Greenhouse Gas Emissions and Soil Indicators Four Years after Manure and Compost Applications
Understanding how carbon, nitrogen, and key soil attributes affect gas emissions from soil is crucial for alleviating their undesirable residual effects that can linger for years after termination of manure and compost applications. This study was conducted to evaluate the emission of soil CO2, N2O,...
Gespeichert in:
| Veröffentlicht in: | Journal of environmental quality 2003-01, Vol.32 (1), p.23-32 |
|---|---|
| Hauptverfasser: | , , , |
| Format: | Artikel |
| Sprache: | eng |
| Schlagworte: | |
| Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
| Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
| container_end_page | 32 |
|---|---|
| container_issue | 1 |
| container_start_page | 23 |
| container_title | Journal of environmental quality |
| container_volume | 32 |
| creator | Ginting, Daniel Kessavalou, Anabayan Eghball, Bahman Doran, John W |
| description | Understanding how carbon, nitrogen, and key soil attributes affect gas emissions from soil is crucial for alleviating their undesirable residual effects that can linger for years after termination of manure and compost applications. This study was conducted to evaluate the emission of soil CO2, N2O, and CH4 and soil C and N indicators four years after manure and compost application had stopped. Experimental plots were treated with annual synthetic N fertilizer (FRT), annual and biennial manure (MN1 and MN2, respectively), and compost (CP1 and CP2, respectively) from 1992 to 1995 based on removal of 151 kg N ha−1 yr−1 by continuous corn (Zea mays L.). The control (CTL) plots received no input. After 1995, only the FRT plots received N fertilizer in the spring of 1999. In 1999, the emissions of CO2 were similar between control and other treatments. The average annual carbon input in the CTL and FRT plots were similar to soil CO2–C emission (4.4 and 5.1 Mg C ha−1 yr−1, respectively). Manure and compost resulted in positive C and N balances in the soil four years after application. Fluxes of CH4–C and N2O-N were nearly zero, which indicated that the residual effects of manure and compost four years after application had no negative influence on soil C and N storage and global warming. Residual effects of compost and manure resulted in 20 to 40% higher soil microbial biomass C, 42 to 74% higher potentially mineralizable N, and 0.5 unit higher pH compared with the FRT treatment. Residual effects of manure and compost on CO2, N2O, and CH4 emissions were minimal and their benefits on soil C and N indicators were more favorable than that of N fertilizer. |
| doi_str_mv | 10.2134/jeq2003.0023 |
| format | Article |
| fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_27898811</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>284150751</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c462t-e57198ee991a1df984f3f8d1bcd2e035ec57fae22eed4bc7566b9bd4c8b8269f3</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNqF0b1r3DAYBnBRGppL2q1zKwLplEv1aUljOJJrICFDmqFDEbL8qvXhsxzJHvrfV-4ZAl2ySO_w4xGvHoQ-UnLJKBdfd_DMCOGXhDD-Bq2o5GrNyvEWrQgRZRZMHqOTnHeEUEZU9Q4dUyaFkVyv0M9tAuh_xykD3rqMr_dtzm3sM3Z9gx9j2-Hbvmm9G2PK-CZOCf8AV0YXRkj43vVTgn92E_dDzCO-GoZu9nPIe3QUXJfhw3Kfoqeb6--bb-u7h-3t5upu7UXFxjVIRY0GMIY62gSjReBBN7T2DQPCJXipggPGABpReyWrqjZ1I7yuNatM4KfoyyF3SPF5gjzasoaHrnM9lNUsU9poTemrkFZUESPU61BUUirBCzz7D-7KJ_VlW0uN4lobIQq6OCCfYs4Jgh1Su3fpj6XEzi3apUU7t1j4pyVzqvfQvOCltgLOF-Cyd11IrvdtfnGSaKXY_O7ngwsuWvcrFfP0yAjlhBqpuZL8L_BWrac</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>197388944</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Greenhouse Gas Emissions and Soil Indicators Four Years after Manure and Compost Applications</title><source>MEDLINE</source><source>Wiley Journals</source><creator>Ginting, Daniel ; Kessavalou, Anabayan ; Eghball, Bahman ; Doran, John W</creator><creatorcontrib>Ginting, Daniel ; Kessavalou, Anabayan ; Eghball, Bahman ; Doran, John W</creatorcontrib><description>Understanding how carbon, nitrogen, and key soil attributes affect gas emissions from soil is crucial for alleviating their undesirable residual effects that can linger for years after termination of manure and compost applications. This study was conducted to evaluate the emission of soil CO2, N2O, and CH4 and soil C and N indicators four years after manure and compost application had stopped. Experimental plots were treated with annual synthetic N fertilizer (FRT), annual and biennial manure (MN1 and MN2, respectively), and compost (CP1 and CP2, respectively) from 1992 to 1995 based on removal of 151 kg N ha−1 yr−1 by continuous corn (Zea mays L.). The control (CTL) plots received no input. After 1995, only the FRT plots received N fertilizer in the spring of 1999. In 1999, the emissions of CO2 were similar between control and other treatments. The average annual carbon input in the CTL and FRT plots were similar to soil CO2–C emission (4.4 and 5.1 Mg C ha−1 yr−1, respectively). Manure and compost resulted in positive C and N balances in the soil four years after application. Fluxes of CH4–C and N2O-N were nearly zero, which indicated that the residual effects of manure and compost four years after application had no negative influence on soil C and N storage and global warming. Residual effects of compost and manure resulted in 20 to 40% higher soil microbial biomass C, 42 to 74% higher potentially mineralizable N, and 0.5 unit higher pH compared with the FRT treatment. Residual effects of manure and compost on CO2, N2O, and CH4 emissions were minimal and their benefits on soil C and N indicators were more favorable than that of N fertilizer.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0047-2425</identifier><identifier>ISSN: 1537-2537</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1537-2537</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.2134/jeq2003.0023</identifier><identifier>PMID: 12549538</identifier><identifier>CODEN: JEVQAA</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Madison, WI: Crop Science Society of America</publisher><subject>Agriculture ; Agronomy. Soil science and plant productions ; Applied sciences ; Atmospheric pollution ; Biological and medical sciences ; Biomass ; Carbon dioxide ; Carbon Dioxide - analysis ; Climate change ; Composts ; Conservation of Natural Resources ; Dispersed sources and other ; Emissions ; Environmental Monitoring ; Exact sciences and technology ; Fertilizers ; Fundamental and applied biological sciences. Psychology ; General agronomy. Plant production ; Global warming ; Greenhouse Effect ; Greenhouse gases ; Manure ; Methane ; Methane - analysis ; Nitrogen ; Nitrous oxide ; Nitrous Oxide - analysis ; Other nutrients. Amendments. Solid and liquid wastes. Sludges and slurries ; Pollution ; Pollution sources. Measurement results ; Refuse Disposal ; Soil-plant relationships. Soil fertility. Fertilization. Amendments ; Soils ; Time Factors ; Zea mays</subject><ispartof>Journal of environmental quality, 2003-01, Vol.32 (1), p.23-32</ispartof><rights>2003 INIST-CNRS</rights><rights>Copyright American Society of Agronomy Jan/Feb 2003</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c462t-e57198ee991a1df984f3f8d1bcd2e035ec57fae22eed4bc7566b9bd4c8b8269f3</citedby></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><link.rule.ids>314,780,784,27924,27925</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttp://pascal-francis.inist.fr/vibad/index.php?action=getRecordDetail&idt=15087724$$DView record in Pascal Francis$$Hfree_for_read</backlink><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/12549538$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Ginting, Daniel</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Kessavalou, Anabayan</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Eghball, Bahman</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Doran, John W</creatorcontrib><title>Greenhouse Gas Emissions and Soil Indicators Four Years after Manure and Compost Applications</title><title>Journal of environmental quality</title><addtitle>J Environ Qual</addtitle><description>Understanding how carbon, nitrogen, and key soil attributes affect gas emissions from soil is crucial for alleviating their undesirable residual effects that can linger for years after termination of manure and compost applications. This study was conducted to evaluate the emission of soil CO2, N2O, and CH4 and soil C and N indicators four years after manure and compost application had stopped. Experimental plots were treated with annual synthetic N fertilizer (FRT), annual and biennial manure (MN1 and MN2, respectively), and compost (CP1 and CP2, respectively) from 1992 to 1995 based on removal of 151 kg N ha−1 yr−1 by continuous corn (Zea mays L.). The control (CTL) plots received no input. After 1995, only the FRT plots received N fertilizer in the spring of 1999. In 1999, the emissions of CO2 were similar between control and other treatments. The average annual carbon input in the CTL and FRT plots were similar to soil CO2–C emission (4.4 and 5.1 Mg C ha−1 yr−1, respectively). Manure and compost resulted in positive C and N balances in the soil four years after application. Fluxes of CH4–C and N2O-N were nearly zero, which indicated that the residual effects of manure and compost four years after application had no negative influence on soil C and N storage and global warming. Residual effects of compost and manure resulted in 20 to 40% higher soil microbial biomass C, 42 to 74% higher potentially mineralizable N, and 0.5 unit higher pH compared with the FRT treatment. Residual effects of manure and compost on CO2, N2O, and CH4 emissions were minimal and their benefits on soil C and N indicators were more favorable than that of N fertilizer.</description><subject>Agriculture</subject><subject>Agronomy. Soil science and plant productions</subject><subject>Applied sciences</subject><subject>Atmospheric pollution</subject><subject>Biological and medical sciences</subject><subject>Biomass</subject><subject>Carbon dioxide</subject><subject>Carbon Dioxide - analysis</subject><subject>Climate change</subject><subject>Composts</subject><subject>Conservation of Natural Resources</subject><subject>Dispersed sources and other</subject><subject>Emissions</subject><subject>Environmental Monitoring</subject><subject>Exact sciences and technology</subject><subject>Fertilizers</subject><subject>Fundamental and applied biological sciences. Psychology</subject><subject>General agronomy. Plant production</subject><subject>Global warming</subject><subject>Greenhouse Effect</subject><subject>Greenhouse gases</subject><subject>Manure</subject><subject>Methane</subject><subject>Methane - analysis</subject><subject>Nitrogen</subject><subject>Nitrous oxide</subject><subject>Nitrous Oxide - analysis</subject><subject>Other nutrients. Amendments. Solid and liquid wastes. Sludges and slurries</subject><subject>Pollution</subject><subject>Pollution sources. Measurement results</subject><subject>Refuse Disposal</subject><subject>Soil-plant relationships. Soil fertility. Fertilization. Amendments</subject><subject>Soils</subject><subject>Time Factors</subject><subject>Zea mays</subject><issn>0047-2425</issn><issn>1537-2537</issn><issn>1537-2537</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2003</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>EIF</sourceid><sourceid>8G5</sourceid><sourceid>ABUWG</sourceid><sourceid>AFKRA</sourceid><sourceid>AZQEC</sourceid><sourceid>BEC</sourceid><sourceid>BENPR</sourceid><sourceid>CCPQU</sourceid><sourceid>DWQXO</sourceid><sourceid>GNUQQ</sourceid><sourceid>GUQSH</sourceid><sourceid>M2O</sourceid><recordid>eNqF0b1r3DAYBnBRGppL2q1zKwLplEv1aUljOJJrICFDmqFDEbL8qvXhsxzJHvrfV-4ZAl2ySO_w4xGvHoQ-UnLJKBdfd_DMCOGXhDD-Bq2o5GrNyvEWrQgRZRZMHqOTnHeEUEZU9Q4dUyaFkVyv0M9tAuh_xykD3rqMr_dtzm3sM3Z9gx9j2-Hbvmm9G2PK-CZOCf8AV0YXRkj43vVTgn92E_dDzCO-GoZu9nPIe3QUXJfhw3Kfoqeb6--bb-u7h-3t5upu7UXFxjVIRY0GMIY62gSjReBBN7T2DQPCJXipggPGABpReyWrqjZ1I7yuNatM4KfoyyF3SPF5gjzasoaHrnM9lNUsU9poTemrkFZUESPU61BUUirBCzz7D-7KJ_VlW0uN4lobIQq6OCCfYs4Jgh1Su3fpj6XEzi3apUU7t1j4pyVzqvfQvOCltgLOF-Cyd11IrvdtfnGSaKXY_O7ngwsuWvcrFfP0yAjlhBqpuZL8L_BWrac</recordid><startdate>20030101</startdate><enddate>20030101</enddate><creator>Ginting, Daniel</creator><creator>Kessavalou, Anabayan</creator><creator>Eghball, Bahman</creator><creator>Doran, John W</creator><general>Crop Science Society of America</general><general>American Society of Agronomy</general><scope>FBQ</scope><scope>IQODW</scope><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>3V.</scope><scope>7ST</scope><scope>7T7</scope><scope>7TG</scope><scope>7X2</scope><scope>7X7</scope><scope>7XB</scope><scope>88E</scope><scope>88I</scope><scope>8AF</scope><scope>8AO</scope><scope>8C1</scope><scope>8FD</scope><scope>8FE</scope><scope>8FG</scope><scope>8FH</scope><scope>8FI</scope><scope>8FJ</scope><scope>8FK</scope><scope>8G5</scope><scope>ABJCF</scope><scope>ABUWG</scope><scope>AFKRA</scope><scope>ATCPS</scope><scope>AZQEC</scope><scope>BEC</scope><scope>BENPR</scope><scope>BGLVJ</scope><scope>BHPHI</scope><scope>C1K</scope><scope>CCPQU</scope><scope>DWQXO</scope><scope>FR3</scope><scope>FYUFA</scope><scope>GHDGH</scope><scope>GNUQQ</scope><scope>GUQSH</scope><scope>HCIFZ</scope><scope>K9.</scope><scope>KL.</scope><scope>L6V</scope><scope>M0K</scope><scope>M0S</scope><scope>M1P</scope><scope>M2O</scope><scope>M2P</scope><scope>M7S</scope><scope>MBDVC</scope><scope>P64</scope><scope>PATMY</scope><scope>PQEST</scope><scope>PQQKQ</scope><scope>PQUKI</scope><scope>PTHSS</scope><scope>PYCSY</scope><scope>Q9U</scope><scope>S0X</scope><scope>SOI</scope><scope>7TV</scope><scope>KR7</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20030101</creationdate><title>Greenhouse Gas Emissions and Soil Indicators Four Years after Manure and Compost Applications</title><author>Ginting, Daniel ; Kessavalou, Anabayan ; Eghball, Bahman ; Doran, John W</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c462t-e57198ee991a1df984f3f8d1bcd2e035ec57fae22eed4bc7566b9bd4c8b8269f3</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2003</creationdate><topic>Agriculture</topic><topic>Agronomy. Soil science and plant productions</topic><topic>Applied sciences</topic><topic>Atmospheric pollution</topic><topic>Biological and medical sciences</topic><topic>Biomass</topic><topic>Carbon dioxide</topic><topic>Carbon Dioxide - analysis</topic><topic>Climate change</topic><topic>Composts</topic><topic>Conservation of Natural Resources</topic><topic>Dispersed sources and other</topic><topic>Emissions</topic><topic>Environmental Monitoring</topic><topic>Exact sciences and technology</topic><topic>Fertilizers</topic><topic>Fundamental and applied biological sciences. Psychology</topic><topic>General agronomy. Plant production</topic><topic>Global warming</topic><topic>Greenhouse Effect</topic><topic>Greenhouse gases</topic><topic>Manure</topic><topic>Methane</topic><topic>Methane - analysis</topic><topic>Nitrogen</topic><topic>Nitrous oxide</topic><topic>Nitrous Oxide - analysis</topic><topic>Other nutrients. Amendments. Solid and liquid wastes. Sludges and slurries</topic><topic>Pollution</topic><topic>Pollution sources. Measurement results</topic><topic>Refuse Disposal</topic><topic>Soil-plant relationships. Soil fertility. Fertilization. Amendments</topic><topic>Soils</topic><topic>Time Factors</topic><topic>Zea mays</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Ginting, Daniel</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Kessavalou, Anabayan</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Eghball, Bahman</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Doran, John W</creatorcontrib><collection>AGRIS</collection><collection>Pascal-Francis</collection><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Corporate)</collection><collection>Environment Abstracts</collection><collection>Industrial and Applied Microbiology Abstracts (Microbiology A)</collection><collection>Meteorological & Geoastrophysical Abstracts</collection><collection>Agricultural Science Collection</collection><collection>Health & Medical Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>Medical Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Science Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>STEM Database</collection><collection>ProQuest Pharma Collection</collection><collection>Public Health Database</collection><collection>Technology Research Database</collection><collection>ProQuest SciTech Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Technology Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Natural Science Collection</collection><collection>Hospital Premium Collection</collection><collection>Hospital Premium Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni) (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>Research Library (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Materials Science & Engineering Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central UK/Ireland</collection><collection>Agricultural & Environmental Science Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Essentials</collection><collection>eLibrary</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>Technology Collection</collection><collection>Natural Science Collection</collection><collection>Environmental Sciences and Pollution Management</collection><collection>ProQuest One Community College</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Korea</collection><collection>Engineering Research Database</collection><collection>Health Research Premium Collection</collection><collection>Health Research Premium Collection (Alumni)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Student</collection><collection>Research Library Prep</collection><collection>SciTech Premium Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Health & Medical Complete (Alumni)</collection><collection>Meteorological & Geoastrophysical Abstracts - Academic</collection><collection>ProQuest Engineering Collection</collection><collection>Agricultural Science Database</collection><collection>Health & Medical Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Medical Database</collection><collection>Research Library</collection><collection>Science Database</collection><collection>Engineering Database</collection><collection>Research Library (Corporate)</collection><collection>Biotechnology and BioEngineering Abstracts</collection><collection>Environmental Science Database</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic Eastern Edition (DO NOT USE)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic UKI Edition</collection><collection>Engineering Collection</collection><collection>Environmental Science Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Basic</collection><collection>SIRS Editorial</collection><collection>Environment Abstracts</collection><collection>Pollution Abstracts</collection><collection>Civil Engineering Abstracts</collection><jtitle>Journal of environmental quality</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Ginting, Daniel</au><au>Kessavalou, Anabayan</au><au>Eghball, Bahman</au><au>Doran, John W</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Greenhouse Gas Emissions and Soil Indicators Four Years after Manure and Compost Applications</atitle><jtitle>Journal of environmental quality</jtitle><addtitle>J Environ Qual</addtitle><date>2003-01-01</date><risdate>2003</risdate><volume>32</volume><issue>1</issue><spage>23</spage><epage>32</epage><pages>23-32</pages><issn>0047-2425</issn><issn>1537-2537</issn><eissn>1537-2537</eissn><coden>JEVQAA</coden><abstract>Understanding how carbon, nitrogen, and key soil attributes affect gas emissions from soil is crucial for alleviating their undesirable residual effects that can linger for years after termination of manure and compost applications. This study was conducted to evaluate the emission of soil CO2, N2O, and CH4 and soil C and N indicators four years after manure and compost application had stopped. Experimental plots were treated with annual synthetic N fertilizer (FRT), annual and biennial manure (MN1 and MN2, respectively), and compost (CP1 and CP2, respectively) from 1992 to 1995 based on removal of 151 kg N ha−1 yr−1 by continuous corn (Zea mays L.). The control (CTL) plots received no input. After 1995, only the FRT plots received N fertilizer in the spring of 1999. In 1999, the emissions of CO2 were similar between control and other treatments. The average annual carbon input in the CTL and FRT plots were similar to soil CO2–C emission (4.4 and 5.1 Mg C ha−1 yr−1, respectively). Manure and compost resulted in positive C and N balances in the soil four years after application. Fluxes of CH4–C and N2O-N were nearly zero, which indicated that the residual effects of manure and compost four years after application had no negative influence on soil C and N storage and global warming. Residual effects of compost and manure resulted in 20 to 40% higher soil microbial biomass C, 42 to 74% higher potentially mineralizable N, and 0.5 unit higher pH compared with the FRT treatment. Residual effects of manure and compost on CO2, N2O, and CH4 emissions were minimal and their benefits on soil C and N indicators were more favorable than that of N fertilizer.</abstract><cop>Madison, WI</cop><pub>Crop Science Society of America</pub><pmid>12549538</pmid><doi>10.2134/jeq2003.0023</doi><tpages>10</tpages><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record> |
| fulltext | fulltext |
| identifier | ISSN: 0047-2425 |
| ispartof | Journal of environmental quality, 2003-01, Vol.32 (1), p.23-32 |
| issn | 0047-2425 1537-2537 1537-2537 |
| language | eng |
| recordid | cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_27898811 |
| source | MEDLINE; Wiley Journals |
| subjects | Agriculture Agronomy. Soil science and plant productions Applied sciences Atmospheric pollution Biological and medical sciences Biomass Carbon dioxide Carbon Dioxide - analysis Climate change Composts Conservation of Natural Resources Dispersed sources and other Emissions Environmental Monitoring Exact sciences and technology Fertilizers Fundamental and applied biological sciences. Psychology General agronomy. Plant production Global warming Greenhouse Effect Greenhouse gases Manure Methane Methane - analysis Nitrogen Nitrous oxide Nitrous Oxide - analysis Other nutrients. Amendments. Solid and liquid wastes. Sludges and slurries Pollution Pollution sources. Measurement results Refuse Disposal Soil-plant relationships. Soil fertility. Fertilization. Amendments Soils Time Factors Zea mays |
| title | Greenhouse Gas Emissions and Soil Indicators Four Years after Manure and Compost Applications |
| url | https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-04T11%3A19%3A30IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Greenhouse%20Gas%20Emissions%20and%20Soil%20Indicators%20Four%20Years%20after%20Manure%20and%20Compost%20Applications&rft.jtitle=Journal%20of%20environmental%20quality&rft.au=Ginting,%20Daniel&rft.date=2003-01-01&rft.volume=32&rft.issue=1&rft.spage=23&rft.epage=32&rft.pages=23-32&rft.issn=0047-2425&rft.eissn=1537-2537&rft.coden=JEVQAA&rft_id=info:doi/10.2134/jeq2003.0023&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E284150751%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=197388944&rft_id=info:pmid/12549538&rfr_iscdi=true |