The race between classical microbial fuel cells, sediment-microbial fuel cells, plant-microbial fuel cells, and constructed wetlands-microbial fuel cells: Applications and technology readiness level
Microbial fuel cell (MFC) is an interesting technology capable of converting the chemical energy stored in organics to electricity. It has raised high hopes among researchers and end users as the world continues to face climate change, water, energy, and land crisis. This review aims to discuss the...
Gespeichert in:
| Veröffentlicht in: | The Science of the total environment 2023-06, Vol.879, p.162757-162757, Article 162757 |
|---|---|
| Hauptverfasser: | , , , , , , , , |
| Format: | Artikel |
| Sprache: | eng |
| Schlagworte: | |
| Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
| Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
| container_end_page | 162757 |
|---|---|
| container_issue | |
| container_start_page | 162757 |
| container_title | The Science of the total environment |
| container_volume | 879 |
| creator | Gupta, Supriya Patro, Ashmita Mittal, Yamini Dwivedi, Saurabh Saket, Palak Panja, Rupobrata Saeed, Tanveer Martínez, Fernando Yadav, Asheesh Kumar |
| description | Microbial fuel cell (MFC) is an interesting technology capable of converting the chemical energy stored in organics to electricity. It has raised high hopes among researchers and end users as the world continues to face climate change, water, energy, and land crisis. This review aims to discuss the journey of continuously progressing MFC technology from the lab to the field so far. It evaluates the historical development of MFC, and the emergence of different variants of MFC or MFC-associated other technologies such as sediment-microbial fuel cell (S-MFC), plant-microbial fuel cell (P-MFC), and integrated constructed wetlands-microbial fuel cell (CW-MFC). This review has assessed primary applications and challenges to overcome existing limitations for commercialization of these technologies. In addition, it further illustrates the design and potential applications of S-MFC, P-MFC, and CW-MFC. Lastly, the maturity and readiness of MFC, S-MFC, P-MFC, and CW-MFC for real-world implementation were assessed by multicriteria-based assessment. Wastewater treatment efficiency, bioelectricity generation efficiency, energy demand, cost investment, and scale-up potential were mainly considered as key criteria. Other sustainability criteria, such as life cycle and environmental impact assessments were also evaluated.
[Display omitted]
•MFC and its variant technologies S-MFC, P-MFC and CW-MFC are the promising self-sustaining bio-electrochemical systems•S-MFC, P-MFC and CW-MFC are hosted in natural environments and give larger areal dimensions to existing MFC technology•The TRL for MFC, S-MFC, P-MFC and CW-MFC achieved so far fall in the range of 5-6, 3-4, 3 and 6-7, respectively.•The cost to benefit ratio for CW-MFCs is much lower compared to MFCs under both experimental and practical conditions•CW-MFC remains leading technology compared to MFC and its inspired variants |
| doi_str_mv | 10.1016/j.scitotenv.2023.162757 |
| format | Article |
| fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_2795359559</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><els_id>S0048969723013736</els_id><sourcerecordid>2795359559</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c453t-cba4199868b90f8a26fa3e6a7e3220f22c1e617cd41b2182d39c5a34eb4ed0e13</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNqFkctuFDEQRS0EIkPgF8BLFvTgR9ttsxtFvKRIbMLactvVxCP3A9s9UX4w34WHCVkFxRtbqnNdpToIvaNkSwmVH_fb7EKZC0yHLSOMb6lkneieoQ1VnW4oYfI52hDSqkZL3Z2hVznvST2doi_RGZeaU0HVBt1dXQNO1gHuodwATNhFm3NwNuIxuDT3ob6GFSJ2EGP-gDP4MMJUmsfLS7T_rdnJYzdPuaTVFfD4BkqlfX4U_4R3yxLrICXUyN9sAXc9zXH-dYsTWB8myBlHOEB8jV4MNmZ4c3-fo59fPl9dfGsuf3z9frG7bFwreGlcb1uqtZKq12RQlsnBcpC2A84YGRhzFCTtnG9pz6hinmsnLG-hb8EToPwcvT_9u6T59wq5mDHk47h2gnnNhqlWKyWEkk-jnRZcaCF0RbsTWreQc4LBLCmMNt0aSszRt9mbB9_m6NucfNfk2_smaz-Cf8j9E1yB3QmAupVDgHT8CCZXJSZwxfg5PNnkD9e1xb8</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>2795359559</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>The race between classical microbial fuel cells, sediment-microbial fuel cells, plant-microbial fuel cells, and constructed wetlands-microbial fuel cells: Applications and technology readiness level</title><source>MEDLINE</source><source>Elsevier ScienceDirect Journals Complete</source><creator>Gupta, Supriya ; Patro, Ashmita ; Mittal, Yamini ; Dwivedi, Saurabh ; Saket, Palak ; Panja, Rupobrata ; Saeed, Tanveer ; Martínez, Fernando ; Yadav, Asheesh Kumar</creator><creatorcontrib>Gupta, Supriya ; Patro, Ashmita ; Mittal, Yamini ; Dwivedi, Saurabh ; Saket, Palak ; Panja, Rupobrata ; Saeed, Tanveer ; Martínez, Fernando ; Yadav, Asheesh Kumar</creatorcontrib><description>Microbial fuel cell (MFC) is an interesting technology capable of converting the chemical energy stored in organics to electricity. It has raised high hopes among researchers and end users as the world continues to face climate change, water, energy, and land crisis. This review aims to discuss the journey of continuously progressing MFC technology from the lab to the field so far. It evaluates the historical development of MFC, and the emergence of different variants of MFC or MFC-associated other technologies such as sediment-microbial fuel cell (S-MFC), plant-microbial fuel cell (P-MFC), and integrated constructed wetlands-microbial fuel cell (CW-MFC). This review has assessed primary applications and challenges to overcome existing limitations for commercialization of these technologies. In addition, it further illustrates the design and potential applications of S-MFC, P-MFC, and CW-MFC. Lastly, the maturity and readiness of MFC, S-MFC, P-MFC, and CW-MFC for real-world implementation were assessed by multicriteria-based assessment. Wastewater treatment efficiency, bioelectricity generation efficiency, energy demand, cost investment, and scale-up potential were mainly considered as key criteria. Other sustainability criteria, such as life cycle and environmental impact assessments were also evaluated.
[Display omitted]
•MFC and its variant technologies S-MFC, P-MFC and CW-MFC are the promising self-sustaining bio-electrochemical systems•S-MFC, P-MFC and CW-MFC are hosted in natural environments and give larger areal dimensions to existing MFC technology•The TRL for MFC, S-MFC, P-MFC and CW-MFC achieved so far fall in the range of 5-6, 3-4, 3 and 6-7, respectively.•The cost to benefit ratio for CW-MFCs is much lower compared to MFCs under both experimental and practical conditions•CW-MFC remains leading technology compared to MFC and its inspired variants</description><identifier>ISSN: 0048-9697</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1879-1026</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1016/j.scitotenv.2023.162757</identifier><identifier>PMID: 36931518</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Netherlands: Elsevier B.V</publisher><subject>Bio-electrochemical systems ; Bioelectric Energy Sources ; bioelectricity ; Bioelectricity generation ; climate change ; commercialization ; Constructed wetland integrated microbial fuel cell ; Electricity ; Electroactive wetlands ; Electrodes ; energy ; environment ; environmental impact ; fuels ; longevity ; microbial fuel cells ; Plant microbial fuel cell ; Sediment microbial fuel cell ; Wastewater ; Wastewater treatment ; Wetlands</subject><ispartof>The Science of the total environment, 2023-06, Vol.879, p.162757-162757, Article 162757</ispartof><rights>2023 The Authors</rights><rights>Copyright © 2023 The Authors. Published by Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c453t-cba4199868b90f8a26fa3e6a7e3220f22c1e617cd41b2182d39c5a34eb4ed0e13</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c453t-cba4199868b90f8a26fa3e6a7e3220f22c1e617cd41b2182d39c5a34eb4ed0e13</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0048969723013736$$EHTML$$P50$$Gelsevier$$Hfree_for_read</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,776,780,3537,27901,27902,65306</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36931518$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Gupta, Supriya</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Patro, Ashmita</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Mittal, Yamini</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Dwivedi, Saurabh</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Saket, Palak</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Panja, Rupobrata</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Saeed, Tanveer</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Martínez, Fernando</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Yadav, Asheesh Kumar</creatorcontrib><title>The race between classical microbial fuel cells, sediment-microbial fuel cells, plant-microbial fuel cells, and constructed wetlands-microbial fuel cells: Applications and technology readiness level</title><title>The Science of the total environment</title><addtitle>Sci Total Environ</addtitle><description>Microbial fuel cell (MFC) is an interesting technology capable of converting the chemical energy stored in organics to electricity. It has raised high hopes among researchers and end users as the world continues to face climate change, water, energy, and land crisis. This review aims to discuss the journey of continuously progressing MFC technology from the lab to the field so far. It evaluates the historical development of MFC, and the emergence of different variants of MFC or MFC-associated other technologies such as sediment-microbial fuel cell (S-MFC), plant-microbial fuel cell (P-MFC), and integrated constructed wetlands-microbial fuel cell (CW-MFC). This review has assessed primary applications and challenges to overcome existing limitations for commercialization of these technologies. In addition, it further illustrates the design and potential applications of S-MFC, P-MFC, and CW-MFC. Lastly, the maturity and readiness of MFC, S-MFC, P-MFC, and CW-MFC for real-world implementation were assessed by multicriteria-based assessment. Wastewater treatment efficiency, bioelectricity generation efficiency, energy demand, cost investment, and scale-up potential were mainly considered as key criteria. Other sustainability criteria, such as life cycle and environmental impact assessments were also evaluated.
[Display omitted]
•MFC and its variant technologies S-MFC, P-MFC and CW-MFC are the promising self-sustaining bio-electrochemical systems•S-MFC, P-MFC and CW-MFC are hosted in natural environments and give larger areal dimensions to existing MFC technology•The TRL for MFC, S-MFC, P-MFC and CW-MFC achieved so far fall in the range of 5-6, 3-4, 3 and 6-7, respectively.•The cost to benefit ratio for CW-MFCs is much lower compared to MFCs under both experimental and practical conditions•CW-MFC remains leading technology compared to MFC and its inspired variants</description><subject>Bio-electrochemical systems</subject><subject>Bioelectric Energy Sources</subject><subject>bioelectricity</subject><subject>Bioelectricity generation</subject><subject>climate change</subject><subject>commercialization</subject><subject>Constructed wetland integrated microbial fuel cell</subject><subject>Electricity</subject><subject>Electroactive wetlands</subject><subject>Electrodes</subject><subject>energy</subject><subject>environment</subject><subject>environmental impact</subject><subject>fuels</subject><subject>longevity</subject><subject>microbial fuel cells</subject><subject>Plant microbial fuel cell</subject><subject>Sediment microbial fuel cell</subject><subject>Wastewater</subject><subject>Wastewater treatment</subject><subject>Wetlands</subject><issn>0048-9697</issn><issn>1879-1026</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2023</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>EIF</sourceid><recordid>eNqFkctuFDEQRS0EIkPgF8BLFvTgR9ttsxtFvKRIbMLactvVxCP3A9s9UX4w34WHCVkFxRtbqnNdpToIvaNkSwmVH_fb7EKZC0yHLSOMb6lkneieoQ1VnW4oYfI52hDSqkZL3Z2hVznvST2doi_RGZeaU0HVBt1dXQNO1gHuodwATNhFm3NwNuIxuDT3ob6GFSJ2EGP-gDP4MMJUmsfLS7T_rdnJYzdPuaTVFfD4BkqlfX4U_4R3yxLrICXUyN9sAXc9zXH-dYsTWB8myBlHOEB8jV4MNmZ4c3-fo59fPl9dfGsuf3z9frG7bFwreGlcb1uqtZKq12RQlsnBcpC2A84YGRhzFCTtnG9pz6hinmsnLG-hb8EToPwcvT_9u6T59wq5mDHk47h2gnnNhqlWKyWEkk-jnRZcaCF0RbsTWreQc4LBLCmMNt0aSszRt9mbB9_m6NucfNfk2_smaz-Cf8j9E1yB3QmAupVDgHT8CCZXJSZwxfg5PNnkD9e1xb8</recordid><startdate>20230625</startdate><enddate>20230625</enddate><creator>Gupta, Supriya</creator><creator>Patro, Ashmita</creator><creator>Mittal, Yamini</creator><creator>Dwivedi, Saurabh</creator><creator>Saket, Palak</creator><creator>Panja, Rupobrata</creator><creator>Saeed, Tanveer</creator><creator>Martínez, Fernando</creator><creator>Yadav, Asheesh Kumar</creator><general>Elsevier B.V</general><scope>6I.</scope><scope>AAFTH</scope><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7X8</scope><scope>7S9</scope><scope>L.6</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20230625</creationdate><title>The race between classical microbial fuel cells, sediment-microbial fuel cells, plant-microbial fuel cells, and constructed wetlands-microbial fuel cells: Applications and technology readiness level</title><author>Gupta, Supriya ; Patro, Ashmita ; Mittal, Yamini ; Dwivedi, Saurabh ; Saket, Palak ; Panja, Rupobrata ; Saeed, Tanveer ; Martínez, Fernando ; Yadav, Asheesh Kumar</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c453t-cba4199868b90f8a26fa3e6a7e3220f22c1e617cd41b2182d39c5a34eb4ed0e13</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2023</creationdate><topic>Bio-electrochemical systems</topic><topic>Bioelectric Energy Sources</topic><topic>bioelectricity</topic><topic>Bioelectricity generation</topic><topic>climate change</topic><topic>commercialization</topic><topic>Constructed wetland integrated microbial fuel cell</topic><topic>Electricity</topic><topic>Electroactive wetlands</topic><topic>Electrodes</topic><topic>energy</topic><topic>environment</topic><topic>environmental impact</topic><topic>fuels</topic><topic>longevity</topic><topic>microbial fuel cells</topic><topic>Plant microbial fuel cell</topic><topic>Sediment microbial fuel cell</topic><topic>Wastewater</topic><topic>Wastewater treatment</topic><topic>Wetlands</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Gupta, Supriya</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Patro, Ashmita</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Mittal, Yamini</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Dwivedi, Saurabh</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Saket, Palak</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Panja, Rupobrata</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Saeed, Tanveer</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Martínez, Fernando</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Yadav, Asheesh Kumar</creatorcontrib><collection>ScienceDirect Open Access Titles</collection><collection>Elsevier:ScienceDirect:Open Access</collection><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><collection>AGRICOLA</collection><collection>AGRICOLA - Academic</collection><jtitle>The Science of the total environment</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Gupta, Supriya</au><au>Patro, Ashmita</au><au>Mittal, Yamini</au><au>Dwivedi, Saurabh</au><au>Saket, Palak</au><au>Panja, Rupobrata</au><au>Saeed, Tanveer</au><au>Martínez, Fernando</au><au>Yadav, Asheesh Kumar</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>The race between classical microbial fuel cells, sediment-microbial fuel cells, plant-microbial fuel cells, and constructed wetlands-microbial fuel cells: Applications and technology readiness level</atitle><jtitle>The Science of the total environment</jtitle><addtitle>Sci Total Environ</addtitle><date>2023-06-25</date><risdate>2023</risdate><volume>879</volume><spage>162757</spage><epage>162757</epage><pages>162757-162757</pages><artnum>162757</artnum><issn>0048-9697</issn><eissn>1879-1026</eissn><abstract>Microbial fuel cell (MFC) is an interesting technology capable of converting the chemical energy stored in organics to electricity. It has raised high hopes among researchers and end users as the world continues to face climate change, water, energy, and land crisis. This review aims to discuss the journey of continuously progressing MFC technology from the lab to the field so far. It evaluates the historical development of MFC, and the emergence of different variants of MFC or MFC-associated other technologies such as sediment-microbial fuel cell (S-MFC), plant-microbial fuel cell (P-MFC), and integrated constructed wetlands-microbial fuel cell (CW-MFC). This review has assessed primary applications and challenges to overcome existing limitations for commercialization of these technologies. In addition, it further illustrates the design and potential applications of S-MFC, P-MFC, and CW-MFC. Lastly, the maturity and readiness of MFC, S-MFC, P-MFC, and CW-MFC for real-world implementation were assessed by multicriteria-based assessment. Wastewater treatment efficiency, bioelectricity generation efficiency, energy demand, cost investment, and scale-up potential were mainly considered as key criteria. Other sustainability criteria, such as life cycle and environmental impact assessments were also evaluated.
[Display omitted]
•MFC and its variant technologies S-MFC, P-MFC and CW-MFC are the promising self-sustaining bio-electrochemical systems•S-MFC, P-MFC and CW-MFC are hosted in natural environments and give larger areal dimensions to existing MFC technology•The TRL for MFC, S-MFC, P-MFC and CW-MFC achieved so far fall in the range of 5-6, 3-4, 3 and 6-7, respectively.•The cost to benefit ratio for CW-MFCs is much lower compared to MFCs under both experimental and practical conditions•CW-MFC remains leading technology compared to MFC and its inspired variants</abstract><cop>Netherlands</cop><pub>Elsevier B.V</pub><pmid>36931518</pmid><doi>10.1016/j.scitotenv.2023.162757</doi><tpages>1</tpages><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record> |
| fulltext | fulltext |
| identifier | ISSN: 0048-9697 |
| ispartof | The Science of the total environment, 2023-06, Vol.879, p.162757-162757, Article 162757 |
| issn | 0048-9697 1879-1026 |
| language | eng |
| recordid | cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_2795359559 |
| source | MEDLINE; Elsevier ScienceDirect Journals Complete |
| subjects | Bio-electrochemical systems Bioelectric Energy Sources bioelectricity Bioelectricity generation climate change commercialization Constructed wetland integrated microbial fuel cell Electricity Electroactive wetlands Electrodes energy environment environmental impact fuels longevity microbial fuel cells Plant microbial fuel cell Sediment microbial fuel cell Wastewater Wastewater treatment Wetlands |
| title | The race between classical microbial fuel cells, sediment-microbial fuel cells, plant-microbial fuel cells, and constructed wetlands-microbial fuel cells: Applications and technology readiness level |
| url | https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-29T07%3A02%3A08IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=The%20race%20between%20classical%20microbial%20fuel%20cells,%20sediment-microbial%20fuel%20cells,%20plant-microbial%20fuel%20cells,%20and%20constructed%20wetlands-microbial%20fuel%20cells:%20Applications%20and%20technology%20readiness%20level&rft.jtitle=The%20Science%20of%20the%20total%20environment&rft.au=Gupta,%20Supriya&rft.date=2023-06-25&rft.volume=879&rft.spage=162757&rft.epage=162757&rft.pages=162757-162757&rft.artnum=162757&rft.issn=0048-9697&rft.eissn=1879-1026&rft_id=info:doi/10.1016/j.scitotenv.2023.162757&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E2795359559%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=2795359559&rft_id=info:pmid/36931518&rft_els_id=S0048969723013736&rfr_iscdi=true |