Er:YAG laser-assisted comprehensive periodontal pocket therapy for residual periodontal pocket treatment: A randomized controlled clinical trial

This study evaluated the effectiveness of a novel pocket therapy (Er:YAG laser-assisted comprehensive periodontal pocket therapy [Er-LCPT]) for residual pocket treatment, compared with conventional mechanical treatment alone, in a randomized controlled clinical trial. Two sites in 18 patients having...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Journal of periodontology (1970) 2023-10, Vol.94 (10), p.1187-1199
Hauptverfasser: Aoki, Akira, Mizutani, Koji, Mikami, Risako, Ohsugi, Yujin, Kobayashi, Hiroaki, Akizuki, Tatsuya, Taniguchi, Yoichi, Takeuchi, Yasuo, Katagiri, Sayaka, Sasaki, Yoshiyuki, Komaki, Motohiro, Meinzer, Walter, Izumi, Yuichi, Iwata, Takanori
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page 1199
container_issue 10
container_start_page 1187
container_title Journal of periodontology (1970)
container_volume 94
creator Aoki, Akira
Mizutani, Koji
Mikami, Risako
Ohsugi, Yujin
Kobayashi, Hiroaki
Akizuki, Tatsuya
Taniguchi, Yoichi
Takeuchi, Yasuo
Katagiri, Sayaka
Sasaki, Yoshiyuki
Komaki, Motohiro
Meinzer, Walter
Izumi, Yuichi
Iwata, Takanori
description This study evaluated the effectiveness of a novel pocket therapy (Er:YAG laser-assisted comprehensive periodontal pocket therapy [Er-LCPT]) for residual pocket treatment, compared with conventional mechanical treatment alone, in a randomized controlled clinical trial. Two sites in 18 patients having residual periodontal pockets of ≥5 mm depth, extant following initial active therapy, or during supportive therapy, were randomized into two groups in a split mouth design: the control group received scaling and root planing (SRP) by curette, and the test group received Er-LCPT using curette and laser. With Er-LCPT, after root debridement, inflamed connective tissue on the inner gingival surface and on the bone surface/within extant bone defects was thoroughly debrided. Furthermore, removal of proximate oral epithelium and coagulation of the blood clot in the pocket entrance were performed with laser. Clinical parameters were evaluated, before and after treatment, through 12 months. Both groups showed significant improvements in clinical parameters. With Er-LCPT, pocket debridement was thoroughly and safely performed, without any adverse side effects and complications, and favorable healing was observed in most of the cases. At 12 months, Er-LCPT demonstrated significantly higher probing pocket depth reduction (2.78 mm vs. 1.89 mm on average; p = 0.012, Wilcoxon signed-rank test), clinical attachment gain (1.67 mm vs. 1.06 mm; p = 0.004) as primary outcomes, and reduced BOP value (0.89 vs. 0.56; p = 0.031), compared with SRP alone. The results of this study indicate that Er-LCPT is more effective for residual pocket treatment, compared with SRP alone.
doi_str_mv 10.1002/jper.22-0552
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_2796158894</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>2796158894</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c357t-fe814187a9ada23d9f8b45fba15285c281c34ed94defdd33909b2e970f99067c3</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNptUT1PwzAUtBAISmFjRh4ZSPFH0sRsVVUKCAmEYGCKHPtFGJw42C5S-RX8ZBIoTEzvPd29O-kOoSNKJpQQdvbSgZ8wlpAsY1toREXKEz7NyTYa9TBLeCrYHtoP4aU_acrJLtrjOaFZkbER-lz486fZElsZwCcyBBMiaKxc03l4hjaYd8C9g3HatVFa3Dn1ChHHZ_CyW-PaeewhGL0asH94HmRsoI3neIa9bLVrzMe3QRu9s3ZYrWmN6l-iN9IeoJ1a2gCHmzlGjxeLh_llcnO7vJrPbhLFszwmNRQ0pUUuhdSScS3qokqzupI0Y0WmWEEVT0GLVEOtNeeCiIqByEktBJnmio_RyY9u593bCkIsGxMUWCtbcKtQslxM-4yKPs4xOv2hKu9C8FCXnTeN9OuSknLooLy-W9yXjJVDBz39eKO8qhrQf-Tf0PkX_IqGCg</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>2796158894</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Er:YAG laser-assisted comprehensive periodontal pocket therapy for residual periodontal pocket treatment: A randomized controlled clinical trial</title><source>Access via Wiley Online Library</source><creator>Aoki, Akira ; Mizutani, Koji ; Mikami, Risako ; Ohsugi, Yujin ; Kobayashi, Hiroaki ; Akizuki, Tatsuya ; Taniguchi, Yoichi ; Takeuchi, Yasuo ; Katagiri, Sayaka ; Sasaki, Yoshiyuki ; Komaki, Motohiro ; Meinzer, Walter ; Izumi, Yuichi ; Iwata, Takanori</creator><creatorcontrib>Aoki, Akira ; Mizutani, Koji ; Mikami, Risako ; Ohsugi, Yujin ; Kobayashi, Hiroaki ; Akizuki, Tatsuya ; Taniguchi, Yoichi ; Takeuchi, Yasuo ; Katagiri, Sayaka ; Sasaki, Yoshiyuki ; Komaki, Motohiro ; Meinzer, Walter ; Izumi, Yuichi ; Iwata, Takanori</creatorcontrib><description>This study evaluated the effectiveness of a novel pocket therapy (Er:YAG laser-assisted comprehensive periodontal pocket therapy [Er-LCPT]) for residual pocket treatment, compared with conventional mechanical treatment alone, in a randomized controlled clinical trial. Two sites in 18 patients having residual periodontal pockets of ≥5 mm depth, extant following initial active therapy, or during supportive therapy, were randomized into two groups in a split mouth design: the control group received scaling and root planing (SRP) by curette, and the test group received Er-LCPT using curette and laser. With Er-LCPT, after root debridement, inflamed connective tissue on the inner gingival surface and on the bone surface/within extant bone defects was thoroughly debrided. Furthermore, removal of proximate oral epithelium and coagulation of the blood clot in the pocket entrance were performed with laser. Clinical parameters were evaluated, before and after treatment, through 12 months. Both groups showed significant improvements in clinical parameters. With Er-LCPT, pocket debridement was thoroughly and safely performed, without any adverse side effects and complications, and favorable healing was observed in most of the cases. At 12 months, Er-LCPT demonstrated significantly higher probing pocket depth reduction (2.78 mm vs. 1.89 mm on average; p = 0.012, Wilcoxon signed-rank test), clinical attachment gain (1.67 mm vs. 1.06 mm; p = 0.004) as primary outcomes, and reduced BOP value (0.89 vs. 0.56; p = 0.031), compared with SRP alone. The results of this study indicate that Er-LCPT is more effective for residual pocket treatment, compared with SRP alone.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0022-3492</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1943-3670</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1002/jper.22-0552</identifier><identifier>PMID: 37015852</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>United States</publisher><ispartof>Journal of periodontology (1970), 2023-10, Vol.94 (10), p.1187-1199</ispartof><rights>2023 American Academy of Periodontology.</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c357t-fe814187a9ada23d9f8b45fba15285c281c34ed94defdd33909b2e970f99067c3</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c357t-fe814187a9ada23d9f8b45fba15285c281c34ed94defdd33909b2e970f99067c3</cites><orcidid>0000-0003-2623-8255 ; 0000-0002-1610-7430 ; 0000-0002-5400-3958 ; 0000-0003-4193-219X ; 0000-0003-1398-0450 ; 0000-0002-5461-7298 ; 0000-0001-9481-5013 ; 0000-0002-5765-2742 ; 0000-0003-4301-2426 ; 0000-0001-5936-1116 ; 0000-0002-2843-173X</orcidid></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><link.rule.ids>315,781,785,27929,27930</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37015852$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Aoki, Akira</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Mizutani, Koji</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Mikami, Risako</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Ohsugi, Yujin</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Kobayashi, Hiroaki</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Akizuki, Tatsuya</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Taniguchi, Yoichi</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Takeuchi, Yasuo</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Katagiri, Sayaka</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Sasaki, Yoshiyuki</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Komaki, Motohiro</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Meinzer, Walter</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Izumi, Yuichi</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Iwata, Takanori</creatorcontrib><title>Er:YAG laser-assisted comprehensive periodontal pocket therapy for residual periodontal pocket treatment: A randomized controlled clinical trial</title><title>Journal of periodontology (1970)</title><addtitle>J Periodontol</addtitle><description>This study evaluated the effectiveness of a novel pocket therapy (Er:YAG laser-assisted comprehensive periodontal pocket therapy [Er-LCPT]) for residual pocket treatment, compared with conventional mechanical treatment alone, in a randomized controlled clinical trial. Two sites in 18 patients having residual periodontal pockets of ≥5 mm depth, extant following initial active therapy, or during supportive therapy, were randomized into two groups in a split mouth design: the control group received scaling and root planing (SRP) by curette, and the test group received Er-LCPT using curette and laser. With Er-LCPT, after root debridement, inflamed connective tissue on the inner gingival surface and on the bone surface/within extant bone defects was thoroughly debrided. Furthermore, removal of proximate oral epithelium and coagulation of the blood clot in the pocket entrance were performed with laser. Clinical parameters were evaluated, before and after treatment, through 12 months. Both groups showed significant improvements in clinical parameters. With Er-LCPT, pocket debridement was thoroughly and safely performed, without any adverse side effects and complications, and favorable healing was observed in most of the cases. At 12 months, Er-LCPT demonstrated significantly higher probing pocket depth reduction (2.78 mm vs. 1.89 mm on average; p = 0.012, Wilcoxon signed-rank test), clinical attachment gain (1.67 mm vs. 1.06 mm; p = 0.004) as primary outcomes, and reduced BOP value (0.89 vs. 0.56; p = 0.031), compared with SRP alone. The results of this study indicate that Er-LCPT is more effective for residual pocket treatment, compared with SRP alone.</description><issn>0022-3492</issn><issn>1943-3670</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2023</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><recordid>eNptUT1PwzAUtBAISmFjRh4ZSPFH0sRsVVUKCAmEYGCKHPtFGJw42C5S-RX8ZBIoTEzvPd29O-kOoSNKJpQQdvbSgZ8wlpAsY1toREXKEz7NyTYa9TBLeCrYHtoP4aU_acrJLtrjOaFZkbER-lz486fZElsZwCcyBBMiaKxc03l4hjaYd8C9g3HatVFa3Dn1ChHHZ_CyW-PaeewhGL0asH94HmRsoI3neIa9bLVrzMe3QRu9s3ZYrWmN6l-iN9IeoJ1a2gCHmzlGjxeLh_llcnO7vJrPbhLFszwmNRQ0pUUuhdSScS3qokqzupI0Y0WmWEEVT0GLVEOtNeeCiIqByEktBJnmio_RyY9u593bCkIsGxMUWCtbcKtQslxM-4yKPs4xOv2hKu9C8FCXnTeN9OuSknLooLy-W9yXjJVDBz39eKO8qhrQf-Tf0PkX_IqGCg</recordid><startdate>20231001</startdate><enddate>20231001</enddate><creator>Aoki, Akira</creator><creator>Mizutani, Koji</creator><creator>Mikami, Risako</creator><creator>Ohsugi, Yujin</creator><creator>Kobayashi, Hiroaki</creator><creator>Akizuki, Tatsuya</creator><creator>Taniguchi, Yoichi</creator><creator>Takeuchi, Yasuo</creator><creator>Katagiri, Sayaka</creator><creator>Sasaki, Yoshiyuki</creator><creator>Komaki, Motohiro</creator><creator>Meinzer, Walter</creator><creator>Izumi, Yuichi</creator><creator>Iwata, Takanori</creator><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7X8</scope><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0003-2623-8255</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-1610-7430</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-5400-3958</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0003-4193-219X</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0003-1398-0450</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-5461-7298</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0001-9481-5013</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-5765-2742</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0003-4301-2426</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0001-5936-1116</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-2843-173X</orcidid></search><sort><creationdate>20231001</creationdate><title>Er:YAG laser-assisted comprehensive periodontal pocket therapy for residual periodontal pocket treatment: A randomized controlled clinical trial</title><author>Aoki, Akira ; Mizutani, Koji ; Mikami, Risako ; Ohsugi, Yujin ; Kobayashi, Hiroaki ; Akizuki, Tatsuya ; Taniguchi, Yoichi ; Takeuchi, Yasuo ; Katagiri, Sayaka ; Sasaki, Yoshiyuki ; Komaki, Motohiro ; Meinzer, Walter ; Izumi, Yuichi ; Iwata, Takanori</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c357t-fe814187a9ada23d9f8b45fba15285c281c34ed94defdd33909b2e970f99067c3</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2023</creationdate><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Aoki, Akira</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Mizutani, Koji</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Mikami, Risako</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Ohsugi, Yujin</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Kobayashi, Hiroaki</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Akizuki, Tatsuya</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Taniguchi, Yoichi</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Takeuchi, Yasuo</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Katagiri, Sayaka</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Sasaki, Yoshiyuki</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Komaki, Motohiro</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Meinzer, Walter</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Izumi, Yuichi</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Iwata, Takanori</creatorcontrib><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><jtitle>Journal of periodontology (1970)</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Aoki, Akira</au><au>Mizutani, Koji</au><au>Mikami, Risako</au><au>Ohsugi, Yujin</au><au>Kobayashi, Hiroaki</au><au>Akizuki, Tatsuya</au><au>Taniguchi, Yoichi</au><au>Takeuchi, Yasuo</au><au>Katagiri, Sayaka</au><au>Sasaki, Yoshiyuki</au><au>Komaki, Motohiro</au><au>Meinzer, Walter</au><au>Izumi, Yuichi</au><au>Iwata, Takanori</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Er:YAG laser-assisted comprehensive periodontal pocket therapy for residual periodontal pocket treatment: A randomized controlled clinical trial</atitle><jtitle>Journal of periodontology (1970)</jtitle><addtitle>J Periodontol</addtitle><date>2023-10-01</date><risdate>2023</risdate><volume>94</volume><issue>10</issue><spage>1187</spage><epage>1199</epage><pages>1187-1199</pages><issn>0022-3492</issn><eissn>1943-3670</eissn><abstract>This study evaluated the effectiveness of a novel pocket therapy (Er:YAG laser-assisted comprehensive periodontal pocket therapy [Er-LCPT]) for residual pocket treatment, compared with conventional mechanical treatment alone, in a randomized controlled clinical trial. Two sites in 18 patients having residual periodontal pockets of ≥5 mm depth, extant following initial active therapy, or during supportive therapy, were randomized into two groups in a split mouth design: the control group received scaling and root planing (SRP) by curette, and the test group received Er-LCPT using curette and laser. With Er-LCPT, after root debridement, inflamed connective tissue on the inner gingival surface and on the bone surface/within extant bone defects was thoroughly debrided. Furthermore, removal of proximate oral epithelium and coagulation of the blood clot in the pocket entrance were performed with laser. Clinical parameters were evaluated, before and after treatment, through 12 months. Both groups showed significant improvements in clinical parameters. With Er-LCPT, pocket debridement was thoroughly and safely performed, without any adverse side effects and complications, and favorable healing was observed in most of the cases. At 12 months, Er-LCPT demonstrated significantly higher probing pocket depth reduction (2.78 mm vs. 1.89 mm on average; p = 0.012, Wilcoxon signed-rank test), clinical attachment gain (1.67 mm vs. 1.06 mm; p = 0.004) as primary outcomes, and reduced BOP value (0.89 vs. 0.56; p = 0.031), compared with SRP alone. The results of this study indicate that Er-LCPT is more effective for residual pocket treatment, compared with SRP alone.</abstract><cop>United States</cop><pmid>37015852</pmid><doi>10.1002/jper.22-0552</doi><tpages>13</tpages><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0003-2623-8255</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-1610-7430</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-5400-3958</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0003-4193-219X</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0003-1398-0450</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-5461-7298</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0001-9481-5013</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-5765-2742</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0003-4301-2426</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0001-5936-1116</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-2843-173X</orcidid></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 0022-3492
ispartof Journal of periodontology (1970), 2023-10, Vol.94 (10), p.1187-1199
issn 0022-3492
1943-3670
language eng
recordid cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_2796158894
source Access via Wiley Online Library
title Er:YAG laser-assisted comprehensive periodontal pocket therapy for residual periodontal pocket treatment: A randomized controlled clinical trial
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2024-12-12T13%3A49%3A48IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Er:YAG%20laser-assisted%20comprehensive%20periodontal%20pocket%20therapy%20for%20residual%20periodontal%20pocket%20treatment:%20A%20randomized%20controlled%20clinical%20trial&rft.jtitle=Journal%20of%20periodontology%20(1970)&rft.au=Aoki,%20Akira&rft.date=2023-10-01&rft.volume=94&rft.issue=10&rft.spage=1187&rft.epage=1199&rft.pages=1187-1199&rft.issn=0022-3492&rft.eissn=1943-3670&rft_id=info:doi/10.1002/jper.22-0552&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E2796158894%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=2796158894&rft_id=info:pmid/37015852&rfr_iscdi=true