Colonisation after disturbance on artificial structures: The influence of timing and grazing

Artificial structures are poor surrogates of natural rocky shores, meaning they generally support depauperate assemblages. These differences may result from a combination of recruitment processes, biotic interactions, and structuring by environmental factors. In this study, plots were cleared on two...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Marine environmental research 2023-05, Vol.187, p.105956-105956, Article 105956
Hauptverfasser: Farrugia Drakard, Veronica, Brooks, Paul R., Crowe, Tasman P.
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page 105956
container_issue
container_start_page 105956
container_title Marine environmental research
container_volume 187
creator Farrugia Drakard, Veronica
Brooks, Paul R.
Crowe, Tasman P.
description Artificial structures are poor surrogates of natural rocky shores, meaning they generally support depauperate assemblages. These differences may result from a combination of recruitment processes, biotic interactions, and structuring by environmental factors. In this study, plots were cleared on two seawalls and two natural shores at two separate timepoints – in August 2020 (summer) and February 2021 (winter) - and monitored over one year to determine the influence of timing of disturbance on recruitment and succession. Additional plots were cleared at one of the seawalls at a single timepoint in August 2020, and exclusion cages were installed to determine the influence of grazing pressure on colonisation; these were monitored for 18 months. Disturbance during winter resulted in higher concentrations of all biofilm components up to 3 months, but did not impact benthic community composition beyond this point. Grazer exclusion on artificial structures increased biofilm concentrations and influenced community composition in comparison to plots on artificial structures without exclusion, while communities on natural surfaces differed in terms of species composition to those on artificial plots at 12 months. We conclude that the timing of routine maintenance works on artificial structures may impact initial biofilm abundances. Furthermore, while grazing pressure does influence community structure on artificial structures, this alone is not sufficient to explain biological differences between artificial structures and natural shores. •Higher concentrations of all biofilm components developed up to 3 months from disturbance in winter.•Disturbance timepoint did not influence taxon richness or community composition from 3 months onwards.•Grazer exclusion on artificial structures increased biofilm concentrations and influenced community composition.•Communities on natural shores differed from those on artificial structures with and without grazer exclusion.
doi_str_mv 10.1016/j.marenvres.2023.105956
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_2791370684</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><els_id>S0141113623000843</els_id><sourcerecordid>2791370684</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c420t-fc16e5efaec1f31fa170e095704ee3c23de09ad4b26b42aeef629924e34bd6b53</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNqFkE1PxCAQhonR6Lr6F5Sjl64MtHTxZjZ-JSZe9GZCKB1WNt1WgZror5d11asn4OWZmcxDyCmwGTCQ56vZ2gTs3wPGGWdc5LRSldwhE5jXqmBcwS6ZMCihABDygBzGuGKMVTVU--RASFXNQc0n5HkxdEPvo0l-6KlxCQNtfUxjaExvkW7CkLzz1puOxhRGm_8wXtDHF6S-d92I35yjya99v6Smb-kymM98PyJ7znQRj3_OKXm6vnpc3Bb3Dzd3i8v7wpacpcJZkFihM2jBCXAGaoZMVTUrEYXlos0v05YNl03JDaKTXCleoiibVjaVmJKzbd_XMLyNGJNe-2ix60yPwxg1rxWImsl5mdF6i9owxBjQ6dfgs8sPDUxv1OqV_lOrN2r1Vm2uPPkZMjZrbP_qfl1m4HILYF713WPQ0fqNnNYHtEm3g_93yBdvpZDz</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>2791370684</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Colonisation after disturbance on artificial structures: The influence of timing and grazing</title><source>ScienceDirect Journals (5 years ago - present)</source><creator>Farrugia Drakard, Veronica ; Brooks, Paul R. ; Crowe, Tasman P.</creator><creatorcontrib>Farrugia Drakard, Veronica ; Brooks, Paul R. ; Crowe, Tasman P.</creatorcontrib><description>Artificial structures are poor surrogates of natural rocky shores, meaning they generally support depauperate assemblages. These differences may result from a combination of recruitment processes, biotic interactions, and structuring by environmental factors. In this study, plots were cleared on two seawalls and two natural shores at two separate timepoints – in August 2020 (summer) and February 2021 (winter) - and monitored over one year to determine the influence of timing of disturbance on recruitment and succession. Additional plots were cleared at one of the seawalls at a single timepoint in August 2020, and exclusion cages were installed to determine the influence of grazing pressure on colonisation; these were monitored for 18 months. Disturbance during winter resulted in higher concentrations of all biofilm components up to 3 months, but did not impact benthic community composition beyond this point. Grazer exclusion on artificial structures increased biofilm concentrations and influenced community composition in comparison to plots on artificial structures without exclusion, while communities on natural surfaces differed in terms of species composition to those on artificial plots at 12 months. We conclude that the timing of routine maintenance works on artificial structures may impact initial biofilm abundances. Furthermore, while grazing pressure does influence community structure on artificial structures, this alone is not sufficient to explain biological differences between artificial structures and natural shores. •Higher concentrations of all biofilm components developed up to 3 months from disturbance in winter.•Disturbance timepoint did not influence taxon richness or community composition from 3 months onwards.•Grazer exclusion on artificial structures increased biofilm concentrations and influenced community composition.•Communities on natural shores differed from those on artificial structures with and without grazer exclusion.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0141-1136</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1879-0291</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1016/j.marenvres.2023.105956</identifier><identifier>PMID: 36958198</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>England: Elsevier Ltd</publisher><subject>Artificial structure ; Disturbance ; Grazing impact ; Seaweeds</subject><ispartof>Marine environmental research, 2023-05, Vol.187, p.105956-105956, Article 105956</ispartof><rights>2023</rights><rights>Published by Elsevier Ltd.</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c420t-fc16e5efaec1f31fa170e095704ee3c23de09ad4b26b42aeef629924e34bd6b53</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c420t-fc16e5efaec1f31fa170e095704ee3c23de09ad4b26b42aeef629924e34bd6b53</cites><orcidid>0000-0002-0635-3021</orcidid></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.marenvres.2023.105956$$EHTML$$P50$$Gelsevier$$Hfree_for_read</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,780,784,3550,27924,27925,45995</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36958198$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Farrugia Drakard, Veronica</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Brooks, Paul R.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Crowe, Tasman P.</creatorcontrib><title>Colonisation after disturbance on artificial structures: The influence of timing and grazing</title><title>Marine environmental research</title><addtitle>Mar Environ Res</addtitle><description>Artificial structures are poor surrogates of natural rocky shores, meaning they generally support depauperate assemblages. These differences may result from a combination of recruitment processes, biotic interactions, and structuring by environmental factors. In this study, plots were cleared on two seawalls and two natural shores at two separate timepoints – in August 2020 (summer) and February 2021 (winter) - and monitored over one year to determine the influence of timing of disturbance on recruitment and succession. Additional plots were cleared at one of the seawalls at a single timepoint in August 2020, and exclusion cages were installed to determine the influence of grazing pressure on colonisation; these were monitored for 18 months. Disturbance during winter resulted in higher concentrations of all biofilm components up to 3 months, but did not impact benthic community composition beyond this point. Grazer exclusion on artificial structures increased biofilm concentrations and influenced community composition in comparison to plots on artificial structures without exclusion, while communities on natural surfaces differed in terms of species composition to those on artificial plots at 12 months. We conclude that the timing of routine maintenance works on artificial structures may impact initial biofilm abundances. Furthermore, while grazing pressure does influence community structure on artificial structures, this alone is not sufficient to explain biological differences between artificial structures and natural shores. •Higher concentrations of all biofilm components developed up to 3 months from disturbance in winter.•Disturbance timepoint did not influence taxon richness or community composition from 3 months onwards.•Grazer exclusion on artificial structures increased biofilm concentrations and influenced community composition.•Communities on natural shores differed from those on artificial structures with and without grazer exclusion.</description><subject>Artificial structure</subject><subject>Disturbance</subject><subject>Grazing impact</subject><subject>Seaweeds</subject><issn>0141-1136</issn><issn>1879-0291</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2023</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><recordid>eNqFkE1PxCAQhonR6Lr6F5Sjl64MtHTxZjZ-JSZe9GZCKB1WNt1WgZror5d11asn4OWZmcxDyCmwGTCQ56vZ2gTs3wPGGWdc5LRSldwhE5jXqmBcwS6ZMCihABDygBzGuGKMVTVU--RASFXNQc0n5HkxdEPvo0l-6KlxCQNtfUxjaExvkW7CkLzz1puOxhRGm_8wXtDHF6S-d92I35yjya99v6Smb-kymM98PyJ7znQRj3_OKXm6vnpc3Bb3Dzd3i8v7wpacpcJZkFihM2jBCXAGaoZMVTUrEYXlos0v05YNl03JDaKTXCleoiibVjaVmJKzbd_XMLyNGJNe-2ix60yPwxg1rxWImsl5mdF6i9owxBjQ6dfgs8sPDUxv1OqV_lOrN2r1Vm2uPPkZMjZrbP_qfl1m4HILYF713WPQ0fqNnNYHtEm3g_93yBdvpZDz</recordid><startdate>202305</startdate><enddate>202305</enddate><creator>Farrugia Drakard, Veronica</creator><creator>Brooks, Paul R.</creator><creator>Crowe, Tasman P.</creator><general>Elsevier Ltd</general><scope>6I.</scope><scope>AAFTH</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7X8</scope><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-0635-3021</orcidid></search><sort><creationdate>202305</creationdate><title>Colonisation after disturbance on artificial structures: The influence of timing and grazing</title><author>Farrugia Drakard, Veronica ; Brooks, Paul R. ; Crowe, Tasman P.</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c420t-fc16e5efaec1f31fa170e095704ee3c23de09ad4b26b42aeef629924e34bd6b53</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2023</creationdate><topic>Artificial structure</topic><topic>Disturbance</topic><topic>Grazing impact</topic><topic>Seaweeds</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Farrugia Drakard, Veronica</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Brooks, Paul R.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Crowe, Tasman P.</creatorcontrib><collection>ScienceDirect Open Access Titles</collection><collection>Elsevier:ScienceDirect:Open Access</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><jtitle>Marine environmental research</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Farrugia Drakard, Veronica</au><au>Brooks, Paul R.</au><au>Crowe, Tasman P.</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Colonisation after disturbance on artificial structures: The influence of timing and grazing</atitle><jtitle>Marine environmental research</jtitle><addtitle>Mar Environ Res</addtitle><date>2023-05</date><risdate>2023</risdate><volume>187</volume><spage>105956</spage><epage>105956</epage><pages>105956-105956</pages><artnum>105956</artnum><issn>0141-1136</issn><eissn>1879-0291</eissn><abstract>Artificial structures are poor surrogates of natural rocky shores, meaning they generally support depauperate assemblages. These differences may result from a combination of recruitment processes, biotic interactions, and structuring by environmental factors. In this study, plots were cleared on two seawalls and two natural shores at two separate timepoints – in August 2020 (summer) and February 2021 (winter) - and monitored over one year to determine the influence of timing of disturbance on recruitment and succession. Additional plots were cleared at one of the seawalls at a single timepoint in August 2020, and exclusion cages were installed to determine the influence of grazing pressure on colonisation; these were monitored for 18 months. Disturbance during winter resulted in higher concentrations of all biofilm components up to 3 months, but did not impact benthic community composition beyond this point. Grazer exclusion on artificial structures increased biofilm concentrations and influenced community composition in comparison to plots on artificial structures without exclusion, while communities on natural surfaces differed in terms of species composition to those on artificial plots at 12 months. We conclude that the timing of routine maintenance works on artificial structures may impact initial biofilm abundances. Furthermore, while grazing pressure does influence community structure on artificial structures, this alone is not sufficient to explain biological differences between artificial structures and natural shores. •Higher concentrations of all biofilm components developed up to 3 months from disturbance in winter.•Disturbance timepoint did not influence taxon richness or community composition from 3 months onwards.•Grazer exclusion on artificial structures increased biofilm concentrations and influenced community composition.•Communities on natural shores differed from those on artificial structures with and without grazer exclusion.</abstract><cop>England</cop><pub>Elsevier Ltd</pub><pmid>36958198</pmid><doi>10.1016/j.marenvres.2023.105956</doi><tpages>1</tpages><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-0635-3021</orcidid><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 0141-1136
ispartof Marine environmental research, 2023-05, Vol.187, p.105956-105956, Article 105956
issn 0141-1136
1879-0291
language eng
recordid cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_2791370684
source ScienceDirect Journals (5 years ago - present)
subjects Artificial structure
Disturbance
Grazing impact
Seaweeds
title Colonisation after disturbance on artificial structures: The influence of timing and grazing
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-06T09%3A27%3A49IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Colonisation%20after%20disturbance%20on%20artificial%20structures:%20The%20influence%20of%20timing%20and%20grazing&rft.jtitle=Marine%20environmental%20research&rft.au=Farrugia%20Drakard,%20Veronica&rft.date=2023-05&rft.volume=187&rft.spage=105956&rft.epage=105956&rft.pages=105956-105956&rft.artnum=105956&rft.issn=0141-1136&rft.eissn=1879-0291&rft_id=info:doi/10.1016/j.marenvres.2023.105956&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E2791370684%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=2791370684&rft_id=info:pmid/36958198&rft_els_id=S0141113623000843&rfr_iscdi=true