Peak Discharge Scaling in Small Hortonian Watershed

Runoff data were analyzed from the semihumid 21.2 km2 Goodwin Creek Experimental Watershed (GCEW) in northern Mississippi to examine watershed response over a range of scales. Runoff is monitored at the GCEW outlet and in 13 subcatchments, ranging in area from 0.06 to 17.6 km2. Previous data-based s...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Journal of hydrologic engineering 2003-03, Vol.8 (2), p.64-73
Hauptverfasser: Ogden, Fred L, Dawdy, David R
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page 73
container_issue 2
container_start_page 64
container_title Journal of hydrologic engineering
container_volume 8
creator Ogden, Fred L
Dawdy, David R
description Runoff data were analyzed from the semihumid 21.2 km2 Goodwin Creek Experimental Watershed (GCEW) in northern Mississippi to examine watershed response over a range of scales. Runoff is monitored at the GCEW outlet and in 13 subcatchments, ranging in area from 0.06 to 17.6 km2. Previous data-based studies have shown that simple scaling theory fails to describe scaling of flood quantiles in large watersheds, and there is a fundamental change in scaling behavior in semihumid watersheds at an area of approximately 100 km2. It has been found that flood quantiles in nearly all subbasins in the GCEW are self-similar as described by simple scaling theory. It has also been found that expected values of peak flows during single runoff events are described by a power law function of catchment area. The primary reasons why flood quantiles are self-similar on Goodwin Creek are that precipitation is relatively uniform over the basin; peak discharges in smaller catchments are highly correlated with rainfall rates; nearly the entire watershed regularly contributes to runoff and; the groundwater table plays little role in runoff production.
doi_str_mv 10.1061/(ASCE)1084-0699(2003)8:2(64)
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_27922795</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>18912311</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-a499t-d6fa15ee0afcbcbbeacaf371e11272369f00f3908ad3871e8cfd44063413f2fd3</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNqNkEFPwjAUxxujiYh-hx2MgcO0r-1KqyeCIBoSTdAYT03ZWhiODdtx8NvbgXhUm7zX95pf_ml-CJ0DvgTM4arTnw6GXcCCxZhL2SEY0664Jh3OugeoBZLROEkEOwzzHjpGJ94vMQYWlhaiT0a_R7e5TxfazU00TXWRl_MoL6PpShdFNK5cXZW5LqNXXRvnFyY7RUdWF96cfd9t9DIaPg_G8eTx7n7Qn8SaSVnHGbcaEmOwtuksnc2MTrWlPTAApEcolxZjSyUWOqMiPIvUZoxhThlQS2xG2-hil7t21cfG-Fqtwj9NUejSVBuvSE-SUMl_QGAyyPkLBCGBUIAA3uzA1FXeO2PV2uUr7T4VYNW4V6pxrxqtqtGqGvdKKKI4oz9CdAhXy2rjyuBJPYzfhqMRbo7YdtI0zrYz7IN_yf0CYSOONg</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>18912311</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Peak Discharge Scaling in Small Hortonian Watershed</title><source>American Society of Civil Engineers:NESLI2:Journals:2014</source><creator>Ogden, Fred L ; Dawdy, David R</creator><creatorcontrib>Ogden, Fred L ; Dawdy, David R</creatorcontrib><description>Runoff data were analyzed from the semihumid 21.2 km2 Goodwin Creek Experimental Watershed (GCEW) in northern Mississippi to examine watershed response over a range of scales. Runoff is monitored at the GCEW outlet and in 13 subcatchments, ranging in area from 0.06 to 17.6 km2. Previous data-based studies have shown that simple scaling theory fails to describe scaling of flood quantiles in large watersheds, and there is a fundamental change in scaling behavior in semihumid watersheds at an area of approximately 100 km2. It has been found that flood quantiles in nearly all subbasins in the GCEW are self-similar as described by simple scaling theory. It has also been found that expected values of peak flows during single runoff events are described by a power law function of catchment area. The primary reasons why flood quantiles are self-similar on Goodwin Creek are that precipitation is relatively uniform over the basin; peak discharges in smaller catchments are highly correlated with rainfall rates; nearly the entire watershed regularly contributes to runoff and; the groundwater table plays little role in runoff production.</description><identifier>ISSN: 1084-0699</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1943-5584</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1061/(ASCE)1084-0699(2003)8:2(64)</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>American Society of Civil Engineers</publisher><subject>TECHNICAL PAPERS</subject><ispartof>Journal of hydrologic engineering, 2003-03, Vol.8 (2), p.64-73</ispartof><rights>Copyright © 2003 American Society of Civil Engineers</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-a499t-d6fa15ee0afcbcbbeacaf371e11272369f00f3908ad3871e8cfd44063413f2fd3</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-a499t-d6fa15ee0afcbcbbeacaf371e11272369f00f3908ad3871e8cfd44063413f2fd3</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttp://ascelibrary.org/doi/pdf/10.1061/(ASCE)1084-0699(2003)8:2(64)$$EPDF$$P50$$Gasce$$H</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttp://ascelibrary.org/doi/abs/10.1061/(ASCE)1084-0699(2003)8:2(64)$$EHTML$$P50$$Gasce$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,780,784,27924,27925,76193,76201</link.rule.ids></links><search><creatorcontrib>Ogden, Fred L</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Dawdy, David R</creatorcontrib><title>Peak Discharge Scaling in Small Hortonian Watershed</title><title>Journal of hydrologic engineering</title><description>Runoff data were analyzed from the semihumid 21.2 km2 Goodwin Creek Experimental Watershed (GCEW) in northern Mississippi to examine watershed response over a range of scales. Runoff is monitored at the GCEW outlet and in 13 subcatchments, ranging in area from 0.06 to 17.6 km2. Previous data-based studies have shown that simple scaling theory fails to describe scaling of flood quantiles in large watersheds, and there is a fundamental change in scaling behavior in semihumid watersheds at an area of approximately 100 km2. It has been found that flood quantiles in nearly all subbasins in the GCEW are self-similar as described by simple scaling theory. It has also been found that expected values of peak flows during single runoff events are described by a power law function of catchment area. The primary reasons why flood quantiles are self-similar on Goodwin Creek are that precipitation is relatively uniform over the basin; peak discharges in smaller catchments are highly correlated with rainfall rates; nearly the entire watershed regularly contributes to runoff and; the groundwater table plays little role in runoff production.</description><subject>TECHNICAL PAPERS</subject><issn>1084-0699</issn><issn>1943-5584</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2003</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><recordid>eNqNkEFPwjAUxxujiYh-hx2MgcO0r-1KqyeCIBoSTdAYT03ZWhiODdtx8NvbgXhUm7zX95pf_ml-CJ0DvgTM4arTnw6GXcCCxZhL2SEY0664Jh3OugeoBZLROEkEOwzzHjpGJ94vMQYWlhaiT0a_R7e5TxfazU00TXWRl_MoL6PpShdFNK5cXZW5LqNXXRvnFyY7RUdWF96cfd9t9DIaPg_G8eTx7n7Qn8SaSVnHGbcaEmOwtuksnc2MTrWlPTAApEcolxZjSyUWOqMiPIvUZoxhThlQS2xG2-hil7t21cfG-Fqtwj9NUejSVBuvSE-SUMl_QGAyyPkLBCGBUIAA3uzA1FXeO2PV2uUr7T4VYNW4V6pxrxqtqtGqGvdKKKI4oz9CdAhXy2rjyuBJPYzfhqMRbo7YdtI0zrYz7IN_yf0CYSOONg</recordid><startdate>20030301</startdate><enddate>20030301</enddate><creator>Ogden, Fred L</creator><creator>Dawdy, David R</creator><general>American Society of Civil Engineers</general><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7TG</scope><scope>7UA</scope><scope>C1K</scope><scope>KL.</scope><scope>8FD</scope><scope>FR3</scope><scope>KR7</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20030301</creationdate><title>Peak Discharge Scaling in Small Hortonian Watershed</title><author>Ogden, Fred L ; Dawdy, David R</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-a499t-d6fa15ee0afcbcbbeacaf371e11272369f00f3908ad3871e8cfd44063413f2fd3</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2003</creationdate><topic>TECHNICAL PAPERS</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Ogden, Fred L</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Dawdy, David R</creatorcontrib><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>Meteorological &amp; Geoastrophysical Abstracts</collection><collection>Water Resources Abstracts</collection><collection>Environmental Sciences and Pollution Management</collection><collection>Meteorological &amp; Geoastrophysical Abstracts - Academic</collection><collection>Technology Research Database</collection><collection>Engineering Research Database</collection><collection>Civil Engineering Abstracts</collection><jtitle>Journal of hydrologic engineering</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Ogden, Fred L</au><au>Dawdy, David R</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Peak Discharge Scaling in Small Hortonian Watershed</atitle><jtitle>Journal of hydrologic engineering</jtitle><date>2003-03-01</date><risdate>2003</risdate><volume>8</volume><issue>2</issue><spage>64</spage><epage>73</epage><pages>64-73</pages><issn>1084-0699</issn><eissn>1943-5584</eissn><abstract>Runoff data were analyzed from the semihumid 21.2 km2 Goodwin Creek Experimental Watershed (GCEW) in northern Mississippi to examine watershed response over a range of scales. Runoff is monitored at the GCEW outlet and in 13 subcatchments, ranging in area from 0.06 to 17.6 km2. Previous data-based studies have shown that simple scaling theory fails to describe scaling of flood quantiles in large watersheds, and there is a fundamental change in scaling behavior in semihumid watersheds at an area of approximately 100 km2. It has been found that flood quantiles in nearly all subbasins in the GCEW are self-similar as described by simple scaling theory. It has also been found that expected values of peak flows during single runoff events are described by a power law function of catchment area. The primary reasons why flood quantiles are self-similar on Goodwin Creek are that precipitation is relatively uniform over the basin; peak discharges in smaller catchments are highly correlated with rainfall rates; nearly the entire watershed regularly contributes to runoff and; the groundwater table plays little role in runoff production.</abstract><pub>American Society of Civil Engineers</pub><doi>10.1061/(ASCE)1084-0699(2003)8:2(64)</doi><tpages>10</tpages></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 1084-0699
ispartof Journal of hydrologic engineering, 2003-03, Vol.8 (2), p.64-73
issn 1084-0699
1943-5584
language eng
recordid cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_27922795
source American Society of Civil Engineers:NESLI2:Journals:2014
subjects TECHNICAL PAPERS
title Peak Discharge Scaling in Small Hortonian Watershed
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2024-12-19T04%3A27%3A52IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Peak%20Discharge%20Scaling%20in%20Small%20Hortonian%20Watershed&rft.jtitle=Journal%20of%20hydrologic%20engineering&rft.au=Ogden,%20Fred%20L&rft.date=2003-03-01&rft.volume=8&rft.issue=2&rft.spage=64&rft.epage=73&rft.pages=64-73&rft.issn=1084-0699&rft.eissn=1943-5584&rft_id=info:doi/10.1061/(ASCE)1084-0699(2003)8:2(64)&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E18912311%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=18912311&rft_id=info:pmid/&rfr_iscdi=true