Clinical and radiological outcomes in lateralized versus nonlateralized and distalized glenospheres in reverse total shoulder arthroplasty: a randomized control trial

Lateralization in reverse total shoulder arthroplasty (RTSA) has been used to theoretically offer the potential benefits of reduced scapular notching rates and improved stability and range of motion (ROM), particularly external rotation. The aim of this study was to compare ROM and clinical and radi...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Journal of shoulder and elbow surgery 2023-07, Vol.32 (7), p.1420-1431
Hauptverfasser: Southam, Brendan R., Bedeir, Yehia H., Johnson, Brian M., Hasselfeld, Kimberly A., Kloby, Michael A., Grawe, Brian M.
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page 1431
container_issue 7
container_start_page 1420
container_title Journal of shoulder and elbow surgery
container_volume 32
creator Southam, Brendan R.
Bedeir, Yehia H.
Johnson, Brian M.
Hasselfeld, Kimberly A.
Kloby, Michael A.
Grawe, Brian M.
description Lateralization in reverse total shoulder arthroplasty (RTSA) has been used to theoretically offer the potential benefits of reduced scapular notching rates and improved stability and range of motion (ROM), particularly external rotation. The aim of this study was to compare ROM and clinical and radiographic outcomes between patients who underwent RTSA with a lateralized vs. a nonlateralized and distalized glenosphere. A single-surgeon randomized control trial was conducted comparing 27 patients with a lateralized glenosphere and 26 patients with a nonlateralized and distalized glenosphere. A total of 66 patients were enrolled, 2 patients died before 2-year follow-up, 4 patients withdrew from the study, and 7 patients were lost to follow-up. All patients in the lateralized group received 6 mm of lateralization through the glenosphere. Participants represented a population presenting to an orthopedics sports medicine clinic with any indication for RTSA including revision arthroplasty. Patients completed preoperative and routine postoperative functional outcome measures 3, 6, 12, and a minimum of 24 months postoperatively, including American Shoulder and Elbow Surgeons, Patient-Reported Outcomes Measurement Information System Physical Function Upper Extremity, and Activities of Daily Living Requiring Active External and Internal Rotation assessments. Patients were also evaluated with ROM and radiographic measurements. The primary outcome of interest in this study was ROM, particularly external rotation. At 2-year follow-up, both groups had significant improvement in their American Shoulder and Elbow Surgeons, Patient-Reported Outcomes Measurement Information System Physical Function Upper Extremity, and Activities of Daily Living Requiring Active External and Internal Rotation scores with no significant difference observed between the groups. There were no statistically significant differences in incidence of scapular notching or acromial stress fractures. ROM in both groups improved significantly at their 2-year assessment with the only exception to this being external rotation at 90° of abduction in the nonlateralized and distalized group (39° ± 31° vs. 48° ± 24°, P = .379). Regardless of glenosphere lateralization status, patients in both groups had significant improvement in functional outcome scores and ROM, and there were no significant differences observed between the groups at 2-year follow-up. Longer follow-up is needed to determine the effect of imp
doi_str_mv 10.1016/j.jse.2023.03.004
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_2793988209</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><els_id>S1058274623003002</els_id><sourcerecordid>2793988209</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c353t-d151ee841acf13a65ac799fc6cb4f7eee19a673070c216b2fc2b742dc7d265543</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp9kc-KFDEQxoMo7j8fwIvk6KXHStLdmdaTDLoKC3txzyGTVO9kSCdjkl5YH8jnNL0ziqeFgqoU3_ejwkfIWwYrBqz_sF_tM644cLGCWtC-IOesE7zpO4CXdYZu3XDZ9mfkIuc9AAwt8NfkTEgA0fLhnPzeeBec0Z7qYGnS1kUf758WcS4mTpipC9Trgkl79wstfcCU50xDDP9vF7t1uZye9x5DzIcdpiMg4WJDWmJV0LyLs7eYqE5ll-LB61weP1JdDwg2Tk8EE0NJ0dOSnPZX5NWofcY3p35J7r5--bH51tzcXn_ffL5pjOhEaSzrGOK6ZdqMTOi-00YOw2h6s21HiYhs0L0UIMFw1m_5aPhWttwaaXnfda24JO-P3EOKP2fMRU0uG_ReB4xzVlwOYlivOQxVyo5Sk2LOCUd1SG7S6VExUEs8aq9qPGqJR0EtWPDvTvh5O6H95_ibRxV8OgqwfvLBYVLZOAwGrUtoirLRPYP_Azu7peU</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>2793988209</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Clinical and radiological outcomes in lateralized versus nonlateralized and distalized glenospheres in reverse total shoulder arthroplasty: a randomized control trial</title><source>ScienceDirect Journals (5 years ago - present)</source><creator>Southam, Brendan R. ; Bedeir, Yehia H. ; Johnson, Brian M. ; Hasselfeld, Kimberly A. ; Kloby, Michael A. ; Grawe, Brian M.</creator><creatorcontrib>Southam, Brendan R. ; Bedeir, Yehia H. ; Johnson, Brian M. ; Hasselfeld, Kimberly A. ; Kloby, Michael A. ; Grawe, Brian M.</creatorcontrib><description>Lateralization in reverse total shoulder arthroplasty (RTSA) has been used to theoretically offer the potential benefits of reduced scapular notching rates and improved stability and range of motion (ROM), particularly external rotation. The aim of this study was to compare ROM and clinical and radiographic outcomes between patients who underwent RTSA with a lateralized vs. a nonlateralized and distalized glenosphere. A single-surgeon randomized control trial was conducted comparing 27 patients with a lateralized glenosphere and 26 patients with a nonlateralized and distalized glenosphere. A total of 66 patients were enrolled, 2 patients died before 2-year follow-up, 4 patients withdrew from the study, and 7 patients were lost to follow-up. All patients in the lateralized group received 6 mm of lateralization through the glenosphere. Participants represented a population presenting to an orthopedics sports medicine clinic with any indication for RTSA including revision arthroplasty. Patients completed preoperative and routine postoperative functional outcome measures 3, 6, 12, and a minimum of 24 months postoperatively, including American Shoulder and Elbow Surgeons, Patient-Reported Outcomes Measurement Information System Physical Function Upper Extremity, and Activities of Daily Living Requiring Active External and Internal Rotation assessments. Patients were also evaluated with ROM and radiographic measurements. The primary outcome of interest in this study was ROM, particularly external rotation. At 2-year follow-up, both groups had significant improvement in their American Shoulder and Elbow Surgeons, Patient-Reported Outcomes Measurement Information System Physical Function Upper Extremity, and Activities of Daily Living Requiring Active External and Internal Rotation scores with no significant difference observed between the groups. There were no statistically significant differences in incidence of scapular notching or acromial stress fractures. ROM in both groups improved significantly at their 2-year assessment with the only exception to this being external rotation at 90° of abduction in the nonlateralized and distalized group (39° ± 31° vs. 48° ± 24°, P = .379). Regardless of glenosphere lateralization status, patients in both groups had significant improvement in functional outcome scores and ROM, and there were no significant differences observed between the groups at 2-year follow-up. Longer follow-up is needed to determine the effect of implant design on late complications, long-term outcomes, and implant retention.</description><identifier>ISSN: 1058-2746</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1532-6500</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1016/j.jse.2023.03.004</identifier><identifier>PMID: 37003429</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>United States: Elsevier Inc</publisher><subject>glenoid lateralization ; notching ; outcome ; outcomes ; radiolucent line ; range of motion ; Reverse total shoulder arthroplasty ; RTSA</subject><ispartof>Journal of shoulder and elbow surgery, 2023-07, Vol.32 (7), p.1420-1431</ispartof><rights>2023</rights><rights>Copyright © 2023. Published by Elsevier Inc.</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c353t-d151ee841acf13a65ac799fc6cb4f7eee19a673070c216b2fc2b742dc7d265543</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c353t-d151ee841acf13a65ac799fc6cb4f7eee19a673070c216b2fc2b742dc7d265543</cites><orcidid>0000-0003-1184-0569 ; 0000-0002-1659-6131 ; 0000-0001-6580-8420</orcidid></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.jse.2023.03.004$$EHTML$$P50$$Gelsevier$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,780,784,3550,27924,27925,45995</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37003429$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Southam, Brendan R.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Bedeir, Yehia H.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Johnson, Brian M.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Hasselfeld, Kimberly A.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Kloby, Michael A.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Grawe, Brian M.</creatorcontrib><title>Clinical and radiological outcomes in lateralized versus nonlateralized and distalized glenospheres in reverse total shoulder arthroplasty: a randomized control trial</title><title>Journal of shoulder and elbow surgery</title><addtitle>J Shoulder Elbow Surg</addtitle><description>Lateralization in reverse total shoulder arthroplasty (RTSA) has been used to theoretically offer the potential benefits of reduced scapular notching rates and improved stability and range of motion (ROM), particularly external rotation. The aim of this study was to compare ROM and clinical and radiographic outcomes between patients who underwent RTSA with a lateralized vs. a nonlateralized and distalized glenosphere. A single-surgeon randomized control trial was conducted comparing 27 patients with a lateralized glenosphere and 26 patients with a nonlateralized and distalized glenosphere. A total of 66 patients were enrolled, 2 patients died before 2-year follow-up, 4 patients withdrew from the study, and 7 patients were lost to follow-up. All patients in the lateralized group received 6 mm of lateralization through the glenosphere. Participants represented a population presenting to an orthopedics sports medicine clinic with any indication for RTSA including revision arthroplasty. Patients completed preoperative and routine postoperative functional outcome measures 3, 6, 12, and a minimum of 24 months postoperatively, including American Shoulder and Elbow Surgeons, Patient-Reported Outcomes Measurement Information System Physical Function Upper Extremity, and Activities of Daily Living Requiring Active External and Internal Rotation assessments. Patients were also evaluated with ROM and radiographic measurements. The primary outcome of interest in this study was ROM, particularly external rotation. At 2-year follow-up, both groups had significant improvement in their American Shoulder and Elbow Surgeons, Patient-Reported Outcomes Measurement Information System Physical Function Upper Extremity, and Activities of Daily Living Requiring Active External and Internal Rotation scores with no significant difference observed between the groups. There were no statistically significant differences in incidence of scapular notching or acromial stress fractures. ROM in both groups improved significantly at their 2-year assessment with the only exception to this being external rotation at 90° of abduction in the nonlateralized and distalized group (39° ± 31° vs. 48° ± 24°, P = .379). Regardless of glenosphere lateralization status, patients in both groups had significant improvement in functional outcome scores and ROM, and there were no significant differences observed between the groups at 2-year follow-up. Longer follow-up is needed to determine the effect of implant design on late complications, long-term outcomes, and implant retention.</description><subject>glenoid lateralization</subject><subject>notching</subject><subject>outcome</subject><subject>outcomes</subject><subject>radiolucent line</subject><subject>range of motion</subject><subject>Reverse total shoulder arthroplasty</subject><subject>RTSA</subject><issn>1058-2746</issn><issn>1532-6500</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2023</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><recordid>eNp9kc-KFDEQxoMo7j8fwIvk6KXHStLdmdaTDLoKC3txzyGTVO9kSCdjkl5YH8jnNL0ziqeFgqoU3_ejwkfIWwYrBqz_sF_tM644cLGCWtC-IOesE7zpO4CXdYZu3XDZ9mfkIuc9AAwt8NfkTEgA0fLhnPzeeBec0Z7qYGnS1kUf758WcS4mTpipC9Trgkl79wstfcCU50xDDP9vF7t1uZye9x5DzIcdpiMg4WJDWmJV0LyLs7eYqE5ll-LB61weP1JdDwg2Tk8EE0NJ0dOSnPZX5NWofcY3p35J7r5--bH51tzcXn_ffL5pjOhEaSzrGOK6ZdqMTOi-00YOw2h6s21HiYhs0L0UIMFw1m_5aPhWttwaaXnfda24JO-P3EOKP2fMRU0uG_ReB4xzVlwOYlivOQxVyo5Sk2LOCUd1SG7S6VExUEs8aq9qPGqJR0EtWPDvTvh5O6H95_ibRxV8OgqwfvLBYVLZOAwGrUtoirLRPYP_Azu7peU</recordid><startdate>202307</startdate><enddate>202307</enddate><creator>Southam, Brendan R.</creator><creator>Bedeir, Yehia H.</creator><creator>Johnson, Brian M.</creator><creator>Hasselfeld, Kimberly A.</creator><creator>Kloby, Michael A.</creator><creator>Grawe, Brian M.</creator><general>Elsevier Inc</general><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7X8</scope><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0003-1184-0569</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-1659-6131</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0001-6580-8420</orcidid></search><sort><creationdate>202307</creationdate><title>Clinical and radiological outcomes in lateralized versus nonlateralized and distalized glenospheres in reverse total shoulder arthroplasty: a randomized control trial</title><author>Southam, Brendan R. ; Bedeir, Yehia H. ; Johnson, Brian M. ; Hasselfeld, Kimberly A. ; Kloby, Michael A. ; Grawe, Brian M.</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c353t-d151ee841acf13a65ac799fc6cb4f7eee19a673070c216b2fc2b742dc7d265543</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2023</creationdate><topic>glenoid lateralization</topic><topic>notching</topic><topic>outcome</topic><topic>outcomes</topic><topic>radiolucent line</topic><topic>range of motion</topic><topic>Reverse total shoulder arthroplasty</topic><topic>RTSA</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Southam, Brendan R.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Bedeir, Yehia H.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Johnson, Brian M.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Hasselfeld, Kimberly A.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Kloby, Michael A.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Grawe, Brian M.</creatorcontrib><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><jtitle>Journal of shoulder and elbow surgery</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Southam, Brendan R.</au><au>Bedeir, Yehia H.</au><au>Johnson, Brian M.</au><au>Hasselfeld, Kimberly A.</au><au>Kloby, Michael A.</au><au>Grawe, Brian M.</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Clinical and radiological outcomes in lateralized versus nonlateralized and distalized glenospheres in reverse total shoulder arthroplasty: a randomized control trial</atitle><jtitle>Journal of shoulder and elbow surgery</jtitle><addtitle>J Shoulder Elbow Surg</addtitle><date>2023-07</date><risdate>2023</risdate><volume>32</volume><issue>7</issue><spage>1420</spage><epage>1431</epage><pages>1420-1431</pages><issn>1058-2746</issn><eissn>1532-6500</eissn><abstract>Lateralization in reverse total shoulder arthroplasty (RTSA) has been used to theoretically offer the potential benefits of reduced scapular notching rates and improved stability and range of motion (ROM), particularly external rotation. The aim of this study was to compare ROM and clinical and radiographic outcomes between patients who underwent RTSA with a lateralized vs. a nonlateralized and distalized glenosphere. A single-surgeon randomized control trial was conducted comparing 27 patients with a lateralized glenosphere and 26 patients with a nonlateralized and distalized glenosphere. A total of 66 patients were enrolled, 2 patients died before 2-year follow-up, 4 patients withdrew from the study, and 7 patients were lost to follow-up. All patients in the lateralized group received 6 mm of lateralization through the glenosphere. Participants represented a population presenting to an orthopedics sports medicine clinic with any indication for RTSA including revision arthroplasty. Patients completed preoperative and routine postoperative functional outcome measures 3, 6, 12, and a minimum of 24 months postoperatively, including American Shoulder and Elbow Surgeons, Patient-Reported Outcomes Measurement Information System Physical Function Upper Extremity, and Activities of Daily Living Requiring Active External and Internal Rotation assessments. Patients were also evaluated with ROM and radiographic measurements. The primary outcome of interest in this study was ROM, particularly external rotation. At 2-year follow-up, both groups had significant improvement in their American Shoulder and Elbow Surgeons, Patient-Reported Outcomes Measurement Information System Physical Function Upper Extremity, and Activities of Daily Living Requiring Active External and Internal Rotation scores with no significant difference observed between the groups. There were no statistically significant differences in incidence of scapular notching or acromial stress fractures. ROM in both groups improved significantly at their 2-year assessment with the only exception to this being external rotation at 90° of abduction in the nonlateralized and distalized group (39° ± 31° vs. 48° ± 24°, P = .379). Regardless of glenosphere lateralization status, patients in both groups had significant improvement in functional outcome scores and ROM, and there were no significant differences observed between the groups at 2-year follow-up. Longer follow-up is needed to determine the effect of implant design on late complications, long-term outcomes, and implant retention.</abstract><cop>United States</cop><pub>Elsevier Inc</pub><pmid>37003429</pmid><doi>10.1016/j.jse.2023.03.004</doi><tpages>12</tpages><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0003-1184-0569</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-1659-6131</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0001-6580-8420</orcidid></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 1058-2746
ispartof Journal of shoulder and elbow surgery, 2023-07, Vol.32 (7), p.1420-1431
issn 1058-2746
1532-6500
language eng
recordid cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_2793988209
source ScienceDirect Journals (5 years ago - present)
subjects glenoid lateralization
notching
outcome
outcomes
radiolucent line
range of motion
Reverse total shoulder arthroplasty
RTSA
title Clinical and radiological outcomes in lateralized versus nonlateralized and distalized glenospheres in reverse total shoulder arthroplasty: a randomized control trial
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-07T13%3A21%3A15IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Clinical%20and%20radiological%20outcomes%20in%20lateralized%20versus%20nonlateralized%20and%20distalized%20glenospheres%20in%20reverse%20total%20shoulder%20arthroplasty:%20a%20randomized%20control%20trial&rft.jtitle=Journal%20of%20shoulder%20and%20elbow%20surgery&rft.au=Southam,%20Brendan%20R.&rft.date=2023-07&rft.volume=32&rft.issue=7&rft.spage=1420&rft.epage=1431&rft.pages=1420-1431&rft.issn=1058-2746&rft.eissn=1532-6500&rft_id=info:doi/10.1016/j.jse.2023.03.004&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E2793988209%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=2793988209&rft_id=info:pmid/37003429&rft_els_id=S1058274623003002&rfr_iscdi=true