A semi-automated software program to assess the impact of second reads in prostate MRI for equivocal lesions: results from a UK tertiary referral centre

•Semi-automated workflows are useful to contour lesions, calculate prostate volume, and create a structured report for accurate biopsy targeting.•Second reads could be helpful to reduce the number of indeterminate lesions, which harboured clinically significant disease after targeted biopsy only in...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:European journal of radiology 2023-05, Vol.162, p.110796-110796, Article 110796
Hauptverfasser: Woernle, Alexandre, Dickinson, Louise, Lelie, Steven, Pendse, Doug, Heffernan Ho, Daniel, Ramachandran, Navin, Kirkham, Alex, Von Stempel, Conrad, Punwani, Shonit, Wah So, Chun, Withington, John, Grey, Alistair, Collins, Thomas, Maffei, Davide, Haider, Aiman, Freeman, Alex, Emberton, Mark, Piper, Jonathan W, Moore, Caroline M, Hines, John, Orczyk, Clément, Allen, Clare, Giganti, Francesco
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page 110796
container_issue
container_start_page 110796
container_title European journal of radiology
container_volume 162
creator Woernle, Alexandre
Dickinson, Louise
Lelie, Steven
Pendse, Doug
Heffernan Ho, Daniel
Ramachandran, Navin
Kirkham, Alex
Von Stempel, Conrad
Punwani, Shonit
Wah So, Chun
Withington, John
Grey, Alistair
Collins, Thomas
Maffei, Davide
Haider, Aiman
Freeman, Alex
Emberton, Mark
Piper, Jonathan W
Moore, Caroline M
Hines, John
Orczyk, Clément
Allen, Clare
Giganti, Francesco
description •Semi-automated workflows are useful to contour lesions, calculate prostate volume, and create a structured report for accurate biopsy targeting.•Second reads could be helpful to reduce the number of indeterminate lesions, which harboured clinically significant disease after targeted biopsy only in a minority of cases.•Second reads using customised workflows could help defer biopsies, reducing the number of side effects. To investigate the utility of a prostate magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) second read using a semi-automated software program in the one-stop clinic, where patients undergo multiparametric MRI, review and biopsy planning in one visit. We looked at concordance between readers for patients with equivocal scans and the possibility for biopsy deferral in this group. We present data from 664 consecutive patients. Scans were reported by seven different expert genitourinary radiologists using dedicated software (MIM®) and a Likert scale. All scans were rescored by another expert genitourinary radiologist using a customised workflow for second reads that includes annotated biopsy contours for accurate visual targeting. The number of scans in which a biopsy could have been deferred using biopsy results and prostate specific antigen density was assessed. Gleason score ≥ 3 + 4 was considered clinically significant disease. Concordance between first and second reads for equivocal scans (Likert 3) was evaluated. A total of 209/664 (31%) patients scored Likert 3 on first read, 128 of which (61%) were concordant after second read. 103/209 (49%) of patients with Likert 3 scans were biopsied, with clinically significant disease in 31 (30%) cases. Considering Likert 3 scans that were both downgraded and biopsied using the workflow-generated biopsy contours, 25/103 (24%) biopsies could have been deferred. Implementing a semi-automated workflow for accurate lesion contouring and targeting biopsies is helpful during the one-stop clinic. We observed a reduction of indeterminate scans after second reading and almost a quarter of biopsies could have been deferred, reducing the potential biopsy-related side effects.
doi_str_mv 10.1016/j.ejrad.2023.110796
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_2793987911</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><els_id>S0720048X23001109</els_id><sourcerecordid>2793987911</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c354t-93042f33c773d557ffc22b9e18635676bc6969463872582bd47ee5025a6a01843</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp9kc9u1DAQxi0EotvCEyAhH7lk8Z_EjpE4VFUpFa0qISpxs7zOGLxK4q3HacWb8Lh42dIjpznM75v5Zj5C3nC25oyr99s1bLMb1oIJueacaaOekRXvtWi0Fvo5WTEtWMPa_vsROUbcMsa61oiX5EhqxiQ3ekV-n1KEKTZuKWlyBQaKKZQHl4HucvqR3URLog4REGn5CTROO-cLTaHqfJoHmsENSOO857HUEfT66yUNKVO4W-J98m6kI2BMM36oMC5jQRpymqijt19ogVyiy79qK0DOFfYwlwyvyIvgRoTXj_WE3H46_3b2ubm6ubg8O71qvOza0hjJWhGk9FrLoet0CF6IjQHeK9kprTZeGWVaJetbul5shlYDdEx0TjnG-1aekHeHudX-3QJY7BTRwzi6GdKCVmgjTa8N5xWVB9TXS7H6tbscp-rdcmb3kdit_RuJ3UdiD5FU1dvHBctmguFJ8y-DCnw8AFDPvI-QLfoIs4chZvDFDin-d8Eftvqe4A</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>2793987911</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>A semi-automated software program to assess the impact of second reads in prostate MRI for equivocal lesions: results from a UK tertiary referral centre</title><source>MEDLINE</source><source>Elsevier ScienceDirect Journals Complete</source><creator>Woernle, Alexandre ; Dickinson, Louise ; Lelie, Steven ; Pendse, Doug ; Heffernan Ho, Daniel ; Ramachandran, Navin ; Kirkham, Alex ; Von Stempel, Conrad ; Punwani, Shonit ; Wah So, Chun ; Withington, John ; Grey, Alistair ; Collins, Thomas ; Maffei, Davide ; Haider, Aiman ; Freeman, Alex ; Emberton, Mark ; Piper, Jonathan W ; Moore, Caroline M ; Hines, John ; Orczyk, Clément ; Allen, Clare ; Giganti, Francesco</creator><creatorcontrib>Woernle, Alexandre ; Dickinson, Louise ; Lelie, Steven ; Pendse, Doug ; Heffernan Ho, Daniel ; Ramachandran, Navin ; Kirkham, Alex ; Von Stempel, Conrad ; Punwani, Shonit ; Wah So, Chun ; Withington, John ; Grey, Alistair ; Collins, Thomas ; Maffei, Davide ; Haider, Aiman ; Freeman, Alex ; Emberton, Mark ; Piper, Jonathan W ; Moore, Caroline M ; Hines, John ; Orczyk, Clément ; Allen, Clare ; Giganti, Francesco</creatorcontrib><description>•Semi-automated workflows are useful to contour lesions, calculate prostate volume, and create a structured report for accurate biopsy targeting.•Second reads could be helpful to reduce the number of indeterminate lesions, which harboured clinically significant disease after targeted biopsy only in a minority of cases.•Second reads using customised workflows could help defer biopsies, reducing the number of side effects. To investigate the utility of a prostate magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) second read using a semi-automated software program in the one-stop clinic, where patients undergo multiparametric MRI, review and biopsy planning in one visit. We looked at concordance between readers for patients with equivocal scans and the possibility for biopsy deferral in this group. We present data from 664 consecutive patients. Scans were reported by seven different expert genitourinary radiologists using dedicated software (MIM®) and a Likert scale. All scans were rescored by another expert genitourinary radiologist using a customised workflow for second reads that includes annotated biopsy contours for accurate visual targeting. The number of scans in which a biopsy could have been deferred using biopsy results and prostate specific antigen density was assessed. Gleason score ≥ 3 + 4 was considered clinically significant disease. Concordance between first and second reads for equivocal scans (Likert 3) was evaluated. A total of 209/664 (31%) patients scored Likert 3 on first read, 128 of which (61%) were concordant after second read. 103/209 (49%) of patients with Likert 3 scans were biopsied, with clinically significant disease in 31 (30%) cases. Considering Likert 3 scans that were both downgraded and biopsied using the workflow-generated biopsy contours, 25/103 (24%) biopsies could have been deferred. Implementing a semi-automated workflow for accurate lesion contouring and targeting biopsies is helpful during the one-stop clinic. We observed a reduction of indeterminate scans after second reading and almost a quarter of biopsies could have been deferred, reducing the potential biopsy-related side effects.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0720-048X</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1872-7727</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1016/j.ejrad.2023.110796</identifier><identifier>PMID: 37003197</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Ireland: Elsevier B.V</publisher><subject>Biopsy ; Humans ; Image-Guided Biopsy - methods ; Magnetic Resonance Imaging - methods ; Male ; Prostate - pathology ; Prostate Cancer ; Prostate MRI ; Prostatic Neoplasms - diagnostic imaging ; Prostatic Neoplasms - pathology ; Reading ; Second reads ; Software ; Tertiary Care Centers ; United Kingdom ; Workflow</subject><ispartof>European journal of radiology, 2023-05, Vol.162, p.110796-110796, Article 110796</ispartof><rights>2023 The Author(s)</rights><rights>Copyright © 2023 The Author(s). Published by Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c354t-93042f33c773d557ffc22b9e18635676bc6969463872582bd47ee5025a6a01843</cites><orcidid>0000-0001-5218-6431</orcidid></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.ejrad.2023.110796$$EHTML$$P50$$Gelsevier$$Hfree_for_read</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,780,784,3550,27924,27925,45995</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37003197$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Woernle, Alexandre</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Dickinson, Louise</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Lelie, Steven</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Pendse, Doug</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Heffernan Ho, Daniel</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Ramachandran, Navin</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Kirkham, Alex</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Von Stempel, Conrad</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Punwani, Shonit</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Wah So, Chun</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Withington, John</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Grey, Alistair</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Collins, Thomas</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Maffei, Davide</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Haider, Aiman</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Freeman, Alex</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Emberton, Mark</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Piper, Jonathan W</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Moore, Caroline M</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Hines, John</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Orczyk, Clément</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Allen, Clare</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Giganti, Francesco</creatorcontrib><title>A semi-automated software program to assess the impact of second reads in prostate MRI for equivocal lesions: results from a UK tertiary referral centre</title><title>European journal of radiology</title><addtitle>Eur J Radiol</addtitle><description>•Semi-automated workflows are useful to contour lesions, calculate prostate volume, and create a structured report for accurate biopsy targeting.•Second reads could be helpful to reduce the number of indeterminate lesions, which harboured clinically significant disease after targeted biopsy only in a minority of cases.•Second reads using customised workflows could help defer biopsies, reducing the number of side effects. To investigate the utility of a prostate magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) second read using a semi-automated software program in the one-stop clinic, where patients undergo multiparametric MRI, review and biopsy planning in one visit. We looked at concordance between readers for patients with equivocal scans and the possibility for biopsy deferral in this group. We present data from 664 consecutive patients. Scans were reported by seven different expert genitourinary radiologists using dedicated software (MIM®) and a Likert scale. All scans were rescored by another expert genitourinary radiologist using a customised workflow for second reads that includes annotated biopsy contours for accurate visual targeting. The number of scans in which a biopsy could have been deferred using biopsy results and prostate specific antigen density was assessed. Gleason score ≥ 3 + 4 was considered clinically significant disease. Concordance between first and second reads for equivocal scans (Likert 3) was evaluated. A total of 209/664 (31%) patients scored Likert 3 on first read, 128 of which (61%) were concordant after second read. 103/209 (49%) of patients with Likert 3 scans were biopsied, with clinically significant disease in 31 (30%) cases. Considering Likert 3 scans that were both downgraded and biopsied using the workflow-generated biopsy contours, 25/103 (24%) biopsies could have been deferred. Implementing a semi-automated workflow for accurate lesion contouring and targeting biopsies is helpful during the one-stop clinic. We observed a reduction of indeterminate scans after second reading and almost a quarter of biopsies could have been deferred, reducing the potential biopsy-related side effects.</description><subject>Biopsy</subject><subject>Humans</subject><subject>Image-Guided Biopsy - methods</subject><subject>Magnetic Resonance Imaging - methods</subject><subject>Male</subject><subject>Prostate - pathology</subject><subject>Prostate Cancer</subject><subject>Prostate MRI</subject><subject>Prostatic Neoplasms - diagnostic imaging</subject><subject>Prostatic Neoplasms - pathology</subject><subject>Reading</subject><subject>Second reads</subject><subject>Software</subject><subject>Tertiary Care Centers</subject><subject>United Kingdom</subject><subject>Workflow</subject><issn>0720-048X</issn><issn>1872-7727</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2023</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>EIF</sourceid><recordid>eNp9kc9u1DAQxi0EotvCEyAhH7lk8Z_EjpE4VFUpFa0qISpxs7zOGLxK4q3HacWb8Lh42dIjpznM75v5Zj5C3nC25oyr99s1bLMb1oIJueacaaOekRXvtWi0Fvo5WTEtWMPa_vsROUbcMsa61oiX5EhqxiQ3ekV-n1KEKTZuKWlyBQaKKZQHl4HucvqR3URLog4REGn5CTROO-cLTaHqfJoHmsENSOO857HUEfT66yUNKVO4W-J98m6kI2BMM36oMC5jQRpymqijt19ogVyiy79qK0DOFfYwlwyvyIvgRoTXj_WE3H46_3b2ubm6ubg8O71qvOza0hjJWhGk9FrLoet0CF6IjQHeK9kprTZeGWVaJetbul5shlYDdEx0TjnG-1aekHeHudX-3QJY7BTRwzi6GdKCVmgjTa8N5xWVB9TXS7H6tbscp-rdcmb3kdit_RuJ3UdiD5FU1dvHBctmguFJ8y-DCnw8AFDPvI-QLfoIs4chZvDFDin-d8Eftvqe4A</recordid><startdate>202305</startdate><enddate>202305</enddate><creator>Woernle, Alexandre</creator><creator>Dickinson, Louise</creator><creator>Lelie, Steven</creator><creator>Pendse, Doug</creator><creator>Heffernan Ho, Daniel</creator><creator>Ramachandran, Navin</creator><creator>Kirkham, Alex</creator><creator>Von Stempel, Conrad</creator><creator>Punwani, Shonit</creator><creator>Wah So, Chun</creator><creator>Withington, John</creator><creator>Grey, Alistair</creator><creator>Collins, Thomas</creator><creator>Maffei, Davide</creator><creator>Haider, Aiman</creator><creator>Freeman, Alex</creator><creator>Emberton, Mark</creator><creator>Piper, Jonathan W</creator><creator>Moore, Caroline M</creator><creator>Hines, John</creator><creator>Orczyk, Clément</creator><creator>Allen, Clare</creator><creator>Giganti, Francesco</creator><general>Elsevier B.V</general><scope>6I.</scope><scope>AAFTH</scope><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7X8</scope><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0001-5218-6431</orcidid></search><sort><creationdate>202305</creationdate><title>A semi-automated software program to assess the impact of second reads in prostate MRI for equivocal lesions: results from a UK tertiary referral centre</title><author>Woernle, Alexandre ; Dickinson, Louise ; Lelie, Steven ; Pendse, Doug ; Heffernan Ho, Daniel ; Ramachandran, Navin ; Kirkham, Alex ; Von Stempel, Conrad ; Punwani, Shonit ; Wah So, Chun ; Withington, John ; Grey, Alistair ; Collins, Thomas ; Maffei, Davide ; Haider, Aiman ; Freeman, Alex ; Emberton, Mark ; Piper, Jonathan W ; Moore, Caroline M ; Hines, John ; Orczyk, Clément ; Allen, Clare ; Giganti, Francesco</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c354t-93042f33c773d557ffc22b9e18635676bc6969463872582bd47ee5025a6a01843</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2023</creationdate><topic>Biopsy</topic><topic>Humans</topic><topic>Image-Guided Biopsy - methods</topic><topic>Magnetic Resonance Imaging - methods</topic><topic>Male</topic><topic>Prostate - pathology</topic><topic>Prostate Cancer</topic><topic>Prostate MRI</topic><topic>Prostatic Neoplasms - diagnostic imaging</topic><topic>Prostatic Neoplasms - pathology</topic><topic>Reading</topic><topic>Second reads</topic><topic>Software</topic><topic>Tertiary Care Centers</topic><topic>United Kingdom</topic><topic>Workflow</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Woernle, Alexandre</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Dickinson, Louise</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Lelie, Steven</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Pendse, Doug</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Heffernan Ho, Daniel</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Ramachandran, Navin</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Kirkham, Alex</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Von Stempel, Conrad</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Punwani, Shonit</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Wah So, Chun</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Withington, John</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Grey, Alistair</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Collins, Thomas</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Maffei, Davide</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Haider, Aiman</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Freeman, Alex</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Emberton, Mark</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Piper, Jonathan W</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Moore, Caroline M</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Hines, John</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Orczyk, Clément</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Allen, Clare</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Giganti, Francesco</creatorcontrib><collection>ScienceDirect Open Access Titles</collection><collection>Elsevier:ScienceDirect:Open Access</collection><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><jtitle>European journal of radiology</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Woernle, Alexandre</au><au>Dickinson, Louise</au><au>Lelie, Steven</au><au>Pendse, Doug</au><au>Heffernan Ho, Daniel</au><au>Ramachandran, Navin</au><au>Kirkham, Alex</au><au>Von Stempel, Conrad</au><au>Punwani, Shonit</au><au>Wah So, Chun</au><au>Withington, John</au><au>Grey, Alistair</au><au>Collins, Thomas</au><au>Maffei, Davide</au><au>Haider, Aiman</au><au>Freeman, Alex</au><au>Emberton, Mark</au><au>Piper, Jonathan W</au><au>Moore, Caroline M</au><au>Hines, John</au><au>Orczyk, Clément</au><au>Allen, Clare</au><au>Giganti, Francesco</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>A semi-automated software program to assess the impact of second reads in prostate MRI for equivocal lesions: results from a UK tertiary referral centre</atitle><jtitle>European journal of radiology</jtitle><addtitle>Eur J Radiol</addtitle><date>2023-05</date><risdate>2023</risdate><volume>162</volume><spage>110796</spage><epage>110796</epage><pages>110796-110796</pages><artnum>110796</artnum><issn>0720-048X</issn><eissn>1872-7727</eissn><abstract>•Semi-automated workflows are useful to contour lesions, calculate prostate volume, and create a structured report for accurate biopsy targeting.•Second reads could be helpful to reduce the number of indeterminate lesions, which harboured clinically significant disease after targeted biopsy only in a minority of cases.•Second reads using customised workflows could help defer biopsies, reducing the number of side effects. To investigate the utility of a prostate magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) second read using a semi-automated software program in the one-stop clinic, where patients undergo multiparametric MRI, review and biopsy planning in one visit. We looked at concordance between readers for patients with equivocal scans and the possibility for biopsy deferral in this group. We present data from 664 consecutive patients. Scans were reported by seven different expert genitourinary radiologists using dedicated software (MIM®) and a Likert scale. All scans were rescored by another expert genitourinary radiologist using a customised workflow for second reads that includes annotated biopsy contours for accurate visual targeting. The number of scans in which a biopsy could have been deferred using biopsy results and prostate specific antigen density was assessed. Gleason score ≥ 3 + 4 was considered clinically significant disease. Concordance between first and second reads for equivocal scans (Likert 3) was evaluated. A total of 209/664 (31%) patients scored Likert 3 on first read, 128 of which (61%) were concordant after second read. 103/209 (49%) of patients with Likert 3 scans were biopsied, with clinically significant disease in 31 (30%) cases. Considering Likert 3 scans that were both downgraded and biopsied using the workflow-generated biopsy contours, 25/103 (24%) biopsies could have been deferred. Implementing a semi-automated workflow for accurate lesion contouring and targeting biopsies is helpful during the one-stop clinic. We observed a reduction of indeterminate scans after second reading and almost a quarter of biopsies could have been deferred, reducing the potential biopsy-related side effects.</abstract><cop>Ireland</cop><pub>Elsevier B.V</pub><pmid>37003197</pmid><doi>10.1016/j.ejrad.2023.110796</doi><tpages>1</tpages><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0001-5218-6431</orcidid><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 0720-048X
ispartof European journal of radiology, 2023-05, Vol.162, p.110796-110796, Article 110796
issn 0720-048X
1872-7727
language eng
recordid cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_2793987911
source MEDLINE; Elsevier ScienceDirect Journals Complete
subjects Biopsy
Humans
Image-Guided Biopsy - methods
Magnetic Resonance Imaging - methods
Male
Prostate - pathology
Prostate Cancer
Prostate MRI
Prostatic Neoplasms - diagnostic imaging
Prostatic Neoplasms - pathology
Reading
Second reads
Software
Tertiary Care Centers
United Kingdom
Workflow
title A semi-automated software program to assess the impact of second reads in prostate MRI for equivocal lesions: results from a UK tertiary referral centre
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2024-12-25T05%3A08%3A34IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=A%20semi-automated%20software%20program%20to%20assess%20the%20impact%20of%20second%20reads%20in%20prostate%20MRI%20for%20equivocal%20lesions:%20results%20from%20a%20UK%20tertiary%20referral%20centre&rft.jtitle=European%20journal%20of%20radiology&rft.au=Woernle,%20Alexandre&rft.date=2023-05&rft.volume=162&rft.spage=110796&rft.epage=110796&rft.pages=110796-110796&rft.artnum=110796&rft.issn=0720-048X&rft.eissn=1872-7727&rft_id=info:doi/10.1016/j.ejrad.2023.110796&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E2793987911%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=2793987911&rft_id=info:pmid/37003197&rft_els_id=S0720048X23001109&rfr_iscdi=true