Postbuckling of Stiffened Panels Using Strut, Strip, and Finite Element Methods

Postbuckling results are presented for isotropic stiffened panels loaded in compression. Comparisons are made between single-bay and double-bay finite element (FE) models (where "bay" denotes a repeating portion, between supports, in the load/length direction) and a new strut model, follow...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:AIAA journal 2003-06, Vol.41 (6), p.1172-1179
Hauptverfasser: Lillico, M, Butler, R, Hunt, G. W, Watson, A, Kennedy, D
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page 1179
container_issue 6
container_start_page 1172
container_title AIAA journal
container_volume 41
creator Lillico, M
Butler, R
Hunt, G. W
Watson, A
Kennedy, D
description Postbuckling results are presented for isotropic stiffened panels loaded in compression. Comparisons are made between single-bay and double-bay finite element (FE) models (where "bay" denotes a repeating portion, between supports, in the load/length direction) and a new strut model, following a Shanley-type approach, for single-bay and multibay panels. The strut model has been incorporated within the strip program VIPASA with CONstraints and OPTimization (VICONOPT) to design a multibay example panel with postbuckling reserve of strength in its skins, assuming linear elastic material properties. The panel has been shown by VICONOPT to have a stiffener buckling failure mode when an overall sinusoidal imperfection causing increased stiffener compression is present. The failure is confirmed by the double-bay FE model, which is shown to be an imperfect representation of the multibay case. Single-bay analysis using the strut model shows good agreement with the single-bay FE results. The VICONOPT code is able to design a metallic panel of realistic dimensions and loading using 50 strip elements (compared with the 9600 shell elements required by the finite element model) but cannot correctly account for material nonlinearity. The important phenomenological difference between postbuckling of single-, double-, and multibay panel models are indicated. [PUBLICATION ABSTRACT]
doi_str_mv 10.2514/2.2061
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_27940298</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>27940298</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-a370t-82b98e7877756d3d2472960adff2082ae5e97652cffb3eaa92d6db04b0da0c063</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNptkF9LwzAUxYMoOKd-hqIoPqwzuf2T9lHGpoKywRz4FtIm0cysrUkK-u1t2WCgPh0u58e5h4PQOcFjSEh8C2PAKTlAA5JEURhlyeshGmCMSUjiBI7RiXPr7gKakQGaL2rni7b8MLp6C2oVLL1WSlZSBAteSeOCleudpbetH_Wim1HAKxHMdKW9DKZGbmTlg2fp32vhTtGR4sbJs50O0Wo2fZk8hE_z-8fJ3VPII4p9mEGRZ5JmlNIkFZGAmEKeYi6UApwBl4nMaZpAqVQRSc5zEKkocFxgwXGJ02iIrre5ja0_W-k822hXSmO60nXrGNA8xpBnHXjxC1zXra26bgz6gQDHdJ9W2to5KxVrrN5w-80IZv2oDFg_agde7dK4K7lRlleldns6zhIKkHfc5ZbjmvP9xz9pN_9RW5c1QjHVGuPll49-ACerjbE</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>215332047</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Postbuckling of Stiffened Panels Using Strut, Strip, and Finite Element Methods</title><source>Alma/SFX Local Collection</source><creator>Lillico, M ; Butler, R ; Hunt, G. W ; Watson, A ; Kennedy, D</creator><creatorcontrib>Lillico, M ; Butler, R ; Hunt, G. W ; Watson, A ; Kennedy, D</creatorcontrib><description>Postbuckling results are presented for isotropic stiffened panels loaded in compression. Comparisons are made between single-bay and double-bay finite element (FE) models (where "bay" denotes a repeating portion, between supports, in the load/length direction) and a new strut model, following a Shanley-type approach, for single-bay and multibay panels. The strut model has been incorporated within the strip program VIPASA with CONstraints and OPTimization (VICONOPT) to design a multibay example panel with postbuckling reserve of strength in its skins, assuming linear elastic material properties. The panel has been shown by VICONOPT to have a stiffener buckling failure mode when an overall sinusoidal imperfection causing increased stiffener compression is present. The failure is confirmed by the double-bay FE model, which is shown to be an imperfect representation of the multibay case. Single-bay analysis using the strut model shows good agreement with the single-bay FE results. The VICONOPT code is able to design a metallic panel of realistic dimensions and loading using 50 strip elements (compared with the 9600 shell elements required by the finite element model) but cannot correctly account for material nonlinearity. The important phenomenological difference between postbuckling of single-, double-, and multibay panel models are indicated. [PUBLICATION ABSTRACT]</description><identifier>ISSN: 0001-1452</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1533-385X</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.2514/2.2061</identifier><identifier>CODEN: AIAJAH</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Reston, VA: American Institute of Aeronautics and Astronautics</publisher><subject>Aerospace materials ; Buckling ; Exact sciences and technology ; Finite element analysis ; Fundamental areas of phenomenology (including applications) ; Physics ; Solid mechanics ; Static buckling and instability ; Structural and continuum mechanics</subject><ispartof>AIAA journal, 2003-06, Vol.41 (6), p.1172-1179</ispartof><rights>2003 INIST-CNRS</rights><rights>Copyright American Institute of Aeronautics and Astronautics Jun 2003</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-a370t-82b98e7877756d3d2472960adff2082ae5e97652cffb3eaa92d6db04b0da0c063</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-a370t-82b98e7877756d3d2472960adff2082ae5e97652cffb3eaa92d6db04b0da0c063</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><link.rule.ids>314,776,780,27901,27902</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttp://pascal-francis.inist.fr/vibad/index.php?action=getRecordDetail&amp;idt=14857229$$DView record in Pascal Francis$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Lillico, M</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Butler, R</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Hunt, G. W</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Watson, A</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Kennedy, D</creatorcontrib><title>Postbuckling of Stiffened Panels Using Strut, Strip, and Finite Element Methods</title><title>AIAA journal</title><description>Postbuckling results are presented for isotropic stiffened panels loaded in compression. Comparisons are made between single-bay and double-bay finite element (FE) models (where "bay" denotes a repeating portion, between supports, in the load/length direction) and a new strut model, following a Shanley-type approach, for single-bay and multibay panels. The strut model has been incorporated within the strip program VIPASA with CONstraints and OPTimization (VICONOPT) to design a multibay example panel with postbuckling reserve of strength in its skins, assuming linear elastic material properties. The panel has been shown by VICONOPT to have a stiffener buckling failure mode when an overall sinusoidal imperfection causing increased stiffener compression is present. The failure is confirmed by the double-bay FE model, which is shown to be an imperfect representation of the multibay case. Single-bay analysis using the strut model shows good agreement with the single-bay FE results. The VICONOPT code is able to design a metallic panel of realistic dimensions and loading using 50 strip elements (compared with the 9600 shell elements required by the finite element model) but cannot correctly account for material nonlinearity. The important phenomenological difference between postbuckling of single-, double-, and multibay panel models are indicated. [PUBLICATION ABSTRACT]</description><subject>Aerospace materials</subject><subject>Buckling</subject><subject>Exact sciences and technology</subject><subject>Finite element analysis</subject><subject>Fundamental areas of phenomenology (including applications)</subject><subject>Physics</subject><subject>Solid mechanics</subject><subject>Static buckling and instability</subject><subject>Structural and continuum mechanics</subject><issn>0001-1452</issn><issn>1533-385X</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2003</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><recordid>eNptkF9LwzAUxYMoOKd-hqIoPqwzuf2T9lHGpoKywRz4FtIm0cysrUkK-u1t2WCgPh0u58e5h4PQOcFjSEh8C2PAKTlAA5JEURhlyeshGmCMSUjiBI7RiXPr7gKakQGaL2rni7b8MLp6C2oVLL1WSlZSBAteSeOCleudpbetH_Wim1HAKxHMdKW9DKZGbmTlg2fp32vhTtGR4sbJs50O0Wo2fZk8hE_z-8fJ3VPII4p9mEGRZ5JmlNIkFZGAmEKeYi6UApwBl4nMaZpAqVQRSc5zEKkocFxgwXGJ02iIrre5ja0_W-k822hXSmO60nXrGNA8xpBnHXjxC1zXra26bgz6gQDHdJ9W2to5KxVrrN5w-80IZv2oDFg_agde7dK4K7lRlleldns6zhIKkHfc5ZbjmvP9xz9pN_9RW5c1QjHVGuPll49-ACerjbE</recordid><startdate>20030601</startdate><enddate>20030601</enddate><creator>Lillico, M</creator><creator>Butler, R</creator><creator>Hunt, G. W</creator><creator>Watson, A</creator><creator>Kennedy, D</creator><general>American Institute of Aeronautics and Astronautics</general><scope>IQODW</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7TB</scope><scope>8FD</scope><scope>FR3</scope><scope>H8D</scope><scope>L7M</scope><scope>KR7</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20030601</creationdate><title>Postbuckling of Stiffened Panels Using Strut, Strip, and Finite Element Methods</title><author>Lillico, M ; Butler, R ; Hunt, G. W ; Watson, A ; Kennedy, D</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-a370t-82b98e7877756d3d2472960adff2082ae5e97652cffb3eaa92d6db04b0da0c063</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2003</creationdate><topic>Aerospace materials</topic><topic>Buckling</topic><topic>Exact sciences and technology</topic><topic>Finite element analysis</topic><topic>Fundamental areas of phenomenology (including applications)</topic><topic>Physics</topic><topic>Solid mechanics</topic><topic>Static buckling and instability</topic><topic>Structural and continuum mechanics</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Lillico, M</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Butler, R</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Hunt, G. W</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Watson, A</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Kennedy, D</creatorcontrib><collection>Pascal-Francis</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>Mechanical &amp; Transportation Engineering Abstracts</collection><collection>Technology Research Database</collection><collection>Engineering Research Database</collection><collection>Aerospace Database</collection><collection>Advanced Technologies Database with Aerospace</collection><collection>Civil Engineering Abstracts</collection><jtitle>AIAA journal</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Lillico, M</au><au>Butler, R</au><au>Hunt, G. W</au><au>Watson, A</au><au>Kennedy, D</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Postbuckling of Stiffened Panels Using Strut, Strip, and Finite Element Methods</atitle><jtitle>AIAA journal</jtitle><date>2003-06-01</date><risdate>2003</risdate><volume>41</volume><issue>6</issue><spage>1172</spage><epage>1179</epage><pages>1172-1179</pages><issn>0001-1452</issn><eissn>1533-385X</eissn><coden>AIAJAH</coden><abstract>Postbuckling results are presented for isotropic stiffened panels loaded in compression. Comparisons are made between single-bay and double-bay finite element (FE) models (where "bay" denotes a repeating portion, between supports, in the load/length direction) and a new strut model, following a Shanley-type approach, for single-bay and multibay panels. The strut model has been incorporated within the strip program VIPASA with CONstraints and OPTimization (VICONOPT) to design a multibay example panel with postbuckling reserve of strength in its skins, assuming linear elastic material properties. The panel has been shown by VICONOPT to have a stiffener buckling failure mode when an overall sinusoidal imperfection causing increased stiffener compression is present. The failure is confirmed by the double-bay FE model, which is shown to be an imperfect representation of the multibay case. Single-bay analysis using the strut model shows good agreement with the single-bay FE results. The VICONOPT code is able to design a metallic panel of realistic dimensions and loading using 50 strip elements (compared with the 9600 shell elements required by the finite element model) but cannot correctly account for material nonlinearity. The important phenomenological difference between postbuckling of single-, double-, and multibay panel models are indicated. [PUBLICATION ABSTRACT]</abstract><cop>Reston, VA</cop><pub>American Institute of Aeronautics and Astronautics</pub><doi>10.2514/2.2061</doi><tpages>8</tpages></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 0001-1452
ispartof AIAA journal, 2003-06, Vol.41 (6), p.1172-1179
issn 0001-1452
1533-385X
language eng
recordid cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_27940298
source Alma/SFX Local Collection
subjects Aerospace materials
Buckling
Exact sciences and technology
Finite element analysis
Fundamental areas of phenomenology (including applications)
Physics
Solid mechanics
Static buckling and instability
Structural and continuum mechanics
title Postbuckling of Stiffened Panels Using Strut, Strip, and Finite Element Methods
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-29T02%3A29%3A23IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Postbuckling%20of%20Stiffened%20Panels%20Using%20Strut,%20Strip,%20and%20Finite%20Element%20Methods&rft.jtitle=AIAA%20journal&rft.au=Lillico,%20M&rft.date=2003-06-01&rft.volume=41&rft.issue=6&rft.spage=1172&rft.epage=1179&rft.pages=1172-1179&rft.issn=0001-1452&rft.eissn=1533-385X&rft.coden=AIAJAH&rft_id=info:doi/10.2514/2.2061&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E27940298%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=215332047&rft_id=info:pmid/&rfr_iscdi=true