Postbuckling of Stiffened Panels Using Strut, Strip, and Finite Element Methods
Postbuckling results are presented for isotropic stiffened panels loaded in compression. Comparisons are made between single-bay and double-bay finite element (FE) models (where "bay" denotes a repeating portion, between supports, in the load/length direction) and a new strut model, follow...
Gespeichert in:
Veröffentlicht in: | AIAA journal 2003-06, Vol.41 (6), p.1172-1179 |
---|---|
Hauptverfasser: | , , , , |
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | eng |
Schlagworte: | |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
container_end_page | 1179 |
---|---|
container_issue | 6 |
container_start_page | 1172 |
container_title | AIAA journal |
container_volume | 41 |
creator | Lillico, M Butler, R Hunt, G. W Watson, A Kennedy, D |
description | Postbuckling results are presented for isotropic stiffened panels loaded in compression. Comparisons are made between single-bay and double-bay finite element (FE) models (where "bay" denotes a repeating portion, between supports, in the load/length direction) and a new strut model, following a Shanley-type approach, for single-bay and multibay panels. The strut model has been incorporated within the strip program VIPASA with CONstraints and OPTimization (VICONOPT) to design a multibay example panel with postbuckling reserve of strength in its skins, assuming linear elastic material properties. The panel has been shown by VICONOPT to have a stiffener buckling failure mode when an overall sinusoidal imperfection causing increased stiffener compression is present. The failure is confirmed by the double-bay FE model, which is shown to be an imperfect representation of the multibay case. Single-bay analysis using the strut model shows good agreement with the single-bay FE results. The VICONOPT code is able to design a metallic panel of realistic dimensions and loading using 50 strip elements (compared with the 9600 shell elements required by the finite element model) but cannot correctly account for material nonlinearity. The important phenomenological difference between postbuckling of single-, double-, and multibay panel models are indicated. [PUBLICATION ABSTRACT] |
doi_str_mv | 10.2514/2.2061 |
format | Article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_27940298</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>27940298</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-a370t-82b98e7877756d3d2472960adff2082ae5e97652cffb3eaa92d6db04b0da0c063</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNptkF9LwzAUxYMoOKd-hqIoPqwzuf2T9lHGpoKywRz4FtIm0cysrUkK-u1t2WCgPh0u58e5h4PQOcFjSEh8C2PAKTlAA5JEURhlyeshGmCMSUjiBI7RiXPr7gKakQGaL2rni7b8MLp6C2oVLL1WSlZSBAteSeOCleudpbetH_Wim1HAKxHMdKW9DKZGbmTlg2fp32vhTtGR4sbJs50O0Wo2fZk8hE_z-8fJ3VPII4p9mEGRZ5JmlNIkFZGAmEKeYi6UApwBl4nMaZpAqVQRSc5zEKkocFxgwXGJ02iIrre5ja0_W-k822hXSmO60nXrGNA8xpBnHXjxC1zXra26bgz6gQDHdJ9W2to5KxVrrN5w-80IZv2oDFg_agde7dK4K7lRlleldns6zhIKkHfc5ZbjmvP9xz9pN_9RW5c1QjHVGuPll49-ACerjbE</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>215332047</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Postbuckling of Stiffened Panels Using Strut, Strip, and Finite Element Methods</title><source>Alma/SFX Local Collection</source><creator>Lillico, M ; Butler, R ; Hunt, G. W ; Watson, A ; Kennedy, D</creator><creatorcontrib>Lillico, M ; Butler, R ; Hunt, G. W ; Watson, A ; Kennedy, D</creatorcontrib><description>Postbuckling results are presented for isotropic stiffened panels loaded in compression. Comparisons are made between single-bay and double-bay finite element (FE) models (where "bay" denotes a repeating portion, between supports, in the load/length direction) and a new strut model, following a Shanley-type approach, for single-bay and multibay panels. The strut model has been incorporated within the strip program VIPASA with CONstraints and OPTimization (VICONOPT) to design a multibay example panel with postbuckling reserve of strength in its skins, assuming linear elastic material properties. The panel has been shown by VICONOPT to have a stiffener buckling failure mode when an overall sinusoidal imperfection causing increased stiffener compression is present. The failure is confirmed by the double-bay FE model, which is shown to be an imperfect representation of the multibay case. Single-bay analysis using the strut model shows good agreement with the single-bay FE results. The VICONOPT code is able to design a metallic panel of realistic dimensions and loading using 50 strip elements (compared with the 9600 shell elements required by the finite element model) but cannot correctly account for material nonlinearity. The important phenomenological difference between postbuckling of single-, double-, and multibay panel models are indicated. [PUBLICATION ABSTRACT]</description><identifier>ISSN: 0001-1452</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1533-385X</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.2514/2.2061</identifier><identifier>CODEN: AIAJAH</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Reston, VA: American Institute of Aeronautics and Astronautics</publisher><subject>Aerospace materials ; Buckling ; Exact sciences and technology ; Finite element analysis ; Fundamental areas of phenomenology (including applications) ; Physics ; Solid mechanics ; Static buckling and instability ; Structural and continuum mechanics</subject><ispartof>AIAA journal, 2003-06, Vol.41 (6), p.1172-1179</ispartof><rights>2003 INIST-CNRS</rights><rights>Copyright American Institute of Aeronautics and Astronautics Jun 2003</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-a370t-82b98e7877756d3d2472960adff2082ae5e97652cffb3eaa92d6db04b0da0c063</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-a370t-82b98e7877756d3d2472960adff2082ae5e97652cffb3eaa92d6db04b0da0c063</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><link.rule.ids>314,776,780,27901,27902</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttp://pascal-francis.inist.fr/vibad/index.php?action=getRecordDetail&idt=14857229$$DView record in Pascal Francis$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Lillico, M</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Butler, R</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Hunt, G. W</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Watson, A</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Kennedy, D</creatorcontrib><title>Postbuckling of Stiffened Panels Using Strut, Strip, and Finite Element Methods</title><title>AIAA journal</title><description>Postbuckling results are presented for isotropic stiffened panels loaded in compression. Comparisons are made between single-bay and double-bay finite element (FE) models (where "bay" denotes a repeating portion, between supports, in the load/length direction) and a new strut model, following a Shanley-type approach, for single-bay and multibay panels. The strut model has been incorporated within the strip program VIPASA with CONstraints and OPTimization (VICONOPT) to design a multibay example panel with postbuckling reserve of strength in its skins, assuming linear elastic material properties. The panel has been shown by VICONOPT to have a stiffener buckling failure mode when an overall sinusoidal imperfection causing increased stiffener compression is present. The failure is confirmed by the double-bay FE model, which is shown to be an imperfect representation of the multibay case. Single-bay analysis using the strut model shows good agreement with the single-bay FE results. The VICONOPT code is able to design a metallic panel of realistic dimensions and loading using 50 strip elements (compared with the 9600 shell elements required by the finite element model) but cannot correctly account for material nonlinearity. The important phenomenological difference between postbuckling of single-, double-, and multibay panel models are indicated. [PUBLICATION ABSTRACT]</description><subject>Aerospace materials</subject><subject>Buckling</subject><subject>Exact sciences and technology</subject><subject>Finite element analysis</subject><subject>Fundamental areas of phenomenology (including applications)</subject><subject>Physics</subject><subject>Solid mechanics</subject><subject>Static buckling and instability</subject><subject>Structural and continuum mechanics</subject><issn>0001-1452</issn><issn>1533-385X</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2003</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><recordid>eNptkF9LwzAUxYMoOKd-hqIoPqwzuf2T9lHGpoKywRz4FtIm0cysrUkK-u1t2WCgPh0u58e5h4PQOcFjSEh8C2PAKTlAA5JEURhlyeshGmCMSUjiBI7RiXPr7gKakQGaL2rni7b8MLp6C2oVLL1WSlZSBAteSeOCleudpbetH_Wim1HAKxHMdKW9DKZGbmTlg2fp32vhTtGR4sbJs50O0Wo2fZk8hE_z-8fJ3VPII4p9mEGRZ5JmlNIkFZGAmEKeYi6UApwBl4nMaZpAqVQRSc5zEKkocFxgwXGJ02iIrre5ja0_W-k822hXSmO60nXrGNA8xpBnHXjxC1zXra26bgz6gQDHdJ9W2to5KxVrrN5w-80IZv2oDFg_agde7dK4K7lRlleldns6zhIKkHfc5ZbjmvP9xz9pN_9RW5c1QjHVGuPll49-ACerjbE</recordid><startdate>20030601</startdate><enddate>20030601</enddate><creator>Lillico, M</creator><creator>Butler, R</creator><creator>Hunt, G. W</creator><creator>Watson, A</creator><creator>Kennedy, D</creator><general>American Institute of Aeronautics and Astronautics</general><scope>IQODW</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7TB</scope><scope>8FD</scope><scope>FR3</scope><scope>H8D</scope><scope>L7M</scope><scope>KR7</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20030601</creationdate><title>Postbuckling of Stiffened Panels Using Strut, Strip, and Finite Element Methods</title><author>Lillico, M ; Butler, R ; Hunt, G. W ; Watson, A ; Kennedy, D</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-a370t-82b98e7877756d3d2472960adff2082ae5e97652cffb3eaa92d6db04b0da0c063</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2003</creationdate><topic>Aerospace materials</topic><topic>Buckling</topic><topic>Exact sciences and technology</topic><topic>Finite element analysis</topic><topic>Fundamental areas of phenomenology (including applications)</topic><topic>Physics</topic><topic>Solid mechanics</topic><topic>Static buckling and instability</topic><topic>Structural and continuum mechanics</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Lillico, M</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Butler, R</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Hunt, G. W</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Watson, A</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Kennedy, D</creatorcontrib><collection>Pascal-Francis</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>Mechanical & Transportation Engineering Abstracts</collection><collection>Technology Research Database</collection><collection>Engineering Research Database</collection><collection>Aerospace Database</collection><collection>Advanced Technologies Database with Aerospace</collection><collection>Civil Engineering Abstracts</collection><jtitle>AIAA journal</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Lillico, M</au><au>Butler, R</au><au>Hunt, G. W</au><au>Watson, A</au><au>Kennedy, D</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Postbuckling of Stiffened Panels Using Strut, Strip, and Finite Element Methods</atitle><jtitle>AIAA journal</jtitle><date>2003-06-01</date><risdate>2003</risdate><volume>41</volume><issue>6</issue><spage>1172</spage><epage>1179</epage><pages>1172-1179</pages><issn>0001-1452</issn><eissn>1533-385X</eissn><coden>AIAJAH</coden><abstract>Postbuckling results are presented for isotropic stiffened panels loaded in compression. Comparisons are made between single-bay and double-bay finite element (FE) models (where "bay" denotes a repeating portion, between supports, in the load/length direction) and a new strut model, following a Shanley-type approach, for single-bay and multibay panels. The strut model has been incorporated within the strip program VIPASA with CONstraints and OPTimization (VICONOPT) to design a multibay example panel with postbuckling reserve of strength in its skins, assuming linear elastic material properties. The panel has been shown by VICONOPT to have a stiffener buckling failure mode when an overall sinusoidal imperfection causing increased stiffener compression is present. The failure is confirmed by the double-bay FE model, which is shown to be an imperfect representation of the multibay case. Single-bay analysis using the strut model shows good agreement with the single-bay FE results. The VICONOPT code is able to design a metallic panel of realistic dimensions and loading using 50 strip elements (compared with the 9600 shell elements required by the finite element model) but cannot correctly account for material nonlinearity. The important phenomenological difference between postbuckling of single-, double-, and multibay panel models are indicated. [PUBLICATION ABSTRACT]</abstract><cop>Reston, VA</cop><pub>American Institute of Aeronautics and Astronautics</pub><doi>10.2514/2.2061</doi><tpages>8</tpages></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | ISSN: 0001-1452 |
ispartof | AIAA journal, 2003-06, Vol.41 (6), p.1172-1179 |
issn | 0001-1452 1533-385X |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_27940298 |
source | Alma/SFX Local Collection |
subjects | Aerospace materials Buckling Exact sciences and technology Finite element analysis Fundamental areas of phenomenology (including applications) Physics Solid mechanics Static buckling and instability Structural and continuum mechanics |
title | Postbuckling of Stiffened Panels Using Strut, Strip, and Finite Element Methods |
url | https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-29T02%3A29%3A23IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Postbuckling%20of%20Stiffened%20Panels%20Using%20Strut,%20Strip,%20and%20Finite%20Element%20Methods&rft.jtitle=AIAA%20journal&rft.au=Lillico,%20M&rft.date=2003-06-01&rft.volume=41&rft.issue=6&rft.spage=1172&rft.epage=1179&rft.pages=1172-1179&rft.issn=0001-1452&rft.eissn=1533-385X&rft.coden=AIAJAH&rft_id=info:doi/10.2514/2.2061&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E27940298%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=215332047&rft_id=info:pmid/&rfr_iscdi=true |