Electrocardiogram to Determine Mitral and Aortic Valve Opening and Closure

Purpose Knowledge of the timing of cardiac valve opening and closing is important in cardiac physiology. The relationship between valve motion and electrocardiogram (ECG) is often assumed, however is not clearly defined. Here we investigate the accuracy of cardiac valve timing estimated using only t...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Cardiovascular engineering and technology 2023-06, Vol.14 (3), p.447-456
Hauptverfasser: Aufan, M. Rifqi, Jost, Zachary T., Miller, Neal J., Sharifov, Oleg F., Gupta, Himanshu, Perry, Gilbert J., Wells, J. Michael, Denney, Thomas S., Lloyd, Steven G.
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
Beschreibung
Zusammenfassung:Purpose Knowledge of the timing of cardiac valve opening and closing is important in cardiac physiology. The relationship between valve motion and electrocardiogram (ECG) is often assumed, however is not clearly defined. Here we investigate the accuracy of cardiac valve timing estimated using only the ECG, compared to Doppler echocardiography (DE) flow imaging as the gold standard. Methods DE was obtained in 37 patients with simultaneous ECG recording. ECG was digitally processed and identifiable features (QRS, T, P waves) were examined as potential reference points to determine opening and closure of aortic and mitral valves, as compared to DE outflow and inflow measurement. Timing offset of the cardiac valves opening and closure between ECG features and DE was measured from derivation set (n = 19). The obtained mean offset in combination with the ECG features model was then evaluated on a validation set (n = 18). Using the same approach, additional measurement was also done for the right sided valves. Results From the derivation set, we found a fixed offset of 22 ± 9 ms, 2 ± 13 ms, 90 ± 26 ms, and − 2 ± − 27 ms when comparing S to aortic valve opening, T end to aortic valve closure, T end to mitral valve opening, and R to mitral valve closure respectively. Application of this model to the validation set showed good estimation of aortic and mitral valve opening and closure timing value, with low model absolute error (median of the mean absolute error of the four events = 19 ms compared to the gold standard DE measurement). For the right-sided (tricuspid and pulmonic) valves in our patient set, there was considerably higher median of the mean absolute error of 42 ms for the model. Conclusion ECG features can be used to estimate aortic and mitral valve timings with good accuracy as compared to DE, allowing useful hemodynamic information to be derived from this easily available test.
ISSN:1869-408X
1869-4098
DOI:10.1007/s13239-023-00664-4