Health registries as research tools: a review of methodological key issues
Health registries provide opportunities for conducting large-scale, population-based studies, but attention must be devoted to their specific limitations. Herein, we describe potential limitations that may affect the validity of registry-based research. Our review includes descriptions of 1) populat...
Gespeichert in:
Veröffentlicht in: | Danish medical journal 2023-03, Vol.70 (4) |
---|---|
Hauptverfasser: | , , , , |
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | eng |
Schlagworte: | |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
container_end_page | |
---|---|
container_issue | 4 |
container_start_page | |
container_title | Danish medical journal |
container_volume | 70 |
creator | Sørensen, Sissel Toft Kristensen, Frederik Pagh Troelsen, Frederikke Schønfeldt Schmidt, Morten Sørensen, Henrik Toft |
description | Health registries provide opportunities for conducting large-scale, population-based studies, but attention must be devoted to their specific limitations. Herein, we describe potential limitations that may affect the validity of registry-based research. Our review includes descriptions of 1) populations, 2) variables, 3) medical coding systems for medical information and 4) selected key methodological challenges. Knowledge of such factors and epidemiological study designs in general is likely to increase the quality of registry-based research and reduce potential biases. |
format | Article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>proquest_pubme</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_2793991273</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>2793991273</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-p211t-6e860968dc94aecbab37a3d648ab921948c626163c19059bb36700bf03f2e21a3</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNo1T01Lw0AUXASxRfsXZI9eAvuRbvK8SVGrFLzoObzdvLSrG7fmpUr_vQHrXIY3DDNvzsTcmHJZaNAwEwvmdzXBGVdrdSFm1gFAbdRcPK8J07iTA20jj0MklsjTxYRD2Mkx58S3EiflO9KPzJ3sadzlNqe8jQGT_KCjjMwH4itx3mFiWpz4Urw93L-u1sXm5fFpdbcp9kbrsXBUOwWubgOUSMGjtxXa1pU1ejAayjpMf2pngwa1BO-tq5TynbKdIaPRXoqbv9z9kL-m3rHpIwdKCT8pH7gxFVgAbSo7Wa9P1oPvqW32Q-xxODb_--0vwbpWFw</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>2793991273</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Health registries as research tools: a review of methodological key issues</title><source>MEDLINE</source><source>Alma/SFX Local Collection</source><creator>Sørensen, Sissel Toft ; Kristensen, Frederik Pagh ; Troelsen, Frederikke Schønfeldt ; Schmidt, Morten ; Sørensen, Henrik Toft</creator><creatorcontrib>Sørensen, Sissel Toft ; Kristensen, Frederik Pagh ; Troelsen, Frederikke Schønfeldt ; Schmidt, Morten ; Sørensen, Henrik Toft</creatorcontrib><description>Health registries provide opportunities for conducting large-scale, population-based studies, but attention must be devoted to their specific limitations. Herein, we describe potential limitations that may affect the validity of registry-based research. Our review includes descriptions of 1) populations, 2) variables, 3) medical coding systems for medical information and 4) selected key methodological challenges. Knowledge of such factors and epidemiological study designs in general is likely to increase the quality of registry-based research and reduce potential biases.</description><identifier>EISSN: 2245-1919</identifier><identifier>PMID: 36999820</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Denmark</publisher><subject>Biomedical Research - methods ; Humans ; Registries</subject><ispartof>Danish medical journal, 2023-03, Vol.70 (4)</ispartof><rights>Articles published in the DMJ are “open access”. This means that the articles are distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution Non-commercial License, which permits any non-commercial use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author(s) and source are credited.</rights><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><link.rule.ids>314,776,780</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36999820$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Sørensen, Sissel Toft</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Kristensen, Frederik Pagh</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Troelsen, Frederikke Schønfeldt</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Schmidt, Morten</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Sørensen, Henrik Toft</creatorcontrib><title>Health registries as research tools: a review of methodological key issues</title><title>Danish medical journal</title><addtitle>Dan Med J</addtitle><description>Health registries provide opportunities for conducting large-scale, population-based studies, but attention must be devoted to their specific limitations. Herein, we describe potential limitations that may affect the validity of registry-based research. Our review includes descriptions of 1) populations, 2) variables, 3) medical coding systems for medical information and 4) selected key methodological challenges. Knowledge of such factors and epidemiological study designs in general is likely to increase the quality of registry-based research and reduce potential biases.</description><subject>Biomedical Research - methods</subject><subject>Humans</subject><subject>Registries</subject><issn>2245-1919</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2023</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>EIF</sourceid><recordid>eNo1T01Lw0AUXASxRfsXZI9eAvuRbvK8SVGrFLzoObzdvLSrG7fmpUr_vQHrXIY3DDNvzsTcmHJZaNAwEwvmdzXBGVdrdSFm1gFAbdRcPK8J07iTA20jj0MklsjTxYRD2Mkx58S3EiflO9KPzJ3sadzlNqe8jQGT_KCjjMwH4itx3mFiWpz4Urw93L-u1sXm5fFpdbcp9kbrsXBUOwWubgOUSMGjtxXa1pU1ejAayjpMf2pngwa1BO-tq5TynbKdIaPRXoqbv9z9kL-m3rHpIwdKCT8pH7gxFVgAbSo7Wa9P1oPvqW32Q-xxODb_--0vwbpWFw</recordid><startdate>20230327</startdate><enddate>20230327</enddate><creator>Sørensen, Sissel Toft</creator><creator>Kristensen, Frederik Pagh</creator><creator>Troelsen, Frederikke Schønfeldt</creator><creator>Schmidt, Morten</creator><creator>Sørensen, Henrik Toft</creator><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>7X8</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20230327</creationdate><title>Health registries as research tools: a review of methodological key issues</title><author>Sørensen, Sissel Toft ; Kristensen, Frederik Pagh ; Troelsen, Frederikke Schønfeldt ; Schmidt, Morten ; Sørensen, Henrik Toft</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-p211t-6e860968dc94aecbab37a3d648ab921948c626163c19059bb36700bf03f2e21a3</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2023</creationdate><topic>Biomedical Research - methods</topic><topic>Humans</topic><topic>Registries</topic><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Sørensen, Sissel Toft</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Kristensen, Frederik Pagh</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Troelsen, Frederikke Schønfeldt</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Schmidt, Morten</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Sørensen, Henrik Toft</creatorcontrib><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><jtitle>Danish medical journal</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Sørensen, Sissel Toft</au><au>Kristensen, Frederik Pagh</au><au>Troelsen, Frederikke Schønfeldt</au><au>Schmidt, Morten</au><au>Sørensen, Henrik Toft</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Health registries as research tools: a review of methodological key issues</atitle><jtitle>Danish medical journal</jtitle><addtitle>Dan Med J</addtitle><date>2023-03-27</date><risdate>2023</risdate><volume>70</volume><issue>4</issue><eissn>2245-1919</eissn><abstract>Health registries provide opportunities for conducting large-scale, population-based studies, but attention must be devoted to their specific limitations. Herein, we describe potential limitations that may affect the validity of registry-based research. Our review includes descriptions of 1) populations, 2) variables, 3) medical coding systems for medical information and 4) selected key methodological challenges. Knowledge of such factors and epidemiological study designs in general is likely to increase the quality of registry-based research and reduce potential biases.</abstract><cop>Denmark</cop><pmid>36999820</pmid></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | EISSN: 2245-1919 |
ispartof | Danish medical journal, 2023-03, Vol.70 (4) |
issn | 2245-1919 |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_2793991273 |
source | MEDLINE; Alma/SFX Local Collection |
subjects | Biomedical Research - methods Humans Registries |
title | Health registries as research tools: a review of methodological key issues |
url | https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-02-19T02%3A29%3A42IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_pubme&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Health%20registries%20as%20research%20tools:%20a%20review%20of%20methodological%20key%20issues&rft.jtitle=Danish%20medical%20journal&rft.au=S%C3%B8rensen,%20Sissel%20Toft&rft.date=2023-03-27&rft.volume=70&rft.issue=4&rft.eissn=2245-1919&rft_id=info:doi/&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_pubme%3E2793991273%3C/proquest_pubme%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=2793991273&rft_id=info:pmid/36999820&rfr_iscdi=true |