmaS85gv6-i_0Ns5puXWhjBDCGMrEQrED1aeYc8KhnZIbbbprGW33Prb_-LjMvLpXnrsRd78nHoxbgJMDkO01_ln7f8VfAUCjow</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>2933399013</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Meniscal Repair Outcome in 3829 Patients With a Minimum Follow-up From 2 Years Up to 5 Years: A Meta-analysis on the Overall Failure Rate and Factors Influencing Failure</title><source>SAGE Complete</source><source>Alma/SFX Local Collection</source><creator>Schweizer, Conradin ; Hanreich, Carola ; Tscholl, Philippe M. ; Blatter, Samuel ; Windhager, Reinhard ; Waldstein, Wenzel</creator><creatorcontrib>Schweizer, Conradin ; Hanreich, Carola ; Tscholl, Philippe M. ; Blatter, Samuel ; Windhager, Reinhard ; Waldstein, Wenzel</creatorcontrib><description>Background: The importance of meniscal repair is widely accepted because of the association of loss of meniscal tissue with the development of early-onset knee arthritis. Many factors influencing the results of meniscal repair have been reported, but results remain controversial. Purpose: This meta-analysis determines the pooled meniscal repair failure rate of studies with a minimum follow-up of 2 years up to 5 years, with a mean follow-up of 43 months. Moreover, selected failure-influencing factors are analyzed. Study Design: Systematic review and meta-analysis; Level of evidence, 4. Methods: PubMed and Scopus were searched for studies published between January 2000 and November 2021 reporting on meniscal repair outcome with a minimum follow-up of 24 months. The overall pooled failure rate and pooled failure rates for possible predictors were calculated. Random-effect models were used to pool failure rates, and effect estimates in the form of odds ratios with 95% CIs were established. Results: The initial literature search identified 6519 studies. A total of 51 studies met the inclusion criteria. In total, 3931 menisci were included with an overall failure rate of 14.8%. Subgroup analysis revealed a significantly lower failure rate for meniscal repair with concomitant anterior cruciate ligament (ACL) reconstruction compared with knees without any reported injury to the ACL (8.5% vs 14%; P = .043). The pooled failure rate for lateral meniscal repair was significantly lower than that for medial meniscal repair (6.1% vs 10.8%; P = .031). Pooled failure rates of all-inside and inside-out repair were not significantly different (11.9% vs 10.6%; P &gt; .05). Conclusion: This meta-analysis on close to 4000 patients demonstrates an overall meniscal repair failure rate of 14.8% at a minimum follow-up from 2 years up to 5 years. Meniscal repair remains a procedure with a high failure rate, especially within the first 2 postoperative years. This review and meta-analysis also identified clinically relevant factors associated with favorable outcomes such as concomitant ACL reconstruction or repair of the lateral meniscus. All-inside meniscal repair with the latest-generation devices yields failure rates of &lt;10%. The failure mechanism and the time of failure is poorly documented; further studies are needed for a better understanding of the retear mechanism.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0363-5465</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1552-3365</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1177/03635465231158385</identifier><identifier>PMID: 37022676</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Los Angeles, CA: SAGE Publications</publisher><subject>Meta-analysis</subject><ispartof>The American journal of sports medicine, 2024-03, Vol.52 (3), p.822-831</ispartof><rights>2023 The Author(s)</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c368t-bca0394b2b7e916be9b469ee56244b89e22f3d91e23ee7e507c9e78d129a21f53</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c368t-bca0394b2b7e916be9b469ee56244b89e22f3d91e23ee7e507c9e78d129a21f53</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://journals.sagepub.com/doi/pdf/10.1177/03635465231158385$$EPDF$$P50$$Gsage$$H</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://journals.sagepub.com/doi/10.1177/03635465231158385$$EHTML$$P50$$Gsage$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,776,780,21798,27901,27902,43597,43598</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37022676$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Schweizer, Conradin</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Hanreich, Carola</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Tscholl, Philippe M.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Blatter, Samuel</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Windhager, Reinhard</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Waldstein, Wenzel</creatorcontrib><title>Meniscal Repair Outcome in 3829 Patients With a Minimum Follow-up From 2 Years Up to 5 Years: A Meta-analysis on the Overall Failure Rate and Factors Influencing Failure</title><title>The American journal of sports medicine</title><addtitle>Am J Sports Med</addtitle><description>Background: The importance of meniscal repair is widely accepted because of the association of loss of meniscal tissue with the development of early-onset knee arthritis. Many factors influencing the results of meniscal repair have been reported, but results remain controversial. Purpose: This meta-analysis determines the pooled meniscal repair failure rate of studies with a minimum follow-up of 2 years up to 5 years, with a mean follow-up of 43 months. Moreover, selected failure-influencing factors are analyzed. Study Design: Systematic review and meta-analysis; Level of evidence, 4. Methods: PubMed and Scopus were searched for studies published between January 2000 and November 2021 reporting on meniscal repair outcome with a minimum follow-up of 24 months. The overall pooled failure rate and pooled failure rates for possible predictors were calculated. Random-effect models were used to pool failure rates, and effect estimates in the form of odds ratios with 95% CIs were established. Results: The initial literature search identified 6519 studies. A total of 51 studies met the inclusion criteria. In total, 3931 menisci were included with an overall failure rate of 14.8%. Subgroup analysis revealed a significantly lower failure rate for meniscal repair with concomitant anterior cruciate ligament (ACL) reconstruction compared with knees without any reported injury to the ACL (8.5% vs 14%; P = .043). The pooled failure rate for lateral meniscal repair was significantly lower than that for medial meniscal repair (6.1% vs 10.8%; P = .031). Pooled failure rates of all-inside and inside-out repair were not significantly different (11.9% vs 10.6%; P &gt; .05). Conclusion: This meta-analysis on close to 4000 patients demonstrates an overall meniscal repair failure rate of 14.8% at a minimum follow-up from 2 years up to 5 years. Meniscal repair remains a procedure with a high failure rate, especially within the first 2 postoperative years. This review and meta-analysis also identified clinically relevant factors associated with favorable outcomes such as concomitant ACL reconstruction or repair of the lateral meniscus. All-inside meniscal repair with the latest-generation devices yields failure rates of &lt;10%. The failure mechanism and the time of failure is poorly documented; further studies are needed for a better understanding of the retear mechanism.</description><subject>Meta-analysis</subject><issn>0363-5465</issn><issn>1552-3365</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2024</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><recordid>eNp1kc9u1DAQxi0EokvhAbigkbhwSfGf2I65VRULlbpaVFEhTpGTnbSuHDvYDqiPxFuS1bYggTiNZuY332jmI-QloyeMaf2WCiVkrSQXjMlGNPIRWTEpeSWEko_Jat-v9sAReZbzLaWUadU8JUdCU86VVivyc4PB5d56uMTJugTbufRxRHABRMMNfLLFYSgZvrhyAxY2LrhxHmEdvY8_qnmCdYojcPiKNmW4mqBEkIfsHZzCBoutbLD-LrsMMUC5Qdh-x2S9h7V1fk4Il7Yg2LBbCn2Ji8x5GPyMoXfh-gF6Tp4M1md8cR-PydX6_eezj9XF9sP52elF1QvVlKrrLRWm7nin0TDVoelqZRCl4nXdNQY5H8TOMOQCUaOkujeomx3jxnI2SHFM3hx0pxS_zZhLOy4PQu9twDjnlmujmaS85gv6-i_0Ns5puXWhjBDCGMrEQrED1aeYc8KhnZIbbbprGW33Prb_-LjMvLpXnrsRd78nHoxbgJMDkO01_ln7f8VfAUCjow</recordid><startdate>202403</startdate><enddate>202403</enddate><creator>Schweizer, Conradin</creator><creator>Hanreich, Carola</creator><creator>Tscholl, Philippe M.</creator><creator>Blatter, Samuel</creator><creator>Windhager, Reinhard</creator><creator>Waldstein, Wenzel</creator><general>SAGE Publications</general><general>Sage Publications Ltd</general><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7TS</scope><scope>K9.</scope><scope>NAPCQ</scope><scope>U9A</scope><scope>7X8</scope></search><sort><creationdate>202403</creationdate><title>Meniscal Repair Outcome in 3829 Patients With a Minimum Follow-up From 2 Years Up to 5 Years: A Meta-analysis on the Overall Failure Rate and Factors Influencing Failure</title><author>Schweizer, Conradin ; Hanreich, Carola ; Tscholl, Philippe M. ; Blatter, Samuel ; Windhager, Reinhard ; Waldstein, Wenzel</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c368t-bca0394b2b7e916be9b469ee56244b89e22f3d91e23ee7e507c9e78d129a21f53</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2024</creationdate><topic>Meta-analysis</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Schweizer, Conradin</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Hanreich, Carola</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Tscholl, Philippe M.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Blatter, Samuel</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Windhager, Reinhard</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Waldstein, Wenzel</creatorcontrib><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>Physical Education Index</collection><collection>ProQuest Health &amp; Medical Complete (Alumni)</collection><collection>Nursing &amp; Allied Health Premium</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><jtitle>The American journal of sports medicine</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Schweizer, Conradin</au><au>Hanreich, Carola</au><au>Tscholl, Philippe M.</au><au>Blatter, Samuel</au><au>Windhager, Reinhard</au><au>Waldstein, Wenzel</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Meniscal Repair Outcome in 3829 Patients With a Minimum Follow-up From 2 Years Up to 5 Years: A Meta-analysis on the Overall Failure Rate and Factors Influencing Failure</atitle><jtitle>The American journal of sports medicine</jtitle><addtitle>Am J Sports Med</addtitle><date>2024-03</date><risdate>2024</risdate><volume>52</volume><issue>3</issue><spage>822</spage><epage>831</epage><pages>822-831</pages><issn>0363-5465</issn><eissn>1552-3365</eissn><abstract>Background: The importance of meniscal repair is widely accepted because of the association of loss of meniscal tissue with the development of early-onset knee arthritis. Many factors influencing the results of meniscal repair have been reported, but results remain controversial. Purpose: This meta-analysis determines the pooled meniscal repair failure rate of studies with a minimum follow-up of 2 years up to 5 years, with a mean follow-up of 43 months. Moreover, selected failure-influencing factors are analyzed. Study Design: Systematic review and meta-analysis; Level of evidence, 4. Methods: PubMed and Scopus were searched for studies published between January 2000 and November 2021 reporting on meniscal repair outcome with a minimum follow-up of 24 months. The overall pooled failure rate and pooled failure rates for possible predictors were calculated. Random-effect models were used to pool failure rates, and effect estimates in the form of odds ratios with 95% CIs were established. Results: The initial literature search identified 6519 studies. A total of 51 studies met the inclusion criteria. In total, 3931 menisci were included with an overall failure rate of 14.8%. Subgroup analysis revealed a significantly lower failure rate for meniscal repair with concomitant anterior cruciate ligament (ACL) reconstruction compared with knees without any reported injury to the ACL (8.5% vs 14%; P = .043). The pooled failure rate for lateral meniscal repair was significantly lower than that for medial meniscal repair (6.1% vs 10.8%; P = .031). Pooled failure rates of all-inside and inside-out repair were not significantly different (11.9% vs 10.6%; P &gt; .05). Conclusion: This meta-analysis on close to 4000 patients demonstrates an overall meniscal repair failure rate of 14.8% at a minimum follow-up from 2 years up to 5 years. Meniscal repair remains a procedure with a high failure rate, especially within the first 2 postoperative years. This review and meta-analysis also identified clinically relevant factors associated with favorable outcomes such as concomitant ACL reconstruction or repair of the lateral meniscus. All-inside meniscal repair with the latest-generation devices yields failure rates of &lt;10%. The failure mechanism and the time of failure is poorly documented; further studies are needed for a better understanding of the retear mechanism.</abstract><cop>Los Angeles, CA</cop><pub>SAGE Publications</pub><pmid>37022676</pmid><doi>10.1177/03635465231158385</doi><tpages>10</tpages></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 0363-5465
ispartof The American journal of sports medicine, 2024-03, Vol.52 (3), p.822-831
issn 0363-5465
1552-3365
language eng
recordid cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_2797150242
source SAGE Complete; Alma/SFX Local Collection
subjects Meta-analysis
title Meniscal Repair Outcome in 3829 Patients With a Minimum Follow-up From 2 Years Up to 5 Years: A Meta-analysis on the Overall Failure Rate and Factors Influencing Failure
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-02-04T12%3A43%3A08IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Meniscal%20Repair%20Outcome%20in%203829%20Patients%20With%20a%20Minimum%20Follow-up%20From%202%20Years%20Up%20to%205%20Years:%20A%20Meta-analysis%20on%20the%20Overall%20Failure%20Rate%20and%20Factors%20Influencing%20Failure&rft.jtitle=The%20American%20journal%20of%20sports%20medicine&rft.au=Schweizer,%20Conradin&rft.date=2024-03&rft.volume=52&rft.issue=3&rft.spage=822&rft.epage=831&rft.pages=822-831&rft.issn=0363-5465&rft.eissn=1552-3365&rft_id=info:doi/10.1177/03635465231158385&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E2933399013%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=2933399013&rft_id=info:pmid/37022676&rft_sage_id=10.1177_03635465231158385&rfr_iscdi=true