Portion control tableware differentially impacts eating behaviour in women with and without overweight
Portion control tableware has been described as a potentially effective approach for weight management, however the mechanisms by which these tools work remain unknown. We explored the processes by which a portion control (calibrated) plate with visual stimuli for starch, protein and vegetable amoun...
Gespeichert in:
| Veröffentlicht in: | Appetite 2023-06, Vol.185, p.106542-106542, Article 106542 |
|---|---|
| Hauptverfasser: | , , , , , |
| Format: | Artikel |
| Sprache: | eng |
| Schlagworte: | |
| Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
| Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
| container_end_page | 106542 |
|---|---|
| container_issue | |
| container_start_page | 106542 |
| container_title | Appetite |
| container_volume | 185 |
| creator | Vargas-Alvarez, M. Ángeles Brunstrom, Jeffrey M. Díaz, Alma E. Navas-Carretero, Santiago Martínez, J. Alfredo Almiron-Roig, Eva |
| description | Portion control tableware has been described as a potentially effective approach for weight management, however the mechanisms by which these tools work remain unknown. We explored the processes by which a portion control (calibrated) plate with visual stimuli for starch, protein and vegetable amounts modulates food intake, satiety and meal eating behaviour. Sixty-five women (34 with overweight/obesity) participated in a counterbalanced cross-over trial in the laboratory, where they self-served and ate a hot meal including rice, meatballs and vegetables, once with a calibrated plate and once with a conventional (control) plate. A sub-sample of 31 women provided blood samples to measure the cephalic phase response to the meal. Effects of plate type were tested through linear mixed-effect models. Meal portion sizes (mean ± SD) were smaller for the calibrated compared with the control plate (served: 296 ± 69 vs 317 ± 78 g; consumed: 287 ± 71 vs 309 ± 79 g respectively), especially consumed rice (69 ± 24 vs 88 ± 30 g) (p |
| doi_str_mv | 10.1016/j.appet.2023.106542 |
| format | Article |
| fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_2789236915</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><els_id>S0195666323000958</els_id><sourcerecordid>2789236915</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c354t-8a91c18c10e46936db77dfecb3b3db0130284eb2cf27cbfc158f8e6e90e260ac3</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp9kMtOwzAQRS0EouXxBUjISzYtfiROsmCBEC-pEixgbdnOmLpK4mA7rfr3BFpYspm5Gt07ozkIXVAyp4SK69Vc9T2kOSOMjxORZ-wATSmp8lnJSXaIpoSOWgjBJ-gkxhUhhOdFcYwmXFQZKTI2RfbVh-R8h43vUvANTko3sFEBcO2shQBdcqpptti1vTIpYlDJdR9Yw1KtnR8Cdh3e-BbG6tISq67-EX5I2K8hbMB9LNMZOrKqiXC-76fo_eH-7e5ptnh5fL67XcwMz7M0K1VFDS0NJZCJiotaF0VtwWiuea0J5YSVGWhmLCuMtobmpS1BQEWACaIMP0VXu7198J8DxCRbFw00jerAD1GyoqzY-D3NRyvfWU3wMQawsg-uVWErKZHfgOVK_gCW34DlDvCYutwfGHQL9V_ml-houNkZYHxz7SDIaBx0BmoXwCRZe_fvgS-s05AA</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>2789236915</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Portion control tableware differentially impacts eating behaviour in women with and without overweight</title><source>MEDLINE</source><source>ScienceDirect Journals (5 years ago - present)</source><creator>Vargas-Alvarez, M. Ángeles ; Brunstrom, Jeffrey M. ; Díaz, Alma E. ; Navas-Carretero, Santiago ; Martínez, J. Alfredo ; Almiron-Roig, Eva</creator><creatorcontrib>Vargas-Alvarez, M. Ángeles ; Brunstrom, Jeffrey M. ; Díaz, Alma E. ; Navas-Carretero, Santiago ; Martínez, J. Alfredo ; Almiron-Roig, Eva</creatorcontrib><description>Portion control tableware has been described as a potentially effective approach for weight management, however the mechanisms by which these tools work remain unknown. We explored the processes by which a portion control (calibrated) plate with visual stimuli for starch, protein and vegetable amounts modulates food intake, satiety and meal eating behaviour. Sixty-five women (34 with overweight/obesity) participated in a counterbalanced cross-over trial in the laboratory, where they self-served and ate a hot meal including rice, meatballs and vegetables, once with a calibrated plate and once with a conventional (control) plate. A sub-sample of 31 women provided blood samples to measure the cephalic phase response to the meal. Effects of plate type were tested through linear mixed-effect models. Meal portion sizes (mean ± SD) were smaller for the calibrated compared with the control plate (served: 296 ± 69 vs 317 ± 78 g; consumed: 287 ± 71 vs 309 ± 79 g respectively), especially consumed rice (69 ± 24 vs 88 ± 30 g) (p < 0.05 for all comparisons). The calibrated plate significantly reduced bite size (3.4 ± 1.0 vs 3.7 ± 1.0 g; p < 0.01) in all women and eating rate (32.9 ± 9.5 vs 33.7 ± 9.2 g/min; p < 0.05), in lean women. Despite this, some women compensated for the reduced intake over the 8 h following the meal. Pancreatic polypeptide and ghrelin levels increased post-prandially with the calibrated plate but changes were not robust. Plate type had no influence on insulin, glucose levels, or memory for portion size. Meal size was reduced by a portion control plate with visual stimuli for appropriate amounts of starch, protein and vegetables, potentially because of the reduced self-served portion size and the resulting reduced bite size. Sustained effects may require the continued use of the plate for long-term impact.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0195-6663</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1095-8304</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1016/j.appet.2023.106542</identifier><identifier>PMID: 36940742</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>England: Elsevier Ltd</publisher><subject>Bite size ; Cephalic phase response (CPR) ; Eating ; Eating rate ; Energy Intake ; Feeding Behavior ; Female ; Humans ; Meals ; Obesity ; Overweight ; Portion control plate ; Portion Size ; Satiation ; Vegetables ; Weight management</subject><ispartof>Appetite, 2023-06, Vol.185, p.106542-106542, Article 106542</ispartof><rights>2023 The Authors</rights><rights>Copyright © 2023 The Authors. Published by Elsevier Ltd.. All rights reserved.</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c354t-8a91c18c10e46936db77dfecb3b3db0130284eb2cf27cbfc158f8e6e90e260ac3</cites><orcidid>0000-0002-1630-8849</orcidid></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.appet.2023.106542$$EHTML$$P50$$Gelsevier$$Hfree_for_read</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,780,784,3548,27923,27924,45994</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36940742$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Vargas-Alvarez, M. Ángeles</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Brunstrom, Jeffrey M.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Díaz, Alma E.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Navas-Carretero, Santiago</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Martínez, J. Alfredo</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Almiron-Roig, Eva</creatorcontrib><title>Portion control tableware differentially impacts eating behaviour in women with and without overweight</title><title>Appetite</title><addtitle>Appetite</addtitle><description>Portion control tableware has been described as a potentially effective approach for weight management, however the mechanisms by which these tools work remain unknown. We explored the processes by which a portion control (calibrated) plate with visual stimuli for starch, protein and vegetable amounts modulates food intake, satiety and meal eating behaviour. Sixty-five women (34 with overweight/obesity) participated in a counterbalanced cross-over trial in the laboratory, where they self-served and ate a hot meal including rice, meatballs and vegetables, once with a calibrated plate and once with a conventional (control) plate. A sub-sample of 31 women provided blood samples to measure the cephalic phase response to the meal. Effects of plate type were tested through linear mixed-effect models. Meal portion sizes (mean ± SD) were smaller for the calibrated compared with the control plate (served: 296 ± 69 vs 317 ± 78 g; consumed: 287 ± 71 vs 309 ± 79 g respectively), especially consumed rice (69 ± 24 vs 88 ± 30 g) (p < 0.05 for all comparisons). The calibrated plate significantly reduced bite size (3.4 ± 1.0 vs 3.7 ± 1.0 g; p < 0.01) in all women and eating rate (32.9 ± 9.5 vs 33.7 ± 9.2 g/min; p < 0.05), in lean women. Despite this, some women compensated for the reduced intake over the 8 h following the meal. Pancreatic polypeptide and ghrelin levels increased post-prandially with the calibrated plate but changes were not robust. Plate type had no influence on insulin, glucose levels, or memory for portion size. Meal size was reduced by a portion control plate with visual stimuli for appropriate amounts of starch, protein and vegetables, potentially because of the reduced self-served portion size and the resulting reduced bite size. Sustained effects may require the continued use of the plate for long-term impact.</description><subject>Bite size</subject><subject>Cephalic phase response (CPR)</subject><subject>Eating</subject><subject>Eating rate</subject><subject>Energy Intake</subject><subject>Feeding Behavior</subject><subject>Female</subject><subject>Humans</subject><subject>Meals</subject><subject>Obesity</subject><subject>Overweight</subject><subject>Portion control plate</subject><subject>Portion Size</subject><subject>Satiation</subject><subject>Vegetables</subject><subject>Weight management</subject><issn>0195-6663</issn><issn>1095-8304</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2023</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>EIF</sourceid><recordid>eNp9kMtOwzAQRS0EouXxBUjISzYtfiROsmCBEC-pEixgbdnOmLpK4mA7rfr3BFpYspm5Gt07ozkIXVAyp4SK69Vc9T2kOSOMjxORZ-wATSmp8lnJSXaIpoSOWgjBJ-gkxhUhhOdFcYwmXFQZKTI2RfbVh-R8h43vUvANTko3sFEBcO2shQBdcqpptti1vTIpYlDJdR9Yw1KtnR8Cdh3e-BbG6tISq67-EX5I2K8hbMB9LNMZOrKqiXC-76fo_eH-7e5ptnh5fL67XcwMz7M0K1VFDS0NJZCJiotaF0VtwWiuea0J5YSVGWhmLCuMtobmpS1BQEWACaIMP0VXu7198J8DxCRbFw00jerAD1GyoqzY-D3NRyvfWU3wMQawsg-uVWErKZHfgOVK_gCW34DlDvCYutwfGHQL9V_ml-houNkZYHxz7SDIaBx0BmoXwCRZe_fvgS-s05AA</recordid><startdate>20230601</startdate><enddate>20230601</enddate><creator>Vargas-Alvarez, M. Ángeles</creator><creator>Brunstrom, Jeffrey M.</creator><creator>Díaz, Alma E.</creator><creator>Navas-Carretero, Santiago</creator><creator>Martínez, J. Alfredo</creator><creator>Almiron-Roig, Eva</creator><general>Elsevier Ltd</general><scope>6I.</scope><scope>AAFTH</scope><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7X8</scope><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-1630-8849</orcidid></search><sort><creationdate>20230601</creationdate><title>Portion control tableware differentially impacts eating behaviour in women with and without overweight</title><author>Vargas-Alvarez, M. Ángeles ; Brunstrom, Jeffrey M. ; Díaz, Alma E. ; Navas-Carretero, Santiago ; Martínez, J. Alfredo ; Almiron-Roig, Eva</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c354t-8a91c18c10e46936db77dfecb3b3db0130284eb2cf27cbfc158f8e6e90e260ac3</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2023</creationdate><topic>Bite size</topic><topic>Cephalic phase response (CPR)</topic><topic>Eating</topic><topic>Eating rate</topic><topic>Energy Intake</topic><topic>Feeding Behavior</topic><topic>Female</topic><topic>Humans</topic><topic>Meals</topic><topic>Obesity</topic><topic>Overweight</topic><topic>Portion control plate</topic><topic>Portion Size</topic><topic>Satiation</topic><topic>Vegetables</topic><topic>Weight management</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Vargas-Alvarez, M. Ángeles</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Brunstrom, Jeffrey M.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Díaz, Alma E.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Navas-Carretero, Santiago</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Martínez, J. Alfredo</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Almiron-Roig, Eva</creatorcontrib><collection>ScienceDirect Open Access Titles</collection><collection>Elsevier:ScienceDirect:Open Access</collection><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><jtitle>Appetite</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Vargas-Alvarez, M. Ángeles</au><au>Brunstrom, Jeffrey M.</au><au>Díaz, Alma E.</au><au>Navas-Carretero, Santiago</au><au>Martínez, J. Alfredo</au><au>Almiron-Roig, Eva</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Portion control tableware differentially impacts eating behaviour in women with and without overweight</atitle><jtitle>Appetite</jtitle><addtitle>Appetite</addtitle><date>2023-06-01</date><risdate>2023</risdate><volume>185</volume><spage>106542</spage><epage>106542</epage><pages>106542-106542</pages><artnum>106542</artnum><issn>0195-6663</issn><eissn>1095-8304</eissn><abstract>Portion control tableware has been described as a potentially effective approach for weight management, however the mechanisms by which these tools work remain unknown. We explored the processes by which a portion control (calibrated) plate with visual stimuli for starch, protein and vegetable amounts modulates food intake, satiety and meal eating behaviour. Sixty-five women (34 with overweight/obesity) participated in a counterbalanced cross-over trial in the laboratory, where they self-served and ate a hot meal including rice, meatballs and vegetables, once with a calibrated plate and once with a conventional (control) plate. A sub-sample of 31 women provided blood samples to measure the cephalic phase response to the meal. Effects of plate type were tested through linear mixed-effect models. Meal portion sizes (mean ± SD) were smaller for the calibrated compared with the control plate (served: 296 ± 69 vs 317 ± 78 g; consumed: 287 ± 71 vs 309 ± 79 g respectively), especially consumed rice (69 ± 24 vs 88 ± 30 g) (p < 0.05 for all comparisons). The calibrated plate significantly reduced bite size (3.4 ± 1.0 vs 3.7 ± 1.0 g; p < 0.01) in all women and eating rate (32.9 ± 9.5 vs 33.7 ± 9.2 g/min; p < 0.05), in lean women. Despite this, some women compensated for the reduced intake over the 8 h following the meal. Pancreatic polypeptide and ghrelin levels increased post-prandially with the calibrated plate but changes were not robust. Plate type had no influence on insulin, glucose levels, or memory for portion size. Meal size was reduced by a portion control plate with visual stimuli for appropriate amounts of starch, protein and vegetables, potentially because of the reduced self-served portion size and the resulting reduced bite size. Sustained effects may require the continued use of the plate for long-term impact.</abstract><cop>England</cop><pub>Elsevier Ltd</pub><pmid>36940742</pmid><doi>10.1016/j.appet.2023.106542</doi><tpages>1</tpages><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-1630-8849</orcidid><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record> |
| fulltext | fulltext |
| identifier | ISSN: 0195-6663 |
| ispartof | Appetite, 2023-06, Vol.185, p.106542-106542, Article 106542 |
| issn | 0195-6663 1095-8304 |
| language | eng |
| recordid | cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_2789236915 |
| source | MEDLINE; ScienceDirect Journals (5 years ago - present) |
| subjects | Bite size Cephalic phase response (CPR) Eating Eating rate Energy Intake Feeding Behavior Female Humans Meals Obesity Overweight Portion control plate Portion Size Satiation Vegetables Weight management |
| title | Portion control tableware differentially impacts eating behaviour in women with and without overweight |
| url | https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-12T13%3A42%3A13IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Portion%20control%20tableware%20differentially%20impacts%20eating%20behaviour%20in%20women%20with%20and%20without%20overweight&rft.jtitle=Appetite&rft.au=Vargas-Alvarez,%20M.%20%C3%81ngeles&rft.date=2023-06-01&rft.volume=185&rft.spage=106542&rft.epage=106542&rft.pages=106542-106542&rft.artnum=106542&rft.issn=0195-6663&rft.eissn=1095-8304&rft_id=info:doi/10.1016/j.appet.2023.106542&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E2789236915%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=2789236915&rft_id=info:pmid/36940742&rft_els_id=S0195666323000958&rfr_iscdi=true |