Potentially More Out of Reach: Public Reporting Exacerbates Inequities in Home Health Access
Policy Points Public reporting is associated with both mitigating and exacerbating inequities in high‐quality home health agency use for marginalized groups. Ensuring equitable access to home health requires taking a closer look at potentially inequitable policies to ensure that these policies are n...
Gespeichert in:
Veröffentlicht in: | The Milbank quarterly 2023-06, Vol.101 (2), p.527-559 |
---|---|
Hauptverfasser: | , , , , , , |
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | eng |
Schlagworte: | |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
Zusammenfassung: | Policy Points
Public reporting is associated with both mitigating and exacerbating inequities in high‐quality home health agency use for marginalized groups.
Ensuring equitable access to home health requires taking a closer look at potentially inequitable policies to ensure that these policies are not inadvertently exacerbating disparities as home health public reporting potentially does.
Targeted federal, state, and local interventions should focus on raising awareness about the five‐star quality ratings among marginalized populations for whom inequities have been exacerbated.
Context
Literature suggests that public reporting of quality may have the unintended consequence of exacerbating disparities in access to high‐quality, long‐term care for older adults. The objective of this study is to evaluate the impact of the home health five‐star ratings on changes in high‐quality home health agency use by race, ethnicity, income status, and place‐based factors.
Methods
We use data from the Outcome and Assessment Information Set, Medicare Enrollment Files, Care Compare, and American Community Survey to estimate differential access to high‐quality home health agencies between July 2014 and June 2017. To estimate the impact of the home health five‐star rating introduction on the use of high‐quality home health agencies, we use a longitudinal observational pretest–posttest design.
Findings
After the introduction of the home health five‐star ratings in 2016, we found that adjusted rates of high‐quality home health agency use increased for all home health patients, except for Hispanic/Latine and Asian American/Pacific Islander patients. Additionally, we found that the disparity in high‐quality home health agency use between low‐income and higher‐income home health patients was exacerbated after the introduction of the five‐star quality ratings. We also observed that patients within predominantly Hispanic/Latine neighborhoods had a significant decrease in their use of high‐quality home health agencies, whereas patients in predominantly White and integrated neighborhoods had a significant increase in high‐quality home health agency use. Other neighborhoods experience a nonsignificant change in high‐quality home health agency use.
Conclusions
Policymakers should be aware of the potential unintended consequences for implementing home health public reporting, specifically for Hispanic/Latine, Asian American/Pacific Islander, and low‐income home health patients, as well as |
---|---|
ISSN: | 0887-378X 1468-0009 |
DOI: | 10.1111/1468-0009.12616 |